Rik C. Schoemaker

High concentration of dexamethasone in aqueous and vitreous after subconjunctival injection

PURPOSE To determine the dexamethasone concentration in aqueous, vitreous, and serum of patients after a subconjunctival injection with dexamethasone disodium phosphate and to compare the effectiveness of a subconjunctival injection as a method of delivering dexamethasone into the vitreous with that of two previously tested routes: peribulbar injection and oral administration. METHODS In a prospective study, 50 phakic patients who underwent a pars plana vitrectomy received a single subconjunctival injection with 2.5 mg of dexamethasone disodium phosphate, aqueous solution (after topical anesthesia and a subconjunctival injection with lidocaine) at varied intervals before surgery. An aqueous and a vitreous sample were taken from each patient, and serum samples were collected at multiple time points from nine of 50 patients. Dexamethasone concentrations were measured by radioimmunoassay. RESULTS The estimated maximum dexamethasone concentration in the aqueous was 858 ng per ml at 2.5 hours after injection, and in the vitreous, 72.5 ng per ml at 3 hours. In serum, a mean maximum concentration of 32.4 ng per ml was measured at approximately 30 minutes after injection. CONCLUSIONS Subconjunctival injection of 2.5 mg of dexamethasone disodium phosphate resulted in an estimated vitreous dexamethasone peak concentration three and 12 times higher, respectively, than after a peribulbar injection of 5 mg of dexamethasone disodium phosphate and an oral dose of 7.5 mg of dexamethasone. Thus, a subconjunctival injection is the most effective method of delivering dexamethasone into both the anterior and posterior segments of the eye. Systemic drug absorption is considerable and is of the same order of magnitude as after peribulbar injection.

The effect of grapefruit juice on cyclosporine and prednisone metabolism in transplant patients

To estimate the effect of grapefruit juice on cyclosporine and prednisone metabolism.

Peribulbar corticosteroid injection: vitreal and serum concentrations after dexamethasone disodium phosphate injection.

PURPOSE To study the dexamethasone level reached in human vitreous after a peribulbar injection of 5 mg of dexamethasone disodium phosphate and to assess its systemic uptake. METHODS In a prospective study, 61 eyes of 61 patients scheduled for vitrectomy received a single peribulbar injection of 5 mg of dexamethasone disodium phosphate at varied intervals before surgery. At the start of vitrectomy, an undiluted vitreous sample was taken. In 22 patients, multiple serum samples were collected. Dexamethasone concentrations were measured by radioimmunoassay. The physiologic cortisol concentration was determined in the vitreous of 12 eyes of 12 patients who did not receive dexamethasone. RESULTS An average dexamethasone peak concentration of approximately 13 ng/ml was reached in vitreous 6 to 7 hours after peribulbar injection. In serum the average peak concentration was approximately 60 ng/ml 20 to 30 minutes after peribulbar injection. The average physiologic cortisol concentration in vitreous was 5.1 ng/ml. CONCLUSIONS After a peribulbar injection of 5 mg of dexamethasone disodium phosphate, an average intravitreal dexamethasone concentration is reached with a 75 times greater anti-inflammatory potency than physiologically present cortisol. Dexamethasone concentration in serum, however, is several times higher. Peribulbar injection is not just a local treatment but results in serum levels comparable to those achieved by a high oral dose.

Influence of a microemulsion vehicle on cutaneous bioequivalence of a lipophilic model drug assessed by microdialysis and pharmacodynamics.

AbstractPurpose. The aim of the study was to investigate the cutaneous bioequivalence of a lipophilic model drug (lidocaine) applied in a novel topical microemulsion vehicle, compared to a conventional oil–in–water (O/W) emulsion, assessed by a pharmacokinetics microdialysis model and a pharmacodynamic method. Methods. Dermal delivery of lidocaine was estimated by microdialysis in 8 volunteers. Absorption coefficients and lag times were determined by pharmacokinetic modelling of the microdialysis data. Subsequently, the anaesthetic effect of the treatments was assessed by mechanical stimuli using von Frey hairs in 12 volunteers. Results. The microemulsion formulation increased the cutaneous absorption coefficient of lidocaine 2.9 times (95% confidence interval: 1.9/4.6) compared with the O/W emulsion–based cream. Also, lag time decreased from 110 ± 43 min to 87 ± 32 min (P = 0.02). The compartmental pharmacokinetic model provided an excellent fit of the concentration–time curves with reliable estimation of absorption coefficient and lag time. A significant anaesthetic effect was found for both active treatments compared to placebo (P < 0.02), but the effect did not diverge significantly between the two formulations. Conclusions. The microemulsion vehicle can be applied to increase dermal drug delivery of lipophilic drugs in humans. The microdialysis technique combined with an appropriate pharmacokinetic model provides a high sensitivity in bioequivalence studies of topically applied substances.

Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic effects of TPA023, a GABAA α2,3 subtype-selective agonist, compared to lorazepam and placebo in healthy volunteers

TPA023, a GABAA α2,3 αsubtype-selective partial agonist, is expected to have comparable anxiolytic efficacy as benzodiazepines with reduced sedating effects. The compound Lacks efficacy at the α1 subtype, which is believed to mediate these effects. This study investigated the effects of 0.5 and 1.5 mg TPA023 and compared them with pLacebo and Lorazepam 2 mg (therapeutic anxioLytic dose). Twelve healthy maLe volunteers participated in this placebo-controlled, double-blind, double-dummy, four-way, cross-over study. Saccadic eye movements and visual analogue scales (VAS) were used to assess the sedative properties of TPA023. The effects on posturaL stability and cognition were assessed using body sway and a standardized battery of neurophysiological memory tests. Lorazepam caused a significant reduction in saccadic peak velocity, the VAS alertness score and impairment of memory and body sway. TPA023 had significant dose dependent effects on saccadic peak velocity (85 deg/sec maximum reduction at the higher dose) that approximated the effects of Lorazepam. In contrast to Lorazepam, TPA023 had no detectabLe effects on saccadic Latency or inaccuracy. Also unlike Lorazepam, TPA023 did not affect VAS alertness, memory or body sway. These results show that the effect profile of TPA023 differs markedly from that of Lorazepam, at doses that were equipotent with regard to effects on saccadic peak veLocity. Contrary to Lorazepam, TPA023 caused no detectabLe memory impairment or postural imbalance. These differences reflect the selectivity of TPA023 for different GABAA receptor subtypes.

Intraocular penetration and systemic absorption after topical application of dexamethasone disodium phosphate

PURPOSE To study the dexamethasone concentration in aqueous humor, vitreous, and serum of patients after repeated topical application of dexamethasone disodium phosphate. DESIGN Prospective nonrandomized comparative trial. PARTICIPANTS Twenty phakic patients scheduled for a first vitrectomy. METHODS All participants received dexamethasone disodium phosphate drops according to an application schedule intended to result in steady-state drug concentrations. Starting on the preoperative day, they received 1 drop of dexamethasone disodium phosphate (0.1%) every 1 hours until the time of vitrectomy (total, 10 or 11 drops). At night, ointment containing dexamethasone (0.3 mg/g) and gentamicin (5 mg/g) was administered once. From 7 AM on, the drop application schedule was resumed. At the start of the vitrectomy, samples were taken from the aqueous humor, vitreous, and blood. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The dexamethasone concentrations in the aqueous humor, vitreous, and serum measured by radioimmunoassay. RESULTS The mean dexamethasone concentrations in the aqueous humor, vitreous, and serum were 30.5 ng/ml (range, 7.1-57.7; standard deviation [SD] 15.0), 1.1 ng/ml (range, 0.0-1.6; SD 0.4), and 0.7 ng/ml (range, 0.0-1.2; SD 0.4), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Compared with previously tested administration routes (peribulbar or subconjunctival injection or oral administration), the penetration of dexamethasone into the vitreous after repeated drop application is negligible. Despite the frequent dosing schedule, the dexamethasone concentration in the aqueous humor is far lower than after a subconjunctival injection with dexamethasone disodium phosphate. Systemic uptake is low.

The sensitivity of pharmacodynamic tests for the central nervous system effects of drugs on the effects of sleep deprivation

Various methods are used to quantify sedative drug effects, but it is unknown how these surrogate measures relate to clinically relevant sleepiness. This study assessed the sensivity of different surrogates of sedation to clinically relevant sleepiness induced by sleep deprivation. Nine healthy volunteers completed a balanced three-way cross-over study with 1-week wash-out periods. Adaptive tracking, smooth-pursuit and saccadic eye movements, body sway, digit symbol substitution (DSST), visual analogue scales (VAS) and electroencephalograms (EEG) were evaluated on three occasions: (1) during the day after normal sleep, (2) during wakefulness at night; and (3) during the day after a night of sleep deprivation.VAS of alertness showed a gradual decline at night and a constant average reduction of 38 percent [95% Confidence intervals (CI), 28–47%] during the day after sleep deprivation. Average mood scores diminished by 14 percent (95%, CI 2–24%) during the day after sleep deprivation. Adaptive tracking, saccadic eye movements and body sway tended to deteriorate at night, but overall this was not statistically significant. After a night of sleep deprivation, adaptive tracking decreased by 21 percent (95% CI, 11–30%), saccadic eye movements decreased by 9–10 percent (95% CI, 5–13%/6–15%) and body sway increased by 37 percent (95% CI, 5–79%). In contrast, EEG b2-amplitudes declined significantly at night by 18 percent (95% CI, 6–29%), without changes during the day after sleep deprivation. Smooth pursuit, DSST and other EEG-amplitudes remained unchanged. These resultsemphasize that reductions in adaptive tracking, saccadic peak velocity and body sway caused by sedative drugs really reflect sedation. They also provide a level of clinical significance for these surrogates of sedation. EEG parameters and smooth pursuit were unaffected by sleep deprivation, so drug-induced changes in these measures may notreflect sedation in a stricter sense. The motivation and alertnessnecessary for DSST may overcome mild sedation.

Dexamethasone Concentration in Vitreous and Serum After Oral Administration

PURPOSE To determine the dexamethasone concentration in vitreous and serum of patients after oral administration of dexamethasone and to compare the results with the concentrations in vitreous and serum found in a previous study with peribulbar injection of 5 mg dexamethasone disodiumphosphate. METHODS In a prospective study, 54 patients who were scheduled for vitrectomy received 7.5 mg dexamethasone orally at varied time intervals before surgery. A vitreous sample was taken from each patient and serum samples were collected at multiple time points from 32 out of 54 patients. Dexamethasone concentrations were measured by radioimmunoassay. RESULTS Dexamethasone concentrations in serum ranged from 2.5 to 98.1 ng/ml (median, 61.6 ng/ml) between 1 and 3 hours after oral administration of 7.5 mg dexamethasone. Serum concentrations after peribulbar injection of 5 mg dexamethasone disodiumphosphate (containing 3.75 mg dexamethasone) were lower by a factor of 1.5. Concentrations in vitreous ranged from 1.7 to 23.4 ng/ml (median, 5.2 ng/ml) between 4 and 10 hours after oral administration. After peribulbar injection of 5 mg dexamethasone disodiumphosphate, the intravitreal concentrations were 3.9 times higher. CONCLUSIONS An oral dose of 7.5 mg dexamethasone resulted in an intravitreal corticosteroid concentration with an anti-inflammatory potency that is clearly above physiological level. This concentration, however, is several times lower than is the intravitreal concentration after a peribulbar injection of 5 mg dexamethasone disodiumphosphate, although the two routes of administration resulted in nearly equal dexamethasone concentrations in serum. The higher intravitreal concentration after peribulbar injection is probably caused by diffusion from the serum and additional transscleral diffusion.

Dexamethasone concentration in the subretinal fluid after a subconjunctival injection, a peribulbar injection, or an oral dose

PURPOSE To determine dexamethasone concentrations in the subretinal fluid of patients after a peribulbar injection, a subconjunctival injection, or an oral dose of dexamethasone and to compare the results with those of previous similar studies of dexamethasone concentrations in the vitreous. DESIGN Prospective, nonrandomized, comparative trial. PARTICIPANTS One hundred forty-eight patients with a rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. METHODS Fifty patients received a peribulbar injection of 5 mg dexamethasone disodium phosphate, 49 received a subconjunctival injection of 2.5 mg dexamethasone disodium phosphate, and 49 received an oral dose of 7. 5 mg dexamethasone at various time intervals before surgery. At the time of surgery, a subretinal fluid sample was taken from each patient. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The dexamethasone concentration in the subretinal fluid measured by radioimmunoassay. RESULTS The estimated maximum dexamethasone concentrations in the subretinal fluid after the peribulbar injection, the subconjunctival injection, and the oral dose were, respectively, 82.2 ng/ml (standard error, 17. 6), 359 ng/ml (standard error, 80.2), and 12.3 ng/ml (standard error, 1.61). Corrected for dose, the maximum dexamethasone concentrations after subconjunctival injection and peribulbar injection were, respectively, 120 (95% confidence interval, 54/180) and 13 (95% confidence interval, 6.8/20) times greater than after oral administration. CONCLUSIONS A subconjunctival injection of dexamethasone disodium phosphate is more effective in delivering dexamethasone into the subretinal fluid of patients with a rhegmatogenous retinal detachment compared with peribulbar injection or oral administration. The subretinal dexamethasone concentrations were higher than concentrations measured in the vitreous in previous studies with a similar setup after all three delivery methods.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of oral and intravenous meta-chlorophenylpiperazine in healthy volunteers

meta-Chlorophenylpiperazine (mCPP) is a compound that is frequently used in challenge tests of the serotonergic system. Its human pharmacology is largely unexplored. The objective of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of mCPP. Eight female and six male healthy volunteers were included in a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, three-way crossover design of single-dose intravenous (0.1 mg/kg), oral (0.5 mg/kg), and placebo treatment, with 24-hour follow-up. mCPP showed a large variability in clearance (11-92 mL/hr) and bioavailability (14-108%). Two female subjects dropped out because of headache and dysphoria. During the 27 occasions in which mCPP was administered, autonomic physical symptoms were observed in 23 subjects and disturbances of mood in 6 subjects. Oral and intravenous mCPP caused sudden increases in cortisol levels, prolactin levels, and total scores of the Body Sensation Questionnaire. Administration of mCPP also led to concentration-dependent increases of saccadic peak velocity and adaptive tracking performance and to a decrease of electroencephalographic occipital theta activity. No clinically relevant effects on electrocardiogram, temperature, and blood pressure were found. In conclusion, it is doubtful whether mCPP is a useful compound for challenge tests in view of the large pharmacokinetic variability after intravenous and oral administration. The effects of mCPP are consistent with disinhibition of the central nervous system.