Rajesh Sonani
Emory University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Rajesh Sonani.
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions | 2016
Badal Thakkar; Aashay Patel; Bashar Mohamad; Nileshkumar J. Patel; Parth Bhatt; Ronak Bhimani; Achint Patel; Shilpkumar Arora; Chirag Savani; Shantanu Solanki; Rajesh Sonani; Samir Patel; Nilay Patel; Abhishek Deshmukh; Tamam Mohamad; Cindy L. Grines; Michael W. Cleman; Abeel A. Mangi; John K. Forrest; Apurva Badheka
To compare the in‐hospital outcomes in cirrhosis patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) versus those undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR).
American Journal of Cardiology | 2016
Sidakpal S. Panaich; Shilpkumar Arora; Nilay Patel; Nileshkumar J. Patel; Samir V. Patel; Chirag Savani; Vikas Singh; Sunny Jhamnani; Rajesh Sonani; Sopan Lahewala; Badal Thakkar; Achint Patel; Abhishek Dave; Harshil Shah; Parth Bhatt; Radhika Jaiswal; Abhijit Ghatak; Vishal Gupta; Abhishek Deshmukh; Ashok Kondur; Theodore Schreiber; Cindy L. Grines; Apurva Badheka
Contemporary data on clinical outcomes after utilization of atherectomy in lower extremity endovascular revascularization are sparse. The study cohort was derived from Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project nationwide inpatient sample database from the year 2012. Peripheral endovascular interventions including atherectomy were identified using appropriate International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnostic and procedural codes. The subjects were divided and compared in 2 groups: atherectomy versus no atherectomy. Two-level hierarchical multivariate mixed models were created. The coprimary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and amputation; secondary outcome was a composite of in-hospital mortality and periprocedural complications. Hospitalization costs were also assessed. Atherectomy utilization (odds ratio, 95% CI, p value) was independently predictive of lower in-hospital mortality (0.46, 0.28 to 0.75, 0.002) and lower amputation rates (0.83, 0.71 to 0.97, 0.020). Atherectomy use was also predictive of significantly lower secondary composite outcome of in-hospital mortality and complications (0.79, 0.69 to 0.90, 0.001). In the propensity-matched cohort, atherectomy utilization was again associated with a lower rate of amputation (11.18% vs 12.92%, p = 0.029), in-hospital mortality (0.71% vs 1.53%, p 0.001), and any complication (13.24% vs 16.09%, p 0.001). However, atherectomy use was also associated with higher costs (
American Journal of Cardiology | 2016
Shilpkumar Arora; Sidakpal S. Panaich; Nilay Patel; Nileshkumar J. Patel; Chirag Savani; Samir V. Patel; Badal Thakkar; Rajesh Sonani; Sunny Jhamnani; Vikas Singh; Sopan Lahewala; Achint Patel; Parth Bhatt; Harshil Shah; Radhika Jaiswal; Vishal Gupta; Abhishek Deshmukh; Ashok Kondur; Theodore Schreiber; Apurva Badheka; Cindy L. Grines
24,790 ± 397 vs
American Journal of Cardiology | 2015
Parth Bhatt; Nileshkumar J. Patel; Achint Patel; Rajesh Sonani; Aashay Patel; Sidakpal S. Panaich; Badal Thakkar; Chirag Savani; Sunny Jhamnani; Nilay Patel; Nish Patel; Sadip Pant; Samir Patel; Shilpkumar Arora; Abhishek Dave; Vikas Singh; Ankit Chothani; Jay Patel; Mohammad M. Ansari; Abhishek Deshmukh; Ronak Bhimani; Cindy L. Grines; Michael W. Cleman; Abeel A. Mangi; John K. Forrest; Apurva Badheka
22635 ± 251, p <0.001). Atherectomy use in conjunction with angioplasty (with or without stenting) was associated with improved in-hospital outcomes in terms of lower amputation rates, mortality, and postprocedural complications.
Angiology | 2016
Shilpkumar Arora; Sidakpal S. Panaich; Nileshkumar J. Patel; Nilay Patel; Shantanu Solanki; Abhishek Deshmukh; Vikas Singh; Sopan Lahewala; Chirag Savani; Badal Thakkar; Abhishek Dave; Achint Patel; Parth Bhatt; Rajesh Sonani; Aashay Patel; Michael W. Cleman; John K. Forrest; Theodore Schreiber; Apurva Badheka; Cindy L. Grines
Contemporary real-world data on clinical outcomes after utilization of coronary atherectomy are sparse. The study cohort was derived from Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample database from year 2012. Percutaneous coronary interventions including atherectomy were identified using appropriate International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision diagnostic and procedural codes. Two-level hierarchical multivariate mixed models were created. The primary outcome was a composite of in-hospital mortality and periprocedural complications; the secondary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Hospitalization costs were also assessed. A total of 107,131 procedures were identified in 2012. Multivariate analysis revealed that atherectomy utilization was independently predictive of greater primary composite outcome of in-hospital mortality and complications (odds ratio 1.34, 95% confidence interval 1.22 to 1.47, p <0.001) but was not associated with any significant difference in terms of in-hospital mortality alone (odds ratio 1.22, 95% confidence interval 0.99 to 1.52, p 0.063). In the propensity-matched cohort, atherectomy utilization was again associated with a higher rate of complications (12.88% vs 10.99%, p = 0.001), in-hospital mortality +a ny complication (13.69% vs 11.91%, p = 0.003) with a nonsignificant difference in terms of in-hospital mortality alone (3.45% vs 2.88%, p = 0.063) and higher hospitalization costs (
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research | 2017
Samir V. Patel; Rajesh Sonani; Vikas Singh; Palak Patel; Apurva Badheka
25,341 ± 353 vs
Journal of Geriatric Cardiology | 2016
Susan P. Bell; Nileshkumar J. Patel; Nish Patel; Rajesh Sonani; Apurva Badheka; Daniel E. Forman
21,984 ± 87, p <0.001). Atherectomy utilization during percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with a higher rate of postprocedural complications without any significant impact on in-hospital mortality.
Journal of Cardiac Surgery | 2016
Samir V. Patel; Sunny Jhamnani; Palak Patel; Rajesh Sonani; Chirag Savani; Nilay Patel; Nileshkumar J. Patel; Sidakpal Panaich; Mihir Patel; Schreiber Theodore; Cindy L. Grines; Apurva Badheka
Use of transcatheter endovascular stenting has been increasing in the treatment of coarctation of aorta (CoA). The present study was undertaken on adults with CoA who underwent stent placement from 2000 to 2011 to analyze the relation of hospital volumes to the outcomes of stenting in adults with CoA. It was a retrospective study based on Healthcare Cost and Utilization Projects Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2000 to 2011 and identified subjects using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification procedure code of 747.10 (CoA). Annual hospital volume was calculated using unique hospital identifiers. Weights provided by the Nationwide Inpatient Sample were used to generate national estimates. A total of 105 (weighted 521) subjects were identified with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, code of 39.90 (Endovascular stent). Hospital volumes were divided into tertiles. We compared the highest tertile (≥3 procedures annually) with other tertiles (<3 procedure annually). The composite outcomes of the analysis were procedure-related complications, length of stay (LOS), and cost in relation to the hospital volume. No inhospital death was reported in either group. Hospitals with ≥3 procedures annually had significantly lower incidence of complications (9.5% vs 23.0%) compared to the hospitals with <3 procedures annually (p-value 0.002). Similar results were obtained after multivariate regression analysis in relation to hospital volume. Shorter LOS and lower cost were observed with annual hospital volume of ≥3 procedures. In conclusion, stenting adults for CoA is remarkably safe, and the outcomes of the procedure have improved in centers with annual hospital volume of ≥3 procedures. There is also decreasing trend of procedure-related complications, shorter LOS, and lower costs compared to centers with annual volume <3 procedures.
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions | 2016
Shilpkumar Arora; Sidakpal S. Panaich; Nilay Patel; Nileshkumar J. Patel; Sopan Lahewala; Badal Thakkar; Chirag Savani; Sunny Jhamnani; Vikas Singh; Nish Patel; Samir Patel; Rajesh Sonani; Achint Patel; Byomesh Tripathi; Abhishek Deshmukh; Ankit Chothani; Jay Patel; Parth Bhatt; Tamam Mohamad; Michael S. Remetz; Jeptha P. Curtis; Ramak R. Attaran; Carlos Mena; Theodore Schreiber; Cindy L. Grines; Michael W. Cleman; John K. Forrest; Apurva Badheka
Background: Multivessel coronary artery disease carries significant mortality risk. Comprehensive data on inhospital outcomes following multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (MVPCI) are sparse. Methods: We queried the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project’s nationwide inpatient sample (NIS) between 2006 and 2011 using different International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification procedure codes. The primary outcome was inhospital all-cause mortality, and the secondary outcome was a composite of inhospital mortality and periprocedural complications. Results: The overall mortality was low at 0.73% following MVPCI. Multivariate analysis revealed that (odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, P value) age (1.63, 1.48-1.79; <.001), female sex (1.19, 1.00-1.42; P = .05), acute myocardial infarction (AMI; 2.97, 2.35-3.74; <.001), shock (17.24, 13.61-21.85; <.001), a higher burden of comorbidities (2.09, 1.32-3.29; .002), and emergent/urgent procedure status (1.67, 1.30-2.16; <.001) are important predictors of primary and secondary outcomes. MVPCI was associated with higher mortality, length of stay (LOS), and cost of care as compared to single vessel single stent PCI. Conclusion: MVPCI is associated with higher inhospital mortality, LOS, and hospitalization costs compared to single vessel, single stent PCI. Higher volume hospitals had lower overall postprocedural mortality rate along with shorter LOS and lower hospitalization costs following MVPCI.
International Journal of Cardiology | 2015
Achint Patel; Aashay Patel; Parth Bhatt; Chirag Savani; Badal Thakkar; Rajesh Sonani; Nileshkumar J. Patel; Shilpkumar Arora; Sidakpal S. Panaich; Vikas Singh; Samir Patel; Sadip Pant; Mohammad M. Ansari; Abhishek Deshmukh; Nilay Patel; Abhishek Dave; Cindy L. Grines; Michael W. Cleman; John K. Forrest; Apurva Badheka
ABSTRACT Introduction: Patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) have traditionally been excluded from large randomized clinical trials involving transcatheter aortic valve replacements (TAVR). Technical enhancements, availability of new generation devices and improved outcomes have led to a marked increase in TAVR volume across the world including off label use in patients with BAV stenosis. Areas covered: In this manuscript, we have reviewed the currently available data regarding safety, efficacy, and outcomes of TAVR in patients with BAV stenosis. 11 large observational studies with near 1300 patients with BAV stenosis were included to summarizes outcomes of TAVR. Expert Commentary: The present review suggested that TAVR may be a safe and feasible treatment modality in BAV stenosis patients. New generation devices were associated with high device success rate whereas higher adverse procedural events were observed in early generation devices. There are no differences in post procedural outcomes with new generation TAVR devices for BAV when compared to tricuspid aortic anatomy. Larger studies are needed to evaluate the long-term outcome and durability of TAVR in patients with BAV.