Richard C. Hunt

Mass casualty triage: an evaluation of the data and development of a proposed national guideline.

Mass casualty triage is a critical skill. Although many systems exist to guide providers in making triage decisions, there is little scientific evidence available to demonstrate that any of the available systems have been validated. Furthermore, in the United States there is little consistency from one jurisdiction to the next in the application of mass casualty triage methodology. There are no nationally agreed upon categories or color designations. This review reports on a consensus committee process used to evaluate and compare commonly used triage systems, and to develop a proposed national mass casualty triage guideline. The proposed guideline, entitled SALT (sort, assess, life-saving interventions, treatment and/or transport) triage, was developed based on the best available science and consensus opinion. It incorporates aspects from all of the existing triage systems to create a single overarching guide for unifying the mass casualty triage process across the United States.

Is Ambulance Transport Time With Lights and Siren Faster Than That Without

STUDY OBJECTIVE To determine whether ambulance transport time from the scene to the emergency department is faster with warning lights and siren than that without. DESIGN In a convenience sample, transport times and routes of ambulances using lights and sirens were recorded by an observer. The time also was recorded by a paramedic who drove an ambulance without lights and siren over identical routes during simulated transports at the same time of day and on the same day of the week as the corresponding lights-and-siren transport. SETTING An emergency medical service system in a city with a population of 46,000. PARTICIPANTS Emergency medical technicians and paramedics. RESULTS Fifty transport times with lights and siren averaged 43.5 seconds faster than the transport times without lights and siren [t = 4.21, P = .0001]. CONCLUSION In this setting, the 43.5-second mean time savings does not warrant the use of lights and siren during ambulance transport, except in rare situations or clinical circumstances.

Do warning lights and sirens reduce ambulance response times

Objective. To determine the time saving associated with lights and siren (L&S) use during emergency response in an urban EMS system. Methods. This prospective study evaluated ambulance response times from the location at time of dispatch to the scene of an emergency in an urban area. A control group of responses using L&S was compared with an experimental group that did not use L&S. An observer was assigned to ride along with ambulance crews and record actual times for all L&S responses. At a later date, an observer and an off-duty paramedic in an identical ambulance retraced the route—at the same time of day on the same day of the week—without using L&S and recorded the travel time. Response times for the two groups were compared using paired t-test. Results. The 32 responses with L&S averaged 105.8 seconds (1 minute, 46 seconds) faster than those without (95% confidence interval: 60.2 to 151.5 seconds, p = 0.0001). The time difference ranged from 425 seconds (7 minutes, 5 seconds) faster with L&S to 210 seconds (3 minutes, 30 seconds) slower with L&S. Conclusion. In this urban EMS system, L&S reduce ambulance response times by an average of 1 minute, 46 seconds. Although statistically significant, this time saving is likely to be clinically relevant in only a very few cases. A large-scale multicenter L&S trial may help address this issue on a national level.

Mass Casualty Triage: An Evaluation of the Science and Refinement of a National Guideline

Mass casualty triage is the process of prioritizing multiple victims when resources are not sufficient to treat everyone immediately. No national guideline for mass casualty triage exists in the United States. The lack of a national guideline has resulted in variability in triage processes, tags, and nomenclature. This variability has the potential to inject confusion and miscommunication into the disaster incident, particularly when multiple jurisdictions are involved. The Model Uniform Core Criteria for Mass Casualty Triage were developed to be a national guideline for mass casualty triage to ensure interoperability and standardization when responding to a mass casualty incident. The Core Criteria consist of 4 categories: general considerations, global sorting, lifesaving interventions, and individual assessment of triage category. The criteria within each of these categories were developed by a workgroup of experts representing national stakeholder organizations who used the best available science and, when necessary, consensus opinion. This article describes how the Model Uniform Core Criteria for Mass Casualty Triage were developed.

Large Cost Savings Realized from the 2006 Field Triage Guideline: Reduction in Overtriage in U.S. Trauma Centers

Abstract Background. Ambulance transport of injured patients to the most appropriate medical care facility is an important decision. Trauma centers are designed and staffed to treat severely injured patients and are increasingly burdened by cases involving less-serious injury. Yet, a cost evaluation of the Field Triage national guideline has never been performed. Objectives. To examine the potential cost savings associated with overtriage for the 1999 and 2006 versions of the Field Triage Guideline. Methods. Data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and the National Trauma Databank (NTDB) produced estimates of injury-related ambulatory transports and exposure to the Field Triage guideline. Case costs were approximated using a cost distribution curve of all cases found in the NTDB. A two-way sensitivity analysis was also used to determine the impact of data uncertainty on medical costs and the reduction in trauma center visits (12%) after implementation of the 2006 Field Triage guideline compared with the 1999 Field Triage guideline. Results. At a 40% overtriage rate, the average case cost was

E LIMINATING E RRORS IN E MERGENCY M EDICAL S ERVICES : R EALITIES AND R ECOMMENDATIONS

16,434. The cost average of 44.2% reduction in case costs if patients were treated in a non–trauma center compared with a trauma center was found in the literature. Implementation of the 2006 Field Triage guideline produced a

Utilization and impact of ambulance diversion at the community level.

7,264 cost savings per case, or an estimated annual national savings of

MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY: CURRENT CONCEPTS AND CHALLENGES FOR EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS

568,000,000. Conclusion. Application of the 2006 Field Triage guideline helps emergency medical services personnel manage overtriage in trauma centers, which could result in a significant national cost savings.

NIH Roundtable on Emergency Trauma Research

Errors in health care can have serious consequences, not only for patients but for society as a whole, given the considerable national expenditures required to address these errors. Because of the number of patients treated and the acuity of emergency situations, eliminating errors should be a priority in emergency medical services (EMS) systems. In a recent report, the Institute of Medicine called for improvements in patient safety, which it defined as freedom from accidental injury. Recent efforts have focused on integrating EMS systems into error analyses of the total health care system. However, EMS systems must take the initiative in addressing their own major error-prone areas using the best and most current data available. Unfortunately, addressing the problem of medical errors in EMS systems still suffers from a paucity of data, owing to a lack of organized, funded programs backed by legislation and dedicated government coordination. We recommend that EMS medical directors consider specific error audits to decrease sources of errors and to be better able to identify EMS providers who would benefit from retraining. Error audits might first be focused on the following potentially serious errors: equipment malfunction, failure to check oxygen saturation, failure to immobilize the patient, use of incorrect protocol or algorithm, failure to check glucose levels, failure to recognize patient deterioration, failure to detect misplaced endotracheal tubes, and use of wrong drug or drug dose.

Comparison of motor vehicle damage documentation in emergency medical services run reports compared with photographic documentation.

Objective. To evaluate the utilization and impact of ambulance diversion in the metropolitan area of Syracuse, New York. Methods. This was a retrospective review of the ambulance diversion system operated by the hospitals of Syracuse, New York. This system allows each emergency department to divert incoming ambulances during periods of extreme overcrowding. Data collected included numbers of hours on ambulance diversion by hospital, numbers of hours when all four hospitals were on diversion simultaneously, and numbers of ambulances received while the hospitals were on and off diversion. Results. For three of the five years evaluated, ambulance diversion hours were most numerous during the period between January and March. For the most recent year studied (2000), ambulance diversion hours did not decline after the first quarter. During periods of diversion, hospital emergency departments received 30%–50% fewer ambulances than they did while open. Conclusion. This study demonstrated that, in Syracuse, New York, ambulance diversion was once a seasonal phenomenon, but is increasingly occurring throughout the year because of staff and resource limitations. It also demonstrated that ambulance diversion can be employed to reduce numbers of incoming transports.