Chockalingam Palaniappan

Evidence for a Unique Mechanism of Strand Transfer from the Transactivation Response Region of HIV-1

We previously found that strand transfer by human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) reverse transcriptase (RT) is promoted at sites where RT pauses during synthesis. In this report, strand transfer is measured within the 5′ transactivation response region (TAR) of HIV-1 RNA. We hypothesized that the stable hairpin structure of TAR would induce RT pausing, promoting RNase H-directed cleavage of the template and subsequent transfer at that site. We further predicted that HIV-1 nucleocapsid protein (NC), known to melt secondary structures, would decrease transfer. We show that TAR created a strong pause site for RT, but NC significantly promoted strand transfer. The effect of NC is specific, since other single strand binding proteins failed to stimulate transfer. In another unexpected outcome, preferred positions of internal transfer were not at the pause site but were in the upper stem and loop of TAR. Thus, we propose a new mechanism for transfer within TAR described by an interactive hairpin model, in which association between the donor and the acceptor templates within the TAR stem promotes transfer. The model is consistent with the observed stimulation of strand transfer by NC. The model is applicable to internal and replicative end transfer.

Mutations within the Primer Grip Region of HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase Result in Loss of RNase H Function

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) DNA synthesis is accompanied by degradation of genomic RNA by the RNase H of reverse transcriptase (RT). Two different modes of RNase H activity appear necessary for complete RNA removal. In one, occurring during minus strand synthesis, positioning of the RNase H is determined by binding of the polymerase active site to the DNA 3′-end. In the other, used for removal of remaining RNA fragments, positioning of RT for RNase H-directed cleavage is determined by the RNA 5′-ends. We attempted to identify RT amino acids responsible for these modes of positioning. Twelve RT mutants, each with one alanine replacement in residues 224 to 235, known as the primer grip region, were examined for catalytic abilities. Six of the examined primer grip mutants, although distant from the RNase H active site were altered in their ability to cleave RNA. The mutants P226A, F227A, G231A, Y232A, E233A, and H235A failed to perform RNA 5′-end-directed RNase H cleavage in heparin-challenged reactions. The last four mutants also lacked DNA synthesis and DNA 3′-end-directed RNase H cleavage activities in challenged reactions. Since mutants P226A and F227A carried out these latter reactions normally, these two residues specifically influence 5′-RNA-directed RNase H catalysis.

Mutations in the Primer Grip Region of HIV Reverse Transcriptase Can Increase Replication Fidelity

Mutations in the primer grip region of human immunodeficiency virus reverse transcriptase (HIV-RT) affect its replication fidelity. The primer grip region (residues 227–235) correctly positions the 3′-ends of primers. Point mutations were created by alanine substitution at positions 224–235. Error frequencies were measured by extension of a dG:dA primer-template mismatch. Mutants E224A, P225A, P226A, L228A, and E233A were approximately equal to the wild type in their ability to extend the mismatch. Mutants F227A, W229A, M230A, G231A, and Y232A extended 40, 66, 54, 72, and 76% less efficiently past a dG:dA mismatch compared with the wild type. We also examined the misinsertion rates of dG, dC, or dA across from a DNA template dA using RT mutants F227A and W229A. Mutant W229A exhibited high fidelity and did not produce a dG:dA or dC:dA mismatch. Interestingly, mutant F227A displayed high fidelity for dG:dA and dC:dA mismatches but low fidelity for dA:dA misinsertions. This indicates that F227A discriminates against particular base substitutions. However, a primer extension assay with three dNTPs showed that F227A generally displays higher fidelity than the wild type RT. Clearly, primer grip mutations can improve or worsen either the overall or base-specific fidelity of HIV-RT. We hypothesize that wild type RT has evolved to a fidelity that allows genetic variation without compromising yield of viable viruses.

Substrate Requirements for Secondary Cleavage by HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase RNase H

During and after minus-strand DNA synthesis, human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) reverse transcriptase (RT) degrades the RNA genome. To remove RNA left after polymerization, the RT aligns to cut 18 nucleotides in from the 5′ RNA end. The enzyme then repositions, making a secondary cut 8 nucleotides from the RNA 5′ end. Transfer of the minus strong stop DNA during viral replication requires cleavage of template RNA. Removal of the terminal RNA segment is a special case because the RNA-DNA hybrid forms a blunt end, shown previously to resist cleavage when tested in vitro. We show here that the structure of the substrate extending beyond the RNA 5′ end is an important determinant of cleavage efficiency. A short single-stranded DNA extension greatly stimulated the secondary cleavage. Annealing an RNA segment to the DNA extension was even more stimulatory. Recessing the DNA from a blunt end by even one nucleotide caused the RT to reorient its binding, preventing secondary cleavage. The presence of the cap at the 5′ end of the viral RNA did not improve the efficiency of secondary cleavage. However, NC protein greatly facilitated the secondary cut on the blunt-ended substrate, suggesting that NC compensates for the unfavorable substrate structure.

Strand Displacement Synthesis in the Central Polypurine Tract Region of HIV-1 Promotes DNA to DNA Strand Transfer Recombination

Two distinct plus strand initiation sites have been identified in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), the central polypurine tract (cPPT) and the polypurine tract located just upstream of the U3 region (U3-PPT). When synthesis from the U3-PPT reaches the cPPT, the elongating primer causes limited strand displacement of the product created from the cPPT. We examined whether reverse transcriptase (RT) catalyzed strand transfer recombination is promoted by this process. Using a substrate having the viral sequence of the displaced region, we measured transfer of an elongating DNA primer from a donor DNA to an acceptor DNA. Strand transfer synthesis was only efficient when RT was performing strand displacement synthesis. Transfer efficiency was directly related to acceptor concentration but independent of the reaction time. Transfer could occur to acceptors containing 80, 40, or 20 nucleotides of homology with the template DNA. Using different acceptors, we found that DNA to DNA transfer occurred at positions throughout the donor template, except near the 5′ end. This shows that a number of the sequences downstream of the cPPT region can promote transfer, but once synthesis has progressed to the point where the downstream segment is completely displaced transfer is not allowed. When the DNA to DNA transfer reactions were performed using a template containing nonviral sequences, the transfer efficiency dropped significantly. This indicates that transfer efficiency is determined by the sequences of the templates used. HIV-RT RNase H-dependent strand transfer between RNA templates is well documented. We propose a quite different mechanism for DNA to DNA transfer, consistent with the ability of RNase H minus RT to perform this reaction. If these DNA to DNA transfer events occur in vivo, they will result in plus strand recombination.