Rebecca A. Meriwether

Uric Acid and the Development of Metabolic Syndrome in Women and Men

Associations between serum uric acid (UA) levels and metabolic syndrome (MetS) have been reported in cross-sectional studies. Limited information, however, is available concerning the prospective association of UA and the risk of developing MetS. The authors evaluated UA as a risk factor for incident MetS in a prospective study of 8429 men and 1260 women (aged 20-82 years) who were free of MetS and for whom measures of waist girth, resting blood pressure, fasting lipids, and glucose were taken during baseline and follow-up examinations between 1977 and 2003. Hyperuricemia was defined as >7.0 mg/dL in men and >6.0 mg/dL in women. Metabolic syndrome was defined with the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III criteria. The overall prevalence of hyperuricemia was 17%. During a mean follow-up of 5.7 years, 1120 men and 44 women developed MetS. Men with serum UA concentrations > or =6.5 mg/dL (upper third) had a 1.60-fold increase in risk of MetS (95% confidence interval, 1.34-1.91) as compared with those who had concentrations <5.5 mg/dL (lowest third). Among women, the risk of MetS was at least 2-fold higher for serum UA concentrations > or =4.6 mg/dL (P for trend = .02). Higher serum UA is a strong and independent predictor of incident MetS in men and women.

Electronic feedback in a diet- and physical activity-based lifestyle intervention for weight loss: a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundThe SenseWear™ Armband (SWA) (BodyMedia, Inc. Pittsburgh, PA) is a physical activity and lifestyle monitor that objectively and accurately measures free-living energy balance and sleep and includes software for self-monitoring of daily energy expenditure and energy intake. The real-time feedback of the SWA can improve individual self-monitoring and, therefore, enhance weight loss outcomes.MethodsWe recruited 197 sedentary overweight or obese adults (age, 46.8 ± 10.8 y; body mass index (BMI), 33.3 ± 5.2 kg/m2; 81% women, 32% African-American) from the greater Columbia, South Carolina area. Participants were randomized into 1 of 4 groups, a self-directed weight loss program via an evidence-based weight loss manual (Standard Care, n = 50), a group-based behavioral weight loss program (GWL, n = 49), the armband alone (SWA-alone, n = 49), or the GWL plus the armband (GWL+SWA, n = 49), during the 9-month intervention. The primary outcome was change in body weight and waist circumference. A mixed-model repeated-measures analysis compared change in the intervention groups to the standard care group on weight and waist circumference status after adjusting for age, sex, race, education, energy expenditure, and recruitment wave.ResultsBody weight was available for 62% of participants at 9 months (52% standard care, 70% intervention). There was significant weight loss in all 3 intervention groups (GWL, 1.86 kg, P = 0.05; SWA-alone, 3.55 kg, P = 0.0002; GWL+SWA, 6.59 kg, P < 0.0001) but not in the Standard Care group (0.89 kg, P = 0.39) at month 9. Only the GWL+SWA group achieved significant weight loss at month 9 compared to the Standard Care group (P = 0.04). Significant waist circumference reductions were achieved in all 4 groups at month 9 (Standard Care, 3.49 cm, P = 0.0004; GWL, 2.42 cm, P = 0.008; SWA-alone, 3.59 cm, P < 0.0001; GWL+SWA, 6.77 cm, P < 0.0001), but no intervention group had significantly reduced waist circumference compared to the Standard Care group.ConclusionsContinuous self-monitoring from wearable technology with real-time feedback may be particularly useful to enhance lifestyle changes that promote weight loss in sedentary overweight or obese adults. This strategy, combined with a group-based behavioral intervention, may yield optimal weight loss.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00957008

An efficacy trial of 'Steps to Your Health', a health promotion programme for adults with intellectual disability

Objective: Although there are evaluation and effectiveness studies of health promotion interventions for adults with intellectual disabilities (ID), randomized efficacy trials of such interventions are lacking. Design: A randomized active control intervention trial. Setting: The participants attended the health promotion classes in local disability agency service facilities. Method: We enrolled 443 individuals and randomly assigned them to one of two eight-week participatory classes. The ‘Steps to Your Health’ (STYH) classes emphasized moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA), healthy eating and body mass index (BMI) reduction. The control intervention focused on hygiene and safety. Results: We did not find a statistically significant difference in mean MVPA or BMI change between completers of the STYH group compared to the control group one year after the intervention was completed. We did find that participation in STYH classes had a non-significant association with odds of reduction in BMI (odds ratio [OR] 2.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91–9.11) and completers who lived in group homes were more likely than their counterparts who lived with families or in apartments to decrease their BMI (OR 4.61; 95% CI 1.14–18.64). Conclusions: This trial did not demonstrate a significant effect of STYH participation on change in mean minutes of MVPA or mean BMI 12 months after classes ended, although there was a non-significant association with odds of reduction of BMI (p = 0.07). This study has implications for design of intervention studies in people with intellectual disability (ID).

An Economic Analysis of Traditional and Technology-Based Approaches to Weight Loss

BACKGROUND The financial burden and human losses associated with noncommunicable diseases necessitate cost-effective and efficacious interventions. PURPOSE An economic analysis of the Lifestyle Education for Activity and Nutrition (LEAN) Study; an RCT that examined the efficacy of traditional and technology-based approaches to weight loss. METHODS Economic analyses from an organizational perspective were conducted for four approaches: standard care control (SC); group weight-loss education (GWL); a multisensor armband (SWA); and the armband in combination with group weight-loss education (GWL+SWA). Data were collected in 2008-2009. Weight loss was the primary outcome. Total costs, costs per participant, costs per kilogram lost, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated in 2010-2011. All costs are the actual expenses (i.e., staff time and materials) incurred by the LEAN study (except where noted) and reported in 2010 U.S. dollars. RESULTS In the sample population of 197 sedentary, overweight, and obese adults (mean [±SD] age=46.9 ± 0.8 years, BMI=33.3 ± 5.2, weight=92.8 ± 18.4 kg), the GWL+SWA was the most expensive intervention in costs/participant (

Themed Review: Clinical Interventions to Promote Physical Activity in Youth

365/partic) while yielding the greatest weight loss/partic (6.59 kg). The GWL was next in cost/partic (

Cardiometabolic results from an armband-based weight loss trial

240), but the SWA was less expensive in cost/partic (

Physical Activity Assessment: Validation of a Clinical Assessment Tool

183) and more efficacious (3.55 vs 1.86 kg/partic). The SC did not achieve significant weight loss. The SWA was the most cost effective (

Body Mass Index as a Predictor of Hypertension Incidence Among Initially Healthy Normotensive Women

51/partic/kg lost), followed by the GWL+SWA (

Availability of physical activity resources in the environment for adults with intellectual disabilities

55) and GWL alone (

Physical activity interventions in clinical settings

129). The ICER suggests that for each additional kilogram lost, the GWL+SWA cost