Randy Davila
Rice University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Randy Davila.
Discrete Applied Mathematics | 2015
David Amos; Yair Caro; Randy Davila; Ryan Pepper
Given a simple undirected graph G and a positive integer k , the k -forcing number of G , denoted F k ( G ) , is the minimum number of vertices that need to be initially colored so that all vertices eventually become colored during the discrete dynamical process described by the following rule. Starting from an initial set of colored vertices and stopping when all vertices are colored: if a colored vertex has at most k non-colored neighbors, then each of its non-colored neighbors becomes colored. When k = 1 , this is equivalent to the zero forcing number, usually denoted with Z ( G ) , a recently introduced invariant that gives an upper bound on the maximum nullity of a graph. In this paper, we give several upper bounds on the k -forcing number. Notable among these, we show that if G is a graph with order n ? 2 and maximum degree Δ ? k , then F k ( G ) ? ( Δ - k + 1 ) n Δ - k + 1 + min { ? , k } . This simplifies to, for the zero forcing number case of k = 1 , Z ( G ) = F 1 ( G ) ? Δ n Δ + 1 . Moreover, when Δ ? 2 and the graph is k -connected, we prove that F k ( G ) ? ( Δ - 2 ) n + 2 Δ + k - 2 , which is an improvement when k ? 2 , and specializes to, for the zero forcing number case, Z ( G ) = F 1 ( G ) ? ( Δ - 2 ) n + 2 Δ - 1 . These results resolve a problem posed by Meyer about regular bipartite circulant graphs. Finally, we present a relationship between the k -forcing number and the connected k -domination number. As a corollary, we find that the sum of the zero forcing number and connected domination number is at most the order for connected graphs.
Graphs and Combinatorics | 2018
Randy Davila; Michael A. Henning; Colton Magnant; Ryan Pepper
In this paper, we study (zero) forcing sets which induce connected subgraphs of a graph. The minimum cardinality of such a set is called the connected forcing number of the graph. We provide sharp upper and lower bounds on the connected forcing number in terms of the minimum degree, maximum degree, girth, and order of the graph.
Discrete Applied Mathematics | 2018
Randy Davila; Michael A. Henning
Let
Discrete Mathematics | 2014
David Amos; Randy Davila; Ryan Pepper
G
Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory | 2018
Randy Davila; Michael A. Henning
be a simple and finite graph without isolated vertices. In this paper we study forcing sets (zero forcing sets) which induce a subgraph of
Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory | 2018
David Amos; John Asplund; Boris Brimkov; Randy Davila
G
arXiv: Discrete Mathematics | 2016
Boris Brimkov; Randy Davila
without isolated vertices. Such a set is called a total forcing set, introduced and first studied by Davila \cite{Davila}. The minimum cardinality of a total forcing set in
arXiv: Discrete Mathematics | 2016
David Amos; John Asplund; Boris Brimkov; Randy Davila
G
Archive | 2016
Randy Davila; Thomas Kalinowski; Sudeep Stephen
is the total forcing number of
arXiv: Combinatorics | 2017
Randy Davila; Michael A. Henning
G