Adam F. Cohen

Subjective Sleep Disturbance in Patients with Partial Epilepsy: A Questionnaire‐based Study on Prevalence and Impact on Quality of Life

Summary:  Purpose: This study was designed to assess whether sleep disturbance is more frequent among patients with partial seizures and what impact on quality of life (QoL) sleep disturbance may have on patients with partial seizures.

High concentration of dexamethasone in aqueous and vitreous after subconjunctival injection

PURPOSE To determine the dexamethasone concentration in aqueous, vitreous, and serum of patients after a subconjunctival injection with dexamethasone disodium phosphate and to compare the effectiveness of a subconjunctival injection as a method of delivering dexamethasone into the vitreous with that of two previously tested routes: peribulbar injection and oral administration. METHODS In a prospective study, 50 phakic patients who underwent a pars plana vitrectomy received a single subconjunctival injection with 2.5 mg of dexamethasone disodium phosphate, aqueous solution (after topical anesthesia and a subconjunctival injection with lidocaine) at varied intervals before surgery. An aqueous and a vitreous sample were taken from each patient, and serum samples were collected at multiple time points from nine of 50 patients. Dexamethasone concentrations were measured by radioimmunoassay. RESULTS The estimated maximum dexamethasone concentration in the aqueous was 858 ng per ml at 2.5 hours after injection, and in the vitreous, 72.5 ng per ml at 3 hours. In serum, a mean maximum concentration of 32.4 ng per ml was measured at approximately 30 minutes after injection. CONCLUSIONS Subconjunctival injection of 2.5 mg of dexamethasone disodium phosphate resulted in an estimated vitreous dexamethasone peak concentration three and 12 times higher, respectively, than after a peribulbar injection of 5 mg of dexamethasone disodium phosphate and an oral dose of 7.5 mg of dexamethasone. Thus, a subconjunctival injection is the most effective method of delivering dexamethasone into both the anterior and posterior segments of the eye. Systemic drug absorption is considerable and is of the same order of magnitude as after peribulbar injection.

The effect of grapefruit juice on cyclosporine and prednisone metabolism in transplant patients

To estimate the effect of grapefruit juice on cyclosporine and prednisone metabolism.

Peribulbar corticosteroid injection: vitreal and serum concentrations after dexamethasone disodium phosphate injection.

PURPOSE To study the dexamethasone level reached in human vitreous after a peribulbar injection of 5 mg of dexamethasone disodium phosphate and to assess its systemic uptake. METHODS In a prospective study, 61 eyes of 61 patients scheduled for vitrectomy received a single peribulbar injection of 5 mg of dexamethasone disodium phosphate at varied intervals before surgery. At the start of vitrectomy, an undiluted vitreous sample was taken. In 22 patients, multiple serum samples were collected. Dexamethasone concentrations were measured by radioimmunoassay. The physiologic cortisol concentration was determined in the vitreous of 12 eyes of 12 patients who did not receive dexamethasone. RESULTS An average dexamethasone peak concentration of approximately 13 ng/ml was reached in vitreous 6 to 7 hours after peribulbar injection. In serum the average peak concentration was approximately 60 ng/ml 20 to 30 minutes after peribulbar injection. The average physiologic cortisol concentration in vitreous was 5.1 ng/ml. CONCLUSIONS After a peribulbar injection of 5 mg of dexamethasone disodium phosphate, an average intravitreal dexamethasone concentration is reached with a 75 times greater anti-inflammatory potency than physiologically present cortisol. Dexamethasone concentration in serum, however, is several times higher. Peribulbar injection is not just a local treatment but results in serum levels comparable to those achieved by a high oral dose.

Influence of a microemulsion vehicle on cutaneous bioequivalence of a lipophilic model drug assessed by microdialysis and pharmacodynamics.

AbstractPurpose. The aim of the study was to investigate the cutaneous bioequivalence of a lipophilic model drug (lidocaine) applied in a novel topical microemulsion vehicle, compared to a conventional oil–in–water (O/W) emulsion, assessed by a pharmacokinetics microdialysis model and a pharmacodynamic method. Methods. Dermal delivery of lidocaine was estimated by microdialysis in 8 volunteers. Absorption coefficients and lag times were determined by pharmacokinetic modelling of the microdialysis data. Subsequently, the anaesthetic effect of the treatments was assessed by mechanical stimuli using von Frey hairs in 12 volunteers. Results. The microemulsion formulation increased the cutaneous absorption coefficient of lidocaine 2.9 times (95% confidence interval: 1.9/4.6) compared with the O/W emulsion–based cream. Also, lag time decreased from 110 ± 43 min to 87 ± 32 min (P = 0.02). The compartmental pharmacokinetic model provided an excellent fit of the concentration–time curves with reliable estimation of absorption coefficient and lag time. A significant anaesthetic effect was found for both active treatments compared to placebo (P < 0.02), but the effect did not diverge significantly between the two formulations. Conclusions. The microemulsion vehicle can be applied to increase dermal drug delivery of lipophilic drugs in humans. The microdialysis technique combined with an appropriate pharmacokinetic model provides a high sensitivity in bioequivalence studies of topically applied substances.

Intraocular penetration and systemic absorption after topical application of dexamethasone disodium phosphate

PURPOSE To study the dexamethasone concentration in aqueous humor, vitreous, and serum of patients after repeated topical application of dexamethasone disodium phosphate. DESIGN Prospective nonrandomized comparative trial. PARTICIPANTS Twenty phakic patients scheduled for a first vitrectomy. METHODS All participants received dexamethasone disodium phosphate drops according to an application schedule intended to result in steady-state drug concentrations. Starting on the preoperative day, they received 1 drop of dexamethasone disodium phosphate (0.1%) every 1 hours until the time of vitrectomy (total, 10 or 11 drops). At night, ointment containing dexamethasone (0.3 mg/g) and gentamicin (5 mg/g) was administered once. From 7 AM on, the drop application schedule was resumed. At the start of the vitrectomy, samples were taken from the aqueous humor, vitreous, and blood. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The dexamethasone concentrations in the aqueous humor, vitreous, and serum measured by radioimmunoassay. RESULTS The mean dexamethasone concentrations in the aqueous humor, vitreous, and serum were 30.5 ng/ml (range, 7.1-57.7; standard deviation [SD] 15.0), 1.1 ng/ml (range, 0.0-1.6; SD 0.4), and 0.7 ng/ml (range, 0.0-1.2; SD 0.4), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Compared with previously tested administration routes (peribulbar or subconjunctival injection or oral administration), the penetration of dexamethasone into the vitreous after repeated drop application is negligible. Despite the frequent dosing schedule, the dexamethasone concentration in the aqueous humor is far lower than after a subconjunctival injection with dexamethasone disodium phosphate. Systemic uptake is low.

Stimulation programs for pediatric drug research – do children really benefit?

Most drugs that are currently prescribed in pediatrics have not been tested in children. Pediatric drug studies are stimulated in the USA by the pediatric exclusivity provision under the Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act (FDAMA) that grants patent extensions when pediatric labeling is provided. We investigated the effectiveness of these programs in stimulating drug research in children, thereby increasing the evidence for safe and effective drug use in the pediatric population. All drugs granted pediatric exclusivity under the FDAMA were analyzed by studying the relevant summaries of medical and clinical pharmacology reviews of the pediatric studies or, if these were unavailable, the labeling information as provided by the manufacturer. A systematic search of the literature was performed to identify drug utilization patterns in children. From July 1998 to August 2006, 135 drug entities were granted pediatric exclusivity. Most frequent drug groups were anti-depressants and mood stabilizers, ACE inhibitors, lipid-lowering preparations, HIV antivirals, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory and anti-rheumatic drugs. The distribution of the different drugs closely matched the distribution of these drugs over the adult market, and not the drug utilization by children. Many drug studies in children have been performed since the introduction of the FDAMA. However, children infrequently use the drugs granted pediatric exclusivity. The priorities for pediatric drug research should be set by the need of the patients, not by market considerations.

Dexamethasone Concentration in Vitreous and Serum After Oral Administration

PURPOSE To determine the dexamethasone concentration in vitreous and serum of patients after oral administration of dexamethasone and to compare the results with the concentrations in vitreous and serum found in a previous study with peribulbar injection of 5 mg dexamethasone disodiumphosphate. METHODS In a prospective study, 54 patients who were scheduled for vitrectomy received 7.5 mg dexamethasone orally at varied time intervals before surgery. A vitreous sample was taken from each patient and serum samples were collected at multiple time points from 32 out of 54 patients. Dexamethasone concentrations were measured by radioimmunoassay. RESULTS Dexamethasone concentrations in serum ranged from 2.5 to 98.1 ng/ml (median, 61.6 ng/ml) between 1 and 3 hours after oral administration of 7.5 mg dexamethasone. Serum concentrations after peribulbar injection of 5 mg dexamethasone disodiumphosphate (containing 3.75 mg dexamethasone) were lower by a factor of 1.5. Concentrations in vitreous ranged from 1.7 to 23.4 ng/ml (median, 5.2 ng/ml) between 4 and 10 hours after oral administration. After peribulbar injection of 5 mg dexamethasone disodiumphosphate, the intravitreal concentrations were 3.9 times higher. CONCLUSIONS An oral dose of 7.5 mg dexamethasone resulted in an intravitreal corticosteroid concentration with an anti-inflammatory potency that is clearly above physiological level. This concentration, however, is several times lower than is the intravitreal concentration after a peribulbar injection of 5 mg dexamethasone disodiumphosphate, although the two routes of administration resulted in nearly equal dexamethasone concentrations in serum. The higher intravitreal concentration after peribulbar injection is probably caused by diffusion from the serum and additional transscleral diffusion.

Dexamethasone concentration in the subretinal fluid after a subconjunctival injection, a peribulbar injection, or an oral dose

PURPOSE To determine dexamethasone concentrations in the subretinal fluid of patients after a peribulbar injection, a subconjunctival injection, or an oral dose of dexamethasone and to compare the results with those of previous similar studies of dexamethasone concentrations in the vitreous. DESIGN Prospective, nonrandomized, comparative trial. PARTICIPANTS One hundred forty-eight patients with a rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. METHODS Fifty patients received a peribulbar injection of 5 mg dexamethasone disodium phosphate, 49 received a subconjunctival injection of 2.5 mg dexamethasone disodium phosphate, and 49 received an oral dose of 7. 5 mg dexamethasone at various time intervals before surgery. At the time of surgery, a subretinal fluid sample was taken from each patient. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The dexamethasone concentration in the subretinal fluid measured by radioimmunoassay. RESULTS The estimated maximum dexamethasone concentrations in the subretinal fluid after the peribulbar injection, the subconjunctival injection, and the oral dose were, respectively, 82.2 ng/ml (standard error, 17. 6), 359 ng/ml (standard error, 80.2), and 12.3 ng/ml (standard error, 1.61). Corrected for dose, the maximum dexamethasone concentrations after subconjunctival injection and peribulbar injection were, respectively, 120 (95% confidence interval, 54/180) and 13 (95% confidence interval, 6.8/20) times greater than after oral administration. CONCLUSIONS A subconjunctival injection of dexamethasone disodium phosphate is more effective in delivering dexamethasone into the subretinal fluid of patients with a rhegmatogenous retinal detachment compared with peribulbar injection or oral administration. The subretinal dexamethasone concentrations were higher than concentrations measured in the vitreous in previous studies with a similar setup after all three delivery methods.

Efficacy and safety of RPL554, a dual PDE3 and PDE4 inhibitor, in healthy volunteers and in patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: findings from four clinical trials.

BACKGROUND Many patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) routinely receive a combination of an inhaled bronchodilator and anti-inflammatory glucocorticosteroid, but those with severe disease often respond poorly to these classes of drug. We assessed the efficacy and safety of a novel inhaled dual phosphodiesterase 3 (PDE3) and PDE4 inhibitor, RPL554 for its ability to act as a bronchodilator and anti-inflammatory drug. METHODS Between February, 2009, and January, 2013, we undertook four proof-of-concept clinical trials in the Netherlands, Italy, and the UK. Nebulised RPL554 was examined in study 1 for safety in 18 healthy men who were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive an inhaled dose of RPL554 (0·003 mg/kg or 0·009 mg/kg) or placebo by a computer-generated randomisation table. Subsequently, six non-smoking men with mild allergic asthma received single doses of RPL554 (three received 0·009 mg/kg and three received 0·018 mg/kg) in an open-label, adaptive study, and then ten men with mild allergic asthma were randomly assigned to receive placebo or RPL554 (0·018 mg/kg) by a computer-generated randomisation table for an assessment of safety, bronchodilation, and bronchoprotection. Study 2 examined the reproducibility of the bronchodilator response to a daily dose of nebulised RPL554 (0·018 mg/kg) for 6 consecutive days in a single-blind (patients masked), placebo-controlled study in 12 men with clinically stable asthma. The safety and bronchodilator effect of RPL554 (0·018 mg/kg) was assessed in study 3, an open-label, placebo-controlled crossover trial, in 12 men with mild-to-moderate COPD. In study 4, a placebo-controlled crossover trial, the effect of RPL554 (0·018 mg/kg) on lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory cell infiltration in induced sputum was investigated in 21 healthy men. In studies 3 and 4, randomisation was done by computer-generated permutation with a block size of two for study 3 and four for study 4. Unless otherwise stated, participants and clinicians were masked to treatment assignment. Analyses were by intention to treat. All trials were registered with EudraCT, numbers 2008-005048-17, 2011-001698-22, 2010-023573-18, and 2012-000742-34. FINDINGS Safety was a primary endpoint of studies 1 and 3 and a secondary endpoint of studies 2 and 4. Overall, RPL554 was well tolerated, and adverse events were generally mild and of equal frequency between placebo and active treatment groups. Efficacy was a primary endpoint of study 2 and a secondary endpoint of studies 1 and 3. Study 1 measured change in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20MCh) in participants with asthma. RPL554 produced rapid bronchodilation in patients with asthma with an FEV1 increase at 1 h of 520 mL (95% CI 320-720; p<0·0001), which was a 14% increase from placebo, and increased the PC20MCh by 1·5 doubling doses (95% CI 0·63-2·28; p=0·004) compared with placebo. The primary endpoint of study 2 was maximum FEV1 reached during 6 h after dosing with RPL554 in patients with asthma. RPL554 produced a similar maximum mean increase in FEV1 from placebo on day 1 (555 mL, 95% CI 442-668), day 3 (505 mL, 392-618), and day 6 (485 mL, 371-598; overall p<0·0001). A secondary endpoint of study 3 (patients with COPD) was the increase from baseline in FEV1. RPL554 produced bronchodilation with a mean maximum FEV1 increase of 17·2% (SE 5·2). In healthy individuals (study 4), the primary endpoint was percentage change in neutrophil counts in induced sputum 6 h after lipopolysaccharide challenge. RPL554 (0·018 mg/kg) did not significantly reduce the percentage of neutrophils in sputum (80·3% in the RPL554 group vs 84·2% in the placebo group; difference -3·9%, 95% CI -9·4 to 1·6, p=0·15), since RPL554 significantly reduced neutrophils (p=0·002) and total cells (p=0·002) to a similar degree. INTERPRETATION In four exploratory studies, inhaled RPL554 is an effective and well tolerated bronchodilator, bronchoprotector, and anti-inflammatory drug and further studies will establish the full potential of this new drug for the treatment of patients with COPD or asthma. FUNDING Verona Pharma.