Robert A. Bambara

Enzymes and Reactions at the Eukaryotic DNA Replication Fork

Many recent reviews of eukaryotic DNA replication have emphasized our current understanding of either the initiation and regulation of eukaryotic nuclear DNA replication (1, 2), the DNA polymerases and other proteins involved (3–11), or the entire range of knowledge of the replication process (12–17). Here, we will focus on recent findings concerning specific enzymatic reactions necessary for the growth of the eukaryotic replication fork.

Macrophage Tropism of HIV-1 Depends on Efficient Cellular dNTP Utilization by Reverse Transcriptase

Retroviruses utilize cellular dNTPs to perform proviral DNA synthesis in infected host cells. Unlike oncoretroviruses, which replicate in dividing cells, lentiviruses, such as human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and simian immunodeficiency virus, are capable of efficiently replicating in non-dividing cells (terminally differentiated macrophages) as well as dividing cells (i.e. activated CD4+ T cells). In general, non-dividing cells are likely to have low cellular dNTP content compared with dividing cells. Here, by employing a novel assay for cellular dNTP content, we determined the dNTP concentrations in two HIV-1 target cells, macrophages and activated CD4+ T cells. We found that human macrophages contained 130-250-fold lower dNTP concentrations than activated human CD4+ T cells. Biochemical analysis revealed that, unlike oncoretroviral reverse transcriptases (RTs), lentiviral RTs efficiently synthesize DNA even in the presence of the low dNTP concentrations equivalent to those found in macrophages. In keeping with this observation, HIV-1 vectors containing mutant HIV-1 RTs, which kinetically mimic oncoretroviral RTs, failed to transduce human macrophages despite retaining normal infectivity for activated CD4+ T cells and other dividing cells. These results suggest that the ability of HIV-1 to infect macrophages, which is essential to establishing the early pathogenesis of HIV-1 infection, depends, at least in part, on enzymatic adaptation of HIV-1 RT to efficiently catalyze DNA synthesis in limited cellular dNTP substrate environments.

Sequence Requirements for Estrogen Receptor Binding to Estrogen Response Elements

The estrogen receptor (ER) is a transcription factor that binds to a specific DNA sequence found in the regulatory regions of estrogen-responsive genes, called the estrogen response element (ERE). Many genes that contain EREs have been identified, and most of these EREs contain one or more changes from the core consensus sequence, a 13-nucleotide segment with 10 nucleotides forming an inverted repeat. A number of genes have multiple copies of these imperfect EREs. In order to understand why natural EREs have developed in this manner, we have attempted to define the basic sequence requirements for ER binding. To this end, we measured the binding of homodimeric ER to a variety of nonconsensus EREs. We discovered that an ERE containing even a single change from the consensus may be unable to bind ER. However, an ERE with two changes from the consensus may be capable of binding avidly to ER in the context of certain flanking sequences. We found that changes in the sequences flanking a nonconsensus ERE can greatly alter ER-ERE affinity, either positively or negatively. Careful study of sequences flanking a series of EREs made it possible to develop rules that predict whether ER binds to a given natural ERE and also to predict the relative amounts of binding when comparing two EREs.

Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated (ATM) and ATM and Rad3-related Protein Exhibit Selective Target Specificities in Response to Different Forms of DNA Damage

The ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) and ATR (ATM and Rad3-related) protein kinases exert cell cycle delay, in part, by phosphorylating Checkpoint kinase (Chk) 1, Chk2, and p53. It is well established that ATR is activated following UV light-induced DNA damage such as pyrimidine dimers and the 6-(1,2)-dihydro-2-oxo-4-pyrimidinyl-5-methyl-2,4-(1H,3H)-pyrimidinediones, whereas ATM is activated in response to double strand DNA breaks. Here we clarify the activation of these kinases in cells exposed to IR, UV, and hyperoxia, a condition of chronic oxidative stress resulting in clastogenic DNA damage. Phosphorylation on Chk1(Ser-345), Chk2(Thr-68), and p53(Ser-15) following oxidative damage by IR involved both ATM and ATR. In response to ultraviolet radiation-induced stalled replication forks, phosphorylation on Chk1 and p53 required ATR, whereas Chk2 required ATM. Cells exposed to hyperoxia exhibited growth delay in G1, S, and G2 that was disrupted by wortmannin. Consistent with ATM or ATR activation, hyperoxia induced wortmannin-sensitive phosphorylation of Chk1, Chk2, and p53. By using ATM- and ATR-defective cells, phosphorylation on Chk1, Chk2, and p53 was found to be ATM-dependent, whereas ATR also contributed to Chk1 phosphorylation. These data reveal activated ATM and ATR exhibit selective substrate specificity in response to different genotoxic agents.

Cleavage Specificity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Flap Endonuclease 1 Suggests a Double-Flap Structure as the Cellular Substrate

Flap endonuclease 1 (FEN1) is a structure-specific nuclease that cleaves substrates containing unannealed 5′-flaps during Okazaki fragment processing. Cleavage removes the flap at or near the point of annealing. The preferred substrate for archaeal FEN1 or the 5′-nuclease domains of bacterial DNA polymerases is a double-flap structure containing a 3′-tail on the upstream primer adjacent to the 5′-flap. We report that FEN1 inSaccharomyces cerevisiae (Rad27p) exhibits a similar specificity. Cleavage was most efficient when the upstream primer contained a 1-nucleotide 3′-tail as compared with the fully annealed upstream primer traditionally tested. The site of cleavage was exclusively at a position one nucleotide into the annealed region, allowing human DNA ligase I to seal all resulting nicks. In contrast, a portion of the products from traditional flap substrates is not ligated. The 3′-OH of the upstream primer is not critical for double-flap recognition, because Rad27p is tolerant of modifications. However, the positioning of the 3′-nucleotide defines the site of cleavage. We have tested substrates having complementary tails that equilibrate to many structures by branch migration. FEN1 only cleaved those containing a 1-nucleotide 3′-tail. Equilibrating substrates containing 12-ribonucleotides at the end of the 5′-flap simulates the situation in vivo. Rad27p cleaves this substrate in the expected 1-nucleotide 3′-tail configuration. Overall, these results suggest that the double-flap substrate is formed and cleaved during eukaryotic DNA replication in vivo.

Single-Chain Estrogen Receptors (ERs) Reveal that the ERα/β Heterodimer Emulates Functions of the ERα Dimer in Genomic Estrogen Signaling Pathways

ABSTRACT The effects of estrogens, particularly 17β-estradiol (E2), are mediated by estrogen receptor α (ERα) and ERβ. Upon binding to E2, ERs homo- and heterodimerize when coexpressed. The ER dimer then regulates the transcription of target genes through estrogen responsive element (ERE)-dependent and -independent pathways that constitute genomic estrogen signaling. Although ERα and ERβ have similar ERE and E2 binding properties, they display different transregulatory capacities in both ERE-dependent and -independent signaling pathways. It is therefore likely that the heterodimerization provides novel functions to ERs by combining distinct properties of the contributing partners. The elucidation of the role of the ER heterodimer is critical for the understanding of physiology and pathophysiology of E2 signaling. However, differentially determining target gene responses during cosynthesis of ER subtypes is difficult, since dimers formed are a heterogeneous population of homo- and heterodimers. To circumvent the pivotal dimerization step in ER action and hence produce a homogeneous ER heterodimer population, we utilized a genetic fusion strategy. We joined the cDNAs of ERα and/or ERβ to produce single-chain ERs to simulate the ER homo- and heterodimers. The fusion ERs interacted with ERE and E2 in a manner similar to that observed with the ER dimers. The homofusion receptors mimicked the functions of the parent ER dimers in the ERE-dependent and -independent pathways in transfected mammalian cells, whereas heterofusion receptors emulated the transregulatory properties of the ERα dimer. These results suggest that ERα is the functionally dominant partner in the ERα/β heterodimer.

Evidence for a Unique Mechanism of Strand Transfer from the Transactivation Response Region of HIV-1

We previously found that strand transfer by human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) reverse transcriptase (RT) is promoted at sites where RT pauses during synthesis. In this report, strand transfer is measured within the 5′ transactivation response region (TAR) of HIV-1 RNA. We hypothesized that the stable hairpin structure of TAR would induce RT pausing, promoting RNase H-directed cleavage of the template and subsequent transfer at that site. We further predicted that HIV-1 nucleocapsid protein (NC), known to melt secondary structures, would decrease transfer. We show that TAR created a strong pause site for RT, but NC significantly promoted strand transfer. The effect of NC is specific, since other single strand binding proteins failed to stimulate transfer. In another unexpected outcome, preferred positions of internal transfer were not at the pause site but were in the upper stem and loop of TAR. Thus, we propose a new mechanism for transfer within TAR described by an interactive hairpin model, in which association between the donor and the acceptor templates within the TAR stem promotes transfer. The model is consistent with the observed stimulation of strand transfer by NC. The model is applicable to internal and replicative end transfer.

Mutants of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) Reverse Transcriptase Resistant to Nonnucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors Demonstrate Altered Rates of RNase H Cleavage That Correlate with HIV-1 Replication Fitness in Cell Culture

ABSTRACT Three mutants of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) reverse transcriptase (V106A, V179D, and Y181C), which occur in clinical isolates and confer resistance to nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), were analyzed for RNA- and DNA-dependent DNA polymerization and RNase H cleavage. All mutants demonstrated processivities of polymerization that were indistinguishable from wild-type enzyme under conditions in which deoxynucleoside triphosphates were not limiting. The V106A reverse transcriptase demonstrated a three- to fourfold slowing of both DNA 3′-end-directed and RNA 5′-end-directed RNase H cleavage relative to both wild-type and V179D enzymes, similar to what was observed for P236L in a previously published study (P. Gerondelis et al., J. Virol. 73:5803–5813, 1999). In contrast, the Y181C reverse transcriptase demonstrated a selective acceleration of the secondary RNase H cleavage step during both modes of RNase H cleavage. The relative replication fitness of these mutants in H9 cells was assessed in parallel infections as well as in growth competition experiments. Of the NNRTI-resistant mutants, V179D was more fit than Y181C, and both of these mutants were more fit than V106A, which demonstrated the greatest reduction in RNase H cleavage. These findings, in combination with results from previous work, suggest that abnormalities in RNase H cleavage are a common characteristic of HIV-1 mutants resistant to NNRTIs and that combined reductions in the rates of DNA 3′-end- and RNA 5′-end-directed cleavages are associated with significant reductions in the replication fitness of HIV-1.

Chicken Ovalbumin Upstream Promoter-Transcription Factor Interacts with Estrogen Receptor, Binds to Estrogen Response Elements and Half-Sites, and Inhibits Estrogen-induced Gene Expression

Chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter-transcription factor (COUP-TF) was identified as a low abundance protein in bovine uterus that co-purified with estrogen receptor (ER) in a ligand-independent manner and was separated from the ER by its lower retention on estrogen response element (ERE)-Sepharose. In gel mobility shift assays, COUP-TF bound as an apparent dimer to ERE and ERE half-sites. COUP-TF bound to an ERE half-site with high affinity,K d = 1.24 nm. In contrast, ER did not bind a single ERE half-site. None of the class II nuclear receptors analyzed, i.e. retinoic acid receptor, retinoid X receptor, thyroid receptor, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor, or vitamin D receptor, were constituents of the COUP-TF·DNA binding complex detected in gel mobility shift assays. Direct interaction of COUP-TF with ER was indicated by GST “pull-down” and co-immunoprecipitation assays. The nature of the ER ligand influenced COUP-TF-ERE half-site binding. When ER was liganded by the antiestrogen 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT), COUP-TF-half-site interaction decreased. Conversely, COUP-TF transcribed and translated in vitroenhanced the ERE binding of purified estradiol (E2)-liganded ER but not 4-OHT-liganded ER. Co-transfection of ER-expressing MCF-7 human breast cancer cells with an expression vector for COUP-TFI resulted in a dose-dependent inhibition of E2-induced expression of a luciferase reporter gene under the control of three tandem copies of EREc38. The ability of COUP-TF to bind specifically to EREs and half-sites, to interact with ER, and to inhibit E2-induced gene expression suggests COUP-TF regulates ER action by both direct DNA binding competition and through protein-protein interactions.

DNA Ligase I and Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen Form a Functional Complex

DNA ligase I is responsible for joining Okazaki fragments during DNA replication. An additional proposed role for DNA ligase I is sealing nicks generated during excision repair. Previous studies have shown that there is a physical interaction between DNA ligase I and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), another important component of DNA replication and repair. The results shown here indicate that human PCNA enhances the reaction rate of human DNA ligase I up to 5-fold. The stimulation is specific to DNA ligase I because T4 DNA ligase is not affected. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays indicate that PCNA improves the binding of DNA ligase I to the ligation site. Increasing the DNA ligase I concentration leads to a reduction in PCNA stimulation, consistent with PCNA-directed improvement of DNA ligase I binding to its DNA substrate. Two experiments show that PCNA is required to encircle duplex DNA to enhance DNA ligase I activity. Biotin-streptavidin conjugations at the ends of a linear substrate inhibit PCNA stimulation. PCNA cannot enhance ligation on a circular substrate without the addition of replication factor C, which is the protein responsible for loading PCNA onto duplex DNA. These results show that PCNA is responsible for the stable association of DNA ligase I to nicked duplex DNA.