Robert D. Campbell

The Information Content of Method of Payment in Mergers: Evidence from Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs)

We provide evidence on the information content of the method of payment in mergers by examining shareholder returns in a sample of REIT mergers over the period 1994-1998. When the target firm is publicly held, we find that transactions are always stock-financed, and that acquiring firm shareholders sustain small negative returns around the announcement date. When the target is privately held, cash financing, mixed (stock and cash) financing, and placement of blocks of acquirer stock with target owners are more prevalent. Acquirer returns are positive in stock-financed mergers when the target is private, which is consistent with both the information signaling and monitoring by blockholders hypotheses. Further analysis supports the information signaling hypothesis as the dominant explanation. The effects of other explanatory variables are similar whether the target is public or private. Most significantly, acquiring shareholder returns are negatively related to the acquirers size, but positively related to the acquirers use of the UPREIT organizational structure. The positive wealth effects of the UPREIT structure are not fully explained as the capitalization of tax benefits. Copyright 2001 by the American Real Estate and Urban Ecopnomics Assocaition.

Wealth Effects of Diversification and Financial Deal Structuring: Evidence from REIT Property Portfolio Acquisitions

This study examines the strategic characteristics and shareholder wealth effects of a popular vehicle for Real Estate Investment Trust growth in the 1990s: the acquisition of a portfolio of properties from a single seller. We examine a sample of 209 REIT portfolio acquisitions during 1995-2001. We observe a wide variety of financing strategies and find an array of different categories of sellers. Contrary to results reported in real estate transactions of this sort in the past, we find that announcement-period shareholder returns are significantly positive in the aggregate. We present evidence that excess returns to acquirers result from (1) wealth benefits received when companies reconfirm their geographical focus in the acquisition, (2) positive information conveyed by the use of project-specific private debt and (3) a positive signal sent to the market when transactions are financed by stock privately placed with financial institutions. Copyright 2003 by the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association

Value Creation in REIT Property Sell-Offs

We examine major sales of real property by public U.S. Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) 1992-2002. We find that abnormal shareholder returns are significantly positive, a result that is consistent with findings for conventional firms that sell off real estate. Because REITs do not pay taxes, this finding supports the view that abnormal returns in real estate sell-offs by all types of firms are derived largely from asset allocation efficiencies and do not result exclusively from tax benefits. Shareholder returns are lower in sell-offs motivated by a desire to reduce long-term debt, as is consistent with financial theory regarding the information content of leverage decisions. Returns are inversely related to the firms operating performance prior to the sell-off announcement, further supporting the case that improved asset efficiencies create value in real estate sell-offs. Copyright 2006 American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association

Policy implications of structural options in the development of real estate investment trusts in Europe

This is a policy paper that examines the most important issues that must be addressed in designing the institutional structure for tax‐advantaged public real estate companies in Europe. The real estate investment trust form of corporate structure was first created in the USA in 1960. In Europe, the real estate invstment trust (REIT) regime has been authorized only in The Netherlands, and very recently in Belgium. However, the establishment of REIT‐like public investment vehicles is under discussion in the UK, and in several Continental European nations. Advocates of European REITs believe that these investment vehicles would reduce costs of capital, improve liquidity in local real estate markets, and promote more efficient allocation of capital. European countries that are moving toward the establishment of REITs face a series of important decisions regarding the features of the institutional environment in which these firms will operate. This paper summarizes the most important decisions that must be made, and considers the policy implications of each. We conclude that the US model should not be adopted uncritically in Europe; instead, structural options should be considered carefully. Problems of international taxation are identified, and the possible development of a pan‐European REIT structure is discussed.