Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Reinier G. Meester is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Reinier G. Meester.


CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians | 2017

Colorectal cancer statistics, 2017: Colorectal Cancer Statistics, 2017

Rebecca L. Siegel; Kimberly D. Miller; Stacey A. Fedewa; Dennis J. Ahnen; Reinier G. Meester; Afsaneh Barzi; Ahmedin Jemal

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common malignancies in the United States. Every 3 years, the American Cancer Society provides an update of CRC incidence, survival, and mortality rates and trends. Incidence data through 2013 were provided by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program, the National Program of Cancer Registries, and the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries. Mortality data through 2014 were provided by the National Center for Health Statistics. CRC incidence rates are highest in Alaska Natives and blacks and lowest in Asian/Pacific Islanders, and they are 30% to 40% higher in men than in women. Recent temporal patterns are generally similar by race and sex, but differ by age. Between 2000 and 2013, incidence rates in adults aged ≥50 years declined by 32%, with the drop largest for distal tumors in people aged ≥65 years (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.50; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.48‐0.52) and smallest for rectal tumors in ages 50 to 64 years (male IRR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.85‐0.96; female IRR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.93‐1.08). Overall CRC incidence in individuals ages ≥50 years declined from 2009 to 2013 in every state except Arkansas, with the decrease exceeding 5% annually in 7 states; however, rectal tumor incidence in those ages 50 to 64 years was stable in most states. Among adults aged <50 years, CRC incidence rates increased by 22% from 2000 to 2013, driven solely by tumors in the distal colon (IRR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.13‐1.35) and rectum (IRR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.13‐1.31). Similar to incidence patterns, CRC death rates decreased by 34% among individuals aged ≥50 years during 2000 through 2014, but increased by 13% in those aged <50 years. Progress against CRC can be accelerated by increasing initiation of screening at age 50 years (average risk) or earlier (eg, family history of CRC/advanced adenomas) and eliminating disparities in high‐quality treatment. In addition, research is needed to elucidate causes for increasing CRC in young adults. CA Cancer J Clin 2017.


Cancer | 2015

Public health impact of achieving 80% colorectal cancer screening rates in the United States by 2018

Reinier G. Meester; Chyke A. Doubeni; Ann G. Zauber; S. Luuk Goede; Theodore R. Levin; Douglas A. Corley; Ahmedin Jemal; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar

The National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable, a national coalition of public, private, and voluntary organizations, has recently announced an initiative to increase colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates in the United States to 80% by 2018. The authors evaluated the potential public health benefits of achieving this goal.


JAMA | 2015

Variation in Adenoma Detection Rate and the Lifetime Benefits and Cost of Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Microsimulation Model.

Reinier G. Meester; Chyke A. Doubeni; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Christopher D. Jensen; Miriam P. van der Meulen; Theodore R. Levin; Virginia P. Quinn; Joanne E. Schottinger; Ann G. Zauber; Douglas A. Corley; Marjolein van Ballegooijen

IMPORTANCE Colonoscopy is the most commonly used colorectal cancer screening test in the United States. Its quality, as measured by adenoma detection rates (ADRs), varies widely among physicians, with unknown consequences for the cost and benefits of screening programs. OBJECTIVE To estimate the lifetime benefits, complications, and costs of an initial colonoscopy screening program at different levels of adenoma detection. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Microsimulation modeling with data from a community-based health care system on ADR variation and cancer risk among 57,588 patients examined by 136 physicians from 1998 through 2010. EXPOSURES Using modeling, no screening was compared with screening initiation with colonoscopy according to ADR quintiles (averages 15.3%, quintile 1; 21.3%, quintile 2; 25.6%, quintile 3; 30.9%, quintile 4; and 38.7%, quintile 5) at ages 50, 60, and 70 years with appropriate surveillance of patients with adenoma. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Estimated lifetime colorectal cancer incidence and mortality, number of colonoscopies, complications, and costs per 1000 patients, all discounted at 3% per year and including 95% confidence intervals from multiway probabilistic sensitivity analysis. RESULTS In simulation modeling, among unscreened patients the lifetime risk of colorectal cancer incidence was 34.2 per 1000 (95% CI, 25.9-43.6) and risk of mortality was 13.4 per 1000 (95% CI, 10.0-17.6). Among screened patients, simulated lifetime incidence decreased with lower to higher ADRs (26.6; 95% CI, 20.0-34.3 for quintile 1 vs 12.5; 95% CI, 9.3-16.5 for quintile 5) as did mortality (5.7; 95% CI, 4.2-7.7 for quintile 1 vs 2.3; 95% CI, 1.7-3.1 for quintile 5). Compared with quintile 1, simulated lifetime incidence was on average 11.4% (95% CI, 10.3%-11.9%) lower for every 5 percentage-point increase of ADRs and for mortality, 12.8% (95% CI, 11.1%-13.7%) lower. Complications increased from 6.0 (95% CI, 4.0-8.5) of 2777 colonoscopies (95% CI, 2626-2943) in quintile 1 to 8.9 (95% CI, 6.1-12.0) complications of 3376 (95% CI, 3081-3681) colonoscopies in quintile 5. Estimated net screening costs were lower from quintile 1 (US


Cancer | 2016

Colorectal Cancer Screening: Estimated Future Colonoscopy Need and Current Volume and Capacity

Djenaba A. Joseph; Reinier G. Meester; Ann G. Zauber; Diane L. Manninen; Linda D. Winges; Fred Dong; Brandy Peaker; Marjolein van Ballegooijen

2.1 million, 95% CI,


Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology | 2016

Consequences of Increasing Time to Colonoscopy Examination After Positive Result From Fecal Colorectal Cancer Screening Test

Reinier G. Meester; Ann A. Zauber; Chyke A. C.A. Doubeni; Christopher D. Jensen; Virginia P. Quinn; Mark M. Helfand; Jason A. Dominitz; Theodore R. Levin; Douglas A. Corley; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar

1.8-


Gastroenterology | 2015

An Accurate Cancer Incidence in Barrett's Esophagus: A Best Estimate Using Published Data and Modeling

Sonja Kroep; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Joel H. Rubenstein; Harry J. de Koning; Reinier G. Meester; John M. Inadomi; Marjolein van Ballegooijen

2.4 million) to quintile 5 (US


Best Practice & Research in Clinical Gastroenterology | 2016

Cost effectiveness of surveillance for GI cancers

Amir-Houshang Omidvari; Reinier G. Meester; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar

1.8 million, 95% CI,


Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | 2017

Effect of Time to Diagnostic Testing for Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening Abnormalities on Screening Efficacy: A Modeling Study

Carolyn M. Rutter; Jane J. Kim; Reinier G. Meester; Brian L. Sprague; Emily A. Burger; Ann G. Zauber; Mehmet Ali Ergun; Nicole G. Campos; Chyke A. Doubeni; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Stephen Sy; Oguzhan Alagoz; Natasha K. Stout; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Douglas A. Corley; Anna N.A. Tosteson

1.3-


Gastroenterology | 2016

Sa1222 The National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable Campaign to Screen 80% for Colorectal Cancer by 2018: Mapping Progress by State to Focus Screening Effort

Ann G. Zauber; Reinier G. Meester; Stacey A. Fedewa; Rebecca L. Siegel; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Ahmedin Jemal; Sara E. Fischer; Otis W. Brawley; Robert A. Smith; Mary Doroshenk; Sidney J. Winawer; Richard Wender

2.3 million) due to averted cancer treatment costs. Results were stable across sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this microsimulation modeling study, higher adenoma detection rates in screening colonoscopy were associated with lower lifetime risks of colorectal cancer and colorectal cancer mortality without being associated with higher overall costs. Future research is needed to assess whether increasing adenoma detection would be associated with improved patient outcomes.


Annals of Epidemiology | 2015

Colorectal cancer deaths attributable to nonuse of screening in the United States

Reinier G. Meester; Chyke A. Doubeni; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; S. Lucas Goede; Theodore R. Levin; Virginia P. Quinn; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Douglas A. Corley; Ann G. Zauber

In 2014, a national campaign was launched to increase colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates in the United States to 80% by 2018; it is unknown whether there is sufficient colonoscopy capacity to reach this goal. This study estimated the number of colonoscopies needed to screen 80% of the eligible population with fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) or colonoscopy and determined whether there was sufficient colonoscopy capacity to meet the need.

Collaboration


Dive into the Reinier G. Meester's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ann G. Zauber

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Chyke A. Doubeni

University of Pennsylvania

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Elisabeth F. Peterse

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge