Walid M. Awni

First-pass metabolism of cyclosporin by the gut.

Cyclosporin is thought to be exclusively metabolised in the liver. We instilled cyclosporin into the small bowel of 2 patients during the anhepatic phase of liver transplantation; cyclosporin metabolites were readily detected in portal venous blood. Our findings indicate that the small intestine is a major site of cyclosporin breakdown: such intestinal metabolism might help to explain the poor oral bioavailability and drug interactions of cyclosporin.

The Adverse Impact of Cyclosporine on Serum Lipids in Renal Transplant Recipients

The extent to which cyclosporine (CsA) directly, or indirectly, influences serum lipid levels in renal transplant patients treated with multiple-drug immunosuppression protocols is unclear. Indeed, patients treated with CsA have reduced corticosteroid requirements, fewer acute rejection episodes, and other differences from patients receiving conventional immunosuppression that may reduce serum lipid levels. We studied patients treated with low-dose CsA, corticosteroids, azathioprine, and Minnesota antilymphocyte globulin ([ALG] n = 205) versus conventional (three-drug) immunosuppression (n = 368) and evaluated the impact of CsA, acute rejection episodes, and other clinical parameters on serum lipids. Fasting serum lipid levels from stable patients transplanted between 1976 to 1989 were studied at 3 (n = 573), 12 (n = 565), 26 (n = 55), and 52 (n = 521) weeks posttransplant using multivariate, linear regression analysis. The incidence of acute rejection episodes was reduced by CsA, but patients with fewer acute rejection episodes in the early posttransplant period had higher serum total cholesterol (increased by .33 +/- .12 mmol/L [13 +/- 5 mg/dL] and .27 +/- .12 mmol/L [10 +/- 5 mg/dL], P less than 0.05, at 3 and 12 weeks, respectively) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) (increased by .23 +/- .11 mmol/L [9 +/- 4 mg/dL] and .23 +/- .11 mmol/L [9 +/- 4 mg/dL], P less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The relationship between cyclosporine pharmacokinetic parameters and subsequent acute rejection in renal transplant recipients

The best approach to determining the optimal dose of cyclosporine in renal transplant recipients is unclear. In this prospective investigation, CsA pharmacokinetic studies were performed in 45 patients 1, 4, and 12 weeks after the initiation of CsA. Data from 104 studies were then combined to analyze the relationship between CsA kinetic parameters and posttransplant clinical events. Random trough levels, used in the day-to-day adjustment of CsA dose, were examined separately in 19 of the 45 study patients. All CsA levels were measured with high-performance liquid chromatography. Results showed: (1) trough CsA levels, obtained by random sampling, or from the kinetic studies, correlated poorly with dose; however, there was a good correlation between CsA dose and maximum concentration (Cmax, r = .39, P less than .001), area under the concentration-time curve (AUC, r = .45, P less than .001), and terminal elimination half-life (r = .43, P less than .001); (2) several pharmacokinetic parameters correlated with subsequent rejection episodes; patients with acute rejection within 2 or 4 weeks after study had 15-31% lower Cmax (P less than .05) and 13-19% lower AUC (P less than .05) compared to those who were rejection-free; and (3) levels of blood constituents known to bind CsA also correlated with rejection, and this correlation was independent of the impact of kinetic parameters on rejection. Altogether, these results suggested that a limited number of CsA pharmacokinetic studies may be more useful than multiple, random trough levels in monitoring CsA therapy.

Drug-drug interaction profile of the all-oral anti-hepatitis C virus regimen of paritaprevir/ritonavir, ombitasvir, and dasabuvir

BACKGROUND & AIMS Paritaprevir (administered with ritonavir, PTV/r), ombitasvir (OBV), and dasabuvir (DSV) are direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Thirteen studies were conducted to characterize drug-drug interactions for the 3D regimen of OBV, PTV/r, and DSV and various medications in healthy volunteers to inform dosing recommendations in HCV-infected patients. METHODS Mechanism-based drug-drug interactions were evaluated for gemfibrozil, ketoconazole, carbamazepine, warfarin, omeprazole, digoxin, pravastatin, and rosuvastatin. Drug-drug interactions with medications commonly used in HCV-infected patients were evaluated for amlodipine, furosemide, alprazolam, zolpidem, duloxetine, escitalopram, methadone, buprenorphine/naloxone, and oral contraceptives. Ratios of geometric means with 90% confidence intervals for maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) were used to determine the magnitude of interaction. RESULTS Coadministration with the 3D regimen of OBV, PTV/r, and DSV resulted in a <2-fold change in mean Cmax and AUC for most medications and the DAAs, indicating minimal to modest interactions. Carbamazepine decreased PTV, ritonavir, and DSV exposures substantially, while gemfibrozil increased DSV exposures substantially. Although coadministration with ethinyl estradiol-containing contraceptives resulted in elevated alanine aminotransferase levels, coadministration with a progestin-only contraceptive did not. CONCLUSIONS The majority of medications can be coadministered with the 3D regimen of OBV, PTV/r, and DSV without dose adjustment, or with clinical monitoring or dose adjustment. Although no dose adjustment is necessary for the 3D regimen when coadministered with 17 of the 20 medications, coadministration with gemfibrozil, carbamazepine, or ethinyl estradiol-containing contraceptives is contraindicated.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of codeine in end‐stage renal disease

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of codeine and its metabolites codeine glucuronide, morphine, and morphine glucuronide were assessed after the administration of a single 60 mg oral dose of codeine sulfate and a single 60 mg intravenous dose of codeine phosphate in six healthy volunteers and six patients on chronic hemodialysis. Plasma and urine drug and metabolite concentrations were determined by sensitive and specific RIA procedures. Pharmacodynamics were assessed by pupillometry and vital sign determinations. Codeine elimination half‐life and mean residence time were increased significantly in the hemodialysis group (18.69 ± 9.03 hours and 12.77 ± 7.09 hours, mean ± SD, respectively) compared with the healthy volunteer group (4.04 ± 0.60 hours and 3.90 ± 0.52 hours, respectively). The total body clearance and volume of distribution of codeine were not significantly different between groups. Peak concentrations, times to peak concentrations, and AUCs for the three metabolites were also not significantly different between the groups, in part as a result of significant interpatient variability in the hemodialysis group. Examination of pupillometry and vital sign data did not reveal clinically significant differences in pharmacodynamics between the groups. Adjustment of dosage regimen may be required in some patients with uremia receiving multiple‐dose codeine therapy.

Are bioequivalence studies of levothyroxine sodium formulations in euthyroid volunteers reliable

Levothyroxine (LT4) has a narrow therapeutic index. Consequently, precise standards for assessing the bioequivalence of different LT4 products are vital. We examined the methodology that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommends for comparing the bioavailability of LT4 products, as well as three modifications to correct for endogenous, thyroxine (T4) levels, to determine if the methodology could distinguish LT4 products that differ by 12.5%, 25%, or 33%. With no baseline correction for the endogenous T4 pool, differences in administered LT4 doses that differed by 25%-33% could not be detected (450 microg and 400 microg doses versus 600 microg dose, respectively). The three mathematical correction methods could distinguish the doses that differed by 25% and 33%. None of the correction methods could distinguish dosage strengths that differed by 12.5% (450 microg versus 400 microg). Dose differences within this range are known to result in clinically relevant differences in safety and effectiveness. Methods of analysis of bioequivalence data that do not consider endogenous T4 concentrations confound accurate quantitation and interpretation of LT4 bioavailability. As a result, products inappropriately deemed bioequivalent may put patients at risk for iatrogenic hyperthyroidism or hypothyroidism. More precise methods for defining bioequivalence are required in order to ensure that LT4 products accepted as bioequivalent will perform equivalently in patients without the need for further monitoring and retitration of their dose.

Quantifying Hepatic Function in the Presence of Liver Disease with Phenazone (Antipyrine) and its Metabolites

SummaryThe disposition of Phenazone (antipyrine), a low extraction compound with low protein binding, is known to be altered in the presence of various types of hepatic dysfunction. As such, its pharmacokinetics may be useful in the objective characterisation of altered liver function. Understanding the known effects of various liver disease states upon the disposition of this probe may provide insight into future applications. This article provides a review of background information about normal plasma Phenazone pharmacokinetics, urinary metabolite disposition and tabulations of reported total body clearances of the drug in the presence of cirrhosis, fatty liver, hepatitis and cholestasis in humans. An estimate is made of the sensitivity and specificity of Phenazone testing for the verification of the presence of cirrhosis based on this compiled literature.

Long-term cyclosporine pharmacokinetic changes in renal transplant recipients: Effects of binding and metabolism

Sequential changes in the pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine (CsA) and metabolites M1, M17, and M21 were determined, 1, 3, and 12 weeks after initiation of CsA therapy in 21 renal transplant recipients. Concentrations of CsA and its metabolites were measured by HPLC. The dose‐adjusted AUC (AUCsst) and 24‐hour trough (C24trough) level of CsA and the metabolites increased significantly during the study period. However, there was no change in the AUCsst ratio of each of the metabolites to that of CsA, suggesting that CsA metabolism did not change. However, the factors that alter the binding and distribution of CsA (i.e., hematocrit, plasma proteins, and lipoproteins) showed a significant rise during the study period, and the rise correlated well with the observed changes in AUCsst and C24trough. Thus alterations in the distribution and binding of CsA and its metabolites in blood, rather than reduction in the metabolism of CsA, may explain changes in CsA pharmacokinetics over time.

Effects of cyclosporine on the isolated perfused rat kidney

Although cyclosporine (CsA) has been shown to cause decreased renal function in humans, the mechanisms important in cyclosporine nephrotoxicity are not well understood. Investigations of cyclosporine nephrotoxicity in animal models have been complicated by systemic toxic effects not seen in humans. In the present study, the direct renal effects of cyclosporine were investigated in the isolated perfused rat kidney (IPRK) model. Cyclosporine delivered by nontoxic liposomes had no effect on IPRK resistance, perfusate flow, inulin clearance, or fractional reabsorption of sodium, despite marked tissue accumulation of CsA (55.1 +/- 7.2 micrograms/g kidney tissue). In contrast, a 63% decrease in inulin clearance was observed following the administration of intravenous cyclosporine (0.1 ml). However, similar changes in IPRK function were seen after the administration of 0.1 ml of the intravenous cyclosporine vehicle, cremophor, suggesting that the alterations in function were secondary to the vehicle. All together, these findings suggest that cyclosporine nephrotoxicity may be secondary to renal innervation, toxic metabolites, or other systemic effects of cyclosporine not present in the IPRK.

Effect of Zileuton on Theophylline Pharmacokinetics

SummaryIn controlled trials involving asthma patients, zileuton — a selective 5-lipoxygenase inhibitor — has significantly improved pulmonary function and reduced symptoms. Since theophylline is frequently prescribed for asthma, we designed a placebo-controlled randomised crossover trial to examine the influence of zileuton on theophylline pharmacokinetics.16 healthy adult males were given theophylline (Slo-Phyllin® ) 200mg 4 times daily for 5 days and either zileuton 800mg twice daily or a matching placebo. After a 15-day washout period, theophylline was resumed and the other study drugs reversed. During coadministration with zileuton, mean peak theophylline levels rose from 12.14 to 20.99 mg/L (p < 0.001), while the apparent plasma clearance dropped from 3.74 to 1.91 L/h (p < 0.001). The time to the peak theophylline concentration was delayed by 0.5 hours and the half-life was significantly prolonged by 1.5 hours. 14 volunteers reported 44 mild or moderately severe adverse events, possibly or probably related to coadministration of zileuton, and 8 volunteers reported 8 such events with placebo coadministration. Three volunteers receiving theophylline plus zileuton withdrew from the trial prematurely.Thus, a pharmacokinetic interaction that may produce theophylline toxicity exists between zileuton and theophylline. Accordingly, theophylline dosages in patients receiving zileuton should be adjusted to maintain levels within the therapeutic range. Upon initiation of zileuton, the typical asthma patient may require dosage reductions of one-half, and monitoring of plasma theophylline concentrations is recommended.