Richard Moran
Harvard University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Richard Moran.
Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology | 1975
Richard Moran; Henry J. Steadman; Joseph J. Cocozza
This is a very reasonable book that should be read. The following may offer you the way to get this book. It is actually ease. When the other people must walk around and go outside to get the book in the book store, you can just be by visiting this site. There is provided link that you can find. It will guide you to visit the book page and get the careers of the criminally insane. Done with the download and get this book, start to read.
Contemporary Sociology | 1983
Richard Moran; Austin T. Turk
Actions have to be defined as criminal by those in authority. This study of rebellion, revolution, police enforcement, and law examines the creation of the category of criminality for acts and people that threaten the power of those in authority. It also examines the wider apparatus for identifying and controlling political opponents: intelligence, information control, intimidation, democratic elections, or the elimination of grievances.
Contemporary Sociology | 1983
Gilbert Geis; Richard Moran
Anglo-American law has been greatly determined by this notorious case, and even though the McNaughtan Rules have metamorphosed into the ALI rule in many jurisdictions, that latter rule is but a more flexible and semantically superior version of the former. Therefore, any review of the actual McNaughtan trial and environment is a helpful literary contribution, particularly for forensic psychiatrists and legal scholars. Richard Moran is a sociologist, currently Chairman of the Department of Sociology and Anthropology at Mount Holyoke. He has also been visiting scholar at the Institute of Criminology at Cambridge University. In Knowing Right from Wrong, he has reviewed both the trial and the social environment of that famous trial in 1843.
Annals of The American Academy of Political and Social Science | 1985
Richard Moran
The modern foundation for the insanity defense was put in place during the first half of the nineteenth century, between the years 1800 and 1843. During this brief period the reaction to the acquittals by reason of insanity of James Hadfield (1800) and Daniel McNaughtan (1843) shaped the present function and administration of the insanity defense in the Anglo-American world. In the case of Hadfield, the reaction of the House of Commons to his acquittal led to the passage of the automatic confinement statutes that now accompany a successful plea of insanity in most jurisdictions. In McNaughtans case, the reaction of the House of Lords to his acquittal led to the establishment of the famous right-from-wrong test of criminal responsibility that bears his name.
Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology | 1983
Richard Moran; Roger Smith
Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology | 1982
Richard J. Lawlor; Richard Moran
European Journal of Philosophy | 2003
Richard Moran
Law & Society Review | 1985
Richard Moran
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research | 2004
Richard Moran
Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume | 2013
Richard Moran