Rena Godfrey

The National Institutes of Health Undiagnosed Diseases Program: insights into rare diseases

Purpose:This report describes the National Institutes of Health Undiagnosed Diseases Program, details the Program’s application of genomic technology to establish diagnoses, and details the Program’s success rate during its first 2 years.Methods:Each accepted study participant was extensively phenotyped. A subset of participants and selected family members (29 patients and 78 unaffected family members) was subjected to an integrated set of genomic analyses including high-density single-nucleotide polymorphism arrays and whole exome or genome analysis.Results:Of 1,191 medical records reviewed, 326 patients were accepted and 160 were admitted directly to the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center on the Undiagnosed Diseases Program service. Of those, 47% were children, 55% were females, and 53% had neurologic disorders. Diagnoses were reached on 39 participants (24%) on clinical, biochemical, pathologic, or molecular grounds; 21 diagnoses involved rare or ultra-rare diseases. Three disorders were diagnosed based on single-nucleotide polymorphism array analysis and three others using whole exome sequencing and filtering of variants. Two new disorders were discovered. Analysis of the single-nucleotide polymorphism array study cohort revealed that large stretches of homozygosity were more common in affected participants relative to controls.Conclusion:The National Institutes of Health Undiagnosed Diseases Program addresses an unmet need, i.e., the diagnosis of patients with complex, multisystem disorders. It may serve as a model for the clinical application of emerging genomic technologies and is providing insights into the characteristics of diseases that remain undiagnosed after extensive clinical workup.Genet Med 2012:14(1):51–59

The implications of familial incidental findings from exome sequencing: the NIH Undiagnosed Diseases Program experience.

Purpose:Using exome sequence data from 159 families participating in the National Institutes of Health Undiagnosed Diseases Program, we evaluated the number and inheritance mode of reportable incidental sequence variants.Methods:Following the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics recommendations for reporting of incidental findings from next-generation sequencing, we extracted variants in 56 genes from the exome sequence data of 543 subjects and determined the reportable incidental findings for each participant. We also defined variant status as inherited or de novo for those with available parental sequence data.Results:We identified 14 independent reportable variants in 159 (8.8%) families. For nine families with parental sequence data in our cohort, a parent transmitted the variant to one or more children (nine minor children and four adult children). The remaining five variants occurred in adults for whom parental sequences were unavailable.Conclusion:Our results are consistent with the expectation that a small percentage of exomes will result in identification of an incidental finding under the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics recommendations. Additionally, our analysis of family sequence data highlights that genome and exome sequencing of families has unavoidable implications for immediate family members and therefore requires appropriate counseling for the family.Genet Med 16 10, 741–750.

Computational evaluation of exome sequence data using human and model organism phenotypes improves diagnostic efficiency.

Purpose:Medical diagnosis and molecular or biochemical confirmation typically rely on the knowledge of the clinician. Although this is very difficult in extremely rare diseases, we hypothesized that the recording of patient phenotypes in Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO) terms and computationally ranking putative disease-associated sequence variants improves diagnosis, particularly for patients with atypical clinical profiles.Methods:Using simulated exomes and the National Institutes of Health Undiagnosed Diseases Program (UDP) patient cohort and associated exome sequence, we tested our hypothesis using Exomiser. Exomiser ranks candidate variants based on patient phenotype similarity to (i) known disease–gene phenotypes, (ii) model organism phenotypes of candidate orthologs, and (iii) phenotypes of protein–protein association neighbors.Results:Benchmarking showed Exomiser ranked the causal variant as the top hit in 97% of known disease–gene associations and ranked the correct seeded variant in up to 87% when detectable disease–gene associations were unavailable. Using UDP data, Exomiser ranked the causative variant(s) within the top 10 variants for 11 previously diagnosed variants and achieved a diagnosis for 4 of 23 cases undiagnosed by clinical evaluation.Conclusion:Structured phenotyping of patients and computational analysis are effective adjuncts for diagnosing patients with genetic disorders.Genet Med 18 6, 608–617.

Neurotransmitter abnormalities and response to supplementation in SPG11

OBJECTIVE To report the detection of secondary neurotransmitter abnormalities in a group of SPG11 patients and describe treatment with l-dopa/carbidopa and sapropterin. DESIGN Case reports. SETTING National Institutes of Health in the Undiagnosed Disease Program; Childrens National Medical Center in the Myelin Disorders Bioregistry Program. PATIENTS Four SPG11 patients with a clinical picture of progressive spastic paraparesis complicated by extrapyramidal symptoms and maculopathy. INTERVENTIONS L-Dopa/carbidopa and sapropterin. RESULTS 3/4 patients presented secondary neurotransmitter abnormalities; 4/4 partially responded to L-dopa as well as sapropterin. CONCLUSIONS In the SPG11 patient with extrapyramidal symptoms, a trial of L-dopa/carbidopa and sapropterin and/or evaluation of cerebrospinal fluid neurotransmitters should be considered.

Defining Disease, Diagnosis, and Translational Medicine within a Homeostatic Perturbation Paradigm: The National Institutes of Health Undiagnosed Diseases Program Experience

Traditionally, the use of genomic information for personalized medical decisions relies on prior discovery and validation of genotype–phenotype associations. This approach constrains care for patients presenting with undescribed problems. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Undiagnosed Diseases Program (UDP) hypothesized that defining disease as maladaptation to an ecological niche allows delineation of a logical framework to diagnose and evaluate such patients. Herein, we present the philosophical bases, methodologies, and processes implemented by the NIH UDP. The NIH UDP incorporated use of the Human Phenotype Ontology, developed a genomic alignment strategy cognizant of parental genotypes, pursued agnostic biochemical analyses, implemented functional validation, and established virtual villages of global experts. This systematic approach provided a foundation for the diagnostic or non-diagnostic answers provided to patients and serves as a paradigm for scalable translational research.

Neurodegeneration as the presenting symptom in 2 adults with xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group F

Objective To describe the features of 2 unrelated adults with xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group F (XP-F) ascertained in a neurology care setting. Methods We report the clinical, imaging, molecular, and nucleotide excision repair (NER) capacity of 2 middle-aged women with progressive neurodegeneration ultimately diagnosed with XP-F. Results Both patients presented with adult-onset progressive neurologic deterioration involving chorea, ataxia, hearing loss, cognitive deficits, profound brain atrophy, and a history of skin photosensitivity, skin freckling, and/or skin neoplasms. We identified compound heterozygous pathogenic mutations in ERCC4 and confirmed deficient NER capacity in skin fibroblasts from both patients. Conclusions These cases illustrate the role of NER dysfunction in neurodegeneration and how adult-onset neurodegeneration could be the major symptom bringing XP-F patients to clinical attention. XP-F should be considered by neurologists in the differential diagnosis of patients with adult-onset progressive neurodegeneration accompanied by global brain atrophy and a history of heightened sun sensitivity, excessive freckling, and skin malignancies.

Late diagnosis and atypical brain imaging of Aicardi-Goutières syndrome: are we failing to diagnose Aicardi-Goutières syndrome-2?

Aicardi–Goutières syndrome (AGS) is a rare disorder with in utero or postnatal onset of encephalopathy and progressive neurological deterioration. The seven genetic subtypes of AGS are associated with abnormal type I interferon‐mediated innate immune response. Most patients with AGS present with progressive microcephaly, spasticity, and cognitive impairment. Some, especially those with type 2 (AGS2), manifest milder phenotypes, reduced childhood mortality, and relative preservation of physical and cognitive abilities. In this report, we describe two siblings (sister and brother) diagnosed with AGS2 in their second decade, who exhibited static encephalopathy since 1 year of age with spastic quadriplegia and anarthria but preserved intellect. Both were homozygous for the common pathogenic RNASEH2B allele (c.529G>A, p.Ala177Thr). Rather than manifesting calcifications and leukoencephalopathy, both had increased iron signal in the basal ganglia. Our report broadens the clinical and imaging spectrum of AGS2 and emphasizes the importance of including AGS2 in the differential diagnosis of idiopathic spastic cerebral palsy.