Ralf Bieger

Primary stability and strain distribution of cementless hip stems as a function of implant design

BACKGROUND Short stem prostheses have been developed to preserve the femoral bone stock. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the stress-shielding effect in the proximal femur as well as the micromotion between bone and implant as a measure of primary stability for a new short stem in comparison to a clinically successful short stem and a straight stem. METHODS Using paired fresh human femurs, stress shielding was examined by using tri-axial strain gage rosettes. The strain distribution of the proximal femur was measured before and after implantation of three cementless prostheses of different design concepts and stem lengths. Furthermore, interface motion and rotational stability were investigated under dynamic loading (100-1600 N) after 100,000 load cycles using inductive miniature displacement transducers. FINDINGS A reduction of longitudinal cortical strains in the proximal femur was displayed for all three implants. The reduction was less pronounced for the shorter stem implants, however. Interface motion was below the critical threshold of 150 μm at almost all measuring points for all three stems, with a tendency for greater rotational stability in the shorter stem implants. INTERPRETATION The new short stem prosthesis displayed reduced stress shielding and comparable primary stability to an established short stem and a conventional shaft design. Shortening the stem did not negatively influence primary stability. The clinical implications of these findings remain to be proven.

Biomechanics of a short stem: In vitro primary stability and stress shielding of a conservative cementless hip stem.

Short stem prostheses provide conservative surgery and favorable metaphyseal load transmission. However, clinical long‐term results are lacking. Therefore, in vitro trials can be used to predict bone‐implant performance. In this in vitro study, primary stability and stress shielding of a new cementless short stem implant was evaluated in comparison to a straight stem using nine pairs of human cadaver femurs. Primary stability, including reversible micromotion and irreversible migration, was assessed in a hip simulator. Furthermore, changes in the pattern of cortical strain were evaluated. The short stem was more resistant to reversible micromotion and irreversible migration into retroversion. Axial stability was similar, with mean reversible micromotions of 9 µm for the short stem and 7 µm for the straight stem. Proximal load transmission was more physiological with the short stem, though both implants could not avoid stress shielding in Gruen zones 1 and 7. Primary stability of the short stem prosthesis was not negatively influenced compared to the straight shaft. Furthermore, proximal femoral strain pattern was more physiological after insertion of the short stem prosthesis. (c) 2013 Orthopaedic Research Society Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 31:1180–1186, 2013

Reliability of radiographic signs for acetabular retroversion

Acetabular retroversion may contribute to femoroacetabular impingement and lead to osteoarthritis of the hip. Retroversion has been measured on computed tomography scans. In recent years, assessment of acetabular version on anteroposterior pelvic views has gained increasing attention. We therefore aimed to determine the reliability of radiographic signs of acetabular retroversion and its association with the rater’s experience. Five orthopedic surgeons (o1 to o5) rated the crossover sign, ischial spine sign and posterior wall sign on X-rays of 40 hip joints. Also, we determined the rater’s experience in recognizing acetabular retroversion with a questionnaire and correlated intraobserver reliability to the calculated experience score. The intraobserver results were 0.325 (o1), 0.848 (o2), 0.684 (o3), 0.701 (o4), and 1.000 (o5) for the crossover sign, 0.750 (o1), 0.890 (o2), 0.593 (o3), 0.483 (o4), and 0.946 (o5) for the posterior wall sign; and 0.578 (o1), 0.680 (o2), 0.595 (o3), 0.375 (o4), and 0.800 (o5) for the ischial spine sign. Interobserver reliability was 0.514 for the crossover, 0.633 for the posterior, and 0.543 for the ischial spine sign wall. The experience sum score correlated to the kappa results for the crossover (r=0.527), posterior wall (r=0.738), and ischial spine sign (r=0.949). Assessing acetabular version on plain radiographs is subject to intra- and interindividual error and related to the observer’s individual experience.

Radiographic Risk Factors for Labral Lesions in Femoroacetabular Impingement

BackgroundTears of the acetabular labrum can lead to pain, disability, and osteoarthritis. Several pathomechanisms have been proposed, including femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Labral tears have been reported to occur in the presence of even subtle deformities of the acetabulum and femoral head-neck junction.Questions/purposesWe analyzed the association of the extent of bony deformity and presence and extent of labral lesions in hips with FAI.Patients and MethodsRadiographs of 123 hips in 116 patients receiving surgical treatment for FAI were analyzed and correlated to the presence and extent of labral lesions. Radiographic parameters of the acetabulum included acetabular index of the weightbearing zone, center-edge angle, inclination of the acetabulum, lateral head extrusion index, and retroversion. On the femoral side, neck-shaft angle, asphericity of the femoral head, superior and anterior alpha angle, offset, and offset ratio were measured. Osteoarthritis was graded according to Tönnis and Kellgren and Lawrence. Labral lesions were graded according to the modified Beck classification. A correlation between labral lesions and age, gender, affected side, type of impingement, and presence and extent of chondromalacia also was tested.ResultsNo correlation was found between presence or extent of labral lesions and any radiographic parameter tested, except osteoarthritis classification. The severity of labral lesions correlated to the severity of acetabular chondromalacia as well as patient age (Beck Grade 0 versus Grade 1, Beck Grade 0 versus Grades 1 and 2).ConclusionsIn the presence of impingement-inducing deformity, the extent of deformation is not associated with the incidence of labral lesions. Labral lesions are associated with early degenerative hip disease in FAI.Level of EvidenceLevel I, diagnostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Erratum to: One-stage bilateral versus unilateral short-stem total hip arthroplasty: comparison of migration patterns using “Ein-Bild-Roentgen-Analysis Femoral-Component-Analysis”

Purpose The hypothesis of this study was that femoral implant migration would not differ between simultaneous bilateral or unilateral short-stem THA.

Periprosthetic Bone Mineral Density Changes After Implantation of a Curved Bone Preserving Hip Stem Compared to a Standard Length Straight Stem: 5-Yr Results of a Prospective, Randomized DEXA-Analysis

INTRODUCTION The objective of this prospective, randomized study was to evaluate differences in periprosthetic bone mineral density changes in the proximal femur after implantation of a cementless bone preserving stem (Fitmore) compared to a cementless straight stem (CLS Spotorno). METHODOLOGY Periprosthetic bone mineral density was measured in 140 patients (aged 33-74 yr) before surgery, 7 d, 3, 12, and 60 mo postoperatively, using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. The 1-yr results have already been published. The results of the first postoperative measurement served as the baseline value. Because of the different length of the 2 implants we used adapted Gruen zones to divide the periprosthetic bone in seven regions of interest with comparable length. Clinical results were recorded using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index and the Harris hip score. RESULTS Clinical findings showed comparable results in both groups at all follow-ups (p > 0.05). A total of 5 yr after surgery, the comparison of periprosthetic bone mineral density changes showed significant differences in regions of interests 3 (CLS -3.9% vs Fitmore -0.2%, p < 0.001) and 5 (CLS -3.6% vs Fitmore -1.3%, p = 0.0028) between both implants. CONCLUSION Despite the fact that no exclusive proximal load distribution could be observed, proximal periprosthetic bone loss in the proximal femur was less pronounced after implantation of the bone preserving stem than with the straight stem.

Mid-term migration analysis of a femoral short-stem prosthesis: a five-year EBRA-FCA-study

Introduction: The objective of this study was to evaluate the mid-term migration pattern of a femoral short stem. Methods: Implant migration of 73 femoral short-stems was assessed by Ein-Bild-Roentgen-Analysis Femoral-Component-Analysis (EBRA-FCA) 5 years after surgery. Migration pattern of the whole group was analysed and compared to the migration pattern of implants “at risk” with a subsidence of more than 1.5 mm 2 years postoperative. Results: Mean axial subsidence was 1.1 mm (–5.0 mm to 1.5 mm) after 60 months. There was a statistical significant axial migration until 2 years postoperative with settling thereafter. 2 years after surgery 18 of 73 Implants were classified “at risk.” Nevertheless, all stems showed secondary stabilisation in the following period with no implant failure neither in the group of implants with early stabilisation nor the group with extensive early onset migration. Conclusion: In summary, even in the group of stems with more pronounced early subsidence, delayed settling occurred in all cases. The determination of a threshold of critical early femoral short stem subsidence is necessary because of the differing migration pattern described in this study with delayed settling of the Fitmore stem 2 years postoperatively compared to early settling within the first postoperative year described for conventional stems.

Biomechanics of a cemented short stem: Standard vs. line-to-line cementation techniques. A biomechanical in-vitro study involving six osteoporotic pairs of human cadaver femurs

Background: Short‐stem total hip arthroplasty (THA) potentially offers advantages compared to conventional THA, including sparing bone and soft tissue and being a facilitated and less traumatic implantation. However, the indication is limited to patients with sufficient bone quality. Cemented short‐stem THA might provide an alternative to conventional cemented THA. To date, no cemented short stem is available on the market. Methods: In the present in vitro study, primary stability of a new cemented short stem was evaluated, comparing standard (undersized stem) versus line‐to‐line (same‐sized stem) cementing techniques, using six pairs of human cadaver femurs. Primary stability, including reversible micromotion and irreversible migration, was assessed in a dynamic material‐testing machine. Fracture load was tested and fracture pattern analyzed. Findings: Both cementation techniques (standard vs. line‐to‐line) displayed comparable results with respect to primary stability without any statistical differences (micromotion: 17.5 &mgr;m vs. 9.6 &mgr;m (p = 0.063); migration: 9.5 &mgr;m vs. 38.2 &mgr;m (p = 0.188)). Regarding fracture load, again, no difference was observed (3670 N vs. 3687 N (p = 0.063)). In all cases, proximal fractures of Vancouver type B3 occurred. Interpretation: The present in vitro study demonstrates that the line‐to‐line cementation technique, which is favourable regarding the philosophy of short stem THA, can be further pursued in the course of the development of a cemented short stem. Further investigations should address how well the cemented short stem compares to well‐established cemented straight‐stem designs.

Outcome of Irrigation and Debridement after Failed Two-Stage Reimplantation for Periprosthetic Joint Infection

Introduction Two-stage revision is the gold standard for the treatment of deep implant infection after knee or hip arthroplasty. Irrigation and debridement may be a treatment option for failed 2-stage revisions in cases where a reinfection occurs within 30 days or the symptoms exist not longer than 3 weeks and is appealing because of its low morbidity. We determined the incidence of recurrent infections following irrigation and debridement for failed two-stage revision hip and knee arthroplasty. Methods We performed a single center retrospective review of periprosthetic hip and knee infections treated with a two-stage procedure from 2002 to 2010. All patients that subsequently underwent irrigation and debridement for a subsequent infection were selected for the current study. Results 440 two-stage revisions were performed between 2002 and 2010. Fifty-one two-stage revisions failed (11.6%). Nineteen failed two-stage revisions were treated with irrigation and debridement; 12 (63.2%) patients remained free of infection at follow-up (mean follow-up: 39 months; range, 24-90 months), infection persisted in 6 patients (31.6%), and 1 patient died (5.3%). Conclusions Success rates of irrigation and debridement for failed two-stage procedures are similar to the success rates of irrigation and debridement in primary implant infections. According to the current paper, irrigation and debridement are an acceptable treatment for acute reinfections after failed two-stage revision if performed within the first 30 postoperative days after failed two-stage procedure or if symptoms are present for less than 3 weeks in the presence of a susceptible organism.