Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Reka M. Winslow is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Reka M. Winslow.


Science | 2011

The Global Magnetic Field of Mercury from MESSENGER Orbital Observations

Brian J. Anderson; C. L. Johnson; Haje Korth; Michael E. Purucker; Reka M. Winslow; James A. Slavin; Sean C. Solomon; Ralph L. McNutt; Jim M. Raines; Thomas H. Zurbuchen

Displacement of Mercurys magnetic dipole implies that the surface field has a north-south asymmetry. Magnetometer data acquired by the MESSENGER spacecraft in orbit about Mercury permit the separation of internal and external magnetic field contributions. The global planetary field is represented as a southward-directed, spin-aligned, offset dipole centered on the spin axis. Positions where the cylindrical radial magnetic field component vanishes were used to map the magnetic equator and reveal an offset of 484 ± 11 kilometers northward of the geographic equator. The magnetic axis is tilted by less than 3° from the rotation axis. A magnetopause and tail-current model was defined by using 332 magnetopause crossing locations. Residuals of the net external and offset-dipole fields from observations north of 30°N yield a best-fit planetary moment of 195 ± 10 nanotesla-RM3, where RM is Mercury’s mean radius.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2014

MESSENGER observations of Mercury's dayside magnetosphere under extreme solar wind conditions

James A. Slavin; Gina A. DiBraccio; Daniel J. Gershman; Suzanne M. Imber; Gang Kai Poh; Jim M. Raines; Thomas H. Zurbuchen; Xianzhe Jia; D. N. Baker; K.-H. Glassmeier; S. Livi; Scott A. Boardsen; Timothy A. Cassidy; Menelaos Sarantos; Torbjörn Sundberg; A. Masters; C. L. Johnson; Reka M. Winslow; Brian J. Anderson; Haje Korth; Ralph L. McNutt; Sean C. Solomon

CLJ and RMW acknowledge support from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and CLJ acknowledges support from MESSENGER Participating Scientist grant NNX11AB84G. The MESSENGER project is supported by the NASA Discovery Program under contracts NASW- 00002 to the Carnegie Institution of Washington and NAS5-97271 to The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory.


Geophysical Research Letters | 2014

Steady‐state field‐aligned currents at Mercury

Brian J. Anderson; C. L. Johnson; Haje Korth; James A. Slavin; Reka M. Winslow; Roger J. Phillips; Ralph L. McNutt; Sean C. Solomon

Magnetic field observations acquired in orbit about Mercury by the MESSENGER spacecraft demonstrate the presence in the planets northern hemisphere of Birkeland currents that flow to low altitudes. Currents of density 10–30 nA/m2 flow downward at dawn and upward at dusk. Total currents are typically 20–40 kA and exceed 200 kA during disturbed conditions. The current density and total current are two orders of magnitude lower than at Earth. An electric potential of ~30 kV from dayside magnetopause magnetic reconnection implies a net electrical conductance of ~1 S. A spherical-shell conductance model indicates closure of current radially through the low-conductivity layers near the surface and by lateral flow from dawn to dusk through more conductive material at depth.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2015

Comprehensive survey of energetic electron events in Mercury's magnetosphere with data from the MESSENGER Gamma‐Ray and Neutron Spectrometer

D. J. Lawrence; Brian J. Anderson; D. N. Baker; William C. Feldman; George C. Ho; Haje Korth; Ralph L. McNutt; Patrick N. Peplowski; Sean C. Solomon; Richard D. Starr; Jon D. Vandegriff; Reka M. Winslow

Data from the MErcury Surface, Space ENvironment, GEochemistry, and Ranging (MESSENGER) Gamma-Ray and Neutron Spectrometer have been used to detect and characterize energetic electron (EE) events in Mercurys magnetosphere. This instrument detects EE events indirectly via bremsstrahlung photons that are emitted when instrument and spacecraft materials stop electrons having energies of tens to hundreds of keV. From Neutron Spectrometer data taken between 18 March 2011 and 31 December 2013 we have identified 2711 EE events. EE event amplitudes versus energy are distributed as a power law and have a dynamic range of a factor of 400. The duration of the EE events ranges from tens of seconds to nearly 20 min. EE events may be classified as bursty (large variation with time over an event) or smooth (small variation). Almost all EE events are detected inside Mercurys magnetosphere on closed field lines. The precise occurrence times of EE events are stochastic, but the events are located in well-defined regions with clear boundaries that persist in time and form what we call “quasi-permanent structures.” Bursty events occur closer to dawn and at higher latitudes than smooth events, which are seen near noon-to-dusk local times at lower latitudes. A subset of EE events shows strong periodicities that range from hundreds of seconds to tens of milliseconds. The few-minute periodicities are consistent with the Dungey cycle timescale for the magnetosphere and the occurrence of substorm events in Mercurys magnetotail region. Shorter periods may be related to phenomena such as north-south bounce processes for the energetic electrons.


Geophysical Research Letters | 2014

Mercury's surface magnetic field determined from proton‐reflection magnetometry

Reka M. Winslow; C. L. Johnson; Brian J. Anderson; Daniel J. Gershman; Jim M. Raines; Robert J. Lillis; Haje Korth; James A. Slavin; Sean C. Solomon; Thomas H. Zurbuchen; Maria T. Zuber

Solar wind protons observed by the MESSENGER spacecraft in orbit about Mercury exhibit signatures of precipitation loss to Mercurys surface. We apply proton-reflection magnetometry to sense Mercurys surface magnetic field intensity in the planets northern and southern hemispheres. The results are consistent with a dipole field offset to the north and show that the technique may be used to resolve regional-scale fields at the surface. The proton loss cones indicate persistent ion precipitation to the surface in the northern magnetospheric cusp region and in the southern hemisphere at low nightside latitudes. The latter observation implies that most of the surface in Mercurys southern hemisphere is continuously bombarded by plasma, in contrast with the premise that the global magnetic field largely protects the planetary surface from the solar wind.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2016

Factors affecting the geoeffectiveness of shocks and sheaths at 1 AU

Noe Lugaz; C. J. Farrugia; Reka M. Winslow; N. Al-Haddad; E. K. J. Kilpua; Pete Riley

We identify all fast-mode forward shocks, whose sheath regions resulted in a moderate (56 cases) or intense (38 cases) geomagnetic storm during 18.5 years from January 1997 to June 2015. We study their main properties, interplanetary causes and geo-effects. We find that half (49/94) such shocks are associated with interacting coronal mass ejections (CMEs), as they are either shocks propagating into a preceding CME (35 cases) or a shock propagating into the sheath region of a preceding shock (14 cases). About half (22/45) of the shocks driven by isolated transients and which have geo-effective sheaths compress pre-existing southward Bz . Most of the remaining sheaths appear to have planar structures with southward magnetic fields, including some with planar structures consistent with field line draping ahead of the magnetic ejecta. A typical (median) geo-effective shock-sheath structure drives a geomagnetic storm with peak Dst of -88 nT, pushes the subsolar magnetopause location to 6.3 RE, i.e. below geosynchronous orbit and is associated with substorms with a peak AL-index of -1350 nT. There are some important differences between sheaths associated with CME-CME interaction (stronger storms) and those associated with isolated CMEs (stronger compression of the magnetosphere). We detail six case studies of different types of geo-effective shock-sheaths, as well as two events for which there was no geomagnetic storm but other magnetospheric effects. Finally, we discuss our results in terms of space weather forecasting, and potential effects on Earths radiation belts.


Geophysical Research Letters | 2016

MESSENGER observations of induced magnetic fields in Mercury's core

C. L. Johnson; Lydia C. Philpott; Brian J. Anderson; Haje Korth; Steven A. Hauck; Daniel Heyner; Roger J. Phillips; Reka M. Winslow; Sean C. Solomon

Orbital data from the Magnetometer on the MErcury Surface, Space ENvironment, GEochemistry, and Ranging (MESSENGER) spacecraft allow investigation of magnetic fields induced at the top of Mercurys core by time-varying magnetospheric fields. We used 15 Mercury years of observations of the magnetopause position as well as the magnetic field inside the magnetosphere to establish the presence and magnitude of an annual induction signal. Our results indicate an annual change in the internal axial dipole term, g10, of 7.5 to 9.5 nT. For negligible mantle conductivity, the average annual induction signal provides an estimate of Mercurys core radius to within ±90 km, independent of geodetic results. Larger induction signals during extreme events are expected but are challenging to identify because of reconnection-driven erosion. Our results indicate that the magnetopause reaches the dayside planetary surface 1.5–4% of the time.


Space Weather-the International Journal of Research and Applications | 2017

Modeling observations of solar coronal mass ejections with heliospheric imagers verified with the Heliophysics System Observatory

C. Möstl; Alexey Isavnin; P. D. Boakes; E. K. J. Kilpua; J. A. Davies; R. A. Harrison; D. Barnes; V. Krupar; J. P. Eastwood; S. W. Good; R. J. Forsyth; V. Bothmer; Martin A. Reiss; T. Amerstorfer; Reka M. Winslow; Brian J. Anderson; L. C. Philpott; L. Rodriguez; A. P. Rouillard; Peter T. Gallagher; Teresa Nieves-Chinchilla; T. L. Zhang

Abstract We present an advance toward accurately predicting the arrivals of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) at the terrestrial planets, including Earth. For the first time, we are able to assess a CME prediction model using data over two thirds of a solar cycle of observations with the Heliophysics System Observatory. We validate modeling results of 1337 CMEs observed with the Solar Terrestrial Relations Observatory (STEREO) heliospheric imagers (HI) (science data) from 8 years of observations by five in situ observing spacecraft. We use the self‐similar expansion model for CME fronts assuming 60° longitudinal width, constant speed, and constant propagation direction. With these assumptions we find that 23%–35% of all CMEs that were predicted to hit a certain spacecraft lead to clear in situ signatures, so that for one correct prediction, two to three false alarms would have been issued. In addition, we find that the prediction accuracy does not degrade with the HI longitudinal separation from Earth. Predicted arrival times are on average within 2.6 ± 16.6 h difference of the in situ arrival time, similar to analytical and numerical modeling, and a true skill statistic of 0.21. We also discuss various factors that may improve the accuracy of space weather forecasting using wide‐angle heliospheric imager observations. These results form a first‐order approximated baseline of the prediction accuracy that is possible with HI and other methods used for data by an operational space weather mission at the Sun‐Earth L5 point.


Nature Communications | 2016

Earth’s magnetosphere and outer radiation belt under sub-Alfvénic solar wind

Noe Lugaz; Charles J. Farrugia; Chia-Lin Huang; Reka M. Winslow; Harlan E. Spence; N. A. Schwadron

The interaction between Earths magnetic field and the solar wind results in the formation of a collisionless bow shock 60,000–100,000 km upstream of our planet, as long as the solar wind fast magnetosonic Mach (hereafter Mach) number exceeds unity. Here, we present one of those extremely rare instances, when the solar wind Mach number reached steady values <1 for several hours on 17 January 2013. Simultaneous measurements by more than ten spacecraft in the near-Earth environment reveal the evanescence of the bow shock, the sunward motion of the magnetopause and the extremely rapid and intense loss of electrons in the outer radiation belt. This study allows us to directly observe the state of the inner magnetosphere, including the radiation belts during a type of solar wind-magnetosphere coupling which is unusual for planets in our solar system but may be common for close-in extrasolar planets.


Geophysical Research Letters | 2014

Constraints on the secular variation of Mercury's magnetic field from the combined analysis of MESSENGER and Mariner 10 data

Lydia C. Philpott; C. L. Johnson; Reka M. Winslow; Brian J. Anderson; Haje Korth; Michael E. Purucker; Sean C. Solomon

Observations of Mercurys internal magnetic field from the Magnetometer on the MErcury Surface, Space ENvironment, GEochemistry, and Ranging (MESSENGER) spacecraft have revealed a dipole moment of 190 nT RM3 offset about 480 km northward from the planetary equator, where RM is Mercurys radius. We have reanalyzed magnetic field observations acquired by the Mariner 10 spacecraft during its third flyby of Mercury (M10-III) in 1975 to constrain the secular variation in the internal field over the past 40 years. With the application of techniques developed in the analysis of MESSENGER data, we find that the dipole moment that best fits the M10-III data is 188 nT RM3 offset 475 km northward from the equator. Our results are consistent with no secular variation, although variations of up to 10%, 16%, and 35%, respectively, are permitted in the zonal coefficients g10, g20, and g30 in a spherical harmonic expansion of the internal field.

Collaboration


Dive into the Reka M. Winslow's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Haje Korth

Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sean C. Solomon

Carnegie Institution for Science

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

C. L. Johnson

University of British Columbia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ralph L. McNutt

Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Noe Lugaz

University of New Hampshire

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge