Renaud Dumas

Cytokinin signalling inhibitory fields provide robustness to phyllotaxis

How biological systems generate reproducible patterns with high precision is a central question in science. The shoot apical meristem (SAM), a specialized tissue producing plant aerial organs, is a developmental system of choice to address this question. Organs are periodically initiated at the SAM at specific spatial positions and this spatiotemporal pattern defines phyllotaxis. Accumulation of the plant hormone auxin triggers organ initiation, whereas auxin depletion around organs generates inhibitory fields that are thought to be sufficient to maintain these patterns and their dynamics. Here we show that another type of hormone-based inhibitory fields, generated directly downstream of auxin by intercellular movement of the cytokinin signalling inhibitor ARABIDOPSIS HISTIDINE PHOSPHOTRANSFER PROTEIN 6 (AHP6), is involved in regulating phyllotactic patterns. We demonstrate that AHP6-based fields establish patterns of cytokinin signalling in the meristem that contribute to the robustness of phyllotaxis by imposing a temporal sequence on organ initiation. Our findings indicate that not one but two distinct hormone-based fields may be required for achieving temporal precision during formation of reiterative structures at the SAM, thus indicating an original mechanism for providing robustness to a dynamic developmental system.

Molecular basis for AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR protein interaction and the control of auxin response repression

Significance Auxin is a critical plant hormone that regulates every aspect of plant growth and development. AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR (ARF) transcription factors control auxin-regulated gene transcription, and their activity is regulated by AUXIN/INDOLE 3-ACETIC ACID repressor proteins. This work identifies that dimerization of the repressor with the transcription factor is insufficient to repress activity, suggesting that multimerization is the mechanism of repressing ARF transcriptional activity and further raising the possibility that multimerization in other systems may play roles in transcriptional repression. In plants, the AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR (ARF) transcription factor family regulates gene expression in response to auxin. In the absence of auxin, ARF transcription factors are repressed by interaction with AUXIN/INDOLE 3-ACETIC ACID (Aux/IAA) proteins. Although the C termini of ARF and Aux/IAA proteins facilitate their homo- and heterooligomerization, the molecular basis for this interaction remained undefined. The crystal structure of the C-terminal interaction domain of Arabidopsis ARF7 reveals a Phox and Bem1p (PB1) domain that provides both positive and negative electrostatic interfaces for directional protein interaction. Mutation of interface residues in the ARF7 PB1 domain yields monomeric protein and abolishes interaction with both itself and IAA17. Expression of a stabilized Aux/IAA protein (i.e., IAA16) bearing PB1 mutations in Arabidopsis suggests a multimerization requirement for ARF protein repression, leading to a refined auxin-signaling model.

Understanding the regulation of aspartate metabolism using a model based on measured kinetic parameters

The aspartate‐derived amino‐acid pathway from plants is well suited for analysing the function of the allosteric network of interactions in branched pathways. For this purpose, a detailed kinetic model of the system in the plant model Arabidopsis was constructed on the basis of in vitro kinetic measurements. The data, assembled into a mathematical model, reproduce in vivo measurements and also provide non‐intuitive predictions. A crucial result is the identification of allosteric interactions whose function is not to couple demand and supply but to maintain a high independence between fluxes in competing pathways. In addition, the model shows that enzyme isoforms are not functionally redundant, because they contribute unequally to the flux and its regulation. Another result is the identification of the threonine concentration as the most sensitive variable in the system, suggesting a regulatory role for threonine at a higher level of integration.

Structural basis for oligomerization of auxin transcriptional regulators

The plant hormone auxin is a key morphogenetic regulator acting from embryogenesis onwards. Transcriptional events in response to auxin are mediated by the auxin response factor (ARF) transcription factors and the Aux/IAA (IAA) transcriptional repressors. At low auxin concentrations, IAA repressors associate with ARF proteins and recruit corepressors that prevent auxin-induced gene expression. At higher auxin concentrations, IAAs are degraded and ARFs become free to regulate auxin-responsive genes. The interaction between ARFs and IAAs is thus central to auxin signalling and occurs through the highly conserved domain III/IV present in both types of proteins. Here, we report the crystal structure of ARF5 domain III/IV and reveal the molecular determinants of ARF-IAA interactions. We further provide evidence that ARFs have the potential to oligomerize, a property that could be important for gene regulation in response to auxin.

Characterization of an Arabidopsis thaliana cDNA encoding an S-adenosylmethionine-sensitive threonine synthase Threonine synthase from higher plants☆

An Arabidopsis thaliana cDNA encoding an Sadenosylmethionine‐sensitive threonine synthase (EC 4.2.99.2) has been isolated by functional complementation of an Escherichia coli mutant devoid of threonine synthase activity. Threonine synthase from A. thaliana was shown to be synthesized with a transit peptide. The recombinant protein is activated by Sadenosylmethionine in the same range as the plant threonine synthase and evidence is presented for an involvement of the N‐terminal part of the mature enzyme in the sensitivity to Sadenosylmethionine.

Amino acid biosynthesis: New architectures in allosteric enzymes

This review focuses on the allosteric controls in the Aspartate-derived and the branched-chain amino acid biosynthetic pathways examined both from kinetic and structural points of view. The objective is to show the differences that exist among the plant and microbial worlds concerning the allosteric regulation of these pathways and to unveil the structural bases of this diversity. Indeed, crystallographic structures of enzymes from these pathways have been determined in bacteria, fungi and plants, providing a wonderful opportunity to obtain insight into the acquisition and modulation of allosteric controls in the course of evolution. This will be examined using two enzymes, threonine synthase and the ACT domain containing enzyme aspartate kinase. In a last part, as many enzymes in these pathways display regulatory domains containing the conserved ACT module, the organization of ACT domains in this kind of allosteric enzymes will be reviewed, providing explanations for the variety of allosteric effectors and type of controls observed.

A Novel Organization of ACT Domains in Allosteric Enzymes Revealed by the Crystal Structure of Arabidopsis Aspartate Kinase

Asp kinase catalyzes the first step of the Asp-derived essential amino acid pathway in plants and microorganisms. Depending on the source organism, this enzyme contains up to four regulatory ACT domains and exhibits several isoforms under the control of a great variety of allosteric effectors. We report here the dimeric structure of a Lys and S-adenosylmethionine–sensitive Asp kinase isoform from Arabidopsis thaliana in complex with its two inhibitors. This work reveals the structure of an Asp kinase and an enzyme containing two ACT domains cocrystallized with its effectors. Only one ACT domain (ACT1) is implicated in effector binding. A loop involved in the binding of Lys and S-adenosylmethionine provides an explanation for the synergistic inhibition by these effectors. The presence of S-adenosylmethionine in the regulatory domain indicates that ACT domains are also able to bind nucleotides. The organization of ACT domains in the present structure is different from that observed in Thr deaminase and in the regulatory subunit of acetohydroxyacid synthase III.

Identification of Six Novel Allosteric Effectors of Arabidopsis thaliana Aspartate Kinase-Homoserine Dehydrogenase Isoforms PHYSIOLOGICAL CONTEXT SETS THE SPECIFICITY

The Arabidopsis genome contains two genes predicted to code for bifunctional aspartate kinase-homoserine dehydrogenase enzymes (isoforms I and II). These two activities catalyze the first and the third steps toward the synthesis of the essential amino acids threonine, isoleucine, and methionine. We first characterized the kinetic and regulatory properties of the recombinant enzymes, showing that they mainly differ with respect to the inhibition of the homoserine dehydrogenase activity by threonine. A systematic search for other allosteric effectors allowed us to identify an additional inhibitor (leucine) and 5 activators (alanine, cysteine, isoleucine, serine, and valine) equally efficient on aspartate kinase I activity (4-fold activation). The six effectors of aspartate kinase I were all activators of aspartate kinase II activity (13-fold activation) and displayed a similar specificity for the enzyme. No synergy between different effectors could be observed. The activation, which resulted from a decrease in the Km values for the substrates, was detected using low substrates concentrations. Amino acid quantification revealed that alanine and threonine were much more abundant than the other effectors in Arabidopsis leaf chloroplasts. In vitro kinetics in the presence of physiological concentrations of the seven allosteric effectors confirmed that aspartate kinase I and II activities were highly sensitive to changes in alanine and threonine concentrations. Thus, physiological context rather than enzyme structure sets the specificity of the allosteric control. Stimulation by alanine may play the role of a feed forward activation of the aspartate-derived amino acid pathway in plant.

Mechanism of control of Arabidopsis thaliana aspartate kinase-homoserine dehydrogenase by threonine.

The regulatory domain of the bifunctional threonine-sensitive aspartate kinase homoserine dehydrogenase contains two homologous subdomains defined by a common loop-αhelix-loop-β strand-loop-β strand motif. This motif is homologous with that found in the two subdomains of the biosynthetic threonine-deaminase regulatory domain. Comparisons of the primary and secondary structures of the two enzymes allowed us to predict the location and identity of the amino acid residues potentially involved in two threonine-binding sites ofArabidopsis thaliana aspartate kinase-homoserine dehydrogenase. These amino acids were then mutated and activity measurements were carried out to test this hypothesis. Steady-state kinetic experiments on the wild-type and mutant enzymes demonstrated that each regulatory domain of the monomers of aspartate kinase-homoserine dehydrogenase possesses two nonequivalent threonine-binding sites constituted in part by Gln443 and Gln524. Our results also demonstrated that threonine interaction with Gln443 leads to inhibition of aspartate kinase activity and facilitates the binding of a second threonine on Gln524. Interaction of this second threonine with Gln524 leads to inhibition of homoserine dehydrogenase activity.

Crystal structure of threonine synthase from Arabidopsis thaliana

Threonine synthase (TS) is a PLP‐dependent enzyme that catalyzes the last reaction in the synthesis of threonine from aspartate. In plants, the methionine pathway shares the same substrate, O‐phospho‐L‐homoserine (OPH), and TS is activated by S‐adenosyl‐methionine (SAM), a downstream product of methionine synthesis. This positive allosteric effect triggered by the product of another pathway is specific to plants. The crystal structure of Arabidopsis thaliana apo threonine synthase was solved at 2.25 Å resolution from triclinic crystals using MAD data from the selenomethionated protein. The structure reveals a four‐domain dimer with a two‐stranded β‐sheet arm protruding from one monomer onto the other. This domain swap could form a lever through which the allosteric effect is transmitted. The N‐terminal domain (domain 1) has a unique fold and is partially disordered, whereas the structural core (domains 2 and 3) shares the functional domain of PLP enzymes of the same family. It also has similarities with SAM‐dependent methyltransferases. Structure comparisons allowed us to propose potential sites for pyridoxal‐phosphate and SAM binding on TS; they are close to regions that are disordered in the absence of these molecules.