Ricardo Lasevitch

Lack of benefit from percutaneous intervention of persistently occluded infarct arteries after the acute phase of myocardial infarction is time independent: insights from Occluded Artery Trial

AIMS The Occluded Artery Trial (OAT) (n = 2201) showed no benefit for routine percutaneous intervention (PCI) (n = 1101) over medical therapy (MED) (n = 1100) on the combined endpoint of death, myocardial infarction (MI), and class IV heart failure (congestive heart failure) in stable post-MI patients with late occluded infarct-related arteries (IRAs). We evaluated the potential for selective benefit with PCI over MED for patients enrolled early in OAT. METHODS AND RESULTS We explored outcomes with PCI over MED in patients randomized to the </=3 calendar days and </=7 calendar days post-MI time windows. Earlier, times to randomization in OAT were associated with higher rates of the combined endpoint (adjusted HR 1.04/day: 99% CI 1.01-1.06; P < 0.001). The 48-month event rates for </=3 days, </=7 days post-MI enrolled patients were similar for PCI vs. MED for the combined and individual endpoints. There was no interaction between time to randomization defined as a continuous (P = 0.55) or categorical variable with a cut-point of 3 days (P = 0.98) or 7 days (P = 0.64) post-MI and treatment effect. CONCLUSION Consistent with overall OAT findings, patients enrolled in the </=3 day and </=7 day post-MI time windows derived no benefit with PCI over MED with no interaction between time to randomization and treatment effect. Our findings do not support routine PCI of the occluded IRA in trial-eligible patients even in the earliest 24-72 h time window.

Hidratação com bicarbonato de sódio não previne a nefropatia de contraste: ensaio clínico multicêntrico

BACKGROUND Radiographic contrast media exposition can cause acute renal function impairment. There is limited and conflicting evidence that hydration with sodium bicarbonate prevents contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization. OBJECTIVE The present study was aimed at determining whether sodium bicarbonate is superior to hydration with saline to prevent nephropathy in patients at risk undergoing cardiac catheterization. METHODS Three hundred and one patients undergoing coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention with serum creatinine > 1.2mg/dL or glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 50 ml/min were randomized to receive hydration with sodium bicarbonate starting 1 hour before the procedure and 6 hours after the procedure, or hydration with 0.9% saline. CIN was defined as an increase of 0.5mg/dL in creatinine in 48 h RESULTS Eighteen patients (5.9%) developed contrast induced nephropathy: 9 patients in the bicarbonate group (6.1%) and 9 patients in the saline group (6.0%), p = 0.97. The change in serum creatinine was similar in both groups, 0.01 ± 0.26 mg/dL in the bicarbonate group and 0.01 ± 0.35 mg/dL in the saline group, p = 0.9. No statistical difference was observed between the change in glomerular filtration rate (0.89 ± 9 ml/min vs. 2.29 ± 10 ml/min, p = 0.2 bicarbonate group and saline group, respectively). CONCLUSION Hydration with sodium bicarbonate was not superior to saline to prevent contrast media induced nephropathy in patients at risk undergoing cardiac catheterization.

Impact of chronic kidney disease on the efficacy of drug-eluting stents: long-term follow-up study

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) submitted to coronary angioplasty have higher rates of target lesion revascularization (TLR) and mortality. Drug-eluting stents (DES) are associated with a lower rate of restenosis, compared to bare metal stents (BMS), although data on DES efficacy and safety is limited in patients with CKD. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of DES in patients with significant CKD as compared to patients without normal renal function in a real world registry. METHODS: 504 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with DES in two centers were included. Outcomes were stratified based on the presence of CKD, defined as a baseline glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 60 ml/min/1.73 m². RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 22.7 months. CKD was present in 165 patients (32.7%). Patients with CKD were older, had a higher incidence of hypertension and diabetes. CKD patients presented an increased incidence of death (12.3% vs 2.4%, p < 0.001) and myocardial infarction (MI) (7.4% vs 3.3%, p = 0.04) compared to patients without CKD. TLR rates were similar between groups (4.8% vs 5.6%, p = 0.7, CKD and no CKD patients, respectively). Independent predictors of death were CKD (HR 6.93; 2.4 - 19.5, p < 0.001), current smoking (HR 3.66; 1.20 - 11.10, p = 0.02) and diabetes (HR 2.66; 1.03 - 6.60, p = 0.045). CONCLUSION: In this registry, coronary intervention with DES in patients with CKD was associated with similar TLR compared to patients without CKD, demonstrating the efficacy of DES in preventing in-stent restenosis in this patient population. CKD was related to significantly increased MI and mortality rates.BACKGROUND Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) submitted to coronary angioplasty have higher rates of target lesion revascularization (TLR) and mortality. Drug-eluting stents (DES) are associated with a lower rate of restenosis, compared to bare metal stents (BMS), although data on DES efficacy and safety is limited in patients with CKD. OBJECTIVE We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of DES in patients with significant CKD as compared to patients without normal renal function in a real world registry. METHODS 504 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with DES in two centers were included. Outcomes were stratified based on the presence of CKD, defined as a baseline glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 60 ml/min/1.73 m². RESULTS The mean follow-up was 22.7 months. CKD was present in 165 patients (32.7%). Patients with CKD were older, had a higher incidence of hypertension and diabetes. CKD patients presented an increased incidence of death (12.3% vs 2.4%, p < 0.001) and myocardial infarction (MI) (7.4% vs 3.3%, p = 0.04) compared to patients without CKD. TLR rates were similar between groups (4.8% vs 5.6%, p = 0.7, CKD and no CKD patients, respectively). Independent predictors of death were CKD (HR 6.93; 2.4 - 19.5, p < 0.001), current smoking (HR 3.66; 1.20 - 11.10, p = 0.02) and diabetes (HR 2.66; 1.03 - 6.60, p = 0.045). CONCLUSION In this registry, coronary intervention with DES in patients with CKD was associated with similar TLR compared to patients without CKD, demonstrating the efficacy of DES in preventing in-stent restenosis in this patient population. CKD was related to significantly increased MI and mortality rates.

Impacto da insuficiência renal crônica na eficácia de stents farmacológicos: estudo de seguimento de longo prazo

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) submitted to coronary angioplasty have higher rates of target lesion revascularization (TLR) and mortality. Drug-eluting stents (DES) are associated with a lower rate of restenosis, compared to bare metal stents (BMS), although data on DES efficacy and safety is limited in patients with CKD. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of DES in patients with significant CKD as compared to patients without normal renal function in a real world registry. METHODS: 504 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with DES in two centers were included. Outcomes were stratified based on the presence of CKD, defined as a baseline glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 60 ml/min/1.73 m². RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 22.7 months. CKD was present in 165 patients (32.7%). Patients with CKD were older, had a higher incidence of hypertension and diabetes. CKD patients presented an increased incidence of death (12.3% vs 2.4%, p < 0.001) and myocardial infarction (MI) (7.4% vs 3.3%, p = 0.04) compared to patients without CKD. TLR rates were similar between groups (4.8% vs 5.6%, p = 0.7, CKD and no CKD patients, respectively). Independent predictors of death were CKD (HR 6.93; 2.4 - 19.5, p < 0.001), current smoking (HR 3.66; 1.20 - 11.10, p = 0.02) and diabetes (HR 2.66; 1.03 - 6.60, p = 0.045). CONCLUSION: In this registry, coronary intervention with DES in patients with CKD was associated with similar TLR compared to patients without CKD, demonstrating the efficacy of DES in preventing in-stent restenosis in this patient population. CKD was related to significantly increased MI and mortality rates.BACKGROUND Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) submitted to coronary angioplasty have higher rates of target lesion revascularization (TLR) and mortality. Drug-eluting stents (DES) are associated with a lower rate of restenosis, compared to bare metal stents (BMS), although data on DES efficacy and safety is limited in patients with CKD. OBJECTIVE We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of DES in patients with significant CKD as compared to patients without normal renal function in a real world registry. METHODS 504 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with DES in two centers were included. Outcomes were stratified based on the presence of CKD, defined as a baseline glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 60 ml/min/1.73 m². RESULTS The mean follow-up was 22.7 months. CKD was present in 165 patients (32.7%). Patients with CKD were older, had a higher incidence of hypertension and diabetes. CKD patients presented an increased incidence of death (12.3% vs 2.4%, p < 0.001) and myocardial infarction (MI) (7.4% vs 3.3%, p = 0.04) compared to patients without CKD. TLR rates were similar between groups (4.8% vs 5.6%, p = 0.7, CKD and no CKD patients, respectively). Independent predictors of death were CKD (HR 6.93; 2.4 - 19.5, p < 0.001), current smoking (HR 3.66; 1.20 - 11.10, p = 0.02) and diabetes (HR 2.66; 1.03 - 6.60, p = 0.045). CONCLUSION In this registry, coronary intervention with DES in patients with CKD was associated with similar TLR compared to patients without CKD, demonstrating the efficacy of DES in preventing in-stent restenosis in this patient population. CKD was related to significantly increased MI and mortality rates.

Prevalência de estenose da artéria subclávia em pacientes candidatos a cirurgia de revascularização do miocárdio: registro multicêntrico

BACKGROUND: Approximately 90% of the patients submitted to coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) receive a left internal thoracic artery (LITA) graft. Stenosis of the left subclavian artery can result in graft failure due to restricted coronary flow. The prevalence of stenosis of the left subclavian artery in patients with severe coronary atherosclerosis, deemed candidates to CABG, is not known. OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of stenosis of left subclavian artery in CABG candidates, as well as the diagnostic effectiveness of clinical evaluation. METHODS: In a multicenter registry, selective angiography of the left subclavian artery was carried out in patients considered candidates to CABG during coronary cineangiography. Stenoses > 50% proximal to the origin of the LITA were considered significant. RESULTS: A total of 205 patients were included. Significant stenosis of the left subclavian artery was observed in 16 (7.8%) patients. Noninvasive differential arterial blood pressure measurement > 10 mmHg between both arms showed low sensitivity (37.5%) and low positive predictive value (13.3%) for stenosis identification. No clinical predictors of significant stenosis were identified by univariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Stenosis of the left subclavian artery is not uncommon in CABG candidates. Noninvasive blood pressure gradient between both arms has low diagnostic accuracy. Therefore, in patients candidates to CABG, selective angiography of the left subclavian artery should be considered, because of the risk of reduced flow and coronary-subclavian steal syndrome in patients with non-diagnosed stenosis of the subclavian artery who receive a LITA graft.

Impacto de la insuficiencia renal crónica en la eficacia de Stents farmacológicos: estudio de seguimiento de largo plazo

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) submitted to coronary angioplasty have higher rates of target lesion revascularization (TLR) and mortality. Drug-eluting stents (DES) are associated with a lower rate of restenosis, compared to bare metal stents (BMS), although data on DES efficacy and safety is limited in patients with CKD. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of DES in patients with significant CKD as compared to patients without normal renal function in a real world registry. METHODS: 504 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with DES in two centers were included. Outcomes were stratified based on the presence of CKD, defined as a baseline glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 60 ml/min/1.73 m². RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 22.7 months. CKD was present in 165 patients (32.7%). Patients with CKD were older, had a higher incidence of hypertension and diabetes. CKD patients presented an increased incidence of death (12.3% vs 2.4%, p < 0.001) and myocardial infarction (MI) (7.4% vs 3.3%, p = 0.04) compared to patients without CKD. TLR rates were similar between groups (4.8% vs 5.6%, p = 0.7, CKD and no CKD patients, respectively). Independent predictors of death were CKD (HR 6.93; 2.4 - 19.5, p < 0.001), current smoking (HR 3.66; 1.20 - 11.10, p = 0.02) and diabetes (HR 2.66; 1.03 - 6.60, p = 0.045). CONCLUSION: In this registry, coronary intervention with DES in patients with CKD was associated with similar TLR compared to patients without CKD, demonstrating the efficacy of DES in preventing in-stent restenosis in this patient population. CKD was related to significantly increased MI and mortality rates.BACKGROUND Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) submitted to coronary angioplasty have higher rates of target lesion revascularization (TLR) and mortality. Drug-eluting stents (DES) are associated with a lower rate of restenosis, compared to bare metal stents (BMS), although data on DES efficacy and safety is limited in patients with CKD. OBJECTIVE We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of DES in patients with significant CKD as compared to patients without normal renal function in a real world registry. METHODS 504 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with DES in two centers were included. Outcomes were stratified based on the presence of CKD, defined as a baseline glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 60 ml/min/1.73 m². RESULTS The mean follow-up was 22.7 months. CKD was present in 165 patients (32.7%). Patients with CKD were older, had a higher incidence of hypertension and diabetes. CKD patients presented an increased incidence of death (12.3% vs 2.4%, p < 0.001) and myocardial infarction (MI) (7.4% vs 3.3%, p = 0.04) compared to patients without CKD. TLR rates were similar between groups (4.8% vs 5.6%, p = 0.7, CKD and no CKD patients, respectively). Independent predictors of death were CKD (HR 6.93; 2.4 - 19.5, p < 0.001), current smoking (HR 3.66; 1.20 - 11.10, p = 0.02) and diabetes (HR 2.66; 1.03 - 6.60, p = 0.045). CONCLUSION In this registry, coronary intervention with DES in patients with CKD was associated with similar TLR compared to patients without CKD, demonstrating the efficacy of DES in preventing in-stent restenosis in this patient population. CKD was related to significantly increased MI and mortality rates.

Cirurgia não-cardíaca e terapia antiplaquetária em pacientes tratados com stents coronários

ABSTRACT Noncardiac Surgery and Antiplatelet Therapy inPatients with Coronary Stents The increasing incidence of cardiovascular diseases andthe use of bare metal or drug eluting stents have led to anincrease in the use of dual antiplatelet therapy. Thesepatients are frequently submitted to non-cardiac surgeries,requiring adequate perioperative management of antiplateletagents. The strategy of systematic discontinuation of anti-platelet agents prior to surgery increases morbidity andmortality due to thrombotic events, especially in patientswith a high risk of in-stent thrombosis. Data indicate thereis no significant increase of bleeding complications in sur gerieswith low to moderate risk of bleeding carried out whendual antiplatelet therapy is used. Adequate risk assessmentof thrombotic events and surgical bleeding enables theidentification of the most appropriate strategy for the patient.Procedures with low or moderate risk of bleeding must becarried out under antiplatelet therapy, whereas it must bediscontinued in those with high risk of bleeding. Alternatively,one must consider postponing the surgery until antiplatelettherapy is safely discontinued. In general, in patients under-going non-cardiac surgery, the discontinuation of antiplatelettherapy involves cardiovascular risks which are higherthan bleeding complications. Thus, the maintenance ofantiplatelet agents is recommended, except in cases ofsurgery carried out in closed compartments or when the riskof bleeding is unacceptable. We propose an algorithm forthe perioperative management of antiplatelet therapy, takinginto consideration the risks of thrombotic events andbleeding.

Impacto do diabetes melito na eficácia e na segurança dos stents farmacológicos: registro com até cinco anos de seguimento

BACKGROUND: Diabetic patients are at high risk of recurrent coronary events. Drug eluting stents (DES) reduce restenosis and target lesion revascularization in both diabetic and non-diabetic patients. However, there are limited data on the long-term safety and efficacy of DES in diabetic patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term clinical outcome in this high risk population. METHOD: From May 2002 to April 2007, all patients undergoing coronary intervention with DES in two hospitals were included in the study and were followed-up for up to 5 years. RESULTS: A total of 611 patients with mean age of 63.5 ± 11.2 years were included in the registry. Diabetic patients (n = 204, 33.4%) included a smaller proportion of males, greater prevalence of hypertension, chronic renal failure, and smaller coronary reference diameter when compared to non-diabetic patients. During the follow-up, diabetics had a higher probability of combined adverse cardiac events (19.7% vs. 13.4%; P = 0.04), as a result of death (7.4% vs. 2.3%; P = 0.003), acute myocardial infarction (5.9% vs. 3.1%; P = 0.10) and definitive/probable stent thrombosis (3.9% vs. 1.3%; P = 0.04). Target vessel and target lesion revascularization, however, were not different between the groups (10.9% vs. 9.8%; P = 0.68 and 3.4% vs. 5.1%; P= 0.35, respectively). The presence of diabetes mellitus was an independent predictor of death [odds ratio (OR) 2.41; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.02-5.78; P = 0.05) but not of stent thrombosis (OR 2.41; 95% CI 0.76-7.61; P = 0.13) in our patients. CONCLUSIONS: The outcomes of this study show that in patients undergoing DES implantation, the presence of diabetes was associated to higher mortality rates, acute myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis when compared to non-diabetics. The finding of similar target lesion revascularization rates in diabetic and non-diabetic patients is promising and suggests the efficacy of percutaneous revascularization with DES implantation in this population.