Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Richard Kijowski is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Richard Kijowski.


Radiology | 2009

Knee Joint: Comprehensive Assessment with 3D Isotropic Resolution Fast Spin-Echo MR Imaging—Diagnostic Performance Compared with That of Conventional MR Imaging at 3.0 T

Richard Kijowski; Kirkland W. Davis; Michael A. Woods; Mary J. Lindstrom; Arthur A. De Smet; Garry E. Gold; Reed F. Busse

PURPOSE To determine whether a three-dimensional isotropic resolution fast spin-echo sequence (FSE-Cube) has similar diagnostic performance as a routine magnetic resonance (MR) imaging protocol for evaluating the cartilage, ligaments, menisci, and osseous structures of the knee joint in symptomatic patients at 3.0 T. MATERIALS AND METHODS This prospective, HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved study was performed with a waiver of informed consent. FSE-Cube was added to the routine 3.0-T MR imaging protocol performed in 100 symptomatic patients (54 male patients with a median age of 32 years and 46 female patients with a median age of 33 years) who subsequently underwent arthroscopic knee surgery. All MR imaging studies were independently reviewed twice by two musculoskeletal radiologists. During the first review, the routine MR imaging protocol was used to detect cartilage lesions, ligament tears, meniscal tears, and bone marrow edema lesions. During the second review, FSE-Cube with multiplanar reformations was used to detect these joint abnormalities. With arthroscopic results as the reference standard, the sensitivity and specificity of FSE-Cube and the routine MR imaging protocol in the detection of cartilage lesions, anterior cruciate ligament tears, and meniscal tears were calculated. Permutation tests were used to compare sensitivity and specificity values. RESULTS FSE-Cube had significantly higher sensitivity (P = .039) but significantly lower specificity (P = .003) than the routine MR imaging protocol for detecting cartilage lesions. There were no significant differences (P = .183-.999) in sensitivity and specificity between FSE-Cube and the routine MR imaging protocol in the detection of anterior cruciate ligament tears, medial meniscal tears, or lateral meniscal tears. FSE-Cube depicted 96.2% of medial collateral ligament tears, 100% of lateral collateral ligament tears, and 85.3% of bone marrow edema lesions identified on images obtained with the routine MR imaging protocol. CONCLUSION FSE-Cube has similar diagnostic performance as a routine MR imaging protocol for detecting cartilage lesions, cruciate ligament tears, collateral ligament tears, meniscal tears, and bone marrow edema lesions within the knee joint at 3.0 T.


Magnetic Resonance in Medicine | 2008

Effects of refocusing flip angle modulation and view ordering in 3D fast spin echo

Reed F. Busse; Anja C. S. Brau; Anthony Vu; Charles R. Michelich; Ersin Bayram; Richard Kijowski; Scott B. Reeder; Howard A. Rowley

Recent advances have reduced scan time in three‐dimensional fast spin echo (3D‐FSE) imaging, including very long echo trains through refocusing flip angle (FA) modulation and 2D‐accelerated parallel imaging. This work describes a method to modulate refocusing FAs that produces sharp point spread functions (PSFs) from very long echo trains while exercising direct control over minimum, center‐k‐space, and maximum FAs in order to accommodate the presence of flow and motion, SNR requirements, and RF power limits. Additionally, a new method for ordering views to map signal modulation from the echo train into ky‐kz space that enables nonrectangular k‐space grids and autocalibrating 2D‐accelerated parallel imaging is presented. With long echo trains and fewer echoes required to encode large matrices, large volumes with high in‐ and through‐plane resolution matrices may be acquired with scan times of 3–6 min, as demonstrated for volumetric brain, knee, and kidney imaging. Magn Reson Med 60:640–649, 2008.


Radiology | 2008

Juvenile versus Adult Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Knee: Appropriate MR Imaging Criteria for Instability

Richard Kijowski; Donna G. Blankenbaker; Kazuhiko Shinki; Jason P. Fine; Ben K. Graf; Arthur A. De Smet

PURPOSE To retrospectively compare the sensitivity and specificity of previously described magnetic resonance (MR) imaging criteria for the detection of instability in patients with juvenile or adult osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) of the knee, with arthroscopic findings as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS Informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board for this HIPAA-compliant study. The study group consisted of 32 skeletally immature patients (25 boys, seven girls; mean age, 14.4 years) with 36 juvenile OCD lesions of the knee and 33 skeletally mature patients (25 men, eight women; mean age, 26.2 years) with 34 adult OCD lesions of the knee. All patients had been evaluated with MR imaging and arthroscopy. MR studies were retrospectively reviewed by two radiologists in consensus to determine the presence of previously described MR imaging criteria for OCD instability (ie, high T2 signal intensity rim, surrounding cysts, high T2 signal intensity cartilage fracture line, and fluid-filled osteochondral defect). Sensitivity and specificity of the criteria were calculated separately for juvenile and adult OCD lesions. RESULTS Separately, previously described MR imaging criteria for detection of OCD instability were 0%-88% sensitive and 21%-100% specific for juvenile OCD lesions and 27%-54% sensitive and 100% specific for adult OCD lesions. When used together, the criteria were 100% sensitive and 11% specific for instability in juvenile OCD lesions and 100% sensitive and 100% specific for instability in adult OCD lesions. CONCLUSION Previously described MR imaging criteria for OCD instability have high specificity for adult but not juvenile lesions of the knee.


American Journal of Roentgenology | 2006

Arthroscopic Validation of Radiographic Grading Scales of Osteoarthritis of the Tibiofemoral Joint

Richard Kijowski; Donna G. Blankenbaker; Paul Stanton; Jason P. Fine; Arthur A. De Smet

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to use the Kellgren-Lawrence, Ahlback, and Brandt grading scales to correlate radiographic grade of osteoarthritis with the actual degree of articular cartilage degeneration within the tibiofemoral joint in patients with chronic knee pain. SUBJECTS AND METHODS The study group consisted of 125 patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis of the tibiofemoral joint. For all patients, standing anteroposterior radiographs of the knee were obtained before arthroscopic knee surgery. Each articular surface of the tibiofemoral joint was graded at arthroscopy. Two radiologists retrospectively reviewed the knee radiographs without knowledge of the arthroscopic findings to determine the presence and severity of osteoarthritis of the tibiofemoral joint using the Kellgren-Lawrence, Ahlback, and Brandt grading scales. Correlation coefficients describing the relation between grade of osteoarthritis and severity of articular cartilage degeneration were calculated for each grading scale. RESULTS The correlation coefficients for the Kellgren-Lawrence, Ahlback, and Brandt grading scales were 0.49, 0.41, and 0.56, respectively. The differences between the correlation coefficients for the Kellgren-Lawrence and Ahlback grading scales and the correlation coefficients for the Brandt and Ahlback grading scales were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Many patients with no radiographic findings of osteoarthritis had significant articular cartilage degeneration within the tibiofemoral joint. CONCLUSION The Kellgren-Lawrence and Brandt grading scales were equally effective in defining the presence of and estimating the severity of osteoarthritis of the tibiofemoral joint but had only a moderately strong correlation with the actual degree of articular cartilage degeneration.


Skeletal Radiology | 2005

Magnetic resonance imaging of the elbow. Part II: Abnormalities of the ligaments, tendons, and nerves

Richard Kijowski; Michael J. Tuite; Matthew Sanford

Part II of this comprehensive review on magnetic resonance imaging of the elbow discusses the role of magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating patients with abnormalities of the ligaments, tendons, and nerves of the elbow. Magnetic resonance imaging can yield high-quality multiplanar images which are useful in evaluating the soft tissue structures of the elbow. Magnetic resonance imaging can detect tears of the ulnar collateral ligament and lateral collateral ligament of the elbow with high sensitivity and specificity. Magnetic resonance imaging can determine the extent of tendon pathology in patients with medial epicondylitis and lateral epicondylitis. Magnetic resonance imaging can detect tears of the biceps tendon and triceps tendon and can distinguishing between partial and complete tendon rupture. Magnetic resonance imaging is also helpful in evaluating patients with nerve disorders at the elbow.


Radiology | 2009

Comparison of 1.5- And 3.0-T MR imaging for evaluating the articular cartilage of the knee joint

Richard Kijowski; Donna G. Blankenbaker; Kirkland W. Davis; Kazuhiko Shinki; Lee D. Kaplan; Arthur A. De Smet

PURPOSE To retrospectively compare the diagnostic performance of 1.5- and 3.0-T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging protocols for evaluating the articular cartilage of the knee joint in symptomatic patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS This HIPAA-compliant study was performed with a waiver of informed consent from the institutional review board. The study group consisted of 200 symptomatic patients undergoing MR examination of the knee at 1.5 T (61 men, 39 women; mean age, 38.9 years) or 3.0 T (52 men, 48 women; mean age, 39.1 years), who also underwent subsequent arthroscopic knee surgery. All MR examinations consisted of multiplanar fast spin-echo sequences with similar tissue contrast at 1.5 and 3.0 T. All articular surfaces were graded at arthroscopy by using the Noyes classification system. Three musculoskeletal radiologists retrospectively and independently graded all articular surfaces seen at MR imaging by using a similar classification system. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the 1.5- and 3.0-T MR protocols for detecting cartilage lesions were determined by using arthroscopy as the reference standard. The z test was used to compare sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy values at 1.5 and 3.0 T. RESULTS For all readers combined, the respective sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MR imaging for detecting cartilage lesions were 69.3%, 78.0%, and 74.5% at 1.5 T (n = 241) and 70.5%, 85.9%, and 80.1% at 3.0 T (n = 226). The MR imaging protocol had significantly higher specificity and accuracy (P < .05) but not higher sensitivity (P = .73) for detecting cartilage lesions at 3.0 T than at 1.5 T. CONCLUSION A 3.0-T MR protocol has improved diagnostic performance for evaluating the articular cartilage of the knee joint in symptomatic patients when compared with a 1.5-T protocol.


American Journal of Roentgenology | 2005

MRI Findings of Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Capitellum with Surgical Correlation

Richard Kijowski; Arthur A. De Smet

OBJECTIVE Few studies have described the MRI findings of osteochondritis dissecans of the capitellum. Our objective was to describe the MRI findings of 10 patients with osteochondritis dissecans of the capitellum and to correlate the imaging findings with surgical findings of stability and instability. CONCLUSION The MRI findings of unstable and stable osteochondritis dissecans of the capitellum are similar to the findings described for osteochondritis dissecans of the femoral condyles and talar dome. Unstable osteochondritis dissecans lesions are surrounded by a rim of high signal intensity or a fluid-filled cyst on T2-weighted images. Stable osteochondritis dissecans lesions show no surrounding signal abnormality on T2-weighted images.


Radiology | 2013

Evaluation of the Articular Cartilage of the Knee Joint: Value of Adding a T2 Mapping Sequence to a Routine MR Imaging Protocol

Richard Kijowski; Donna G. Blankenbaker; Alejandro Munoz del Rio; Geoffrey S. Baer; Ben K. Graf

PURPOSE To determine whether the addition of a T2 mapping sequence to a routine magnetic resonance (MR) imaging protocol could improve diagnostic performance in the detection of surgically confirmed cartilage lesions within the knee joint at 3.0 T. MATERIALS AND METHODS This prospective study was approved by the institutional review board, and the requirement to obtain informed consent was waived. The study group consisted of 150 patients (76 male and 74 female patients with an average age of 41.2 and 41.5 years, respectively) who underwent MR imaging and arthroscopy of the knee joint. MR imaging was performed at 3.0 T by using a routine protocol with the addition of a sagittal T2 mapping sequence. Images from all MR examinations were reviewed in consensus by two radiologists before surgery to determine the presence or absence of cartilage lesions on each articular surface, first by using the routine MR protocol alone and then by using the routine MR protocol with T2 maps. Each articular surface was then evaluated at arthroscopy. Generalized estimating equation models were used to compare the sensitivity and specificity of the routine MR imaging protocol with and without T2 maps in the detection of surgically confirmed cartilage lesions. RESULTS The sensitivity and specificity in the detection of 351 cartilage lesions were 74.6% and 97.8%, respectively, for the routine MR protocol alone and 88.9% and 93.1% for the routine MR protocol with T2 maps. Differences in sensitivity and specificity were statistically significant (P < .001). The addition of T2 maps to the routine MR imaging protocol significantly improved the sensitivity in the detection of 24 areas of cartilage softening (from 4.2% to 62%, P < .001), 41 areas of cartilage fibrillation (from 20% to 66%, P < .001), and 96 superficial partial-thickness cartilage defects (from 71% to 88%, P = .004). CONCLUSION The addition of a T2 mapping sequence to a routine MR protocol at 3.0 T improved sensitivity in the detection of cartilage lesions within the knee joint from 74.6% to 88.9%, with only a small reduction in specificity. The greatest improvement in sensitivity with use of the T2 maps was in the identification of early cartilage degeneration.


Radiology | 2009

Vastly Undersampled Isotropic Projection Steady-State Free Precession Imaging of the Knee: Diagnostic Performance Compared with Conventional MR

Richard Kijowski; Donna G. Blankenbaker; Jessica L. Klaers; Kazuhiko Shinki; Arthur A. De Smet; Walter F. Block

PURPOSE To compare a vastly undersampled isotropic projection steady-state free precession (VIPR-SSFP) sequence and routine magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for evaluating the cartilage, ligaments, menisci, and osseous structures of the knee in symptomatic patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS All subjects signed written informed consent prior to participation in this prospective, HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved study. VIPR-SSFP was added to the routine 1.5-T MR imaging performed on 95 symptomatic patients (52 men, 43 women; average age, 41.6 years) who subsequently underwent arthroscopic knee surgery. All MR examinations were independently reviewed twice by two musculoskeletal radiologists to detect cartilage lesions, anterior and posterior cruciate ligament tears, meniscal tears, and bone marrow edema lesions, first by using routine MR and second by using VIPR-SSFP. By using arthroscopy as the reference standard, the sensitivity and specificity of both MR protocols were calculated. The z test was used to compare sensitivity and specificity values. RESULTS VIPR-SSFP had significantly higher specificity (P < .01) for helping detect cartilage lesions (92.2% for VIPR-SSFP and 88.4% for routine MR), while routine MR had significantly higher sensitivity (P = .02) and accuracy (P = .05) for helping detect lateral meniscal tears (73.2% sensitivity and 88.4% accuracy for VIPR-SSFP and 87.5% specificity and 93.2% accuracy for routine MR). There was no significant difference (P = .14 to >.99) between VIPR-SSFP and routine MR in the remaining sensitivity and specificity values. VIPR-SSFP helped detect 69.3% of bone marrow edema lesions identified at routine MR. CONCLUSION VIPR-SSFP can provide important clinical information regarding the cartilage, ligaments, menisci, and osseous structures of the knee, but is less sensitive than conventional MR imaging at helping detect lateral meniscal tears and bone marrow edema lesions.


Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging | 2011

Routine 3D magnetic resonance imaging of joints

Richard Kijowski; Garry E. Gold

Due to its high spatial resolution and excellent tissue contrast, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become the most commonly used imaging method to evaluate joints. Most musculoskeletal MRI is performed using 2D fast spin‐echo sequences. However, 3D sequences have also been used for joint imaging and have the advantage of acquiring thin continuous slices through joints, which reduces the effects of partial volume averaging. With recent advances in MR technology, 3D sequences with isotropic resolution have been developed. These sequences allow high‐quality multiplanar reformat images to be obtained following a single acquisition, thereby eliminating the need to repeat sequences with identical tissue contrast in different planes. Preliminary results on the diagnostic performance of 3D isotropic resolution sequences are encouraging. However, additional studies are needed to determine whether these sequences can replace currently used 2D fast spin‐echo sequences for providing comprehensive joint assessment in clinical practice. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2011;33:758–771.

Collaboration


Dive into the Richard Kijowski's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Arthur A. De Smet

University of Wisconsin-Madison

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Walter F. Block

University of Wisconsin-Madison

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Fang Liu

University of Wisconsin-Madison

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Donna G. Blankenbaker

University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David Rabago

University of Wisconsin-Madison

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alexey A. Samsonov

University of Wisconsin-Madison

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alejandro Munoz del Rio

University of Wisconsin-Madison

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Scott B. Reeder

University of Wisconsin-Madison

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Aleksandra Zgierska

University of Wisconsin-Madison

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge