Rita De Smet

Normal and Pathologic Concentrations of Uremic Toxins

An updated review of the existing knowledge regarding uremic toxins facilitates the design of experimental studies. We performed a literature search and found 621 articles about uremic toxicity published after a 2003 review of this topic. Eighty-seven records provided serum or blood measurements of one or more solutes in patients with CKD. These records described 32 previously known uremic toxins and 56 newly reported solutes. The articles most frequently reported concentrations of β2-microglobulin, indoxyl sulfate, homocysteine, uric acid, and parathyroid hormone. We found most solutes (59%) in only one report. Compared with previous results, more recent articles reported higher uremic concentrations of many solutes, including carboxymethyllysine, cystatin C, and parathyroid hormone. However, five solutes had uremic concentrations less than 10% of the originally reported values. Furthermore, the uremic concentrations of four solutes did not exceed their respective normal concentrations, although they had been previously described as uremic retention solutes. In summary, this review extends the classification of uremic retention solutes and their normal and uremic concentrations, and it should aid the design of experiments to study the biologic effects of these solutes in CKD.

Toxicity of Free p-Cresol: A Prospective and Cross-Sectional Analysis

BACKGROUND Uremic syndrome is the consequence of the retention of solutes usually cleared by the healthy kidneys. p-Cresol can be considered a prototypic protein-bound uremic toxin. It is conceivable, analogous with drugs, that the non-protein-bound fraction of p-cresol exerts toxicity. This aspect had never been evaluated, nor have the factors influencing the free fraction of p-cresol. METHODS In a transsectional study we evaluated the relationship between prehemodialysis free p-cresol and the ratio of free to total p-cresol (F:T) to clinical and biological factors in 44 chronic renal failure patients. The evolution of free p-cresol was assessed prospectively in 12 patients showing a change in serum albumin of at least 5 g/L over time. Hospitalization days attributable to infection and the free p-cresol concentrations were noted over a 1-year period. The impact of free p-cresol in vitro on leukocyte functional capacity was evaluated by chemiluminescence. RESULTS We observed a correlation between total and free p-cresol (r = 0.84; P <0.001). In the multivariate analyses, free p-cresol and F:T showed a negative correlation with albumin. A shift from normal serum albumin to hypoalbumininemia in 12 patients led to an increase in free p-cresol from 5.9 +/- 3.2 to 8.2 +/- 4.5 micro mol/L (P <0.05; 0.64 +/- 0.35 to 0.89 +/- 0.49 mg/L). Free p-cresol (P <0.05) was higher in the patients hospitalized for infectious disease. In vitro, free p-cresol was higher in a 25 g/L than in a 50 g/L albumin solution (P <0.05). Leukocyte chemiluminescence production was more inhibited in the low albumin (high free p-cresol) solution (28% +/- 6% vs 21% +/- 8%; P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS Hypoalbuminemia and total p-cresol increase the free fraction of p-cresol. Patients hospitalized for infections have higher free p-cresol. In vitro, high free p-cresol has a negative impact on leukocyte chemiluminescence production. These data demonstrate the toxicity of free p-cresol.

A sensitive HPLC method for the quantification of free and total p-cresol in patients with chronic renal failure

Para-cresol (4-methylphenol) is a volatile phenolic compound which is retained in chronic renal failure. Several recent studies suggest that p-cresol interferes with various biochemical and physiological functions at concentrations currently observed in uremia. Only a few methods are available for the determination of p-cresol concentration in serum. In addition, these methods have only been used for the determination of total p-cresol. In particular, the evolution of free (non-protein bound) p-cresol is of concern, because conceivably this is the biologically active fraction. The concentration of free p-cresol, is, however, markedly lower than that of total p-cresol, in view of its important protein binding. We report a method enabling the measurement of total and free p-cresol concentration in serum of healthy controls and uremic patients. Deproteinization, extraction and HPLC procedure are efficient, without interference of other protein bound ligands and/or precursors of p-cresol or phenol. By means of spiking experiments, the measurement of the UV absorbance over the 200-400 nm wavelength range, and capillary gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, the considered compound is identified as p-cresol. With a fluorescence detection at 284/310 nm as extinction/emission wavelengths the detection limit of p-cresol is 1.3 micromol/l (0.14 microg/ml). Recovery of added p-cresol to normal serum is 95.4+/-4.1%. For free p-cresol and total p-cresol determinations, intra-assay and day-to-day variation co-efficients are 3.2%, 4.2%, 6.9% and 7.3%, respectively. Compared to healthy controls, the serum p-cresol levels are 7-10 times higher in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients (CAPD), uremic outpatients, and hemodialysis patients: 8.6+/-3.0 vs. 62.0+/-19.5, 87.8+/-31.7 and 88.7+/-49.3 micromol/l (0.93+/-0.32 vs. 6.70+/-2.11, 9.49+/-3.43, and 9.60+/-5.30 microg/ml) (p<0.05), respectively. The difference is even more important if free p-cresol is considered. This corresponds to a decreased protein binding in uremic patients. We conclude that the present method allows an accurate measurement of both total and free p-cresol, and that the measured concentrations in uremia are in the range which may cause biochemical alterations.

P-cresol, a uremic retention solute, alters the endothelial barrier function in vitro

Patients with chronic renal failure (CRF) exhibit endothelial dysfunction, which may involve uremic retention solutes that accumulate in blood and tissues. In this study, we investigated the in vitro effect of the uremic retention solute p-cresol on the barrier function of endothelial cells (HUVEC). P-cresol was tested at concentrations found in CRF patients, and since p-cresol is protein-bound, experiments were performed with and without physiological concentration of human albumin (4 g/dl). With albumin, we showed that p-cresol caused a strong increase in endothelial permeability after a 24-hour exposure. Concomitant with this increase in endothelial permeability, p-cresol induced a reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton and an alteration of adherens junctions. These molecular events were demonstrated by the decreased staining of cortical actin, associated with the formation of stress fibers across the cell, and by the decreased staining of junctional VE-cadherin. This decrease in junctional VE-cadherin staining was not associated with a reduction of membrane expression. Without albumin, the effects of p-cresol were more pronounced. The specific Rho kinase inhibitor, Y-27632, inhibited the effects of p-cresol, indicating that p-cresol mediates the increase in endothelial permeability in a Rho kinase-dependent way. In conclusion, these results show that p-cresol causes a severe dysfunction of endothelial barrier function in vitro and suggest this uremic retention solute may participate in the endothelium dysfunction observed in CRF patients.

Reevaluation of Formulas for Predicting Creatinine Clearance in Adults and Children, Using Compensated Creatinine Methods

In clinical practice, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is the most important marker for evaluation of renal function (1). Dosages of drugs that are eliminated by glomerular filtration are often based on GFR. At present, the most reliable methods for accurate assessment of overall GFR require intravenous administration of exogenous compounds and are both cumbersome and expensive. In clinical practice, creatinine clearance (CrCl) is widely accepted as a simple measure of GFR. However, CrCl systematically overestimates GFR because creatinine is freely filtered by the glomerulus and is also secreted by the proximal tubule. In the earliest methods, serum creatinine was assayed by the Jaffe reaction after deproteinization, eliminating the pseudo-chromogen effect of proteins (2). Similarly, the first automated methods used dialysis membranes to prevent interference from plasma proteins. Today, however, analyzers use undiluted serum and plasma, making them subject to the so-called “protein error” (3). This produces a positive difference of ∼27 μmol/L creatinine compared with HPLC methods (4)(5)(6)(7). Because urine contains relatively little or no protein, the protein error affects only creatinine determinations in serum. Therefore, CrCl is underestimated when creatinine methods affected by protein error are used. This underestimation has been stated to be compensated by the overestimation attributable to tubular secretion of creatinine. However, studies confirming this statement are lacking. In compensated Jaffe methods, the values assigned to the calibrator set point are adjusted to minimize the pseudo-creatinine contribution of proteins. The result is that compensated methods produce lower creatinine values. Alternatively, the protein error can be avoided by use of enzymatic creatinine methods. Collection of timed urine for CrCl is often a major source of error; therefore, simple formulas have been introduced to estimate GFR based on serum creatinine concentration, age, gender, body weight, and body length (8)(9) …

Impact of increasing haemodialysis frequency versus haemodialysis duration on removal of urea and guanidino compounds: a kinetic analysis

BACKGROUND Patients with renal failure retain a large variety of uraemic solutes, characterized by different kinetic behaviour. It is not entirely clear what the impact is of increasing dialysis frequency and/or duration on removal efficiency, nor whether this impact is the same for all types of solutes. METHODS This study was based on two-compartmental kinetic data obtained in stable haemodialysis patients (n = 7) for urea, creatinine (CREA), guanidinosuccinic acid (GSA) and methylguanidine (MG). For each individual patient, mathematical simulations were performed for different dialysis schedules, varying in frequency, duration and intensity. For each dialysis schedule, plasmatic and extraplasmatic weekly time-averaged concentrations (TAC) were calculated, as well as their %difference to weekly TAC of the reference dialysis schedule (three times weekly 4 h). RESULTS Increasing dialysis duration was most beneficial for CREA and MG, which are distributed in a larger volume (54.0 +/- 5.9 L and 102.6 +/- 33.9 L) than urea (42.7 +/- 6.0 L) [plasmatic weekly TAC decrease of 31.5 +/- 3.2% and 31.8 +/- 3.8% for CREA and MG with Q(B) of 200 mL/min, compared to 25.7 +/- 3.2% for urea (P = 0.001 and P < 0.001)]. Increasing dialysis frequency resulted only in a limited increase in efficiency, most pronounced for solutes distributed in a small volume like GSA (30.6 +/- 4.2 L). Increasing both duration and frequency results in weekly TAC decreases of >65% for all solutes. Comparable results were found in the extraplasmatic compartment. CONCLUSION Prolonged dialysis significantly reduces solute concentration levels, especially for those solutes that are distributed in a larger volume. Increasing both dialysis frequency and duration is the superior dialysis schedule.

Study by means of high-performance liquid chromatography of solutes that decrease theophylline/protein binding in the serum of uremic patients

Substantial changes in protein binding of drugs occur during the progression of renal insufficiency. Protein-bound uremic solutes play a role in the inhibition of drug protein binding. We previously demonstrated that hippuric acid in uremic ultrafiltrate was an inhibitor of the theophylline protein binding. The present study was undertaken to extend the yield of protein-bound uremic solutes by displacing ligands in uremic serum from their binding sites by five deproteinization methods. The inhibitory effect on theophylline protein binding of the deproteinized uremic serum was higher than with ultrafiltrate (p < 0.05). The influence of 30 semi-preparative HPLC fractions from deproteinized uremic serum on the theophylline protein binding was evaluated to identify the responsible compounds and to compare their relative individual impact. The theophylline protein binding was calculated as a percentage (bound versus total). The most important decrease of the protein binding was observed in HPLC fractions 6, 10 to 13, 15 and 28 with protein binding of: 61.5 +/- 10.8, 64.5 +/- 7.6, 60.9 +/- 10.1, 47.5 +/- 3.3, 60.0 +/- 6.7, 60.7 +/- 6.3 and 61.3 +/- 6.9%, respectively versus 69.1 +/- 2.4% for control serum (p < 0.05). The responsible compounds were characterized in the fractions by co-elution: 3-carboxy-4-methyl-5-propyl-2-furanpropanoic acid (CMPF), indole-3-acetic acid, indoxyl sulfate, hippuric acid, p-hydroxyhippuric acid and tryptophan. Their concentration was determined by analytical HPLC and a solution containing these compounds at the same concentration as in deproteinized uremic serum was composed. This solution was added to control serum and decreased the theophylline protein binding from 69.0 +/- 4.4% to 61.3 +/- 1.3%, which was less important than in genuine uremic serum (44.4 +/- 3.8%, p < 0.05). Dose-response curves with the characterized compounds revealed that the most important role in binding inhibition could be attributed to hippuric acid and CMPF. Our data suggests that the yield of protein binding inhibiting compounds is more important with deproteinized uremic serum than with uremic ultrafiltrate. The identified uremic compounds are not entirely representative for the decreased protein binding of theophylline, indicating that additional factors than those identified in this study affect the protein binding as well.

Back to the future: middle molecules, high flux membranes, and optimal dialysis.

Middle molecules can be defined as compounds with a molecular weight (MW) above 500 Da. An even broader definition includes those molecules that do not cross the membranes of standard low‐flux dialyzers, not only because of molecular weight, but also because of protein binding and/or multicompartmental behavior. Recently, several of these middle molecules have been linked to the increased tendency of uremic patients to develop inflammation, malnutrition, and atheromatosis. Other toxic actions can also be attributed to the middle molecules. In the present publication we will consider whether improved removal of middle molecules by large pore membranes has an impact on clinical conditions related to the uremic syndrome.

Uremic toxins: removal with different therapies.

A convenient way to classify uremic solutes is to subdivide them according to the physicochemical characteristics influencing their dialytic removal into small water‐soluble compounds (<500 Da), protein‐bound compounds, and middle molecules (>500 Da). The prototype of small water‐soluble solutes remains urea although the proof of its toxicity is scanty. Only a few other water‐soluble compounds exert toxicity (e.g., the guanidines, the purines), but most of these are characterized by an intra‐dialytic behavior, which is different from that of urea. In addition, the protein‐bound compounds and the middle molecules behave in a different way from urea, due to their protein binding and their molecular weights, respectively. Because of these specific removal patterns, it is suggested that new approaches of influencing uremic solute concentration should be explored, such as specific adsorptive systems, alternative dialytic timeframes, removal by intestinal adsorption, modification of toxin, or general metabolism by drug administration. Middle molecule removal has been improved by the introduction of large pore, high‐flux membranes, but this approach seems to have come close to its maximal removal capacity, whereas multicompartmental behavior might become an additional factor hampering attempts to decrease toxin concentration. Hence, further enhancement of uremic toxin removal should be pursued by the introduction of alternative concepts of elimination.