Robert A. Bender

Polyphosphate Is a Primordial Chaperone

Composed of up to 1,000 phospho-anhydride bond-linked phosphate monomers, inorganic polyphosphate (polyP) is one of the most ancient, conserved, and enigmatic molecules in biology. Here we demonstrate that polyP functions as a hitherto unrecognized chaperone. We show that polyP stabilizes proteins in vivo, diminishes the need for other chaperone systems to survive proteotoxic stress conditions, and protects a wide variety of proteins against stress-induced unfolding and aggregation. In vitro studies reveal that polyP has protein-like chaperone qualities, binds to unfolding proteins with high affinity in an ATP-independent manner, and supports their productive refolding once nonstress conditions are restored. Our results uncover a universally important function for polyP and suggest that these long chains of inorganic phosphate may have served as one of natures first chaperones, a role that continues to the present day.

The Klebsiella pneumoniae O Antigen Contributes to Bacteremia and Lethality during Murine Pneumonia

ABSTRACT Bacterial surface carbohydrates are important pathogenic factors in gram-negative pneumonia infections. Among these factors, O antigen has been reported to protect pathogens against complement-mediated killing. To examine further the role of O antigen, we insertionally inactivated the gene encoding a galactosyltransferase necessary for serotype O1 O-antigen synthesis (wbbO) from Klebsiella pneumoniae 43816. Analysis of the mutant lipopolysaccharide by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis confirmed the absence of O antigen. In vitro, there were no detectable differences between wild-type K. pneumoniae and the O-antigen-deficient mutant in regard to avid binding by murine complement C3 or resistance to serum- or whole-blood-mediated killing. Nevertheless, the 72-h 50% lethal dose of the wild-type strain was 30-fold greater than that of the mutant (2 × 103 versus 6 × 104 CFU) after intratracheal injection in ICR strain mice. Despite being less lethal, the mutant organism exhibited comparable intrapulmonary proliferation at 24 h compared to the level of the wild type. Whole-lung chemokine expression (CCL3 and CXCL2) and bronchoalveolar inflammatory cell content were also similar between the two infections. However, whereas the wild-type organism produced bacteremia within 24 h of infection in every instance, bacteremia was not seen in mutant-infected mice. These results suggest that during murine pneumonia caused by K. pneumoniae, O antigen contributes to lethality by increasing the propensity for bacteremia and not by significantly changing the early course of intrapulmonary infection.

Roles of Glutamate Synthase, gltBD, and gltF in Nitrogen Metabolism of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella aerogenes

Mutants of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella aerogenes that are deficient in glutamate synthase (glutamate-oxoglutarate amidotransferase [GOGAT]) activity have difficulty growing with nitrogen sources other than ammonia. Two models have been proposed to account for this inability to grow. One model postulated an imbalance between glutamine synthesis and glutamine degradation that led to a repression of the Ntr system and the subsequent failure to activate transcription of genes required for the use of alternative nitrogen sources. The other model postulated that mutations in gltB or gltD (which encode the subunits of GOGAT) were polar on a downstream gene, gltF, which is necessary for proper activation of gene expression by the Ntr system. The data reported here show that the gltF model is incorrect for three reasons: first, a nonpolar gltB and a polar gltD mutation of K. aerogenes both show the same phenotype; second, K. aerogenes and several other enteric bacteria lack a gene homologous to gltF; and third, mutants of E. coli whose gltF gene has been deleted show no defect in nitrogen metabolism. The argument that accumulated glutamine represses the Ntr system in gltB or gltD mutants is also incorrect, because these mutants can derepress the Ntr system normally so long as sufficient glutamate is supplied. Thus, we conclude that gltB or gltD mutants grow slowly on many poor nitrogen sources because they are starved for glutamate. Much of the glutamate formed by catabolism of alternative nitrogen sources is converted to glutamine, which cannot be efficiently converted to glutamate in the absence of GOGAT activity. Finally, GOGAT-deficient E. coli cells growing with glutamine as the sole nitrogen source increase their synthesis of the other glutamate-forming enzyme, glutamate dehydrogenase, severalfold, but this is still insufficient to allow rapid growth under these conditions.

Regulation of the Histidine Utilization (Hut) System in Bacteria

SUMMARY The ability to degrade the amino acid histidine to ammonia, glutamate, and a one-carbon compound (formate or formamide) is a property that is widely distributed among bacteria. The four or five enzymatic steps of the pathway are highly conserved, and the chemistry of the reactions displays several unusual features, including the rearrangement of a portion of the histidase polypeptide chain to yield an unusual imidazole structure at the active site and the use of a tightly bound NAD molecule as an electrophile rather than a redox-active element in urocanase. Given the importance of this amino acid, it is not surprising that the degradation of histidine is tightly regulated. The study of that regulation led to three central paradigms in bacterial regulation: catabolite repression by glucose and other carbon sources, nitrogen regulation and two-component regulators in general, and autoregulation of bacterial regulators. This review focuses on three groups of organisms for which studies are most complete: the enteric bacteria, for which the regulation is best understood; the pseudomonads, for which the chemistry is best characterized; and Bacillus subtilis, for which the regulatory mechanisms are very different from those of the Gram-negative bacteria. The Hut pathway is fundamentally a catabolic pathway that allows cells to use histidine as a source of carbon, energy, and nitrogen, but other roles for the pathway are also considered briefly here.

The hpx Genetic System for Hypoxanthine Assimilation as a Nitrogen Source in Klebsiella pneumoniae: Gene Organization and Transcriptional Regulation

Growth experiments showed that adenine and hypoxanthine can be used as nitrogen sources by several strains of K. pneumoniae under aerobic conditions. The assimilation of all nitrogens from these purines indicates that the catabolic pathway is complete and proceeds past allantoin. Here we identify the genetic system responsible for the oxidation of hypoxanthine to allantoin in K. pneumoniae. The hpx cluster consists of seven genes, for which an organization in four transcriptional units, hpxDE, hpxR, hpxO, and hpxPQT, is proposed. The proteins involved in the oxidation of hypoxanthine (HpxDE) or uric acid (HpxO) did not display any similarity to other reported enzymes known to catalyze these reactions but instead are similar to oxygenases acting on aromatic compounds. Expression of the hpx system is activated by nitrogen limitation and by the presence of specific substrates, with hpxDE and hpxPQT controlled by both signals. Nitrogen control of hpxPQT transcription, which depends on sigma(54), is mediated by the Ntr system. In contrast, neither NtrC nor the nitrogen assimilation control protein is involved in the nitrogen control of hpxDE, which is dependent on sigma(70) for transcription. Activation of these operons by the specific substrates is also mediated by different effectors and regulatory proteins. Induction of hpxPQT requires uric acid formation, whereas expression of hpxDE is induced by the presence of hypoxanthine through the regulatory protein HpxR. This LysR-type regulator binds to a TCTGC-N(4)-GCAAA site in the intergenic hpxD-hpxR region. When bound to this site for hpxDE activation, HpxR negatively controls its own transcription.

Nitrogen Regulation of the codBA (Cytosine Deaminase) Operon from Escherichia coli by the Nitrogen Assimilation Control Protein, NAC

Transcription of the cytosine deaminase (codBA) operon of Escherichia coli is regulated by nitrogen, with about three times more codBA expression in cells grown in nitrogen-limiting medium than in nitrogen-excess medium. Beta-galactosidase expression from codBp-lacZ operon fusions showed that the nitrogen assimilation control protein NAC was necessary for this regulation. In vitro transcription from the codBA promoter with purified RNA polymerase was stimulated by the addition of purified NAC, confirming that no other factors are required. Gel mobility shifts and DNase I footprints showed that NAC binds to a site centered at position -59 relative to the start site of transcription and that mutants that cannot bind NAC there cannot activate transcription. When a longer promoter region (positions -120 to +67) was used, a double footprint was seen with a second 26-bp footprint separated from the first by a hypersensitive site. When a shorter fragment was used (positions -83 to +67), only the primary footprint was seen. Nevertheless, both the shorter and longer fragments showed NAC-mediated regulation in vivo. Cytosine deaminase expression in Klebsiella pneumoniae was also regulated by nitrogen in a NAC-dependent manner. K. pneumoniae differs from E. coli in having two cytosine deaminase genes, an intervening open reading frame between the codB and codA orthologs, and a different response to hypoxanthine which increased cod expression in K. pneumoniae but decreased it in E. coli.

Importance of Tetramer Formation by the Nitrogen Assimilation Control Protein for Strong Repression of Glutamate Dehydrogenase Formation in Klebsiella pneumoniae

The nitrogen assimilation control protein (NAC) from Klebsiella pneumoniae is a very versatile regulatory protein. NAC activates transcription of operons such as hut (histidine utilization) and ure (urea utilization), whose products generate ammonia. NAC also represses the transcription of genes such as gdhA, whose products use ammonia. NAC exerts a weak repression at gdhA by competing with the binding of a lysine-sensitive activator. NAC also strongly represses transcription of gdhA (about 20-fold) by binding to two separated sites, suggesting a model involving DNA looping. We have identified negative control mutants that are unable to exert this strong repression of gdhA expression but still activate hut and ure expression normally. Some of these negative control mutants (e.g., NAC(86ter) and NAC(132ter)) delete the C-terminal domain, thought to be required for tetramerization. Other negative control mutants (e.g., NAC(L111K) and NAC(L125R)) alter single amino acids involved in tetramerization. In this work we used gel filtration to show that NAC(86ter) and NAC(L111K) are dimers in solution, even at high concentration (NAC(WT) is a tetramer). Moreover, using a combination of DNase I footprints and gel mobility shifts assays, we showed that when NAC(WT) binds to two adjacent sites on a DNA fragment, NAC(WT) binds as a tetramer that bends the DNA fragment significantly. NAC(L111K) binds to such a fragment as two independent dimers without inducing the strong bend. Thus, NAC(L111K) is a dimer in solution or when bound to DNA. NAC(L111K) (typical of the negative control mutants) is wild type for every other property tested: (i) it activates transcription at hut and ure; (ii) it competes with the lysine-sensitive activator for binding at gdhA; (iii) it binds to the same sites at the hut, ure, nac, and gdhA promoters as NAC(WT); (iv) the relative affinity of NAC(L111K) for these sites follows the same order as NAC(WT) (ure > gdhA > nac > hut); (v) it induces the same slight bend as dimers of NAC(WT); and (vi) its DNase I footprints at these sites are indistinguishable from those of NAC(WT) (except for features ascribed to tetramer formation). The only two phenotypes we know for negative control mutants of NAC are their inability to tetramerize and their inability to cause the strong repression of gdhA. Thus, we propose that in order for NAC(WT) to exert the strong repression, it must form a tetramer that bridges the two sites at gdhA (similar to other DNA looping models) and that the negative control mutants of NAC, which fail to tetramerize, cannot form this loop and thus fail to exert the strong repression at gdhA.

A NAC for Regulating Metabolism: the Nitrogen Assimilation Control Protein (NAC) from Klebsiella pneumoniae

The nitrogen assimilation control protein (NAC) is a LysR-type transcriptional regulator (LTTR) that is made under conditions of nitrogen-limited growth. NACs synthesis is entirely dependent on phosphorylated NtrC from the two-component Ntr system and requires the unusual sigma factor σ54 for transcription of the nac gene. NAC activates the transcription of σ70-dependent genes whose products provide the cell with ammonia or glutamate. NAC represses genes whose products use ammonia and also represses its own transcription. In addition, NAC also subtly adjusts other cellular functions to keep pace with the supply of biosynthetically available nitrogen.

Complex Regulation of Urease Formation from the Two Promoters of the ure Operon of Klebsiella pneumoniae

Klebsiella pneumoniae can use urea as the sole source of nitrogen, thanks to a urease encoded by the ureDABCEFG operon. Expression of this operon is independent of urea and is regulated by the supply of nitrogen in the growth medium. When cells were growth rate limited for nitrogen, the specific activity of urease was about 70 times higher than that in cells grown under conditions of excess nitrogen. Much of this nitrogen regulation of urease formation depended on the nitrogen regulatory system acting through the nitrogen assimilation control protein, NAC. In a strain deleted for the nac gene, nitrogen limitation resulted in only a 7-fold increase in the specific activity of urease, in contrast to the 70-fold increase seen in that of the wild type. The ure operon was transcribed from two promoters. The proximal promoter (P1) had an absolute requirement for NAC; little or no transcription was seen in the absence of NAC. The distal promoter (P2) was independent of NAC, but its activity increased about threefold when the growth rate of the cells was limited by the nitrogen source. Transcriptional regulation of P1 and P2 accounted for most of the changes in urease activity seen under various nitrogen conditions. However, when transcription of ureDABCEFG was less than 20% of its maximum, the amount of active urease formed per transcript of ure decreased almost linearly with decreasing transcription. This may reflect a defect in the assembly of active urease and accounted for as much as a threefold activity difference under the conditions tested here. Thus, the ure operon was transcribed from a NAC-independent promoter (P2) and the most strongly NAC-dependent promoter known (P1). Most of the regulation of urease formation was transcriptional, but when ure transcription was low, assembly of active urease also was defective.

Repression of Glutamate Dehydrogenase Formation in Klebsiella aerogenes Requires Two Binding Sites for the Nitrogen Assimilation Control Protein, NAC

In Klebsiella aerogenes, the gdhA gene codes for glutamate dehydrogenase, one of the enzymes responsible for assimilating ammonia into glutamate. Expression of a gdhAp-lacZ transcriptional fusion was strongly repressed by the nitrogen assimilation control protein, NAC. This strong repression (>50-fold under conditions of severe nitrogen limitation) required the presence of two separate NAC binding sites centered at -89 and +57 relative to the start of gdhA transcription. Mutants lacking either or both of these sites lost the strong repression. The distance between the two sites was less important than the face of the helix on which they lay. Insertion or deletion of 10 bp between the sites had little effect on the strong repression, but insertion of 5 bp or deletion of either 5 or 15 bp decreased the repression significantly. We propose that the strong repression of gdhAp-lacZ expression requires an interaction between the NAC molecules bound at the two sites. A weaker repression of gdhAp-lacZ expression (about threefold) required only the NAC site centered at -89. This weaker repression appears to result from NACs ability to prevent the action of a positive effector the target of which overlaps the NAC binding site centered at -89. Point mutations and deletions of this region result in the same threefold reduction in gdhAp-lacZ expression as the presence of NAC at this site.