Robert F. Rea
Mayo Clinic
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Robert F. Rea.
The New England Journal of Medicine | 2000
Barry J. Maron; Win Kuang Shen; Mark S. Link; Andrew E. Epstein; Adrian K. Almquist; James P. Daubert; Gust H. Bardy; Stefano Favale; Robert F. Rea; Giuseppe Boriani; N.A. Mark Estes; Paolo Spirito; Susan A. Casey; Marshall S. Stanton; Sandro Betocchi
BACKGROUND Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is a genetic disease associated with a risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias and sudden death, especially in young patients. METHODS We conducted a retrospective multicenter study of the efficacy of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in preventing sudden death in 128 patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy who were judged to be at high risk for sudden death. RESULTS At the time of the implantation of the defibrillator, the patients were 8 to 82 years old (mean [+/-SD], 40+/-16), and 69 patients (54 percent) were less than 41 years old. The average follow-up period was 3.1 years. Defibrillators were activated appropriately in 29 patients (23 percent), by providing defibrillation shocks or antitachycardia pacing, with the restoration of sinus rhythm; the average age at the time of the intervention was 41 years. The rate of appropriate defibrillator discharge was 7 percent per year. A total of 32 patients (25 percent) had episodes of inappropriate discharges. In the group of 43 patients who received defibrillators for secondary prevention (after cardiac arrest or sustained ventricular tachycardia), the devices were activated appropriately in 19 patients (11 percent per year). Of 85 patients who had prophylactic implants because of risk factors (i.e., for primary prevention), 10 had appropriate interventions (5 percent per year). The interval between implantation and the first appropriate discharge was highly variable but was substantially prolonged (four to nine years) in six patients. In all 21 patients with stored electrographic data and appropriate interventions, the interventions were triggered by ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation. CONCLUSIONS Ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation appears to be the principal mechanism of sudden death in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. In high-risk patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, implantable defibrillators are highly effective in terminating such arrhythmias, indicating that these devices have a role in the primary and secondary prevention of sudden death.
The New England Journal of Medicine | 2001
Cevher Ozcan; Arshad Jahangir; Paul A. Friedman; Philip J. Patel; Thomas M. Munger; Robert F. Rea; Margaret A. Lloyd; Douglas L. Packer; David O. Hodge; Bernard J. Gersh; Stephen C. Hammill; Win-Kuang Shen
Background In patients with atrial fibrillation that is refractory to drug therapy, radio-frequency ablation of the atrioventricular node and implantation of a permanent pacemaker are an alternative therapeutic approach. The effect of this procedure on long-term survival is unknown. Methods We studied all patients who underwent ablation of the atrioventricular node and implantation of a permanent pacemaker at the Mayo Clinic between 1990 and 1998. Observed survival was compared with the survival rates in two control populations: age- and sex-matched members of the Minnesota population between 1970 and 1990 and consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation who received drug therapy in 1993. Results A total of 350 patients (mean [±SD] age, 68±11 years) were studied. During a mean of 36±26 months of follow-up, 78 patients died. The observed survival rate was significantly lower than the expected survival rate based on the general Minnesota population (P<0.001). Previous myocardial infarction (P< 0.001), a hi...
Circulation | 2000
Paul A. Friedman; David M. Luria; Alexis M. Fenton; Thomas M. Munger; Arshad Jahangir; Win Kuang Shen; Robert F. Rea; Marshall S. Stanton; Stephen C. Hammill; Douglas L. Packer
BACKGROUND Previous studies of atrial flutter have found linear block at the crista terminalis; this was thought to predispose the patient to the arrhythmia. More recent observations, however, have demonstrated crista conduction. We sought to characterize the posterior boundary of atrial flutter. METHODS AND RESULTS Patients with counterclockwise flutter (n=20), clockwise flutter (n=3), or both (n=5) were studied using two 20-pole catheters. Biplane fluoroscopy determined catheter positions. During counterclockwise flutter, craniocaudal activation occurred along the entire lateral and posterior right atrial walls. Septal activation proceeded caudocranially. In all patients, a line of block was seen in the posteromedial (sinus venosa) right atrium; this was manifested by the presence of double potentials where the upward and downward activations collided. Anatomic location was confirmed by intracardiac echocardiography in 9 patients. In patients with clockwise flutter, the line of block and double potentials were seen in the same location during counterclockwise flutter, but the activation sequence around the line of block was reversed. Pacing near the site of double potentials during sinus rhythm excluded a fixed line of block, and premature atrial complexes demonstrated functional block with manifest double potentials. In 2 patients, posterior ectopy organized to subsequently initiate isthmus-dependent atrial flutter. CONCLUSIONS (1) A functional line of block is seen at the posteromedial (sinus venosa region) right atrium during counterclockwise and clockwise atrial flutter. (2) All lateral wall right atrial activation can be uniform during flutter, without linear block or double potentials in the region of the crista terminalis. (3) Activation at the site of posteromedial right atrial functional block can organize to subsequently initiate isthmus-dependent atrial flutter.
Heart Rhythm | 2002
Paul A. Friedman; Samuel J. Asirvatham; Suellen Grice; Michael Glikson; Thomas M. Munger; Robert F. Rea; Win Kuang Shen; Arshad Jahanghir; Douglas L. Packer; Stephen C. Hammill
BACKGROUND There is limited data on outcomes after noncontact mapping (NCM)-guided right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) ventricular arrhythmia (VA) ablation. OBJECTIVES To assess outcomes of NCM-guided RVOT VA ablation in a large cohort with extended follow-up, to determine optimal ablation site, and to analyze limitations of conventional mapping techniques. METHODS In consecutive patients undergoing RVOT VA ablation, 2 sites of early activation--earliest activation (EA) and breakout (BO) sites--were identified on NCM maps. Pace mapping and activation mapping were performed at both sites. The area of depolarized myocardium during the first 10 ms of spontaneous VA and pacing was measured. The initial site of ablation was randomized to either EA or BO sites, with crossover to the alternate site if ablation was not successful. RESULTS In 136 patients, prematurity of local activation and pace maps were similar at EA and BO sites. More myocardium was depolarized 10 ms after pacing than during spontaneous VA (12.9 ± 7.8 cm(2) vs 5.3 ± 3.9 cm(2); P < .01). Clinical success was more likely achieved when initial ablation was directed toward the EA site (P < .05). A wider EA-BO separation was associated with acute procedural failure (P < .01). With a follow-up of 36.2 ± 17.5 months, the success rate after a single procedure without antiarrhythmic agents was 86.8%. CONCLUSIONS NCM-guided RVOT VA ablation is highly effective, and clinical success is best achieved by ablating the EA site. Broad regions of early activation are associated with worsened clinical outcomes. Spatial resolution of activation and pace mapping is limited by rapid electrical propagation in the RVOT.
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology | 2008
T. Jared Bunch; Thomas M. Munger; Paul A. Friedman; Samuel J. Asirvatham; Peter A. Brady; Yong Mei Cha; Robert F. Rea; Win Kuang Shen; Brian D. Powell; Steve R. Ommen; Kristi H. Monahan; Janis M. Haroldson; Douglas L. Packer
Background: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is often accompanied by atrial fibrillation (AF) due to diastolic dysfunction, elevated left atrial pressure, and enlargement. Although catheter ablation for drug‐refractory AF is an effective treatment, the efficacy in HCM remains to be established.
Heart Rhythm | 2010
Kan Dong; Win Kuang Shen; Brian D. Powell; Ying Xu Dong; Robert F. Rea; Paul A. Friedman; David O. Hodge; Heather J. Wiste; Tracy Webster; David L. Hayes; Yong Mei Cha
BACKGROUND Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) benefits patients with advanced heart failure. The role of atrioventricular nodal (AVN) ablation in improving CRT outcomes, including survival benefit in CRT recipients with atrial fibrillation, is uncertain. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of AVN ablation on clinical and survival outcomes in a large atrial fibrillation and heart failure population that met the current indication for CRT and to determine whether AVN ablation is an independent predictor of survival in CRT recipients. METHODS Of 154 patients with atrial fibrillation who received CRT-D, 45 (29%) underwent AVN ablation (+AVN-ABL group), whereas 109 (71%) received drug therapy for rate control during CRT (-AVN-ABL group). New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, electrocardiogram, and echocardiogram were assessed before and after CRT. Survival data were obtained from the national death and location database (Accurint). RESULTS CRT comparably improved left ventricular ejection fraction (8.1% +/- 10.7% vs 6.8% +/- 9.6%, P = .49) and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (-2.1 +/- 5.9 mm vs -2.1 +/- 6.7 mm, P = .74) in both +AVN-ABL and -AVN-ABL groups. Improvement in NYHA class was significantly greater in the +AVN-ABL group than in -AVN-ABL group (-0.7 +/- 0.8 vs -0.4 +/- 0.8, P = .04). Survival estimates at 2 years were 96.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 88.6%-100%) for +AVN-ABL group and 76.5% (95% CI 68.1%-85.8%) for-AVN-ABL group (P = .008). AVN ablation was independently associated with survival benefit from death (hazard ratio [HR] 0.13, 95% CI 0.03-0.58, P = .007) and from combined death, heart transplant, and left ventricular assist device (HR 0.19, 95% CI 0.06-0.62, P = .006) after CRT. CONCLUSION Among patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure receiving CRT, AVN ablation for definitive biventricular pacing provides greater improvement in NYHA class and survival benefit. Larger-scale randomized trials are needed to assess the clinical and survival outcomes of this therapy.
Circulation | 2008
Yong Mei Cha; Paul A. Friedman; Samuel J. Asirvatham; Win Kuang Shen; Thomas M. Munger; Robert F. Rea; Peter A. Brady; Arshad Jahangir; Kristi H. Monahan; David O. Hodge; Ryan A. Meverden; Bernard J. Gersh; Stephen C. Hammill; Douglas L. Packer
Background— Obesity is a risk factor for atrial fibrillation and other cardiovascular conditions. Our objective was to determine whether catheter-based ablation effectively treated atrial fibrillation in obese patients. Methods and Results— Five hundred twenty-three consecutive patients with symptomatic, medication-refractory atrial fibrillation underwent catheter ablation. Patients were grouped by body mass index (lean, <25 kg/m2; overweight, 25 to 29.9 kg/m2; obese, ≥30 kg/m2). Outcome and quality of life were measured with a general health survey (Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form General Health Survey [SF-36]); patients were assessed before ablation and at 3 and 12 months after the procedure. Two hundred twenty-eight study patients (44%) were overweight, and 201 (38%) were obese. Twelve months after curative ablation, 72% of patients were free of atrial fibrillation without the use of antiarrhythmic agents; 84% were arrhythmia free when those receiving medication were included. Atrial fibrillation was eliminated in 75%, 72%, and 70% of the lean, overweight, and obese patients, respectively, at 12 months (P=0.41, trend test). SF-36 scores were lower for patients with higher body mass index (P<0.05) at baseline. SF-36 scores improved in every functional domain for all body mass index groups after ablation. The mean SF-36 total physical score increased from 59±20 at baseline to 77±19 in 12 months (P<0.001). The total mental health score improved from 66±18 to 79±16 in 12 months (P<0.001). Conclusions— Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation was effective in obese patients. Coexistence of atrial fibrillation and obesity indicated lower SF-36 scores, but the improvement in quality of life was consistent across all body mass index categories.
Circulation-heart Failure | 2010
Chinami Miyazaki; Margaret M. Redfield; Brian D. Powell; Grace Lin; Regina M. Herges; David O. Hodge; Lyle J. Olson; David L. Hayes; Raul E. Espinosa; Robert F. Rea; Charles J. Bruce; Susan M. Nelson; Fletcher A. Miller; Jae K. Oh
Background—Whether mechanical dyssynchrony indices predict reverse remodeling (RR) or clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) remains controversial. This prospective study evaluated whether echocardiographic dyssynchrony indices predict RR or clinical response after CRT. Methods and Results—Of 184 patients with heart failure with anticipated CRT who were prospectively enrolled, 131 with wide QRS and left ventricular ejection fraction <35% had 6-month follow-up after CRT implantation. Fourteen dyssynchrony indices (feasibility) by M-mode (94%), tissue velocity (96%), tissue Doppler strain (92%), 2D speckle strain (65% to 86%), 3D echocardiography (79%), and timing intervals (98%) were evaluated. RR (end-systolic volume reduction ≥15%) occurred in 55% and more frequently in patients without (71%) than in patients with (42%) ischemic cardiomyopathy (P=0.002). Overall, only M-mode, tissue Doppler strain, and total isovolumic time had a receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC) greater than the line of no information, but none of these were strongly predictive of RR (AUC, 0.63 to 0.71). In nonischemic cardiomyopathy, no dyssynchrony index predicted RR. In ischemic cardiomyopathy, M-mode (AUC, 0.67), tissue Doppler strain (AUC, 0.79), and isovolumic time (AUC, 0.76) -derived indices predicted RR (P<0.05 for all), although the incremental value was modest. No indices predicted clinical response assessed by Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire, 6-minute walk distance, and peak oxygen consumption. Conclusions—These findings are consistent with the Predictors of Response to CRT study and do not support use of these dyssynchrony indices to guide use of CRT.
Heart Rhythm | 2009
Anita Wokhlu; Robert F. Rea; Samuel J. Asirvatham; Tracy Webster; Kelly L. Brooke; David O. Hodge; Heather J. Wiste; YingXue Dong; David L. Hayes; Yong Mei Cha
BACKGROUND Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves outcomes in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB), but the benefits of CRT in patients with other QRS morphologies or previous pacing are uncertain. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to describe outcomes in patients with prior right ventricular pacing and non-LBBB morphologies. METHODS We studied 505 patients who underwent de novo CRT (n = 338) or CRT upgrade (n = 167). De novo patients were categorized by underlying QRS morphology: LBBB (67%), right bundle branch block (RBBB; 11%), intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD; 13%), and QRS <120 ms (9%). Upgrade patients were categorized by the percentage of previous ventricular pacing. RESULTS Patients were followed for death over a median of 2.6 years (interquartile range 1.6-4.0). New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class and echocardiographic improvements were similar in de novo and upgrade patients. However, within the de novo group, NYHA improvements were less in patients with RBBB (0.3 +/- 0.8; P = .014) or IVCD (0.2 +/- 0.7; P = .001) than in those with LBBB (0.7 +/- 0.8). These patients had less left ventricular functional improvement as well. Survival was comparable after de novo versus upgrade CRT (61% vs 63% at 4 years; P = .906). No clinical or survival differences were noted in upgrade patients based on the percentage of previous pacing. However, survival in de novo CRT recipients with RBBB (32%) was lower than in those with LBBB (66%; P <.001), and RBBB independently predicted death (hazard ratio 3.5, confidence interval 1.9-6.5; P <.001). CONCLUSION RBBB and IVCD result in less clinical improvement or worsened survival after CRT. Additional selection criteria may be beneficial in identifying potential responders with RBBB, IVCD, or narrow QRS.
Heart Rhythm | 2009
Michael Glikson; Mahmoud Suleiman; David Luria; Marjorie L. Martin; David O. Hodge; Win Kuang Shen; David J. Bradley; Thomas M. Munger; Robert F. Rea; David L. Hayes; Stephen C. Hammill; Paul A. Friedman
BACKGROUND With the increased number of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) recipients and the frequent need for device upgrading, lead malfunction is a concern, but the optimal approach to managing nonfunctioning leads is unknown. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to determine the rate and characteristics of complications related to abandoned ICD leads. METHODS Patients with abandoned leads were identified by retrospective review of the Mayo Clinic ICD database from August 1993 to May 2002. We reviewed the medical records to assess long-term follow-up for venous thromboembolic complications, device sensing malfunction, appropriateness of delivered shocks, defibrillation threshold (DFT) values before and after lead abandonment, and subsequent surgical procedures related to devices or leads. RESULTS We identified 78 ICD patients (81% males; mean age 63 +/- 14 years) with 101 abandoned leads (69 in the right ventricle, 31 in the right atrium or superior vena cava, 1 in the coronary sinus). During a mean follow-up of 3.1 +/- 2.0 years, neither sensing malfunction nor venous thromboembolic complications were detected. DFT values were high in 13 patients (17%), but there was no significant increase in mean DFT values before and after lead abandonment in 43 patients for whom both values were available (16.2 +/- 9.2 J before abandonment vs 14.1 +/- 5.5 J after; P = .24). Fourteen patients (18%) required further ICD-related surgery; none of these operations were attributed to abandoned leads. Five-year rates of appropriate and inappropriate shocks were 25.9% and 20.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION Abandoning a nonfunctioning lead appears to be safe and does not pose a clinically significant additional risk of future complications.