Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Robert H. Peter is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Robert H. Peter.


Circulation | 1978

The role of the exercise test in the evaluation of patients for ischemic heart disease.

J F McNeer; James R. Margolis; Kerry L. Lee; Joseph Kisslo; Robert H. Peter; Yihong Kong; Victor S. Behar; Andrew G. Wallace; Charles B. McCants; Robert A. Rosati

A cohort of 1472 patients who underwent both exercise stress testing and coronary angiography within six weeks was examined. The data indicated that a combination of exercise parameters is both diagnostically and prognostically important. Almost all patients (> 97%) who had positive exercise tests at Stage I or Stage II had significant coronary artery disease. More than half of these (> 60%) had three vessel disease and over 25% had significant narrowing (> 50%) of the left main coronary artery. Patients who achieved Stage IV or greater exercise durations with either negative or indeterminate ST-segment response had less than a 15% prevalence of three vessel disease and less than a 1% prevalence of left main coronary artery disease. A low risk subgroup (75% of all nonoperated patients) was identified with a twelve month survival greater than 99%. A high risk subgroup (11% of all nonoperated patients) was identified with a twelve month survival of less than 85%. The exercise test is a noninvasive, reproducible method to assess the presence and extent of anatomic disease and the prognosis when significant disease has been defined. It should be used in conjunction with other noninvasive tests to determine optimal management in patients evaluated for ischemic heart disease.


American Journal of Cardiology | 1978

Unstable angina pectoris: National cooperative study group to compare surgical and medical therapy: II. In-Hospital experience and initial follow-up results in patients with one, two and three vessel disease

Richard O. Russell; Roger E. Moraski; Nicholas T. Kouchoukos; Robert B. Karp; John A. Mantle; William J. Rogers; Charles E. Rackley; Leon Resnekov; Raul E. Falicov; Jafar Al-Sadir; Harold L. Brooks; Constantine E. Anagnostopoulos; John J. Lamberti; Michael J. Wolk; Thomas Killip; Robert A. Rosati; H.N. Oldham; Galen S. Wagner; Robert H. Peter; C.R. Conti; R.C. Curry; George R. Daicoff; Lewis C. Becker; G. Plotnick; Vincent L. Gott; Robert K. Brawley; James S. Donahoo; Richard S. Ross; Adolph M. Hutter; Roman W. DeSanctis

Abstract A prospective randomized study comparing intensive medical therapy with urgent coronary bypass surgery for the acute management of patients with unstable angina pectoris was carried out by nine cooperating medical centers under the auspices of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Between 1972 and 1976, a total of 288 patients were entered into the study. All patients had transient S-T or T wave changes, or both, in the electrocardiogram during pain; 90 percent had pain at rest in the hospital, and 76 percent had multivessel coronary disease. The medically and surgically treated patients were comparable with respect to clinical, electrocardiographic and angiographic characteristics and left ventricular function. During the total study period, the hospital mortality rate was 5 percent in the surgical group and 3 percent in the medical group (difference not significant). The rate of in-hospital myocardial infarction was 17 and 8 percent in the respective groups (P In the 1st year after hospital discharge class III or IV angina (New York Heart Association criteria) was more common in medically than in surgically treated patients with one vessel disease (22 percent versus 3 percent, P The results indicate that patients with unstable angina pectoris can be managed acutely with intensive medical therapy, including the administration of propranolol and long-acting nitrates in pharmacologic doses, with adequate control of pain in most patients and no increase in early mortality or myocardial infarction rates. Later, elective surgery can be performed with a low risk and good clinical results if the patients angina fails to respond to intensive medical therapy.


Circulation | 1974

Graded Exercise Stress Tests in Angiographically Documented Coronary Artery Disease

Alan G. Bartel; Victor S. Behar; Robert H. Peter; Edward S. Orgain; Yihong Kong

Graded exercise stress tests performed on 650 consecutive patients with proven or suspected coronary disease undergoing evaluation by cardiac catheterization were correlated with clinical, hemodynamic, and angiographic findings. Among 451 patients with significant coronary stenosis, 332 (74%) had interpretable stress tests and 65% of these were positive (sensitivity). The rate of “false positives’ was 8%.The clinical syndrome of typical angina identified significant coronary disease in 89% of the patients, and 58% of that group had a positive exercise test defined by objective electrocardiographic criteria.Patients were not eliminated from this study because of recent digitalis ingestion. Although a higher frequency of uninterpretable exercise tests was found in this group (40%), the test results reflected more severe coronary disease. None of the patients with “false positive’ tests were taking digitalis. It is concluded that recent digitalis ingestion should not be considered a contraindication for exercise stress testing.Among the patients with interpretable exercise tests, the angiographic severity of coronary artery disease correlates strongly with the frequency of positive tests (40%, 66%, and 76%, with 70% or greater occlusion of one, two or three vessels respectively). Left main coronary stenosis of 70% or greater was associated with more severe ST segment changes, inability to achieve target heart rate during stress, and a lower maximum heart rate during exercise. The angiographic occurrence of collateral vessels was related to the extent of coronary disease and was associated with a higher percentage of positive exercise tests; no protective effect of collateral circulation could be demonstrated. Patients with abnormal resting hemodynamics or left ventricular asynergy had no significant difference in the frequency of positive tests after adjustment for the angiographic severity of disease.


American Heart Journal | 1998

Progression of renal artery stenosis in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization

James J. Crowley; Renato M. Santos; Robert H. Peter; Joseph A. Puma; Steve J. Schwab; Harry R. Phillips; Richard S. Stack; Peter J. Conlon

BACKGROUND Renal artery stenosis is potentially correctable by either revascularization surgery or percutaneous methods. However, appropriate use of these techniques has been hampered by a lack of data on the natural history of this disease. This study assesses the prevalence, risk factors for progression, and effect on renal function of angiographically demonstrated renal artery disease in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization. METHODS The severity of renal artery stenosis was quantified in all patients who underwent abdominal aortography as part of a diagnostic cardiac catheterization study at Duke University Medical Center between January 1989 and February 1996. RESULTS There were 14,152 patients in the study (mean age 61+/-12 years, 62% male). Normal renal arteries were identified in 12,543 (88.7%) patients, insignificant disease (<50% stenosis) in 1 or more vessels in 726 patients (5.1 %), and significant stenosis in 883 patients (6.3%). Significant bilateral renal artery stenosis was present in 178 patients (1.3%). By multivariate logistic regression, elevated serum creatinine level, coronary artery disease, peripheral vascular disease, hypertension, cerebrovascular disease, older age, female sex, and family history of coronary artery disease were identified as independent predictors of significant renal arterial disease. Disease progression was assessed in 1189 patients. Mean time between cardiac catheterizations was 2.6+/-1.6 years. Significant disease progression occurred in 133 patients (11.1 %). Independent predictors of disease progression were female sex, age, coronary artery disease at baseline, and time between baseline and follow-up. At follow-up, serum creatinine level was significantly higher in patients who demonstrated > or =75% stenosis in 1 or more vessels (mean creatinine level 141+114 micromol/L compared with those with insignificant disease (mean creatinine level 97+/-44 micromol/L (P= .01). CONCLUSIONS Renal artery disease is frequently progressive in patients who undergo cardiac catheterization for investigation of coronary artery disease. Significant stenotic disease may develop over a short period despite evidence of normal renal arteries at prior catheterization.


Journal of Clinical Investigation | 1983

Functional improvement of jeopardized myocardium following intracoronary streptokinase infusion in acute myocardial infarction.

Richard S. Stack; H R Phillips rd; D S Grierson; Victor S. Behar; Yihong Kong; Robert H. Peter; Judith L. Swain; Joseph C. Greenfield

The effect of reperfusion on regional left ventricular performance following acute myocardial infarction in man was determined. Intracoronary streptokinase was administered in 24 patients within 6 h of the onset of symptoms. 15 patients (62%) were successfully recanalized during the initial study. Mean percent radial shortening (%RS) in both the jeopardized and compensatory regions were determined using 23 radii from the centroid of diastolic and systolic angiographic silhouettes. Sequential measurements were obtained during repeat cardiac catheterization studies at 24 h in 19 patients and before discharge from the hospital (16 +/- 11 d) in 15 patients. At the time of the predischarge study, each acutely reperfused patient showed improvement in %RS in the jeopardized region (P = 0.01) with 56% returning to the normal range. Despite the uniform improvement in the contractile function of the jeopardized region in each reperfused patient, the global ejection fraction showed no improvement or a decrease at the time of the chronic study in 44%. This was due to a decrease in the compensatory wall motion in the uninvolved segments between the acute and chronic study in each case. Neither the %RS nor the ejection fraction changed significantly at the time of the chronic study in the patients who could not be acutely recanalized. These data indicate (a) significant salvage of jeopardized myocardium associated with recovery of contractile function in patients reperfused during the first 6 h of chest pain following acute myocardial infarction; (b) no improvement in regional or global left ventricular performance in patients who could not be reperfused acutely; and (c) the ejection fraction is strongly influenced by changes in the compensatory wall motion of the uninvolved segments and does not accurately reflect changes in the contractile function of the jeopardized myocardium.


The New England Journal of Medicine | 1980

Oral Hydralazine Therapy for Primary Pulmonary Hypertension

Lewis J. Rubin; Robert H. Peter

To evaluate the hemodynamic effects of hydralazine in four patients with primary pulmonary hypertension, we catheterized the right side of the heart before and 48 hours after starting therapy with oral hydralazine, 50 mg every six hours. Data were obtained at rest in four patients and also during exercise in three. After hydralazine, total pulmonary resistance at rest fell from 17.5 to 7.7 U, and pulmonary arteriolar resistance from 15.6 to 7.1 U; cardiac output increased from 3.8 to 7.1 liters per minute, and the arteriovenous oxygen difference narrowed from 7.8 to 5.4 ml per deciliter. Mean pulmonary and systemic arterial pressures were unchanged. Hydralazine also caused total pulmonary resistance during exercise to fall from 15.7 to 10.2 U, and cardiac output to rise from 4.7 to 7.0 liters per minute. Treatment was continued, and on repeat catheterizations three to six months later the hemodynamic effects persisted. These data suggest that hydralazine can reduce pulmonary resistance in some patients with idiopathic pulmonary hypertension.


American Journal of Cardiology | 1976

Unstable angina pectoris: National cooperative study group to compare medical and surgical therapy

Richard O. Russell; Roger E. Moraski; Nicholas T. Kouchoukos; Robert B. Karp; John A. Mantle; William J. Rogers; Charles E. Rackley; Leon Resnekov; Raul E. Falicov; Jafar Al-Sadir; Harold L. Brooks; Constantine E. Anagnostopoulos; John J. Lamberti; Michael J. Wolk; Thomas Killip; Robert A. Rosati; H.N. Oldham; Galen S. Wagner; Robert H. Peter; C.R. Conti; R.C. Curry; George R. Daicoff; Lewis C. Becker; G. Plotnick; Vincent L. Gott; Robert K. Brawley; James S. Donahoo; Richard S. Ross; Adolph M. Hutter; Roman W. DeSanctis

A preliminary report is presented of a prospective randomized trial conducted by eight cooperative institutions under the auspices of the National Heart and Lung Institute to compare the effectiveness of medical and surgical therapy in the management of the acute stages of unstable angina pectoris. To date 150 patients have been included in the randomized trial, 80 assigned to medical and 70 to surgical therapy; the clinical presentation, coronary arterial anatomy and left ventricular function in the two groups are similar. Some physicians have been reluctant to prescribe medical or surgical therapy by a random process, and the eithical basis of the trial has been questioned. Since there are no hard data regarding the natural history and outcome of therapy for unstable angina pectoris, randomization appears to provide a rational way of selecting therapy. Furthermore, subsets of patients at high risk may emerge during the process of randomization. The design of this randomized trial is compared with that of another reported trial. Thus far, the study has shown that it is possible to conduct a randomized trial in patients with unstable angina pectoris, and that the medical and surgical groups have been similar in relation to the variables examined. The group as a whole presented with severe angina pectoris, either as a crescendo pattern or as new onset of angina at rest, and 84 percent had recurrence of pain while in the coronary care unit and receiving vigorous medical therapy. It is anticipated that sufficient patients will have been entered into the trial within the next 12 months to determine whether medical or surgical therapy is superior in the acute stages of unstable angina pectoris.Abstract A preliminary report is presented of a prospective randomized trial conducted by eight cooperative institutions under the auspices of the National Heart and Lung Institute to compare the effectiveness of medical and surgical therapy in the management of the acute stages of unstable angina pectoris. To date 150 patients have been included in the randomized trial, 80 assigned to medical and 70 to surgical therapy; the clinical presentation, coronary arterial anatomy and left ventricular function in the two groups are similar. Some physicians have been reluctant to prescribe medical or surgical therapy by a random process, and the ethical basis of the trial has been questioned. Since there are no hard data regarding the natural history and outcome of therapy for unstable angina pectoris, randomization appears to provide a rational way of selecting therapy. Furthermore, subsets of patients at high risk may emerge during the process of randomization. The design of this randomized trial is compared with that of another reported trial. Thus far, the study has shown that it is possible to conduct a randomized trial in patients with unstable angina pectoris, and that the medical and surgical groups have been similar in relation to the variables examined. The group as a whole presented with severe angina pectoris, either as a crescendo pattern or as new onset of angina at rest, and 84 percent had recurrence of pain while in the coronary care unit and receiving vigorous medical therapy. It is anticipated that sufficient patients will have been entered into the trial within the next 12 months to determine whether medical or surgical therapy is superior in the acute stages of unstable angina pectoris.


Circulation | 1983

Outcome in one-vessel coronary artery disease.

Robert M. Califf; Y Tomabechi; Kerry L. Lee; Harry R. Phillips; David B. Pryor; Frank E. Harrell; Phillip J. Harris; Robert H. Peter; Victor S. Behar; Yihong Kong; Robert A. Rosati

We analyzed the clinical outcomes in 688 patients with isolated stenosis of one major coronary artery. The survival rate among patients with disease of the right coronary artery (RCA) was higher than that among patients with left anterior descending (LAD) or left circumflex coronary artery (LCA) disease. The survival rate among patients in all three anatomic subgroups exceeded 90% at 5 years. The presence of a lesion proximal to the first septal perforator of the LAD was associated with decreased survival compared with the presence of a more distal lesion. For the entire group of one-vessel disease patients, total ischemic events (death and nonfatal infarction) occurred at similar rates regardless of the anatomic location of the lesion. Left ventricular ejection fraction was the baseline descriptor most strongly associated with survival, and the characteristics of the angina had the strongest relationship with nonfatal myocardial infarction. No differences in survival or total cardiac event rates were found with surgical or nonsurgical therapy. The relief of angina was superior with surgical therapy, although the majority of nonsurgically treated patients had significant relief of angina. The survival rate of patients with one-vessel coronary disease is excellent, and the risk of nonfatal infarction is low. Clinical strategies for the care of these patients must consider the long-term clinical course of one-vessel coronary disease.


Circulation | 1974

The Significance of Coronary Calcification Detected by Fluoroscopy A Report of 360 Patients

Alan G. Bartel; James T. T. Chen; Robert H. Peter; Victor S. Behar; Yihong Kong; Richard G. Lester

Cardiac fluoroscopy to detect coronary calcification was performed on 360 patients before undergoing coronary arteriography for proven or suspected coronary artery disease. Among the 154 patients in whom coronary calcification was identified, 97% had significant coronary disease angiographically (≧ 70% stenosis). In this group, the distribution of one, two, and three vessel coronary disease was 9%, 25%, and 66% respectively. The prevalence of coronary calcification increased with age and severity of coronary disease, but no difference in males versus females was demonstrable. The angiographic severity of coronary disease increased with multiple vessel calcification; three vessel disease occurred in 45%, 66%, and 82% of patients with one, two, and three vessel calcification, respectively. Patients with hyperlipidemia or hypertension had no significant difference in the prevalence of coronary calcification. Among the 267 patients with significant coronary lesions, 56% had calcification detected by fluoroscopy.Five of the 93 patients with no significant coronary disease angiographically had coronary calcification fluoroscopically. Four of the five had a prior history of myocardial infarction, and two showed asynergy on left ventriculography.This study demonstrates that cardiac fluoroscopy is a valuable procedure for detecting significant coronary artery disease since this highly specific test is easily performed, inexpensive, noninvasive, and widely applicable for screening large patient populations.


Circulation | 1988

Myocardial protection during coronary angioplasty with an autoperfusion balloon catheter in humans.

Peter J. Quigley; Tomoaki Hinohara; Harry R. Phillips; Robert H. Peter; Victor S. Behar; Yihong Kong; Charles A. Simonton; Jose A. Perez; Richard S. Stack

An autoperfusion balloon catheter was developed to allow passive myocardial perfusion during inflation through a central lumen and multiple side holes in the shaft proximal and distal to the balloon. We report its safety and efficacy in 11 patients undergoing elective angioplasty to a single coronary lesion. Each lesion was dilated three times with the autoperfusion inflation bracketed between two inflations by standard angioplasty catheters. Chest pain score, 12-lead electrocardiogram, heart rate, and mean aortic pressure were recorded before each inflation and at 1-minute intervals after inflation. Inflation duration during autoperfusion angioplasty (513 +/- 303 seconds) was longer than for the pre- (107 +/- 55 seconds, p = 0.0004) and post- (139 +/- 71 seconds, p = 0.0006) standard dilatations. The maximum ST-segment elevation and depression in any lead during autoperfusion angioplasty (0.3 +/- 0.5 and 0.6 +/- 0.8 mm) was significantly less than for the pre- (2.4 +/- 1.7 mm, p = 0.002 and 2.2 +/- 1.3 mm, p = 0.0004) or post- (1.9 +/- 1.3 mm, p = 0.002 and 1.6 +/- 1.3 mm, p = 0.018) standard dilatations at the same point in time. Maximal chest pain score during autoperfusion (3.2 +/- 3.5) was lower than for the pre- (6.1 +/- 2.1, p = 0.003) but not the post- (5.2 +/- 3.1, p = 0.07) standard angioplasty. All 11 patients underwent successful, uncomplicated procedures. We conclude that this autoperfusion catheter significantly reduces ischemic symptoms and signs during coronary angioplasty, allowing prolonged periods of balloon inflation.

Collaboration


Dive into the Robert H. Peter's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge