Rajendra S. Pradhan

Phase I and Biomarker Study of ABT-869, a Multiple Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, in Patients With Refractory Solid Malignancies

PURPOSE To determine the safety and tolerability of ABT-869 at escalating doses and its effects on biomarkers relevant for antiangiogenic activity in patients with solid malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with solid malignancies refractory to or for which no standard effective therapy exists were enrolled onto escalating-dose cohorts and treated with oral ABT-869 once daily continuously. RESULTS Thirty-three patients were studied at doses of 10 mg/d, 0.1 mg/kg/d, 0.25 mg/kg/d, and 0.3 mg/kg/d. Dose-limiting toxicities in the first cycle (21 days) included grade 3 fatigue in a patient at 10 mg/d, grade 3 proteinuria and grade 3 hypertension in two separate patients at 0.25 mg/kg/d, and grade 3 hypertension and grade 3 proteinuria in two separate patients at 0.3 mg/kg/d, which was the maximum-tolerated dose. Other significant treatment-related adverse events included asthenia, hand and foot blisters, and myalgia. Oral clearance of ABT-869 was linear, with a mean of 2.7 +/- 1.2 L/h and half-life of 18.4 +/- 5.7 hours, with no evidence of drug accumulation at day 15. Two patients with lung cancer and one patient with colon cancer achieved partial response. Stable disease for more than four cycles was observed in 16 patients (48%). Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) showed dose-dependent reduced tumor vascular permeability that correlated with drug exposure. By day 15 of treatment, circulating endothelial cells were significantly reduced (P = .007), whereas plasma vascular endothelial growth factor was increased (P = .004). CONCLUSION ABT-869 by continuous once-daily dosing was tolerable at doses </= 0.25 mg/kg/d. Biomarker evidence of antiangiogenic activity and DCE-MRI evidence of tumor antiangiogenesis were observed together with promising clinical activity.

Phase 2 Trial of Linifanib (ABT-869) in Patients with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Introduction: This study assessed activity and safety of linifanib (ABT-869), a selective inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor receptors, in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Methods: In this open-label trial (NCT00517790), patients who received one to two prior lines of systemic therapy were randomized to oral linifanib 0.10 mg/kg (low dose) or 0.25 mg/kg (high dose) once daily. Tumor responses were assessed by independent central imaging review every 8 weeks. The primary end point was progression-free rate at 16 weeks. Secondary end points included objective response rate, time to progression, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Safety was also assessed. Results: Between August 2007 and October 2008, 139 patients were enrolled; 60% had two or more prior regimens, and 88% had nonsquamous cell carcinoma. The objective response rate (low dose and high dose) was 5.0% (3.1 and 6.8%), progression-free rate at 16 weeks was 33.1% (32.3 and 33.8%), median time to progression was 3.6 months (3.6 and 3.7 months), median progression-free survival was 3.6 months (3.5 and 3.6 months), and median overall survival was 9.0 months (10.0 and 8.3 months). The most common linifanib-related adverse events were fatigue (42%), decreased appetite (38%), hypertension (37%), diarrhea (32%), nausea (27%), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (24%), and proteinuria (22%). These events were more common in the high-dose group. The most common linifanib-related grade 3 or 4 adverse event was hypertension (14%). Conclusions: Linifanib is active in advanced non-small cell lung cancer as second- or third-line therapy. Increased adverse event rates were observed at the high dose of linifanib.

Phase I/II Study of Pemetrexed With or Without ABT-751 in Advanced or Metastatic Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE ABT-751 is an antimitotic and vascular disrupting agent with potent preclinical anticancer activity. We conducted a phase I and randomized double-blind phase II study of pemetrexed with ABT-751 or placebo in patients with recurrent advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS One hundred seventy-one patients received intravenous pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) day 1 and oral ABT-751 or placebo days 1 to 14 of 21-day cycles. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end point included overall survival (OS); pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters were also analyzed. RESULTS The recommended phase II dose of ABT-751 with pemetrexed is 200 mg. Fatigue, constipation, anemia, nausea, and diarrhea were the most common toxicities in both study arms. No pharmacokinetic interactions were observed. Median PFS in the ABT-751 arm was 2.3 months versus 1.9 for placebo (P = .819, log-rank) for the intention-to-treat population. However, differences in PFS (P = .112, log-rank) and OS (P = .034, log-rank; median 3.3 v 8.1 months) favoring ABT-751 were seen in the squamous NSCLC subgroup. Baseline circulating tumor cell concentrations were predictive of improved OS (P = .013). Changes from baseline of greater than 20% in plasma levels of placenta growth factor (P = .056), squamous cell carcinoma antigen (P = .03), and cytokeratin 19 fragment antigen 21-1 (P = .01) were markers best associated with improved OS. CONCLUSION Addition of ABT-751 to pemetrexed is well-tolerated, but does not improve outcome in unselected patients with recurrent NSCLC. ABT-751 may have therapeutic potential in squamous NSCLC. Exploratory cellular and molecular analyses in this study identified biomarkers that may correlate with survival.

Comparison of the Gastrointestinal Absorption and Bioavailability of Fenofibrate and Fenofibric Acid in Humans

This study compared the gastrointestinal (GI) absorption characteristics and absolute bioavailability of fenofibric acid and fenofibrate (which is converted to fenofibric acid in vivo) in healthy volunteers. Treatments were delivered to the proximal small bowel, distal small bowel, and colon using a site‐specific delivery system (Enterion capsule) and to the stomach by oral administration of equimolar doses. Serial blood samples were collected for 120 hours postdose and assayed for plasma fenofibric acid concentrations. The absolute bioavailability of each treatment was determined relative to 50 mg of fenofibric acid administered intravenously. Plasma exposure to fenofibric acid following fenofibric acid administration was approximately 1.5 times higher than that following fenofibrate administration for delivery to the proximal and distal small bowel and following oral administration, and it was approximately 5 times higher following colon delivery. The absolute bioavailability in the stomach, proximal small bowel, distal small bowel, and colon was approximately 81%, 88%, 84%, and 78%, respectively, for fenofibric acid and 69%, 73%, 66%, and 22%, respectively, for fenofibrate (P < .0001 and P = .033 for fenofibric acid vs fenofibrate in the colon and distal small bowel, respectively). In conclusion, fenofibric acid is well absorbed throughout the GI tract and has greater bioavailability than fenofibrate in all GI regions.

Phase 2 trial of linifanib (ABT-869) in patients with advanced renal cell cancer after sunitinib failure.

PURPOSE This study assessed the efficacy and safety of linifanib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who were previously treated with sunitinib. MATERIALS AND METHODS This open-label, multicentre, phase 2 trial of oral linifanib 0.25 mg/kg/day enrolled patients who had prior nephrectomy and adequate organ function. The primary end-point was objective response rate (ORR) per response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) by central imaging. Secondary end-points were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP). Safety was also assessed. RESULTS Fifty-three patients, median age 61 years (range 40-80) were enrolled (August 2007 to October 2008) across 12 North-American centres. Median number of prior therapies was 2 (range 1-4); 43 patients (81%) had clear-cell histology. ORR was 13.2%, median PFS was 5.4 months (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 3.6, 6.0) and TTP was the same; median OS was 14.5 months (95% CI: 10.8, 24.1). The most common treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were diarrhoea (74%), fatigue (74%) and hypertension (66%), and the most common treatment-related Grade 3/4 AE was hypertension (40%). CONCLUSIONS Linifanib demonstrated clinically meaningful activity in patients with advanced RCC after sunitinib failure. At 0.25 mg/kg/day, significant dose modifications were required. An alternative, fixed-dosing strategy is being evaluated in other trials.

ABT‐335, the Choline Salt of Fenofibric Acid, Does Not Have a Clinically Significant Pharmacokinetic Interaction With Rosuvastatin in Humans

ABT‐335 is the choline salt of fenofibric acid under clinical development as a combination therapy with rosuvastatin for the management of dyslipidemia. ABT‐335 and rosuvastatin have different mechanisms of actions and exert complementary pharmacodynamic effects on lipids. The current study assessed the pharmacokinetic interaction between the 2 drugs following a multiple‐dose, open‐label, 3‐period, randomized, crossover design. Eighteen healthy men and women received 40 mg rosuvastatin alone, 135 mg ABT‐335 alone, and the 2 drugs in combination once daily for 10 days. Blood samples were collected prior to dosing on multiple days and up to 120 hours after day 10 dosing for the measurements of fenofibric acid and rosuvastatin plasma concentrations. Coadministering 40 mg rosuvastatin had no significant effect on the steady‐state Cmax, Cmin, or AUC24 of fenofibric acid (P > .05). Coadministering ABT‐335 had no significant effect on the steady‐state Cmin or AUC24 of rosuvastatin (P > .05) but increased Cmax by 20% (90% confidence interval: 12%–28%). All 3 regimens were generally well tolerated with no clinically significant changes in clinical laboratory values, vital signs, or electrocardiograms during the study. Results from this study demonstrate no clinically significant pharmacokinetic interaction between ABT‐335 at the full clinical dose and rosuvastatin at the highest approved dose.

Exposure-Response (Safety) Analysis to Identify Linifanib Dose for a Phase III Study in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BACKGROUND Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third most common cause of cancer-related deaths and the fifth most common cancer globally. Hepatocellular carcinoma produces highly vascular tumors that overexpress vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), thus making VEGF a promising therapeutic target. The competitive inhibitor linifanib (ABT-869) has selectivity for VEGF and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) receptors and minimal activity against unrelated tyrosine and serine and threonine kinases. However, the optimal dosing regimen for linifanib in HCC patients is not yet known. OBJECTIVE This study attempts to identify a linifanib dose or dosing regimen with an acceptable safety profile for a Phase III study in HCC patients. METHODS The pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of linifanib were characterized from 2 Phase I and 3 Phase II clinical trials. Of the 266 patients evaluated, the median weight was 68 kg (range, 35-177 kg), 64% were male, and 87.6% of patients received an oral solution of linifanib, whereas 12.4% received a tablet formulation. Approximately 95% of patients received drug based on weight, with the remaining on a fixed-dosing regimen. A population PK analysis was conducted to characterize the linifanib exposure for each patient. Linifanib Cmax and AUC derived from the population PK properties were correlated with the rates of adverse events (AEs). RESULTS Linifanib PK properties are dose proportional for the 0.10-mg/kg to 0.25-mg/kg once daily dose range and are time independent after repeated oral dosing. The Tmax of linifanib is approximately 3 hours, and the t½ is approximately 1 day. The most common AEs related to linifanib PK were hypertension (P = 0.02 for Cmax and P = 0.01 for AUC), diarrhea (P = 0.001 for Cmax and P = 0.0012 for AUC), proteinuria (P = 0.001 for Cmax and P = 0.002 for AUC), and asthenia (P = 0.03 for AUC). Weight and sex were identified as covariates for Cmax, and sex was identified as a covariate for AUC. The predicted AE range for females was slightly higher compared with males; however, the AE range is tighter for the weight range for fixed dosing compared with weight-based dosing, regardless of sex. CONCLUSIONS The PK properties of linifanib support a one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination. Comparison of weight-based and fixed dosing revealed predicted AE rates to be similar, with a tighter AE range for fixed dosing. The safety profile of linifanib, therefore, supports a 17.5 mg fixed starting dose for Phase III clinical studies.

Phase 1 trial of linifanib (ABT-869) in patients with refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia

Abstract Linifanib, a potent oral inhibitor of fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases, has demonstrated promising preclinical single-agent and synergistic anti-leukemic activity in combination with cytarabine. In this phase 1, multicenter, open-label, dose-escalation study, 45 adults with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) received linifanib alone in arm A (n = 29) and linifanib plus intermediate-dose cytarabine in arm B (n = 16). Median treatment duration was 21 days (range 5–110). Linifanib was well tolerated overall. The most common grade 3/4 events were fatigue (arm A) and febrile neutropenia (arm B). The recommended phase 2 dose was 15 mg (alone), and 10 mg (with cytarabine). Evidence of on-target kinase inhibition in patients with FLT3-mutant and wild-type AML was seen. Decreased phosphorylated FLT3 was seen in 3/3 patients with FLT3-internal tandem duplication (ITD) with peripheral blast reductions and in 8/24 (33%) patients with wild-type, D835 or unknown FLT3 mutation. Eight/29 (28%) patients had decreased phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK).

Sa1204 Pharmacokinetics of Adalimumab in Adult Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis

P412 Pharmacokinetics of adalimumab in adult patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis W. Awni1 *, D. Eckert2, S. Sharma1, N. Mostafa1, P. Noertersheuser2, R. Pradhan1, A. Robinson1, W. Sandborn3, S. Hanauer4, J.-F. Colombel5, R. Thakkar1. 1Abbott Laboratories, United States, 2Abbott Laboratories, Germany, 3University of California, San Diego, United States, 4University of Chicago, United States, 5Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille, Hopital Claude Huriez, Lille, France

Abstract B53: Assessment of the effect of food on the oral bioavailability and assessment of diurnal variation in the pharmacokinetics of linifanib

Background: Linifanib (ABT‐869) is a novel orally active and selective inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor and platelet derived growth factor families of receptor tyrosine kinases. Efficacy was observed at 0.25 mg/kg dose in 3 Phase II studies in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, non‐small cell lung cancer and renal cell carcinoma. Methods: This is an ongoing Phase 1, single‐ and multiple‐dose, openlabel, randomized, multicenter, crossover study. Patients (N=12) with advanced or metastatic solid tumors are randomly assigned to one of the two Groups (N=6 per group): Group I (oral administration of 0.25 mg/kg linifanib under fasting conditions on Day (D)1 followed by non‐fasting conditions on D7 and alternating multiple doses in the AM or PM under fasting conditions), Group II (oral administration of 0.25 mg/kg linifanib under non‐fasting conditions on D1 followed by fasting on D7 and alternating multiple doses in the PM or AM under fasting conditions). PK samples are collected at various time points after single dose on D1 and D7 for food effect and multiple doses on D21 and D31 for diurnal variation assessment. The samples were analyzed for plasma concentration using LCMS/MS. Maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax), time to Cmax (Tmax) and total area under the concentration‐time curve (AUC) or from 0 to 24h were determined by non‐compartmental analysis using WinNonlin Professional V. 5.2. Results: Based on preliminary data from 9 patients, there appears to be a negative effect of food on linifanib PK (a decrease of 43% in Cmax and 20% in AUC). AM dosing appears to result in higher exposures than PM dosing (an increase of 69% in Cmax and 58% in AUC) based on data from 5 patients. Terminal half‐life of linifanib was estimated to be approximately 1 day. Conclusion: Preliminary results show that linifanib exposures may be influenced by food and time of dosing. Citation Information: Mol Cancer Ther 2009;8(12 Suppl):B53.