Randall H. Wilson

A general framework for assembly planning: The motion space approach

Abstract. Assembly planning is the problem of finding a sequence of motions to assemble a product from its parts. We present a general framework for finding assembly motions based on the concept of motion space . Assembly motions are parameterized such that each point in motion space represents a mating motion that is independent of the moving part set. For each motion we derive blocking relations that explicitly state which parts collide with other parts; each subassembly (rigid subset of parts) that does not collide with the rest of the assembly can easily be derived from the blocking relations. Motion space is partitioned into an arrangement of cells such that the blocking relations are fixed within each cell. We apply the approach to assembly motions of several useful types, including one-step translations, multistep translations, and infinitesimal rigid motions. Several efficiency improvements are described, as well as methods to include additional assembly constraints into the framework. The resulting algorithms have been implemented and tested extensively on complex assemblies. We conclude by describing some remaining open problems.

A general framework for assembly planning: the motion space approach

Assembly planning is the problem of finding a sequence of motions to assemble a product from its parts. We present a general framework for finding assembly motions based on the concept of motion space . Assembly motions are parameterized such that each point in motion space represents a mating motion that is independent of the moving part set. For each motion we derive blocking relations that explicitly state which parts collide with other parts; each subassembly (rigid subset of parts) that does not collide with the rest of the assembly can easily be derived from the blocking relations. Motion space is partitioned into an arrangement of cells such that the blocking relations are fixed within each cell. We apply the approach to assembly motions of several useful types, including one-step translations, multistep translations, and infinitesimal rigid motions. Several efficiency improvements are described, as well as methods to include additional assembly constraints into the framework. The resulting algorithms have been implemented and tested extensively on complex assemblies. We conclude by describing some remaining open problems.

Considerations for tolerancing aspheric optical components

Optical designs often specify both surface form and centering (tilt and lateral displacement) tolerances on aspheric surfaces. Such tolerances are often ambiguous and current standards do not resolve this ambiguity. We describe several difficult issues that arise in attempting to interpret aspheric centering tolerances and their consequences for optical design and metrology. We conclude by calling on the optics community to standardize an interpretation method for aspheric tolerances.