Raymond Waters

Distinct functions of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway influence nucleotide excision repair.

The Rad23/Rad4 nucleotide excision repair (NER) protein complex functions at an early stage of the NER reaction, possibly promoting the recognition of damaged DNA. Here we show that Rad4 protein is ubiquitinated and degraded in response to ultraviolet (UV) radiation, and identify a novel cullin‐based E3 ubiquitin ligase required for this process. We also show that this novel ubiquitin ligase is required for optimal NER. Our results demonstrate that optimal NER correlates with the ubiquitination of Rad4 following UV radiation, but not its subsequent degradation. Furthermore, we show that the ubiquitin–proteasome pathway (UPP) regulates NER via two distinct mechanisms. The first occurs independently of de novo protein synthesis, and requires Rad23 and a nonproteolytic function of the 19S regulatory complex of the 26S proteasome. The second requires de novo protein synthesis, and relies on the activity of the newly identified E3 ubiquitin ligase. These studies reveal that, following UV radiation, NER is mediated by nonproteolytic activities of the UPP, via the ubiquitin‐like domain of Rad23 and UV radiation‐induced ubiquitination of Rad4.

Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad16 mediates ultraviolet‐dependent histone H3 acetylation required for efficient global genome nucleotide‐excision repair

In yeast, global genome nucleotide‐excision repair (GG‐NER) requires a protein complex containing Rad7 and Rad16. Rad16 is a member of the switch/sucrose nonfermentable superfamily, and it is presumed that chromatin remodelling is its primary function during repair. We show that RAD16 is required for ultraviolet‐dependent hyperacetylation of histone H3 (Lys 9 and Lys 14) at the MFA2 promoter and throughout the genome. The yeast repressor complex Ssn6–Tup1 represses many genes including MFA2. TUP1 deletion results in constitutive hyperacetylation of histone H3, nucleosome disruption and derepression of gene transcription in Tup1‐regulated genes. GG‐NER in the MFA2 promoter proceeds more rapidly in tup1Δ α‐cells compared with wild type, even when transcription is inhibited. We show that elevated histone H3 acetylation levels in the MFA2 promoter in tup1Δ α‐cells result in Rad7‐ and Rad16‐independent GG‐NER, and that Rad16 mediates the ultraviolet‐induced acetylation of histone H3, necessary for efficient GG‐NER.

How Chromatin Is Remodelled during DNA Repair of UV-Induced DNA Damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Global genome nucleotide excision repair removes DNA damage from transcriptionally silent regions of the genome. Relatively little is known about the molecular events that initiate and regulate this process in the context of chromatin. Weve shown that, in response to UV radiation–induced DNA damage, increased histone H3 acetylation at lysine 9 and 14 correlates with changes in chromatin structure, and these alterations are associated with efficient global genome nucleotide excision repair in yeast. These changes depend on the presence of the Rad16 protein. Remarkably, constitutive hyperacetylation of histone H3 can suppress the requirement for Rad7 and Rad16, two components of a global genome repair complex, during repair. This reveals the connection between histone H3 acetylation and DNA repair. Here, we investigate how chromatin structure is modified following UV irradiation to facilitate DNA repair in yeast. Using a combination of chromatin immunoprecipitation to measure histone acetylation levels, histone acetylase occupancy in chromatin, MNase digestion, or restriction enzyme endonuclease accessibility assays to analyse chromatin structure, and finally nucleotide excision repair assays to examine DNA repair, we demonstrate that global genome nucleotide excision repair drives UV-induced chromatin remodelling by controlling histone H3 acetylation levels in chromatin. The concerted action of the ATPase and C3HC4 RING domains of Rad16 combine to regulate the occupancy of the histone acetyl transferase Gcn5 on chromatin in response to UV damage. We conclude that the global genome repair complex in yeast regulates UV-induced histone H3 acetylation by controlling the accessibility of the histone acetyl transferase Gcn5 in chromatin. The resultant changes in histone H3 acetylation promote chromatin remodelling necessary for efficient repair of DNA damage. Recent evidence suggests that GCN5 plays a role in NER in human cells. Our work provides important insight into how GG-NER operates in chromatin.

UV-induced endonuclease III-sensitive sites at the mating type loci inSaccharomyces cerevisiae are repaired by nucleotide excision repair: RAD7 and RAD16 are not required for their removal fromHMLα

Ultraviolet irradiation of DNA induces cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs), 6-4′-(pyrimidine 2′-one) pyrimidines and pyrimidine hydrates. The dimer is the major photoproduct, and is specifically recognized by endonuclease V of phage T4. Pyrimidine hydrates represent a small fraction of the total photoproducts, and are substrates for endonuclease III ofEscherichia coli. We used these enzymes to follow the fate of their substrates in the mating type loci ofSaccharomyces cerevisiae. In a RAD strain, CPDs in the transcriptionally activeMATα locus are preferentially repaired relative to the inactiveHMLα locus, whilst repair of endonuclease III-sensitive sites is not preferential. Therad1, 2, 3 and4 mutants, which lack factors that are essential for the incision step of nucleotide excision repair (NER), repair neither CPDs nor endonuclease III-sensitive sites, clearly showing that these lesions are repaired by the NER pathway. Previously it had been shown that the products of theRAD7 andRAD16 genes are required for the NER of CPDs from theHMLα locus. We show that, in the same locus, these gene products are not needed for removal of endonuclease III-sensitive sites by the same mechanism. This indicates that the components required for NER differ depending on either the type of lesion encountered or on the specific location of the lesion within the genome.

Tilting at windmills? The nucleotide excision repair of chromosomal DNA

A typical view of how DNA repair functions in chromatin usually depicts a struggle in which the DNA repair machinery battles to overcome the inhibitory effect of chromatin on the repair process. It may be that in this current interpretation the repair mechanisms are tilting at windmills, fighting an imaginary foe. An emerging picture suggests that we should not consider chromatin as an inhibitory force to be overcome like some quixotic giant by the DNA repair processes. Instead we should now recognize that DNA repair and chromatin metabolism are inextricably and mechanistically linked. Here we discuss the latest findings which are beginning to reveal how changes in chromatin dynamics integrate with the DNA repair process in response to UV induced DNA damage, with an emphasis on events in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Histone modification and chromatin remodeling during NER.

Here we review our developments of and results with high resolution studies on global genome nucleotide excision repair (GG-NER) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Technologies were developed to examine NER at nucleotide resolution in yeast sequences of choice and to determine how these related to local changes in chromatin. We focused on how GG-NER relates to histone acetylation for its functioning and we identified the histone acetyltransferase Gcn5 and acetylation at lysines 9/14 of histone H3 as a major factor in enabling efficient repair. Factors influencing this Gcn5-mediated event are considered which include Rad16, a GG-NER specific SWI/SNF factor and the yeast histone variant of H2AZ (Htz1). We describe results employing primarily MFA2 as a model gene, but also those with URA3 located at subtelomeric sequences. In the latter case we also see a role for acetylation at histone H4. We then consider the development of a high resolution genome-wide approach that enables one to examine correlations between histone modifications and the NER of UV-induced cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers throughout entire yeast genome. This is an approach that will enable rapid advances in understanding the complexities of how compacted chromatin in chromosomes is processed to access DNA damage before it is returned to its pre-damaged status to maintain epigenetic codes.

ABF1-binding Sites Promote Efficient Global Genome Nucleotide Excision Repair

Global genome nucleotide excision repair (GG-NER) removes DNA damage from nontranscribing DNA. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the RAD7 and RAD16 genes are specifically required for GG-NER. We have reported that autonomously replicating sequence-binding factor 1 (ABF1) protein forms a stable complex with Rad7 and Rad16 proteins. ABF1 functions in transcription, replication, gene silencing, and NER in yeast. Here we show that binding of ABF1 to its DNA recognition sequence found at multiple genomic locations promotes efficient GG-NER in yeast. Mutation of the I silencer ABF1-binding site at the HMLα locus caused loss of ABF1 binding, which resulted in a domain of reduced GG-NER efficiency on one side of the ABF1-binding site. During GG-NER, nucleosome positioning at this site was not altered, and this correlated with an inability of the GG-NER complex to reposition nucleosomes in vitro.We discuss how the GG-NER complex might facilitate GG-NER while preventing unregulated gene transcription during this process.

A Role for Checkpoint Kinase-Dependent Rad26 Phosphorylation in Transcription-Coupled DNA Repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

ABSTRACT Upon DNA damage, eukaryotic cells activate a conserved signal transduction cascade known as the DNA damage checkpoint (DDC). We investigated the influence of DDC kinases on nucleotide excision repair (NER) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and found that repair of both strands of an active gene is affected by Mec1 but not by the downstream checkpoint kinases, Rad53 and Chk1. Repair of the nontranscribed strand (by global genome repair) requires new protein synthesis, possibly reflecting the involvement of Mec1 in the activation of repair genes. In contrast, repair of the transcribed strand by transcription-coupled NER (TC-NER) occurs in the absence of new protein synthesis, and DNA damage results in Mec1-dependent but Rad53-, Chk1-, Tel1-, and Dun1-independent phosphorylation of the TC-NER factor Rad26, a member of the Swi/Snf group of ATP-dependent translocases and yeast homologue of Cockayne syndrome B. Mutation of the Rad26 phosphorylation site results in a decrease in the rate of TC-NER, pointing to direct activation of Rad26 by Mec1 kinase. These findings establish a direct role for Mec1 kinase in transcription-coupled repair, at least partly via phosphorylation of Rad26, the main transcription-repair coupling factor.

The levels of repair of endonuclease III-sensitive sites, 6-4 photoproducts and cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers differ in a point mutant forRAD14, theSaccharomyces cerevisiae homologue of the human gene defective inXPA patients

In the accompanying paper we demonstrated that endonuclease III-sensitive sites in theMATα andHMLα loci ofSaccharomyces cerevisiae are repaired by the Nucleotide Excision Repair (NER) pathway. In the current report we investigated the repair of endonuclease III sites, 6-4 photoproducts and cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) in arad14-2 point mutant and in arad14 deletion mutant. TheRAD14 gene is the yeast homologue of the human gene that complements the defect in cells from xeroderma pigmentosum (XP) patients belonging to complementation group A. In the point mutant we observed normal repair of endonuclease III sites (i.e. as wild type), but no removal of CPDs at theMATα andHMLα loci. Similar experiments were undertaken using the recently createdrad14 deletion mutant. Here, neither endonuclease III sites nor CPDs were repaired inMATa orHMRa. Thus the point mutant appears to produce a gene product that permits the repair of endonuclease III sites, but prevents the repair of CPDs. Previously it was found that, in the genome overall, repair of 6-4 photoproducts was less impaired than repair of CPDs in the point mutant. The deletion mutant repairs neither CPDs nor 6-4 photoproducts in the genome overall. This finding is consistent with the RAD14 protein being involved in lesion recognition in yeast. A logical interpretation is that therad14-2 point mutant produces a modified protein that enables the cell to repair endonuclease III sites and 6-4 photoproducts much more efficiently than CPDs. This modified protein may aid studies designed to elucidate the role of the RAD14 protein in lesion recognition.

Lux ex tenebris: Nucleotide resolution DNA repair and nucleosome mapping

In recent years a great deal of progress has been made in understanding how the various DNA repair mechanisms function when DNA is assembled into chromatin. In the case of nucleotide excision repair, a core group of DNA repair proteins is required in vitro to observe DNA repair activity in damaged DNA devoid of chromatin structure. This group of proteins is not sufficient to promote repair in the same DNA when assembled into nucleosomes; the first level of chromatin compaction. Clearly other factors are required for efficient DNA repair of chromatin. For some time chromatin has been considered a barrier to be overcome, and inhibitory to DNA metabolic processes including DNA repair. However, an emerging picture suggests a fascinating link at the interface of chromatin metabolism and DNA repair. In this view these two fundamental processes are mechanistically intertwined and function in concert to bring about regulated DNA repair throughout the genome. Light from the darkness has come as a result of many elegant studies performed by a number of research groups. Here we describe two techniques developed in our laboratories which we hope have contributed to our understanding in this arena.