Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Richard A. Goodman is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Richard A. Goodman.


The Lancet | 2014

Prevention of chronic disease in the 21st century: elimination of the leading preventable causes of premature death and disability in the USA

Ursula E. Bauer; Peter A. Briss; Richard A. Goodman; Barbara A. Bowman

With non-communicable conditions accounting for nearly two-thirds of deaths worldwide, the emergence of chronic diseases as the predominant challenge to global health is undisputed. In the USA, chronic diseases are the main causes of poor health, disability, and death, and account for most of health-care expenditures. The chronic disease burden in the USA largely results from a short list of risk factors--including tobacco use, poor diet and physical inactivity (both strongly associated with obesity), excessive alcohol consumption, uncontrolled high blood pressure, and hyperlipidaemia--that can be effectively addressed for individuals and populations. Increases in the burden of chronic diseases are attributable to incidence and prevalence of leading chronic conditions and risk factors (which occur individually and in combination), and population demographics, including ageing and health disparities. To effectively and equitably address the chronic disease burden, public health and health-care systems need to deploy integrated approaches that bundle strategies and interventions, address many risk factors and conditions simultaneously, create population-wide changes, help the population subgroups most affected, and rely on implementation by many sectors, including public-private partnerships and involvement from all stakeholders. To help to meet the chronic disease burden, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) uses four cross-cutting strategies: (1) epidemiology and surveillance to monitor trends and inform programmes; (2) environmental approaches that promote health and support healthy behaviours; (3) health system interventions to improve the effective use of clinical and other preventive services; and (4) community resources linked to clinical services that sustain improved management of chronic conditions. Establishment of community conditions to support healthy behaviours and promote effective management of chronic conditions will deliver healthier students to schools, healthier workers to employers and businesses, and a healthier population to the health-care system. Collectively, these four strategies will prevent the occurrence of chronic diseases, foster early detection and slow disease progression in people with chronic conditions, reduce complications, support an improved quality of life, and reduce demand on the health-care system. Of crucial importance, with strengthened collaboration between the public health and health-care sectors, the health-care system better uses prevention and early detection services, and population health is improved and sustained by solidifying collaborations between communities and health-care providers. This collaborative approach will improve health equity by building communities that promote health rather than disease, have more accessible and direct care, and focus the health-care system on improving population health.


Preventing Chronic Disease | 2014

Multiple Chronic Conditions Among US Adults: A 2012 Update

Brian W. Ward; Jeannine S. Schiller; Richard A. Goodman

The objective of this research was to update earlier estimates of prevalence rates of single chronic conditions and multiple (>2) chronic conditions (MCC) among the noninstitutionalized, civilian US adult population. Data from the 2012 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) were used to generate estimates of MCC for US adults and by select demographic characteristics. Approximately half (117 million) of US adults have at least one of the 10 chronic conditions examined (ie, hypertension, coronary heart disease, stroke, diabetes, cancer, arthritis, hepatitis, weak or failing kidneys, current asthma, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD]). Furthermore, 1 in 4 adults has MCC.


Preventing Chronic Disease | 2013

Defining and measuring chronic conditions: imperatives for research, policy, program, and practice.

Richard A. Goodman; Samuel F. Posner; Elbert S. Huang; Anand K. Parekh; Howard K. Koh

Current trends in US population growth, age distribution, and disease dynamics foretell rises in the prevalence of chronic diseases and other chronic conditions. These trends include the rapidly growing population of older adults, the increasing life expectancy associated with advances in public health and clinical medicine, the persistently high prevalence of some risk factors, and the emerging high prevalence of multiple chronic conditions. Although preventing and mitigating the effect of chronic conditions requires sufficient measurement capacities, such measurement has been constrained by lack of consistency in definitions and diagnostic classification schemes and by heterogeneity in data systems and methods of data collection. We outline a conceptual model for improving understanding of and standardizing approaches to defining, identifying, and using information about chronic conditions in the United States. We illustrate this model’s operation by applying a standard classification scheme for chronic conditions to 5 national-level data systems.


American Journal of Sports Medicine | 1999

The Prevention of Ankle Sprains in Sports A Systematic Review of the Literature

Stephen B. Thacker; Donna F. Stroup; Christine M. Branche; Julie Gilchrist; Richard A. Goodman; Elyse A. Weitman

To assess the published evidence on the effectiveness of various approaches to the prevention of ankle sprains in athletes, we used textbooks, journals, and experts in the field of sports medicine to identify citations. We identified 113 studies reporting the risk of ankle sprains in sports, methods to provide support, the effect of these interventions on performance, and comparison of prevention efforts. The most common risk factor for ankle sprain in sports is history of a previous sprain. Ten citations of studies involving athletes in basketball, football, soccer, or volleyball compared alternative methods of prevention. Methods tested included wrapping the ankle with tape or cloth, orthoses, high-top shoes, or some combination of these methods. Most studies indicate that appropriately applied braces, tape, or orthoses do not adversely affect performance. Based on our review, we recommend that athletes with a sprained ankle complete supervised rehabilitation before returning to practice or competition, and those athletes suffering a moderate or severe sprain should wear an appropriate orthosis for at least 6 months. Both coaches and players must assume responsibility for prevention of injuries in sports. Methodologic limitations of published studies suggested several areas for future research.


Public Health Reports | 2011

Managing multiple chronic conditions: a strategic framework for improving health outcomes and quality of life.

Anand K. Parekh; Richard A. Goodman; Catherine Gordon; Howard K. Koh

The escalating problem of multiple chronic conditions (MCC) among Americans is now a major public health and medical challenge, associated with suboptimal health outcomes and rising health-care expenses. Despite this problems growth, the delivery of health services has continued to employ outmoded “siloed” approaches that focus on individual chronic diseases. We describe an action-oriented framework—developed by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services with additional input provided by stakeholder organizations—that outlines national strategies for maximizing care coordination and for improving health and quality of life for individuals with MCC. We note how the frameworks potential can be optimized through some of the provisions of the new Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, and through public-private partnerships.


American Journal of Public Health | 1986

Alcohol use and interpersonal violence: Alcohol detected in homicide victims

Richard A. Goodman; James A. Mercy; F. Loya; Mark L. Rosenberg; Jack C. Smith; N. H. Allen; L. Vargas; R. Kolts

To characterize the relationship between alcohol use and homicide victimization, we used data from the Los Angeles City Police Department and the Los Angeles Medical Examiners Office to study 4,950 victims of criminal homicides in Los Angeles in the period 1970-79. Alcohol was detected in the blood of 1,883 (46 per cent) of the 4,092 victims who were tested. In 30 per cent of those tested, the blood alcohol level was greater than or equal to 100 mg/100 ml, the level of legal intoxication in most states. Blood alcohol was present most commonly in victims who were male, young, and Latino, categories where rates have been increasing at an alarming pace. Alcohol was also detected most commonly in victims killed during weekends, when homicides occurred in bars or restaurants, when homicides resulted from physical fights or verbal arguments, when victims were friends or acquaintances of offenders, and when homicides resulted from stabbings. The evidence for alcohol use by homicide victims focuses attention on the need for controlled epidemiologic studies of the role played by alcohol as a risk factor in homicide and on the importance of considering situational variables in developing approaches to homicide prevention.


Annals of Internal Medicine | 1987

Prevention and Control of Type A Influenza Infections in Nursing Homes: Benefits and Costs of Four Approaches Using Vaccination and Amantadine

Peter A. Patriarca; Nancy H. Arden; Jeffrey P. Koplan; Richard A. Goodman

We developed a model to project morbidity, mortality, and costs attributable to type A influenza virus infections in nursing homes and to evaluate the relative benefits and costs of programs for prevention and control. Influenza vaccination was the most cost-effective intervention under various simulations in the model but usually allowed for higher rates of morbidity and mortality compared with other alternatives. The combined use of previous vaccination and chemoprophylaxis during outbreaks in the nursing home was associated with significantly fewer cases than use of vaccination alone, with only modest increases in net program costs. The use of chemoprophylaxis throughout the influenza season (without vaccination) resulted in the fewest number of illnesses, hospitalizations, and deaths but would cost at least 650% more than alternatives involving vaccination. Regardless of which strategy is chosen, our model suggests that influenza control programs in nursing homes are both beneficial and cost-effective and should be considered a part of standard care.


Journal of the American College of Cardiology | 2014

AHA/ACC/HHS Strategies to Enhance Application of Clinical Practice Guidelines in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease and Comorbid Conditions

Donna K. Arnett; Richard A. Goodman; Jonathan L. Halperin; Jeffrey L. Anderson; Anand K. Parekh; William A. Zoghbi

Cardiovascular disease, the leading cause of death in the United States and worldwide, accounts for substantial suffering and healthcare-related expenditures.1–3 For more than 30 years, the American Heart Association (AHA) and the American College of Cardiology (ACC) have partnered with other organizations to translate the best available scientific evidence into clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for cardiovascular conditions. These efforts reflect a shared vision and responsibility for using scientific evidence and the expert clinical opinion of leaders in the field to develop recommendations for healthcare providers. These CPGs, based on systematic methods to evaluate and classify evidence, have provided the cornerstones for delivering quality cardiovascular care. CPGs are essential tools for optimizing care for patients with cardiovascular conditions. Enhancing the utility of CPGs requires that the development process reflect the evolution of relevant foundational domains, such as biomedical discoveries, public policy, clinical care systems, and epidemiological knowledge. Dynamic changes in these domains pose substantial implications for organizations that develop CPGs. Among these changes is the increasing prevalence of ≥2 chronic conditions among individual Americans, estimated to be present in more than one quarter of adults.4 In the large population of Medicare beneficiaries, the prevalence of persons with multiple chronic conditions is considerably greater: more than two thirds (68%) have ≥2 chronic conditions, and 14% have ≥6 chronic conditions.5,6 CPGs jointly developed by the AHA/ACC are cardiovascular disease-specific documents focused on the prevention, diagnosis, and management of conditions such as ischemic heart disease, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation. These CPGs often contain considerations for special factors (eg, older adults) and common problems affecting pharmacokinetics (eg, renal impairment). For example, the 2014 CPG on atrial fibrillation7 highlights special considerations for acute myocardial infarction, pregnancy, hyperthyroidism, and other conditions. With the exception of the CPGs on …


Circulation | 2014

AHA/ACC/HHS Strategies to Enhance Application of Clinical Practice Guidelines in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease and Comorbid Conditions From the American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, and US Department of Health and Human Services

Donna K. Arnett; Richard A. Goodman; Jonathan L. Halperin; Jeffrey L. Anderson; Anand K. Parekh; William A. Zoghbi

Cardiovascular disease, the leading cause of death in the United States and worldwide, accounts for substantial suffering and healthcare-related expenditures.1–3 For more than 30 years, the American Heart Association (AHA) and the American College of Cardiology (ACC) have partnered with other organizations to translate the best available scientific evidence into clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for cardiovascular conditions. These efforts reflect a shared vision and responsibility for using scientific evidence and the expert clinical opinion of leaders in the field to develop recommendations for healthcare providers. These CPGs, based on systematic methods to evaluate and classify evidence, have provided the cornerstones for delivering quality cardiovascular care. CPGs are essential tools for optimizing care for patients with cardiovascular conditions. Enhancing the utility of CPGs requires that the development process reflect the evolution of relevant foundational domains, such as biomedical discoveries, public policy, clinical care systems, and epidemiological knowledge. Dynamic changes in these domains pose substantial implications for organizations that develop CPGs. Among these changes is the increasing prevalence of ≥2 chronic conditions among individual Americans, estimated to be present in more than one quarter of adults.4 In the large population of Medicare beneficiaries, the prevalence of persons with multiple chronic conditions is considerably greater: more than two thirds (68%) have ≥2 chronic conditions, and 14% have ≥6 chronic conditions.5,6 CPGs jointly developed by the AHA/ACC are cardiovascular disease-specific documents focused on the prevention, diagnosis, and management of conditions such as ischemic heart disease, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation. These CPGs often contain considerations for special factors (eg, older adults) and common problems affecting pharmacokinetics (eg, renal impairment). For example, the 2014 CPG on atrial fibrillation7 highlights special considerations for acute myocardial infarction, pregnancy, hyperthyroidism, and other conditions. With the exception of the CPGs on …


Social Science & Medicine | 2003

Strengthening capacity in developing countries for evidence-based public health:: the data for decision-making project

Marguerite Pappaioanou; Michael Malison; Karen Wilkins; Bradley Otto; Richard A. Goodman; R.Elliott Churchill; Mark White; Stephen B. Thacker

Public health officials and the communities they serve need to: identify priority health problems; formulate effective health policies; respond to public health emergencies; select, implement, and evaluate cost-effective interventions to prevent and control disease and injury; and allocate human and financial resources. Despite agreement that rational, data-based decisions will lead to improved health outcomes, many public health decisions appear to be made intuitively or politically. During 1991-1996, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention implemented the US Agency for International Development funded Data for Decision-Making (DDM) Project. DDM goals were to: (a) strengthen the capacity of decision makers to identify data needs for solving problems and to interpret and use data appropriately for public health decisions; (b) enhance the capacity of technical advisors to provide valid, essential, and timely data to decision makers clearly and effectively; and (c) strengthen health information systems (HISs) to facilitate the collection, analysis, reporting, presentation, and use of data at local, district, regional, and national levels. Assessments were conducted to identify important health problems, problem-driven implementation plans with data-based solutions as objectives were developed, interdisciplinary, in-service training programs for mid-level policy makers, program managers, and technical advisors in applied epidemiology, management and leadership, communications, economic evaluation, and HISs were designed and implemented, national staff were trained in the refinement of HISs to improve access to essential data from multiple sources, and the effectiveness of the strategy was evaluated. This strategy was tested in Bolivia, Cameroon, Mexico, and the Philippines, where decentralization of health services led to a need to strengthen the capacity of policy makers and health officers at sub-national levels to use information more effectively. Results showed that the DDM strategy improved evidence-based public health. Subsequently, DDM concepts and practices have been institutionalized in participating countries and at CDC.

Collaboration


Dive into the Richard A. Goodman's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Stephen B. Thacker

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anthony D. Moulton

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anand K. Parekh

United States Department of Health and Human Services

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

James A. Mercy

Medical College of Wisconsin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Samuel F. Posner

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Donna F. Stroup

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Christine M. Branche

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Frederic E. Shaw

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge