Ravilla D. Thulasiraj
Aravind Eye Hospital
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Ravilla D. Thulasiraj.
The New England Journal of Medicine | 1990
Laxmi Rahmathullah; Barbara A. Underwood; Ravilla D. Thulasiraj; Roy C. Milton; Kala Ramaswamy; Raheem Rahmathullah; Ganeesh Babu
Abstract Background. Clinical vitamin A deficiency affects millions of children worldwide, and subclinical deficiency is even more common. Supplemental vitamin A has been reported to reduce mortality among these children, but the results have been questioned. Methods. We conducted a randomized, controlled, masked clinical trial for one year in southern India involving 15,419 preschool-age children who received either 8.7 μmol (8333 IU) of vitamin A and 46 μmol (20 mg) of vitamin E (the treated group) or vitamin E alone (the control group). Vitamin supplements were delivered weekly by community health volunteers who also recorded mortality and morbidity. Weekly contact was made with at least 88 percent of the children in both study groups. The base-line characteristics of the children were similar and documented a high prevalence of vitamin A deficiency and undernutrition. Results. One hundred twenty-five deaths occurred, of which 117 were not accidental. The risk of death in the group treated with vitamin...
Ophthalmology | 2003
R Ramakrishnan; Praveen K Nirmalan; R. Krishnadas; Ravilla D. Thulasiraj; James M. Tielsch; Joanne Katz; David S. Friedman; Alan L. Robin
PURPOSE To determine the prevalence of glaucoma and risk factors for primary open-angle glaucoma in a rural population of southern India. DESIGN A population-based cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS A total of 5150 subjects aged 40 years and older from 50 clusters representative of three southern districts of Tamil Nadu in southern India. METHODS All participants had a comprehensive eye examination at the base hospital, including visual acuity using logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution illiterate E charts and refraction, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, gonioscopy, applanation tonometry, dilated fundus examinations, and automated central 24-2 full-threshold perimetry. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Definite primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) was defined as angles open on gonioscopy and glaucomatous optic disc changes with matching visual field defects, whereas ocular hypertension was defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) greater than 21 mmHg without glaucomatous optic disc damage and visual field defects in the presence of an open angle. Manifest primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) was defined as glaucomatous optic disc damage or glaucomatous visual field defects with the anterior chamber angle partly or totally closed, appositional angle closure or synechiae in the angle, and absence of signs of secondary angle closure. Secondary glaucoma was defined as glaucomatous optic nerve damage and/or visual field abnormalities suggestive of glaucoma with ocular disorders that contribute to a secondary elevation in IOP. RESULTS The prevalence (95% confidence interval) of any glaucoma was 2.6% (2.2, 3.0), of POAG it was 1.7% (1.3, 2.1), and if PACG it was 0.5% (0.3, 0.7), and secondary glaucoma excluding pseudoexfoliation was 0.3% (0.2,0.5). On multivariate analysis, increasing age, male gender, myopia greater than 1 diopter, and pseudoexfoliation were significantly associated with POAG. After best correction, 18 persons (20.9%) with POAG were blind in either eye because of glaucoma, including 6 who were bilaterally blind and an additional 12 persons with unilateral blindness because of glaucomatous optic neuropathy in that eye. Of those identified with POAG, 93.0% had not been previously diagnosed with POAG. CONCLUSIONS The prevalence of glaucoma in this population is not lower than that reported for white populations elsewhere. A large proportion of those with POAG had not been previously diagnosed. One fifth of those with POAG had blindness in one or both eyes from glaucoma. Early detection of glaucoma in this population will reduce the burden of blindness in India.
BMJ | 2003
Lakshmi Rahmathullah; James M. Tielsch; Ravilla D. Thulasiraj; Joanne Katz; Christian L. Coles; Sheela Devi; Rajeesh John; Karthik Prakash; A V Sadanand; N Edwin; C Kamaraj
Abstract Objective To assess the impact of supplementing newborn infants with vitamin A on mortality at age 6 months. Design Community based, randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial. Setting Two rural districts of Tamil Nadu, southern India. Participants 11 619 newborn infants allocated 24 000 IU oral vitamin A or placebo on days 1 and 2 after delivery. Main outcome measure Primary outcome measure was mortality at age 6 months. Results Infants in the vitamin A group had a 22% reduction in total mortality (95%confidence interval 4% to 37%) compared with those in the placebo group. Vitamin A had an impact on mortality between two weeks and three months after treatment, with no additional impact after three months. Conclusion Supplementing newborn infants with vitamin A can significantly reduce early infant mortality.
British Journal of Ophthalmology | 2002
P K Nirmalan; Ravilla D. Thulasiraj; V Maneksha; R Rahmathullah; R Ramakrishnan; A Padmavathi; S R Munoz; Leon B. Ellwein
Aims: To assess the prevalence of vision impairment, blindness, and cataract surgery and to evaluate visual acuity outcomes after cataract surgery in a south Indian population. Methods: Cluster sampling was used to randomly select a cross sectional sample of people ≥50 years of age living in the Tirunelveli district of south India. Eligible subjects in 28 clusters were enumerated through a door to door household survey. Visual acuity measurements and ocular examinations were performed at a selected site within each of the clusters in early 2000. The principal cause of visual impairment was identified for eyes with presenting visual acuity <6/18. Independent replicate testing for quality assurance monitoring was performed in subjects with reduced vision and in a sample of those with normal vision for six of the study clusters. Results: A total of 5795 people in 3986 households were enumerated and 5411 (93.37%) were examined. The prevalence of presenting and best corrected visual acuity ≥6/18 in both eyes was 59.4% and 75.7%, respectively. Presenting vision <6/60 in both eyes (the definition of blindness in India) was found in 11.0%, and in 4.6% with best correction. Presenting blindness was associated with older age, female sex, and illiteracy. Cataract was the principal cause of blindness in at least one eye in 70.6% of blind people. The prevalence of cataract surgery was 11.8%—with an estimated 56.5% of the cataract blind already operated on. Surgical coverage was inversely associated with illiteracy and with female sex in rural areas. Within the cataract operated sample, 31.7% had presenting visual acuity ≥6/18 in both eyes and 11.8% were <6/60; 40% were bilaterally operated on, with 63% pseudophakic. Presenting vision was <6/60 in 40.7% of aphakic eyes and in 5.1% of pseudophakic eyes; with best correction the percentages were 17.6% and 3.7%, respectively. Refractive error, including uncorrected aphakia, was the main cause of visual impairment in cataract operated eyes. Vision <6/18 was associated with cataract surgery in government, as opposed to that in non-governmental/private facilities. Age, sex, literacy, and area of residence were not predictors of visual outcomes. Conclusion: Treatable blindness, particularly that associated with cataract and refractive error, remains a significant problem among older adults in south Indian populations, especially in females, the illiterate, and those living in rural areas. Further study is needed to better understand why a significant proportion of the cataract blind are not taking advantage of free of charge eye care services offered by the Aravind Eye Hospital and others in the district. While continuing to increase cataract surgical volume to reduce blindness, emphasis must also be placed on improving postoperative visual acuity outcomes.
Ophthalmology | 2003
Ravilla D. Thulasiraj; Praveen K Nirmalan; R Ramakrishnan; R. Krishnadas; T.K Manimekalai; N.P Baburajan; Joanne Katz; James M. Tielsch; Alan L. Robin
OBJECTIVE To determine the prevalence of blindness and vision impairment in a rural population of southern India. DESIGN A population-based cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS A total of 17200 subjects aged 6 years or older, including 5150 subjects aged 40 years or older from 50 clusters representative of three southern districts of Tamil Nadu in southern India. METHODS All participants had preliminary screenings consisting of vision using a LogMAR illiterate E chart and anterior segment hand light examinations at the village level. Subjects aged 40 years or older were offered comprehensive eye examinations at the base hospital, including visual acuity using LogMAR illiterate E charts and refraction, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, gonioscopy, applanation tonometry, dilated fundus examinations, and automated Humphrey central 24-2 full threshold perimetry; subjects younger than 40 years of age who had any signs or symptoms of ocular disease were also offered comparable examinations at the base hospital. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Visual impairment was defined as best-corrected visual acuity <6/18, and blindness was defined using both Indian (<6/60) and World Health Organization (<3/60) definitions. RESULTS Comprehensive examinations at the base hospital were performed on 5150 (96.5%) of 5337 persons 40 years of age or older. Among those 40 years of age and older, presenting visual acuity at the <3/60 level was present in 4.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.8, 4.9) and 11.4% (95% CI: 10.6, 12.3) at the <6/60 level. After best correction, the corresponding figures were 1.0% (95% CI: 0.79, 1.2) and 2.1% (95% CI: 1.7, 2.5). Over 70% of subjects improved their vision by at least one line, and nearly a third by three lines after refraction. Age-related cataract was the most common potentially reversible blinding disorder (72.0%) among eyes presenting with blindness. CONCLUSIONS Blindness and vision impairment remain major public health problems in India that need to be addressed. Cataracts and refractive errors remain the major reversible causes for the burden of vision impairment in this rural population.
British Journal of Ophthalmology | 2002
Venkatapathy Narendran; R K John; A Raghuram; R D Ravindran; P K Nirmalan; Ravilla D. Thulasiraj
Aims: To estimate the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy among self reported diabetics in a population of southern India. Methods: A cross sectional sample of subjects aged 50 years and older was selected using a cluster sampling technique from Palakkad district of Kerala state. Eligible subjects were identified through a door to door survey. Ocular examinations including visual acuity and anterior and posterior segment examinations were performed at preselected sites within clusters. History of diabetes was elicited, and height, weight, and blood pressure were measured for all subjects. Results: Among the 5212 examined people (92% response rate), 68 (26.2%) of 260 people with self reported history of diabetes had diabetic retinopathy. The age-sex adjusted prevalence of diabetes among people aged 50 years and older was 5.1% (95% CI 3.9, 6.3, deff 4.33) and of diabetic retinopathy among the diabetics was 26.8% (95% CI: 19.2, 34.4, deff 1.99). Non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (94.1%) was the most common form of retinopathy seen. Two eyes were blind (presenting vision <6/60) as a result of retinopathy. Conclusion: Preventive strategies have to be evolved to ensure that blindness due to diabetic retinopathy does not become a public health problem in India. Further studies are required to understand the risk factors for retinopathy and vision loss in this population.
International Journal of Epidemiology | 2009
James M. Tielsch; Joanne Katz; Ravilla D. Thulasiraj; Christian L. Coles; Sethu Sheeladevi; Elizabeth L. Yanik; Lakshmi Rahmathullah
BACKGROUND Exposure to indoor air pollution due to open burning of biomass fuel is common in low- and middle-income countries. Previous studies linked this exposure to an increased risk of respiratory illness, low birth weight (LBW) and other disorders. We assessed the association between exposure to biomass fuel sources and second-hand tobacco smoke (SHTS) in the home and adverse health outcomes in early infancy in a population in rural south India. METHODS A population-based cohort of newborns was followed from birth through 6 months. Household characteristics were assessed during an enrolment interview including the primary type of cooking fuel and smoking behaviour of household residents. Follow-up visits for morbidity were carried out every 2 weeks after delivery. Infants were discharged at 6 months when anthropometric measurements were collected. RESULTS 11 728 live-born infants were enrolled and followed, of whom 92.3% resided in households that used wood and/or dung as a primary source of fuel. Exposure to biomass fuel was associated with an adjusted 49% increased risk of LBW, a 34% increased incidence of respiratory illness and a 21% increased risk of 6-month infant mortality. Exposed infants also had 45 and 30% increased risks of underweight and stunting at 6 months. SHTS exposure was also associated with these adverse health outcomes except for attained growth. CONCLUSIONS Open burning of biomass fuel in the home is associated with significant health risks to the newborn child and young infant. Community-based trials are needed to clarify causal connections and identify effective approaches to reduce this burden of illnesses.
American Journal of Ophthalmology | 1998
Astrid E. Fletcher; V. Vijaykumar; S. Selvaraj; Ravilla D. Thulasiraj; Leon B. Ellwein
PURPOSE To compare the effects of extracapsular cataract extraction with posterior chamber intraocular lens (ECCE/PC-IOL) vs intracapsular cataract extraction with aphakic glasses (ICCE-AG) on everyday visual functioning and quality of life. METHODS In a nonmasked randomized controlled clinical trial, 3,400 bilateral vision-impaired patients, aged 40 to 75 years, with operable cataract were randomly assigned to receive one of the two treatment options. One half in each group were randomly selected for interviewer administration of visual functioning and quality of life questionnaires before surgery and at 6 and 12 months after surgery. RESULTS Both ICCE-AG and ECCE/PC-IOL produced dramatic improvements in visual functioning and quality of life scores. Patients receiving ECCE/PC-IOL reported larger beneficial changes than did those receiving ICCE-AG, compatible with additional beneficial effects of a moderate magnitude for visual functioning and of a smaller beneficial magnitude for quality of life. All between-group differences were highly statistically significant (P < .00001). The additional benefits of ECCE/PC-IOL are not explained by visual acuity differences. A higher proportion of patients in the ICCE-AG group reported problems on a vision problem checklist at 6 months (more than 50%) than did patients in the ECCE/PC-IOL group (approximately 30%). CONCLUSIONS In this developing-country setting, ICCE-AG and ECCE/PC-IOL were associated with substantial benefits in improved everyday vision function and vision-related quality of life. Patients who received ECCE/PC-IOL reported greater benefits and fewer problems with vision than did patients who received ICCE-AG.
British Journal of Ophthalmology | 2004
Praveen K. Nirmalan; J. Katz; Alan L. Robin; R. Krishnadas; R Ramakrishnan; Ravilla D. Thulasiraj; James M. Tielsch
Aim: To determine utilisation of eye care services in a rural population of southern India aged 40 years or older. Methods: 5150 subjects aged 40 years and older selected through a random cluster sampling technique from three districts in southern India underwent detailed ocular examinations for vision impairment, blindness, and ocular morbidity. Information regarding previous use of eye care services was collected from this population through a questionnaire administered by trained social workers before ocular examinations. Results: 3476 (72.7%) of 5150 subjects examined required eye care examinations. 1827 (35.5%) people gave a history of previous eye examinations, primarily from a general hospital (n = 1073, 58.7%). Increasing age and education were associated with increased utilisation of eye care services. Among the 3323 people who had never sought eye care, 912 (27.4%) had felt the need to have an eye examination but did not do so. Only one third of individuals with vision impairment, cataracts, refractive errors, and glaucoma had previously utilised services. Conclusions: A large proportion of people in a rural population of southern India who require eye care are currently not utilising existing eye care services. Improved strategies to improve uptake of services is required to reduce the huge burden of vision impairment in India.
British Journal of Ophthalmology | 2004
Praveen K. Nirmalan; Alan L. Robin; J. Katz; James M. Tielsch; Ravilla D. Thulasiraj; R. Krishnadas; R Ramakrishnan
Aim: To determine risk factors for lens opacities and age related cataract in an older rural population of southern India. Methods: A cross sectional population based study of 5150 people aged 40 years and above from 50 clusters from three districts in southern India. The lens was graded and classified after dilation using LOCS III system at the slit lamp for cataract. Definite cataract was defined as nuclear opalescence ⩾3.0 and/or cortical cataract ⩾3.0 and/or PSC ⩾2.0. Results: Definite cataracts were found in 2449 (47.5%) of 5150 subjects and the prevalence of cataract increased with age. The age adjusted prevalence of cataract was significantly lower in males (p = 0.0002). Demographic risk factors—increasing age and illiteracy—were common for the three subtypes of cataract; females were more likely to have cortical cataracts and nuclear cataracts. Additionally, nuclear cataracts were associated with moderate smoking (OR:1.28, 95% CI:1.01 to 1.64), lean body mass indices (OR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.17 to 1.59) and higher waist to hip ratios (OR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.54 to 0.82); cortical cataracts with hypertension (OR: 1.39 95% CI:1.11 to 1.72), pseudoexfoliation (OR:1.53,95% CI:1.17 to 2.01), and moderate to heavy smoking; and posterior subcapsular cataracts with diabetes (OR:1.55, 95% CI:1.12 to 2.15), lean body mass (OR:1.32, 95% CI:1.11 to 1.57), and high waist to hip ratios (OR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.62 to 0.94). Conclusions: Risk factors for age related cataract in this population do not appear to be different from those reported in other populations. Further studies are required to identify the reason for the high prevalence of age related cataract and to understand better the role of each risk factor for cataractogenesis in this population.