Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Rajni Nigam is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Rajni Nigam.


Nucleic Acids Research | 2015

The Rat Genome Database 2015: genomic, phenotypic and environmental variations and disease

Mary Shimoyama; Jeff De Pons; G. Thomas Hayman; Stanley J. F. Laulederkind; Weisong Liu; Rajni Nigam; Victoria Petri; Jennifer R. Smith; Marek Tutaj; Shur-Jen Wang; Elizabeth A. Worthey; Melinda R. Dwinell; Howard J. Jacob

The Rat Genome Database (RGD, http://rgd.mcw.edu) provides the most comprehensive data repository and informatics platform related to the laboratory rat, one of the most important model organisms for disease studies. RGD maintains and updates datasets for genomic elements such as genes, transcripts and increasingly in recent years, sequence variations, as well as map positions for multiple assemblies and sequence information. Functional annotations for genomic elements are curated from published literature, submitted by researchers and integrated from other public resources. Complementing the genomic data catalogs are those associated with phenotypes and disease, including strains, QTL and experimental phenotype measurements across hundreds of strains. Data are submitted by researchers, acquired through bulk data pipelines or curated from published literature. Innovative software tools provide users with an integrated platform to query, mine, display and analyze valuable genomic and phenomic datasets for discovery and enhancement of their own research. This update highlights recent developments that reflect an increasing focus on: (i) genomic variation, (ii) phenotypes and diseases, (iii) data related to the environment and experimental conditions and (iv) datasets and software tools that allow the user to explore and analyze the interactions among these and their impact on disease.


Briefings in Bioinformatics | 2013

The Rat Genome Database 2013—data, tools and users

Stanley J. F. Laulederkind; G. Thomas Hayman; Shur-Jen Wang; Jennifer R. Smith; T. F. Lowry; Rajni Nigam; Victoria Petri; Jeff De Pons; Melinda R. Dwinell; Mary Shimoyama; Diane H. Munzenmaier; Elizabeth A. Worthey; Howard J. Jacob

The Rat Genome Database (RGD) was started >10 years ago to provide a core genomic resource for rat researchers. Currently, RGD combines genetic, genomic, pathway, phenotype and strain information with a focus on disease. RGD users are provided with access to structured and curated data from the molecular level through the organismal level. Those users access RGD from all over the world. End users are not only rat researchers but also researchers working with mouse and human data. Translational research is supported by RGD’s comparative genetics/genomics data in disease portals, in GBrowse, in VCMap and on gene report pages. The impact of RGD also goes beyond the traditional biomedical researcher, as the influence of RGD reaches bioinformaticians, tool developers and curators. Import of RGD data into other publicly available databases expands the influence of RGD to a larger set of end users than those who avail themselves of the RGD website. The value of RGD continues to grow as more types of data and more tools are added, while reaching more types of end users.


Nucleic Acids Research | 2004

The Rat Genome Database (RGD): developments towards a phenome database

Norberto de la Cruz; Susan Bromberg; Dean Pasko; Mary Shimoyama; Simon N. Twigger; Jiali Chen; Chin-Fu Chen; Chunyu Fan; Cindy Foote; Gopal Gopinath; Glenn Harris; Aubrey Hughes; Yuan Ji; Weihong Jin; Dawei Li; Jedidiah Mathis; Natalya Nenasheva; Jeff Nie; Rajni Nigam; Victoria Petri; Dorothy Reilly; Weiye Wang; Wenhua Wu; Angela Zuniga-Meyer; Lan Zhao; Anne E. Kwitek; Peter J. Tonellato; Howard J. Jacob

The Rat Genome Database (RGD) (http://rgd.mcw.edu) aims to meet the needs of its community by providing genetic and genomic infrastructure while also annotating the strengths of rat research: biochemistry, nutrition, pharmacology and physiology. Here, we report on RGDs development towards creating a phenome database. Recent developments can be categorized into three groups. (i) Improved data collection and integration to match increased volume and biological scope of research. (ii) Knowledge representation augmented by the implementation of a new ontology and annotation system. (iii) The addition of quantitative trait loci data, from rat, mouse and human to our advanced comparative genomics tools, as well as the creation of new, and enhancement of existing, tools to enable users to efficiently browse and survey research data. The emphasis is on helping researchers find genes responsible for disease through the use of rat models. These improvements, combined with the genomic sequence of the rat, have led to a successful year at RGD with over two million page accesses that represent an over 4-fold increase in a year. Future plans call for increased annotation of biological information on the rat elucidated through its use as a model for human pathobiology. The continued development of toolsets will facilitate integration of these data into the context of rat genomic sequence, as well as allow comparisons of biological and genomic data with the human genomic sequence and of an increasing number of organisms.


Frontiers in Genetics | 2012

Three ontologies to define phenotype measurement data

Mary Shimoyama; Rajni Nigam; Leslie Sanders McIntosh; Rakesh Nagarajan; Treva Rice; D. C. Rao; Melinda R. Dwinell

Background: There is an increasing need to integrate phenotype measurement data across studies for both human studies and those involving model organisms. Current practices allow researchers to access only those data involved in a single experiment or multiple experiments utilizing the same protocol. Results: Three ontologies were created: Clinical Measurement Ontology, Measurement Method Ontology and Experimental Condition Ontology. These ontologies provided the framework for integration of rat phenotype data from multiple studies into a single resource as well as facilitated data integration from multiple human epidemiological studies into a centralized repository. Conclusion: An ontology based framework for phenotype measurement data affords the ability to successfully integrate vital phenotype data into critical resources, regardless of underlying technological structures allowing the user to easily query and retrieve data from multiple studies.


Journal of Biomedical Semantics | 2014

The pathway ontology - updates and applications

Victoria Petri; Pushkala Jayaraman; Marek Tutaj; G. Thomas Hayman; Jennifer R. Smith; Jeff De Pons; Stanley J. F. Laulederkind; T. F. Lowry; Rajni Nigam; Shur-Jen Wang; Mary Shimoyama; Melinda R. Dwinell; Diane H. Munzenmaier; Elizabeth A. Worthey; Howard J. Jacob

BackgroundThe Pathway Ontology (PW) developed at the Rat Genome Database (RGD), covers all types of biological pathways, including altered and disease pathways and captures the relationships between them within the hierarchical structure of a directed acyclic graph. The ontology allows for the standardized annotation of rat, and of human and mouse genes to pathway terms. It also constitutes a vehicle for easy navigation between gene and ontology report pages, between reports and interactive pathway diagrams, between pathways directly connected within a diagram and between those that are globally related in pathway suites and suite networks. Surveys of the literature and the development of the Pathway and Disease Portals are important sources for the ongoing development of the ontology. User requests and mapping of pathways in other databases to terms in the ontology further contribute to increasing its content. Recently built automated pipelines use the mapped terms to make available the annotations generated by other groups.ResultsThe two released pipelines – the Pathway Interaction Database (PID) Annotation Import Pipeline and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) Annotation Import Pipeline, make available over 7,400 and 31,000 pathway gene annotations, respectively. Building the PID pipeline lead to the addition of new terms within the signaling node, also augmented by the release of the RGD “Immune and Inflammatory Disease Portal” at that time. Building the KEGG pipeline lead to a substantial increase in the number of disease pathway terms, such as those within the ‘infectious disease pathway’ parent term category. The ‘drug pathway’ node has also seen increases in the number of terms as well as a restructuring of the node. Literature surveys, disease portal deployments and user requests have contributed and continue to contribute additional new terms across the ontology. Since first presented, the content of PW has increased by over 75%.ConclusionsOngoing development of the Pathway Ontology and the implementation of pipelines promote an enriched provision of pathway data. The ontology is freely available for download and use from the RGD ftp site at ftp://rgd.mcw.edu/pub/ontology/pathway/ or from the National Center for Biomedical Ontology (NCBO) BioPortal website at http://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/PW.


Human Genomics | 2011

RGD: A comparative genomics platform

Mary Shimoyama; Jennifer R. Smith; Tom Hayman; Stan Laulederkind; Tim Lowry; Rajni Nigam; Victoria Petri; Shur-Jen Wang; Melinda R. Dwinell; Howard J. Jacob

The Rat Genome Database (RGD) (http://rgd.mcw.edu) provides a comprehensive platform for comparative genomics and genetics research. RGD houses gene, QTL and polymorphic marker data for rat, mouse and human and provides easy access to data through sophisticated searches, disease portals, interactive pathway diagrams and rat and human genome browsers.


Journal of Biomedical Semantics | 2013

The Vertebrate Trait Ontology: a controlled vocabulary for the annotation of trait data across species.

Carissa A. Park; Susan M. Bello; Cynthia L. Smith; Zhi-Liang Hu; Diane H. Munzenmaier; Rajni Nigam; Jennifer R. Smith; Mary Shimoyama; Janan T. Eppig; James M. Reecy

BackgroundThe use of ontologies to standardize biological data and facilitate comparisons among datasets has steadily grown as the complexity and amount of available data have increased. Despite the numerous ontologies available, one area currently lacking a robust ontology is the description of vertebrate traits. A trait is defined as any measurable or observable characteristic pertaining to an organism or any of its substructures. While there are several ontologies to describe entities and processes in phenotypes, diseases, and clinical measurements, one has not been developed for vertebrate traits; the Vertebrate Trait Ontology (VT) was created to fill this void.DescriptionSignificant inconsistencies in trait nomenclature exist in the literature, and additional difficulties arise when trait data are compared across species. The VT is a unified trait vocabulary created to aid in the transfer of data within and between species and to facilitate investigation of the genetic basis of traits. Trait information provides a valuable link between the measurements that are used to assess the trait, the phenotypes related to the traits, and the diseases associated with one or more phenotypes. Because multiple clinical and morphological measurements are often used to assess a single trait, and a single measurement can be used to assess multiple physiological processes, providing investigators with standardized annotations for trait data will allow them to investigate connections among these data types.ConclusionsThe annotation of genomic data with ontology terms provides unique opportunities for data mining and analysis. Links between data in disparate databases can be identified and explored, a strategy that is particularly useful for cross-species comparisons or in situations involving inconsistent terminology. The VT provides a common basis for the description of traits in multiple vertebrate species. It is being used in the Rat Genome Database and Animal QTL Database for annotation of QTL data for rat, cattle, chicken, swine, sheep, and rainbow trout, and in the Mouse Phenome Database to annotate strain characterization data. In these databases, data are also cross-referenced to applicable terms from other ontologies, providing additional avenues for data mining and analysis. The ontology is available at http://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/50138.


PLOS Computational Biology | 2009

The Rat Genome Database Curators: Who, What, Where, Why

Mary Shimoyama; G. Thomas Hayman; Stanley J. F. Laulederkind; Rajni Nigam; T. F. Lowry; Victoria Petri; Jennifer R. Smith; Shur-Jen Wang; Diane H. Munzenmaier; Melinda R. Dwinell; Simon N. Twigger; Howard J. Jacob

abstracts. As can be seen by the amount oftime spent in curation, the time savings forresearchers are substantial. Education and Outreach An essential part of the curator’s job is toprovide education and training for RGDusers and potential users. This is accom-plished in several ways. The RGD Web sitecontains a ‘‘Help’’ section developed by thecurators and which is accessible from allpages. This component contains a Glossaryof Terms, general information on how touse the searches and tools, a FrequentlyAsked Questions (FAQ) section, and acomponent that walks users through typicaluse case scenarios. Curators also handleindividual questions through the userrequest system accessible via the ContactUs button on each page, and throughtelephone calls and the Rat CommunityForum. RGD has published seven tutorialvideos at SciVee (http://www.scivee.tv/), aWeb site for video publications for re-search, and videos are available at RGD aswell. Curators present tutorials at majorconferences such as Experimental Biology,Society of Toxicology, Neuroscience andRat Genomics and Models, as well asindividual rat research laboratories. Inaddition, RGD is well represented at majorconferences such as Biology of Genomes,Genome Informatics, Intelligent Systemsfor Molecular Biology, and the Interna-tional Mammalian Genome Conferencewith presentations and posters highlightingnew tools and datasets. Other outreachactivities involve contact with individualresearchers for nomenclature assignment togenes, QTLs, and strains, as well asconstruction of customized datasets.


Physiological Genomics | 2013

Rat Genome Database: a unique resource for rat, human, and mouse quantitative trait locus data

Rajni Nigam; Stanley J. F. Laulederkind; G. Thomas Hayman; Jennifer R. Smith; Shur-Jen Wang; T. F. Lowry; Victoria Petri; Jeff De Pons; Marek Tutaj; Weisong Liu; Pushkala Jayaraman; Diane H. Munzenmaier; Elizabeth A. Worthey; Melinda R. Dwinell; Mary Shimoyama; Howard J. Jacob

The rat has been widely used as a disease model in a laboratory setting, resulting in an abundance of genetic and phenotype data from a wide variety of studies. These data can be found at the Rat Genome Database (RGD, http://rgd.mcw.edu/), which provides a platform for researchers interested in linking genomic variations to phenotypes. Quantitative trait loci (QTLs) form one of the earliest and core datasets, allowing researchers to identify loci harboring genes associated with disease. These QTLs are not only important for those using the rat to identify genes and regions associated with disease, but also for cross-organism analyses of syntenic regions on the mouse and the human genomes to identify potential regions for study in these organisms. Currently, RGD has data on >1,900 rat QTLs that include details about the methods and animals used to determine the respective QTL along with the genomic positions and markers that define the region. RGD also curates human QTLs (>1,900) and houses>4,000 mouse QTLs (imported from Mouse Genome Informatics). Multiple ontologies are used to standardize traits, phenotypes, diseases, and experimental methods to facilitate queries, analyses, and cross-organism comparisons. QTLs are visualized in tools such as GBrowse and GViewer, with additional tools for analysis of gene sets within QTL regions. The QTL data at RGD provide valuable information for the study of mapped phenotypes and identification of candidate genes for disease associations.


Database | 2012

Ontology searching and browsing at the Rat Genome Database

Stanley J. F. Laulederkind; Marek Tutaj; Mary Shimoyama; G. Thomas Hayman; T. F. Lowry; Rajni Nigam; Victoria Petri; Jennifer R. Smith; Shur-Jen Wang; Jeff De Pons; Melinda R. Dwinell; Howard J. Jacob

The Rat Genome Database (RGD) is the premier repository of rat genomic and genetic data and currently houses over 40 000 rat gene records, as well as human and mouse orthologs, 1857 rat and 1912 human quantitative trait loci (QTLs) and 2347 rat strains. Biological information curated for these data objects includes disease associations, phenotypes, pathways, molecular functions, biological processes and cellular components. RGD uses more than a dozen different ontologies to standardize annotation information for genes, QTLs and strains. That means a lot of time can be spent searching and browsing ontologies for the appropriate terms needed both for curating and mining the data. RGD has upgraded its ontology term search to make it more versatile and more robust. A term search result is connected to a term browser so the user can fine-tune the search by viewing parent and children terms. Most publicly available term browsers display a hierarchical organization of terms in an expandable tree format. RGD has replaced its old tree browser format with a ‘driller’ type of browser that allows quicker drilling up and down through the term branches, which has been confirmed by testing. The RGD ontology report pages have also been upgraded. Expanded functionality allows more choice in how annotations are displayed and what subsets of annotations are displayed. The new ontology search, browser and report features have been designed to enhance both manual data curation and manual data extraction. Database URL: http://rgd.mcw.edu/rgdweb/ontology/search.html

Collaboration


Dive into the Rajni Nigam's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mary Shimoyama

Medical College of Wisconsin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Melinda R. Dwinell

Medical College of Wisconsin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Victoria Petri

Medical College of Wisconsin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jennifer R. Smith

Medical College of Wisconsin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Shur-Jen Wang

Medical College of Wisconsin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

G. Thomas Hayman

Medical College of Wisconsin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Howard J. Jacob

Medical College of Wisconsin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jeff De Pons

Medical College of Wisconsin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marek Tutaj

Medical College of Wisconsin

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge