Robert A. Preti
New York Medical College
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Robert A. Preti.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 1998
Andrew Pecora; Robert A. Preti; Gilbert W. Gleim; Andrew Jennis; Kathleen Zahos; Susan Cantwell; Lisa Doria; Randi Isaacs; Alfred P. Gillio; Mary Ann Michelis; Joel A. Brochstein
PURPOSE To evaluate the reliability of CD34/CD33 subset enumeration as a predictor of hematopoietic repopulating potential in autologous blood stem-cell transplantation and to determine which patient and treatment-related factors affect the timing, quantity, and type of blood stem cells mobilized. PATIENTS AND METHODS We analyzed blood stem-cell collections from 410 consecutive cancer patients who received mobilization therapy and evaluated factors, including CD34+ subset quantities, that might influence engraftment kinetics and transfusion requirements in autologous blood stem-cell recipients. RESULTS The majority of patients (97%) mobilized CD34+33- cells, which were usually collected in the greatest quantity on the first day of apheresis. Patients who received only growth factor mobilized the highest percentage of CD34+33- cells. Extensive prior chemotherapy limited the collection of CD34+33- cells. In addition to patient diagnosis (P < .006) and total CD34+ cell dose (P = .0001), CD34+33- cell dose (P < .005) and percentage of CD34+33- cells (P < .005) were identified as independent factors significantly predictive of engraftment kinetics. CD34+33- cell dose (R2 < or = .177; P < .0001) was a strong and the only significant predictor of RBC and platelet transfusion requirements. Furthermore, independent of the total CD34+ cell dose, as the CD34+33- cell dose increased, days to neutrophil recovery, days to platelet recovery, and transfusion requirements decreased. CONCLUSION These findings show that CD34+33- cells are readily collected in most cancer patients and significantly influence engraftment kinetics and transfusion requirements in autologous blood stem-cell recipients. CD34+33- cell quantity of the blood stem-cell graft appears to be a more reliable predictor of hematopoietic recovery rates than total CD34+ cell quantity in this setting.
Circulation Research | 2017
Arshed A. Quyyumi; Alejandro Vasquez; Marc Klapholz; Gary L. Schaer; Ahmed Abdel-Latif; Stephen Frohwein; Timothy D. Henry; Richard A. Schatz; Nabil Dib; Catalin Toma; Charles J. Davidson; Gregory W. Barsness; David M. Shavelle; Martin H. Cohen; Joseph Poole; Thomas Moss; Pamela Hyde; Anna Maria Kanakaraj; Vitaly Druker; Amy Chung; Candice Junge; Robert A. Preti; Robin L. Smith; David J. Mazzo; Andrew Pecora; Douglas W. Losordo
Rationale: Despite direct immediate intervention and therapy, ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) victims remain at risk for infarct expansion, heart failure, reinfarction, repeat revascularization, and death. Objective: To evaluate the safety and bioactivity of autologous CD34+ cell (CLBS10) intracoronary infusion in patients with left ventricular dysfunction post STEMI. Methods and Results: Patients who underwent successful stenting for STEMI and had left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction⩽48%) ≥4 days poststent were eligible for enrollment. Subjects (N=161) underwent mini bone marrow harvest and were randomized 1:1 to receive (1) autologous CD34+ cells (minimum 10 mol/L±20% cells; N=78) or (2) diluent alone (N=83), via intracoronary infusion. The primary safety end point was adverse events, serious adverse events, and major adverse cardiac event. The primary efficacy end point was change in resting myocardial perfusion over 6 months. No differences in myocardial perfusion or adverse events were observed between the control and treatment groups, although increased perfusion was observed within each group from baseline to 6 months (P<0.001). In secondary analyses, when adjusted for time of ischemia, a consistently favorable cell dose–dependent effect was observed in the change in left ventricular ejection fraction and infarct size, and the duration of time subjects was alive and out of hospital (P=0.05). At 1 year, 3.6% (N=3) and 0% deaths were observed in the control and treatment group, respectively. Conclusions: This PreSERVE-AMI (Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial) represents the largest study of cell-based therapy for STEMI completed in the United States and provides evidence supporting safety and potential efficacy in patients with left ventricular dysfunction post STEMI who are at risk for death and major morbidity. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01495364.Rationale: Despite direct immediate intervention and therapy, ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) victims remain at risk for infarct expansion, heart failure, reinfarction, repeat revascularization, and death. Objective: To evaluate the safety and bioactivity of autologous CD34+ cell (CLBS10) intracoronary infusion in patients with left ventricular dysfunction post STEMI. Methods and Results: Patients who underwent successful stenting for STEMI and had left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction≤48%) ≥4 days poststent were eligible for enrollment. Subjects (N=161) underwent mini bone marrow harvest and were randomized 1:1 to receive (1) autologous CD34+ cells (minimum 10 mol/L±20% cells; N=78) or (2) diluent alone (N=83), via intracoronary infusion. The primary safety end point was adverse events, serious adverse events, and major adverse cardiac event. The primary efficacy end point was change in resting myocardial perfusion over 6 months. No differences in myocardial perfusion or adverse events were observed between the control and treatment groups, although increased perfusion was observed within each group from baseline to 6 months ( P <0.001). In secondary analyses, when adjusted for time of ischemia, a consistently favorable cell dose–dependent effect was observed in the change in left ventricular ejection fraction and infarct size, and the duration of time subjects was alive and out of hospital ( P =0.05). At 1 year, 3.6% (N=3) and 0% deaths were observed in the control and treatment group, respectively. Conclusions: This PreSERVE-AMI (Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial) represents the largest study of cell-based therapy for STEMI completed in the United States and provides evidence supporting safety and potential efficacy in patients with left ventricular dysfunction post STEMI who are at risk for death and major morbidity. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: . Unique identifier: [NCT01495364][1]. # Novelty and Significance {#article-title-42} [1]: /lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT01495364&atom=%2Fcircresaha%2F120%2F2%2F324.atom
Circulation Research | 2017
Arshed A. Quyyumi; Alejandro Vasquez; Marc Klapholz; Gary L. Schaer; Ahmed Abdel-Latif; Stephen Frohwein; Timothy D. Henry; Richard A. Schatz; Nabil Dib; Catalin Toma; Charles J. Davidson; Gregory W. Barsness; David M. Shavelle; Martin H. Cohen; Joseph Poole; Thomas Moss; Pamela Hyde; Anna Maria Kanakaraj; Vitaly Druker; Amy Chung; Candice Junge; Robert A. Preti; Robin L. Smith; David J. Mazzo; Andrew Pecora; Douglas W. Losordo
Rationale: Despite direct immediate intervention and therapy, ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) victims remain at risk for infarct expansion, heart failure, reinfarction, repeat revascularization, and death. Objective: To evaluate the safety and bioactivity of autologous CD34+ cell (CLBS10) intracoronary infusion in patients with left ventricular dysfunction post STEMI. Methods and Results: Patients who underwent successful stenting for STEMI and had left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction⩽48%) ≥4 days poststent were eligible for enrollment. Subjects (N=161) underwent mini bone marrow harvest and were randomized 1:1 to receive (1) autologous CD34+ cells (minimum 10 mol/L±20% cells; N=78) or (2) diluent alone (N=83), via intracoronary infusion. The primary safety end point was adverse events, serious adverse events, and major adverse cardiac event. The primary efficacy end point was change in resting myocardial perfusion over 6 months. No differences in myocardial perfusion or adverse events were observed between the control and treatment groups, although increased perfusion was observed within each group from baseline to 6 months (P<0.001). In secondary analyses, when adjusted for time of ischemia, a consistently favorable cell dose–dependent effect was observed in the change in left ventricular ejection fraction and infarct size, and the duration of time subjects was alive and out of hospital (P=0.05). At 1 year, 3.6% (N=3) and 0% deaths were observed in the control and treatment group, respectively. Conclusions: This PreSERVE-AMI (Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial) represents the largest study of cell-based therapy for STEMI completed in the United States and provides evidence supporting safety and potential efficacy in patients with left ventricular dysfunction post STEMI who are at risk for death and major morbidity. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01495364.Rationale: Despite direct immediate intervention and therapy, ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) victims remain at risk for infarct expansion, heart failure, reinfarction, repeat revascularization, and death. Objective: To evaluate the safety and bioactivity of autologous CD34+ cell (CLBS10) intracoronary infusion in patients with left ventricular dysfunction post STEMI. Methods and Results: Patients who underwent successful stenting for STEMI and had left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction≤48%) ≥4 days poststent were eligible for enrollment. Subjects (N=161) underwent mini bone marrow harvest and were randomized 1:1 to receive (1) autologous CD34+ cells (minimum 10 mol/L±20% cells; N=78) or (2) diluent alone (N=83), via intracoronary infusion. The primary safety end point was adverse events, serious adverse events, and major adverse cardiac event. The primary efficacy end point was change in resting myocardial perfusion over 6 months. No differences in myocardial perfusion or adverse events were observed between the control and treatment groups, although increased perfusion was observed within each group from baseline to 6 months ( P <0.001). In secondary analyses, when adjusted for time of ischemia, a consistently favorable cell dose–dependent effect was observed in the change in left ventricular ejection fraction and infarct size, and the duration of time subjects was alive and out of hospital ( P =0.05). At 1 year, 3.6% (N=3) and 0% deaths were observed in the control and treatment group, respectively. Conclusions: This PreSERVE-AMI (Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial) represents the largest study of cell-based therapy for STEMI completed in the United States and provides evidence supporting safety and potential efficacy in patients with left ventricular dysfunction post STEMI who are at risk for death and major morbidity. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: . Unique identifier: [NCT01495364][1]. # Novelty and Significance {#article-title-42} [1]: /lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT01495364&atom=%2Fcircresaha%2F120%2F2%2F324.atom
Journal of the American College of Cardiology | 2015
Arshed A. Quyyumi; David M. Shavelle; Timothy D. Henry; Ali E. Denktas; Ahmed Abdel-Latif; Catalin Toma; Gregory W. Barsness; Stephen Frohwein; Richard A. Schatz; Martin H. Cohen; Charles J. Davidson; Nabil Dib; Marc Klapholz; Gary L. Schaer; Alejandro Vasquez; Andrew Pecora; Thomas Moss; Pamela Hyde; Anna Maria Kanakaraj; Le Dich; Vitaly Druker; Candice Junge; Robert A. Preti; Douglas W. Losordo
ST segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) affects 160,000 annually in the US. Guidelines direct immediate revascularization and adjunctive medical therapies. Yet STEMI victims remain at risk for infarct expansion, heart failure, reinfarction, repeat revascularization and death. In pre-
Blood | 2002
Stuart L. Goldberg; Andrew Pecora; Robert S. Alter; Mark S. Kroll; Scott D. Rowley; Stanley E. Waintraub; Kavita Imrit; Robert A. Preti
Circulation | 2014
Arshed A. Quyyumi; Alejandro Vasquez; Marc Klapholz; Gary L. Schaer; Ken Fujise; Ahmed Abdel-Latif; Robert S Iwaoka; Ali E. Denktas; Roger S. Gammon; Steve Frohwein; Vijaykumar S. Kasi; Michael R. Tamberella; Catalin Toma; Nabil Dib; Tanvir Bajwa; Richard A. Schatz; Timothy D. Henry; Martin Cohen; David M. Shavelle; Gregory W. Barsness; Charles Davidson; Thomas Moss; Pamela Hyde; AnnaMarie Kanakaraj; Vitaly Druker; Le Dich; Jonathan Sackner-Bernstein; Robert A. Preti; Douglas W. Losordo; Andrew Pecora
Journal of hematotherapy | 1997
Timothy J. Farley; William Rooney; Edward Kuhns; Tauseef Ahmed; Robert A. Preti
Journal of hematotherapy | 1997
Timothy J. Farley; Tauseef Ahmed; Maura Fitzgerald; Robert A. Preti
Archive | 2006
Andrew L. Pecora; Robert A. Preti
Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation | 2004
Scott D. Rowley; Stuart L. Goldberg; Andrew L. Pecora; Jack S. Hsu; Barbara Adler Brecher; Linda Butrin; Kelly Kobbe; Phyllis McKiernan; Robert A. Preti