Thomas Moss
Case Western Reserve University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Thomas Moss.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 1998
Brenda W. Cooper; Thomas Moss; Amy A. Ross; Jane Ybanez; Hillard M. Lazarus
PURPOSE To determine whether occult tumor contamination of autologous bone marrow or peripheral-blood progenitor cells (PBPC) influences clinical outcome after high-dose chemotherapy in patients with stage IV breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS We used an immunocytochemical assay capable of detecting one tumor cell in 5 x 10(5) hematopoietic cells to analyze bone marrow and/or PBPC collections obtained from 57 consecutive women with chemotherapy-sensitive metastatic breast cancer who received high-dose chemotherapy. The influence of occult tumor on time to progression, overall survival, and first site of recurrence (old or new) was studied. RESULTS Twenty-three of 57 (40%) patients received bone marrow (n=6) or peripheral-blood progenitor collections (n=17) that contained microscopic cancer. Median time to progression and overall survival were 9 and 22 months in patients who did not receive infused tumor cells, compared with 10 and 24 months, respectively, in those who received occult tumor (P=not significant [NS]). Worse survival, but not time to progression, was observed in six patients who received > or = 2/100,000 tumor cells. Regardless of whether occult tumor was infused, the majority of relapses occurred in prior, rather than new sites of disease. Three patients who received stem-cell products contaminated by microscopic breast cancer remain free from progression at 21+, 47+, and 52+ months. CONCLUSION Microscopic tumor was frequently detected by immunocytochemistry in hematopoietic stem-cell products, but did not predict for inferior treatment outcome in this cohort of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Quantitative information regarding infused tumor burden may have prognostic significance.
Journal of hematotherapy | 1996
Klaus Pantel; Thomas Moss
ABSTRACT This conference was held on June 23–25, 1996, at the Kunstlerhaus, Munich, Germany, and was sponsored by the International Society for Hematotherapy and Graft Engineering, as well as AMGEN...
Circulation Research | 2017
Arshed A. Quyyumi; Alejandro Vasquez; Marc Klapholz; Gary L. Schaer; Ahmed Abdel-Latif; Stephen Frohwein; Timothy D. Henry; Richard A. Schatz; Nabil Dib; Catalin Toma; Charles J. Davidson; Gregory W. Barsness; David M. Shavelle; Martin H. Cohen; Joseph Poole; Thomas Moss; Pamela Hyde; Anna Maria Kanakaraj; Vitaly Druker; Amy Chung; Candice Junge; Robert A. Preti; Robin L. Smith; David J. Mazzo; Andrew Pecora; Douglas W. Losordo
Rationale: Despite direct immediate intervention and therapy, ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) victims remain at risk for infarct expansion, heart failure, reinfarction, repeat revascularization, and death. Objective: To evaluate the safety and bioactivity of autologous CD34+ cell (CLBS10) intracoronary infusion in patients with left ventricular dysfunction post STEMI. Methods and Results: Patients who underwent successful stenting for STEMI and had left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction⩽48%) ≥4 days poststent were eligible for enrollment. Subjects (N=161) underwent mini bone marrow harvest and were randomized 1:1 to receive (1) autologous CD34+ cells (minimum 10 mol/L±20% cells; N=78) or (2) diluent alone (N=83), via intracoronary infusion. The primary safety end point was adverse events, serious adverse events, and major adverse cardiac event. The primary efficacy end point was change in resting myocardial perfusion over 6 months. No differences in myocardial perfusion or adverse events were observed between the control and treatment groups, although increased perfusion was observed within each group from baseline to 6 months (P<0.001). In secondary analyses, when adjusted for time of ischemia, a consistently favorable cell dose–dependent effect was observed in the change in left ventricular ejection fraction and infarct size, and the duration of time subjects was alive and out of hospital (P=0.05). At 1 year, 3.6% (N=3) and 0% deaths were observed in the control and treatment group, respectively. Conclusions: This PreSERVE-AMI (Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial) represents the largest study of cell-based therapy for STEMI completed in the United States and provides evidence supporting safety and potential efficacy in patients with left ventricular dysfunction post STEMI who are at risk for death and major morbidity. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01495364.Rationale: Despite direct immediate intervention and therapy, ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) victims remain at risk for infarct expansion, heart failure, reinfarction, repeat revascularization, and death. Objective: To evaluate the safety and bioactivity of autologous CD34+ cell (CLBS10) intracoronary infusion in patients with left ventricular dysfunction post STEMI. Methods and Results: Patients who underwent successful stenting for STEMI and had left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction≤48%) ≥4 days poststent were eligible for enrollment. Subjects (N=161) underwent mini bone marrow harvest and were randomized 1:1 to receive (1) autologous CD34+ cells (minimum 10 mol/L±20% cells; N=78) or (2) diluent alone (N=83), via intracoronary infusion. The primary safety end point was adverse events, serious adverse events, and major adverse cardiac event. The primary efficacy end point was change in resting myocardial perfusion over 6 months. No differences in myocardial perfusion or adverse events were observed between the control and treatment groups, although increased perfusion was observed within each group from baseline to 6 months ( P <0.001). In secondary analyses, when adjusted for time of ischemia, a consistently favorable cell dose–dependent effect was observed in the change in left ventricular ejection fraction and infarct size, and the duration of time subjects was alive and out of hospital ( P =0.05). At 1 year, 3.6% (N=3) and 0% deaths were observed in the control and treatment group, respectively. Conclusions: This PreSERVE-AMI (Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial) represents the largest study of cell-based therapy for STEMI completed in the United States and provides evidence supporting safety and potential efficacy in patients with left ventricular dysfunction post STEMI who are at risk for death and major morbidity. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: . Unique identifier: [NCT01495364][1]. # Novelty and Significance {#article-title-42} [1]: /lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT01495364&atom=%2Fcircresaha%2F120%2F2%2F324.atom
Circulation Research | 2017
Arshed A. Quyyumi; Alejandro Vasquez; Marc Klapholz; Gary L. Schaer; Ahmed Abdel-Latif; Stephen Frohwein; Timothy D. Henry; Richard A. Schatz; Nabil Dib; Catalin Toma; Charles J. Davidson; Gregory W. Barsness; David M. Shavelle; Martin H. Cohen; Joseph Poole; Thomas Moss; Pamela Hyde; Anna Maria Kanakaraj; Vitaly Druker; Amy Chung; Candice Junge; Robert A. Preti; Robin L. Smith; David J. Mazzo; Andrew Pecora; Douglas W. Losordo
Rationale: Despite direct immediate intervention and therapy, ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) victims remain at risk for infarct expansion, heart failure, reinfarction, repeat revascularization, and death. Objective: To evaluate the safety and bioactivity of autologous CD34+ cell (CLBS10) intracoronary infusion in patients with left ventricular dysfunction post STEMI. Methods and Results: Patients who underwent successful stenting for STEMI and had left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction⩽48%) ≥4 days poststent were eligible for enrollment. Subjects (N=161) underwent mini bone marrow harvest and were randomized 1:1 to receive (1) autologous CD34+ cells (minimum 10 mol/L±20% cells; N=78) or (2) diluent alone (N=83), via intracoronary infusion. The primary safety end point was adverse events, serious adverse events, and major adverse cardiac event. The primary efficacy end point was change in resting myocardial perfusion over 6 months. No differences in myocardial perfusion or adverse events were observed between the control and treatment groups, although increased perfusion was observed within each group from baseline to 6 months (P<0.001). In secondary analyses, when adjusted for time of ischemia, a consistently favorable cell dose–dependent effect was observed in the change in left ventricular ejection fraction and infarct size, and the duration of time subjects was alive and out of hospital (P=0.05). At 1 year, 3.6% (N=3) and 0% deaths were observed in the control and treatment group, respectively. Conclusions: This PreSERVE-AMI (Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial) represents the largest study of cell-based therapy for STEMI completed in the United States and provides evidence supporting safety and potential efficacy in patients with left ventricular dysfunction post STEMI who are at risk for death and major morbidity. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01495364.Rationale: Despite direct immediate intervention and therapy, ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) victims remain at risk for infarct expansion, heart failure, reinfarction, repeat revascularization, and death. Objective: To evaluate the safety and bioactivity of autologous CD34+ cell (CLBS10) intracoronary infusion in patients with left ventricular dysfunction post STEMI. Methods and Results: Patients who underwent successful stenting for STEMI and had left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction≤48%) ≥4 days poststent were eligible for enrollment. Subjects (N=161) underwent mini bone marrow harvest and were randomized 1:1 to receive (1) autologous CD34+ cells (minimum 10 mol/L±20% cells; N=78) or (2) diluent alone (N=83), via intracoronary infusion. The primary safety end point was adverse events, serious adverse events, and major adverse cardiac event. The primary efficacy end point was change in resting myocardial perfusion over 6 months. No differences in myocardial perfusion or adverse events were observed between the control and treatment groups, although increased perfusion was observed within each group from baseline to 6 months ( P <0.001). In secondary analyses, when adjusted for time of ischemia, a consistently favorable cell dose–dependent effect was observed in the change in left ventricular ejection fraction and infarct size, and the duration of time subjects was alive and out of hospital ( P =0.05). At 1 year, 3.6% (N=3) and 0% deaths were observed in the control and treatment group, respectively. Conclusions: This PreSERVE-AMI (Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial) represents the largest study of cell-based therapy for STEMI completed in the United States and provides evidence supporting safety and potential efficacy in patients with left ventricular dysfunction post STEMI who are at risk for death and major morbidity. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: . Unique identifier: [NCT01495364][1]. # Novelty and Significance {#article-title-42} [1]: /lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT01495364&atom=%2Fcircresaha%2F120%2F2%2F324.atom
Journal of the American College of Cardiology | 2015
Arshed A. Quyyumi; David M. Shavelle; Timothy D. Henry; Ali E. Denktas; Ahmed Abdel-Latif; Catalin Toma; Gregory W. Barsness; Stephen Frohwein; Richard A. Schatz; Martin H. Cohen; Charles J. Davidson; Nabil Dib; Marc Klapholz; Gary L. Schaer; Alejandro Vasquez; Andrew Pecora; Thomas Moss; Pamela Hyde; Anna Maria Kanakaraj; Le Dich; Vitaly Druker; Candice Junge; Robert A. Preti; Douglas W. Losordo
ST segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) affects 160,000 annually in the US. Guidelines direct immediate revascularization and adjunctive medical therapies. Yet STEMI victims remain at risk for infarct expansion, heart failure, reinfarction, repeat revascularization and death. In pre-
Archive | 2009
Klaus Pantel; Thomas Moss
ABSTRACT This conference was held on June 23–25, 1996, at the Kunstlerhaus, Munich, Germany, and was sponsored by the International Society for Hematotherapy and Graft Engineering, as well as AMGEN...
Blood | 1993
Amy A. Ross; Brenda W. Cooper; Hillard M. Lazarus; Wilma Mackay; Thomas Moss; Niculae Ciobanu; Martin S. Tallman; M. John Kennedy; Nancy E. Davidson; Donald L. Sweet; Christine Winter; Luke P. Akard; Jan Jansen; Edward A. Copelan; Richard Meagher; Roger H. Herzig; Thomas R. Klumpp; Douglas G. Kahn; Nancy E. Warner
Journal of hematotherapy | 1992
Thomas Moss; Amy A. Ross
Journal of hematotherapy | 1996
Bruce Brockstein; Amy A. Ross; Thomas Moss; Douglas G. Kahn; Kristi Hollingsworth; Stephanie F. Williams
Circulation | 2014
Arshed A. Quyyumi; Alejandro Vasquez; Marc Klapholz; Gary L. Schaer; Ken Fujise; Ahmed Abdel-Latif; Robert S Iwaoka; Ali E. Denktas; Roger S. Gammon; Steve Frohwein; Vijaykumar S. Kasi; Michael R. Tamberella; Catalin Toma; Nabil Dib; Tanvir Bajwa; Richard A. Schatz; Timothy D. Henry; Martin Cohen; David M. Shavelle; Gregory W. Barsness; Charles Davidson; Thomas Moss; Pamela Hyde; AnnaMarie Kanakaraj; Vitaly Druker; Le Dich; Jonathan Sackner-Bernstein; Robert A. Preti; Douglas W. Losordo; Andrew Pecora