Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Raymond A. Strikas is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Raymond A. Strikas.


American Journal of Preventive Medicine | 2000

Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to improve vaccination coverage in children, adolescents, and adults

Peter A. Briss; Lance E. Rodewald; Alan R. Hinman; Abigail Shefer; Raymond A. Strikas; Roger R. Bernier; Vilma G Carande-Kulis; Hussain R. Yusuf; Serigne M. Ndiaye; Sheree M. Williams

Abstract Background: This paper presents the results of systematic reviews of the effectiveness, applicability, other effects, economic impact, and barriers to use of selected population-based interventions intended to improve vaccination coverage. The related systematic reviews are linked by a common conceptual approach. These reviews form the basis for recommendations by the Task Force on Community Preventive Services (the Task Force) regarding the use of these selected interventions. The Task Force recommendations are presented on pp. 92–96 of this issue.


American Journal of Preventive Medicine | 2000

Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to improve vaccination coverage in children, adolescents, and adults 1 2

Peter A. Briss; Lance E. Rodewald; Alan R. Hinman; Abigail Shefer; Raymond A. Strikas; Roger R. Bernier; Vilma G Carande-Kulis; Hussain R. Yusuf; Serigne M. Ndiaye; Sheree M. Williams

Abstract Background: This paper presents the results of systematic reviews of the effectiveness, applicability, other effects, economic impact, and barriers to use of selected population-based interventions intended to improve vaccination coverage. The related systematic reviews are linked by a common conceptual approach. These reviews form the basis for recommendations by the Task Force on Community Preventive Services (the Task Force) regarding the use of these selected interventions. The Task Force recommendations are presented on pp. 92–96 of this issue.


The Journal of Infectious Diseases | 2001

Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in Preventing Hospitalizations and Deaths in Persons 65 Years or Older in Minnesota, New York, and Oregon: Data from 3 Health Plans

James D. Nordin; John P. Mullooly; Sung Poblete; Raymond A. Strikas; Richard Petrucci; Feifei Wei; Bill Rush; Benjamin Safirstein; Deborah Wheeler; Kristin L. Nichol

This study developed methods and determined the impact of influenza vaccination on elderly persons in 3 large health plans: Kaiser Permanente Northwest, HealthPartners, and Oxford Health Plans. Data for the 1996-1997 and 1997-1998 seasons were extracted from administrative databases. Subjects were health plan members > or = 65 years old. Comorbid conditions collected from the preceding year were used for risk adjustment with logistic regression. The virus-vaccine match was excellent for year 1 and fair for year 2. Both years, during peak and total periods, vaccination reduced all causes of death and hospitalization for pneumonia and influenza: hospitalizations were reduced by 19%-20% and 18%-24% for years 1 and 2, respectively, and deaths were reduced by 60%-61% and 35%-39% for the same periods. These results show that all elderly persons should be immunized annually for influenza. The methods used in this study are an efficient cost-effective way to study vaccine impact and similar questions.


Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report | 2017

Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommended immunization schedule for adults aged 19 years or older - United States, 2014.

Carolyn B. Bridges; Tamera Coyne-Beasley; Elizabeth Briere; Amy Parker Fiebelkorn; Lisa A. Grohskopf; Craig M. Hales; Rafael Harpaz; Charles W. LeBaron; Jennifer L. Liang; Jessica R. MacNeil; Lauri E. Markowitz; Matthew R. Moore; Tamara Pilishvili; Sarah Schillie; Raymond A. Strikas; Walter W. Williams; Sandra Fryhofer; Kathleen Harriman; Molly Howell; Linda Kinsinger; Laura Pinkston Koenigs; Marie Michele Leger; Susan M. Lett; Terri Murphy; Robert Palinkas; Gregory A. Poland; Joni Reynolds; Laura E. Riley; William Schaffner; Kenneth E. Schmader

In October 2015, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)* approved the Recommended Immunization Schedule for Adults Aged 19 Years or Older, United States, 2016. This schedule provides a summary of ACIP recommendations for the use of vaccines routinely recommended for adults aged 19 years or older in two figures, footnotes for each vaccine, and a table that describes primary contraindications and precautions for commonly used vaccines for adults. Although the figures in the adult immunization schedule illustrate recommended vaccinations that begin at age 19 years, the footnotes contain information on vaccines that are recommended for adults that may begin at age younger than age 19 years. The footnotes also contain vaccine dosing, intervals between doses, and other important information and should be read with the figures.


Clinical Infectious Diseases | 2002

Influence of High-Risk Medical Conditions on the Effectiveness of Influenza Vaccination among Elderly Members of 3 Large Managed-Care Organizations

Eelko Hak; James D. Nordin; Feifei Wei; John P. Mullooly; Sung Poblete; Raymond A. Strikas; Kristin L. Nichol

This serial cohort study assessed the risk of hospitalization or death associated with influenza and the effectiveness of influenza vaccination among subgroups of elderly members of 3 managed-care organizations in the United States. Data on baseline characteristics and outcomes were obtained from computerized databases. A total of 122,974 (1996-1997 season) and 158,454 (1997-1998 season) persons were included in the cohorts. Among unvaccinated persons, hospitalizations for pneumonia/influenza or death occurred in 8.2 of 1000 healthy and 38.4 of 1000 high-risk persons in year 1, and in 8.2 of 1000 healthy and 29.3 of 1000 high-risk persons in year 2. After adjustments, vaccination was associated with a 48% reduction in the incidence of hospitalization or death (95% confidence interval [CI], 42-52) in year 1 and 31% (95% CI, 26-37) in year 2. Effectiveness estimates were statistically significant and generally consistent across the healthy and high-risk subgroups. The absolute risk reduction, however, was 2.4- to 4.7-fold higher among high-risk than among healthy elderly persons. All elderly individuals may substantially benefit from vaccination. However, the impact of influenza is greater in persons with high-risk medical conditions.


Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology | 2006

Influenza Vaccination of Healthcare Workers in the United States, 1989-2002

Frances J. Walker; James A. Singleton; Peng-Jun Lu; Karen Wooten; Raymond A. Strikas

OBJECTIVES We sought to estimate influenza vaccination coverage among healthcare workers (HCWs) in the United States during 1989-2002 and to identify factors associated with vaccination in this group. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommends annual influenza vaccination for HCWs to reduce transmission of influenza to patients at high risk for serious complications of influenza. DESIGN Analysis of cross-sectional data from 1989-2002 surveys conducted by the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). The outcome measure was self-reported influenza vaccination in the past 12 months. Bivariate and multivariate analysis of 2002 NHIS data. SETTING Household interviews conducted during 1989-2002, weighted to reflect the noninstitutionalized, civilian US population. PARTICIPANTS Adults aged 18 years or older participated in the study. A total of 2,089 were employed in healthcare occupations or settings in 2002, and 17,160 were employed in nonhealthcare occupations or settings. RESULTS The influenza vaccination rate among US HCWs increased from 10.0% in 1989 to 38.4% in 2002, with no significant change since 1997. In a multivariate model that included data from the 2002 NHIS, factors associated with a higher rate of influenza vaccination among HCWs aged 18-64 years included age of 50 years or older (odds ratio [OR], 1.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-2.1), hospital employee status (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2-1.9), 1 or more visits to the office of a healthcare professional in the past 12 months (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-2.2), receipt of employer-provided health insurance (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-2.1), a history of pneumococcal vaccination (OR, 3.9; 95% CI, 2.5-6.1), and history of hepatitis B vaccination (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.4-2.4). Non-Hispanic black persons were less likely to be vaccinated (OR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.5-0.9) than non-Hispanic white persons. There were no significant differences in vaccination levels according to HCW occupation category. CONCLUSIONS Influenza immunization among HCWs reached a plateau during 1997-2002. New strategies are needed to encourage US HCWs to receive influenza vaccination to prevent influenza illness in themselves and transmission of influenza to vulnerable patients.


Vaccine | 1997

Influenza vaccination in 22 developed countries: An update to 1995

David S. Fedson; Yoshio Hirota; Hak-Kyoon Shin; Pierre-Etienne Cambillard; James Kiely; F. Ambrosch; Claude Hannoun; Jane Leese; Marc Sprenger; Alan W. Hampson; Klaus Bro-Jørgensen; Ann-Marie Ahlbom; Hanne Nøkleby; Martti Valle; Olafur Olafsson; Francisco Salmerón; Jann Cloetta; Helena Rebelo de Andrade; René Snacken; Isabella Donatelli; Lance C. Jennings; Raymond A. Strikas

This study expands and updates through 1995 our earlier report on influenza vaccine use in 18 developed countries. Five of the six countries with high levels of vaccine use in 1992 (> or = 130 doses/1000 population) showed little change or slight declines over the subsequent 3 years. The exception was the United States, where a new federal program for vaccination reimbursement for the elderly helped to increase vaccine distribution from 144 to 239 doses/1000 population. The six countries with medium levels of vaccine use in 1992 (76-96 doses/1000 population) increased to > or = 100 doses/1000 population by 1995. Among the six low-use countries in 1992 (< or = 65 doses/1000 population), only Finland showed substantial improvement (96 doses/1000 population) in 1995. Four new countries were added to the study. In Germany, vaccine use increased to 80 doses/1000 population in 1995, but in Ireland it remained at a low level (48 doses/1000 population). In Korea, vaccine use increased from 17 to 95 doses/ 1000 population during the period 1987-1995. In Japan, very high levels of vaccine use (approximately 280 doses/1000 population) in the early 1980s were associated with vaccination programs for school children. However, vaccine use fell precipitously when these programs were discontinued, and only 2 and 8 doses/1000 population were used in 1994 and 1995, respectively. In all 22 countries, higher levels of vaccine use were associated with vaccination reimbursement programs under national or social health insurance and were not correlated with different levels of economic development. Excluding Japan, in 1995 there was still a greater than fourfold difference between the highest and lowest levels of vaccine use among the other 21 countries in the study. Given its well established clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, none of these countries has yet achieved the full benefits of its programs for influenza vaccination.


Clinical Infectious Diseases | 2005

Reactions after 3 or More Doses of Pneumococcal Polysaccharide Vaccine in Adults in Alaska

Frances J. Walker; Rosalyn J. Singleton; Lisa R. Bulkow; Raymond A. Strikas; Jay C. Butler

BACKGROUND Following vaccination with 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV), pneumococcal antibody levels decline to prevaccination levels within 6-10 years. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices does not recommend routine revaccination because data on the safety and effectiveness of additional doses are insufficient. METHODS To determine whether medically attended adverse events occur more frequently after the third dose of PPV than after the first or second dose, we performed a retrospective review of medical records from a computer database for health care facilities that serve more than one-half of the Alaska Native population. All persons who had received > or = 3 PPV doses (n = 179) were included in the review, as were a randomly selected comparison group of 181 persons who had received 1 or 2 doses. RESULTS Only 1 (0.55%) of 179 persons who had received > or = 3 PPV doses and 4 (2.76%) of 181 persons in the comparison group had a medically attended adverse event, and no severe adverse events were recorded. CONCLUSION We found no difference in the risk of medically attended adverse events following > or = 3 doses of PPV, compared with 1 or 2 doses.


Annals of Internal Medicine | 2011

Student vaccination requirements of U.S. health professional schools: a survey.

Megan C. Lindley; Suchita A. Lorick; Jovonni R. Spinner; Andrea R. Krull; Gina T. Mootrey; Faruque Ahmed; Rosa Myers; Geraldine P. Bednash; Tyler Cymet; Rika Maeshiro; C. Fay Raines; Stephen C. Shannon; Henry M. Sondheimer; Raymond A. Strikas

BACKGROUND Unvaccinated health care personnel are at increased risk for transmitting vaccine-preventable diseases to their patients. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommends that health care personnel, including students, receive measles, mumps, rubella, hepatitis B, varicella, influenza, and pertussis vaccines. Prematriculation vaccination requirements of health professional schools represent an early opportunity to ensure that health care personnel receive recommended vaccines. OBJECTIVE To examine prematriculation vaccination requirements and related policies at selected health professional schools in the United States and compare requirements with current ACIP recommendations. DESIGN Cross-sectional study using an Internet-based survey. SETTING Medical and baccalaureate nursing schools in the United States and its territories. PARTICIPANTS Deans of accredited medical schools granting MD (n = 130) and DO (n = 26) degrees and of baccalaureate nursing programs (n = 603). MEASUREMENTS Proportion of MD-granting and DO-granting schools and baccalaureate nursing programs that require that entering students receive vaccines recommended by the ACIP for health care personnel. RESULTS 563 schools (75%) responded. More than 90% of all school types required measles, mumps, rubella, and hepatitis B vaccines for entering students; varicella vaccination also was commonly required. Tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis vaccination was required by 66%, 70%, and 75% of nursing, MD-granting, and DO-granting schools, respectively. Nursing and DO-granting schools (31% and 45%, respectively) were less likely than MD-granting schools (78%) to offer students influenza vaccines free of charge. LIMITATIONS Estimates were conservative, because schools that reported that they did not require proof of immunity for a given vaccine were considered not to require that vaccine. Estimates also were restricted to schools that train physicians and nurses. CONCLUSION The majority of schools now require most ACIP-recommended vaccines for students. Medical and nursing schools should adopt policies on student vaccination and serologic testing that conform to ACIP recommendations and should encourage annual influenza vaccination by offering influenza vaccination to students at no cost. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE None.


Clinical Infectious Diseases | 2002

Influenza Pandemic Preparedness Action Plan for the United States: 2002 Update

Raymond A. Strikas; Gregory S. Wallace; Martin G. Myers

Preparation for the next influenza pandemic includes development of a national plan that has 3 goals: to limit the burden of disease, to minimize social disruption, and to reduce economic losses attributable to the pandemic. Priority areas to be addressed and improved in the plan to achieve these goals include global and national influenza surveillance, vaccine development and production, vaccine use and coverage, chemoprophylaxis and therapy, guidelines for clinical care and health resources management, emergency preparedness, and research. This multifaceted plan will require close collaboration between public and private sectors to ameliorate the potentially devastating impact of pandemic influenza.

Collaboration


Dive into the Raymond A. Strikas's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lance E. Rodewald

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Abigail Shefer

National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Peter A. Briss

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Serigne M. Ndiaye

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hussain R. Yusuf

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

James A. Singleton

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Roger R. Bernier

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sheree M. Williams

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Vilma G Carande-Kulis

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge