Richard S. Kang

Solution Structure of a CUE-Ubiquitin Complex Reveals a Conserved Mode of Ubiquitin Binding

Monoubiquitination serves as a regulatory signal in a variety of cellular processes. Monoubiquitin signals are transmitted by binding to a small but rapidly expanding class of ubiquitin binding motifs. Several of these motifs, including the CUE domain, also promote intramolecular monoubiquitination. The solution structure of a CUE domain of the yeast Cue2 protein in complex with ubiquitin reveals intermolecular interactions involving conserved hydrophobic surfaces, including the Leu8-Ile44-Val70 patch on ubiquitin. The contact surface extends beyond this patch and encompasses Lys48, a site of polyubiquitin chain formation. This suggests an occlusion mechanism for inhibiting polyubiquitin chain formation during monoubiquitin signaling. The CUE domain shares a similar overall architecture with the UBA domain, which also contains a conserved hydrophobic patch. Comparative modeling suggests that the UBA domain interacts analogously with ubiquitin. The structure of the CUE-ubiquitin complex may thus serve as a paradigm for ubiquitin recognition and signaling by ubiquitin binding proteins.

Solution structure of Vps27 UIM–ubiquitin complex important for endosomal sorting and receptor downregulation

Monoubiquitylation is a well‐characterized signal for the internalization and sorting of integral membrane proteins to distinct cellular organelles. Recognition and transmission of monoubiquitin signals is mediated by a variety of ubiquitin‐binding motifs such as UIM, UBA, UEV, VHS and CUE in endocytic proteins. The yeast Vps27 protein requires two UIMs for efficient interactions with ubiquitin and for sorting cargo into multivesicular bodies. Here we show that the individual UIMs of Vps27 exist as autonomously folded α‐helices that bind ubiquitin independently, non‐cooperatively and with modest affinity. The Vps27 N‐terminal UIM engages the Leu8–Ile44–Val70 hydrophobic patch of ubiquitin through a helical surface conserved in UIMs of diverse proteins, including that of the S5a proteasomal regulatory subunit. The Leu8–Ile44–Val70 ubiquitin surface is also the site of interaction for CUE and UBA domains in endocytic proteins, consistent with the view that ubiquitin‐ binding endocytic proteins act serially on the same monoubiquitylated cargo during transport from cell surface to the lysosome.

v-SNARE cellubrevin is required for basolateral sorting of AP-1B–dependent cargo in polarized epithelial cells

The epithelial cell–specific adaptor complex AP-1B is crucial for correct delivery of many transmembrane proteins from recycling endosomes to the basolateral plasma membrane. Subsequently, membrane fusion is dependent on the formation of complexes between SNARE proteins located at the target membrane and on transport vesicles. Although the t-SNARE syntaxin 4 has been localized to the basolateral membrane, the v-SNARE operative in the AP-1B pathway remained unknown. We show that the ubiquitously expressed v-SNARE cellubrevin localizes to the basolateral membrane and to recycling endosomes, where it colocalizes with AP-1B. Furthermore, we demonstrate that cellubrevin coimmunoprecipitates preferentially with syntaxin 4, implicating this v-SNARE in basolateral fusion events. Cleavage of cellubrevin with tetanus neurotoxin (TeNT) results in scattering of AP-1B localization and missorting of AP-1B–dependent cargos, such as transferrin receptor and a truncated low-density lipoprotein receptor, LDLR-CT27. These data suggest that cellubrevin and AP-1B cooperate in basolateral membrane trafficking.

HBP1 and Mad1 repressors bind the Sin3 corepressor PAH2 domain with opposite helical orientations.

Recruitment of the histone deacetylase (HDAC)-associated Sin3 corepressor is an obligatory step in many eukaryotic gene silencing pathways. Here we show that HBP1, a cell cycle inhibitor and regulator of differentiation, represses transcription in a HDAC/Sin3-dependent manner by targeting the mammalian Sin3A (mSin3A) PAH2 domain. HBP1 is unrelated to the Mad1 repressor for which high-resolution structures in complex with PAH2 have been described. We show that like Mad1, the HBP1 transrepression domain binds through a helical structure to the hydrophobic cleft of mSin3A PAH2. Notably, the HBP1 helix binds PAH2 in a reversed orientation relative to Mad1 and, equally unexpectedly, this is correlated with a chain reversal of the minimal Sin3 interaction motifs. These results not only provide insights into how multiple, unrelated transcription factors recruit the same coregulator, but also have implications for how sequence similarity searches are conducted.

Phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate localization in recycling endosomes is necessary for AP-1B - Dependent sorting in polarized epithelial cells

The authors show that PI(3,4,5)P3 in recycling endosomes is needed for AP-1B recruitment and AP-1Bdependent sorting to the basolateral membrane. Interestingly, AP-1B expression itself triggers the formation of PI(3,4,5)P3 in this location.

ARH cooperates with AP-1B in the exocytosis of LDLR in polarized epithelial cells

The low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) doesn’t directly bind AP-1B; however, it relies on this clathrin adaptor for basolateral exocytosis. Identification of the autosomal recessive hypercholesterolemia protein (ARH) as a link between LDLR and AP-1B explains this apparent discrepancy and provides a model for how other endocytic proteins may contribute to endosomal recycling.

Functional Analysis of the Mad1-mSin3A Repressor-Corepressor Interaction Reveals Determinants of Specificity, Affinity, and Transcriptional Response

ABSTRACT The recruitment of corepressors by DNA-bound repressors is likely to be a critical rate-limiting step in the transcriptional regulation of many genes. An excellent paradigm for such an interaction is the association of the basic helix-loop-helix zipper protein Mad1 with the corepressor mSin3A. When bound together, the Sin3 interaction domain (SID) of Mad1 forms extensive hydrophobic contacts with the four-helix bundle formed by the paired amphipathic helix 2 (PAH2) domain of mSin3A. Using the costructure to predict the principle residues required for binding, we have carried out an extensive mutational analysis to examine the Mad1 SID-mSin3A PAH2 interaction in vitro and in vivo. Bulky hydrophobic residues in the α1 (I308 and V311) and α2 (L329 and L332) helices of the PAH2 domain are necessary to accommodate the precise arrangement of bulky (L12) and short (A15 and A16) hydrophobic residues in the amphipathic Mad1 SID. We have also used phage display to derive an optimal SID, which shows an essentially identical arrangement of key residues. By manipulating these key residues, we have generated altered-specificity Mad1 SID mutants that bind only to a PAH2 domain with a reciprocal mutation, permitting us to demonstrate for the first time that these domains interact directly in vivo. We have also found that the integrity of the PAH1 domain affects the Mad1 SID-PAH2 interaction. It is conceivable that cross talk between different PAH domains and their binding partners helps to determine the subunit composition and order of assembly of mSin3A complexes.

An old dog learns new tricks: novel functions of the exocyst complex in polarized epithelia in animals.

The role of the exocyst complex has been studied mainly in the context of basolateral sorting of cargos in polarized cells. Recent developments indicate an extended yet specific function of the exocyst in the outgrowth of the primary cilium from the apical membrane, thereby highlighting a role for the exocyst in ensuring membrane trafficking to important signaling stations in the cell, the tight junctions, and the cilia.

Using Replication Defective Viruses to Analyze Membrane Trafficking in Polarized Epithelial Cells

Epithelial cells in culture, especially once they are polarized, are extremely hard to manipulate by transient transfection methods. The use of replication defective adenoviruses for gene expression or replication defective retroviruses or lentiviruses to express shRNA for gene knockdown provides efficient tools to manipulate gene expression patterns even in hard-to-transfect cell lines. One of the advantages of using defective adenoviruses for gene expression is that once the virus has been generated, it can easily be applied to a wide variety of cells. In addition, replication defective retro- and lentiviruses are used to stably deplete proteins from cell lines, which subsequently may be used for analyzing the polarized surface delivery of receptors that may be expressed using defective adenoviruses. The latter approach is especially useful if the expressed shRNA also encodes GFP for easy assessment of shRNA-expressing cells. Thus the use of defective viruses in epithelial cell research is convenient. This makes a detailed infection protocol a research tool that would be valuable to many laboratories. Here we describe in detail how cells are infected with defective retro- or lentiviruses and subsequently selected for stable gene knockdown. We then describe how these cells may be used for infection with defective adenoviruses and the subsequent analyses.