Robert J. Lonigro
University of Michigan
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Robert J. Lonigro.
Nature | 2009
Arun Sreekumar; Laila M. Poisson; Thekkelnaycke M. Rajendiran; Amjad P. Khan; Qi Cao; Jindan Yu; Bharathi Laxman; Rohit Mehra; Robert J. Lonigro; Yong Li; Mukesh K. Nyati; Aarif Ahsan; Shanker Kalyana-Sundaram; Bo Han; Xuhong Cao; Jaeman Byun; Gilbert S. Omenn; Debashis Ghosh; Subramaniam Pennathur; Danny Alexander; Alvin Berger; Jeffrey R. Shuster; John T. Wei; Sooryanarayana Varambally; Christopher Beecher; Arul M. Chinnaiyan
Multiple, complex molecular events characterize cancer development and progression. Deciphering the molecular networks that distinguish organ-confined disease from metastatic disease may lead to the identification of critical biomarkers for cancer invasion and disease aggressiveness. Although gene and protein expression have been extensively profiled in human tumours, little is known about the global metabolomic alterations that characterize neoplastic progression. Using a combination of high-throughput liquid-and-gas-chromatography-based mass spectrometry, we profiled more than 1,126 metabolites across 262 clinical samples related to prostate cancer (42 tissues and 110 each of urine and plasma). These unbiased metabolomic profiles were able to distinguish benign prostate, clinically localized prostate cancer and metastatic disease. Sarcosine, an N-methyl derivative of the amino acid glycine, was identified as a differential metabolite that was highly increased during prostate cancer progression to metastasis and can be detected non-invasively in urine. Sarcosine levels were also increased in invasive prostate cancer cell lines relative to benign prostate epithelial cells. Knockdown of glycine-N-methyl transferase, the enzyme that generates sarcosine from glycine, attenuated prostate cancer invasion. Addition of exogenous sarcosine or knockdown of the enzyme that leads to sarcosine degradation, sarcosine dehydrogenase, induced an invasive phenotype in benign prostate epithelial cells. Androgen receptor and the ERG gene fusion product coordinately regulate components of the sarcosine pathway. Here, by profiling the metabolomic alterations of prostate cancer progression, we reveal sarcosine as a potentially important metabolic intermediary of cancer cell invasion and aggressivity.
Nature | 2012
Catherine S. Grasso; Yi Mi Wu; Dan R. Robinson; Xuhong Cao; Saravana M. Dhanasekaran; Amjad P. Khan; Michael J. Quist; Xiaojun Jing; Robert J. Lonigro; J. Chad Brenner; Irfan A. Asangani; Bushra Ateeq; Sang Y. Chun; Javed Siddiqui; Lee Sam; Matt Anstett; Rohit Mehra; John R. Prensner; Nallasivam Palanisamy; Gregory A Ryslik; Fabio Vandin; Benjamin J. Raphael; Lakshmi P. Kunju; Daniel R. Rhodes; Kenneth J. Pienta; Arul M. Chinnaiyan; Scott A. Tomlins
Characterization of the prostate cancer transcriptome and genome has identified chromosomal rearrangements and copy number gains and losses, including ETS gene family fusions, PTEN loss and androgen receptor (AR) amplification, which drive prostate cancer development and progression to lethal, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). However, less is known about the role of mutations. Here we sequenced the exomes of 50 lethal, heavily pre-treated metastatic CRPCs obtained at rapid autopsy (including three different foci from the same patient) and 11 treatment-naive, high-grade localized prostate cancers. We identified low overall mutation rates even in heavily treated CRPCs (2.00 per megabase) and confirmed the monoclonal origin of lethal CRPC. Integrating exome copy number analysis identified disruptions of CHD1 that define a subtype of ETS gene family fusion-negative prostate cancer. Similarly, we demonstrate that ETS2, which is deleted in approximately one-third of CRPCs (commonly through TMPRSS2:ERG fusions), is also deregulated through mutation. Furthermore, we identified recurrent mutations in multiple chromatin- and histone-modifying genes, including MLL2 (mutated in 8.6% of prostate cancers), and demonstrate interaction of the MLL complex with the AR, which is required for AR-mediated signalling. We also identified novel recurrent mutations in the AR collaborating factor FOXA1, which is mutated in 5 of 147 (3.4%) prostate cancers (both untreated localized prostate cancer and CRPC), and showed that mutated FOXA1 represses androgen signalling and increases tumour growth. Proteins that physically interact with the AR, such as the ERG gene fusion product, FOXA1, MLL2, UTX (also known as KDM6A) and ASXL1 were found to be mutated in CRPC. In summary, we describe the mutational landscape of a heavily treated metastatic cancer, identify novel mechanisms of AR signalling deregulated in prostate cancer, and prioritize candidates for future study.
Science | 2008
Sooryanarayana Varambally; Qi Cao; Ram Shankar Mani; Sunita Shankar; Xiaosong Wang; Bushra Ateeq; Bharathi Laxman; Xuhong Cao; Xiaojun Jing; Kalpana Ramnarayanan; J. Chad Brenner; Jindan Yu; Jung Kim; Bo Han; Patrick Tan; Chandan Kumar-Sinha; Robert J. Lonigro; Nallasivam Palanisamy; Christopher A. Maher; Arul M. Chinnaiyan
Enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) is a mammalian histone methyltransferase that contributes to the epigenetic silencing of target genes and regulates the survival and metastasis of cancer cells. EZH2 is overexpressed in aggressive solid tumors by mechanisms that remain unclear. Here we show that the expression and function of EZH2 in cancer cell lines are inhibited by microRNA-101 (miR-101). Analysis of human prostate tumors revealed that miR-101 expression decreases during cancer progression, paralleling an increase in EZH2 expression. One or both of the two genomic loci encoding miR-101 were somatically lost in 37.5% of clinically localized prostate cancer cells (6 of 16) and 66.7% of metastatic disease cells (22 of 33). We propose that the genomic loss of miR-101 in cancer leads to overexpression of EZH2 and concomitant dysregulation of epigenetic pathways, resulting in cancer progression.
Cell | 2015
Dan R. Robinson; Eliezer M. Van Allen; Yi Mi Wu; Nikolaus Schultz; Robert J. Lonigro; Juan Miguel Mosquera; Bruce Montgomery; Mary-Ellen Taplin; Colin C. Pritchard; Gerhardt Attard; Himisha Beltran; Wassim Abida; Robert K. Bradley; Jake Vinson; Xuhong Cao; Pankaj Vats; Lakshmi P. Kunju; Maha Hussain; Felix Y. Feng; Scott A. Tomlins; Kathleen A. Cooney; David C. Smith; Christine Brennan; Javed Siddiqui; Rohit Mehra; Yu Chen; Dana E. Rathkopf; Michael J. Morris; Stephen B. Solomon; Jeremy C. Durack
Toward development of a precision medicine framework for metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), we established a multi-institutional clinical sequencing infrastructure to conduct prospective whole-exome and transcriptome sequencing of bone or soft tissue tumor biopsies from a cohort of 150 mCRPC affected individuals. Aberrations of AR, ETS genes, TP53, and PTEN were frequent (40%-60% of cases), with TP53 and AR alterations enriched in mCRPC compared to primary prostate cancer. We identified new genomic alterations in PIK3CA/B, R-spondin, BRAF/RAF1, APC, β-catenin, and ZBTB16/PLZF. Moreover, aberrations of BRCA2, BRCA1, and ATM were observed at substantially higher frequencies (19.3% overall) compared to those in primary prostate cancers. 89% of affected individuals harbored a clinically actionable aberration, including 62.7% with aberrations in AR, 65% in other cancer-related genes, and 8% with actionable pathogenic germline alterations. This cohort study provides clinically actionable information that could impact treatment decisions for these affected individuals.
Cancer Cell | 2010
Jindan Yu; Jianjun Yu; Ram Shankar Mani; Qi Cao; Chad Brenner; Xuhong Cao; Xiaoju Wang; Longtao Wu; James Li; Ming Hu; Yusong Gong; Hong Cheng; Bharathi Laxman; Adaikkalam Vellaichamy; Sunita Shankar; Yong Li; Saravana M. Dhanasekaran; Roger Morey; Terrence R. Barrette; Robert J. Lonigro; Scott A. Tomlins; Sooryanarayana Varambally; Zhaohui S. Qin; Arul M. Chinnaiyan
Chromosomal rearrangements fusing the androgen-regulated gene TMPRSS2 to the oncogenic ETS transcription factor ERG occur in approximately 50% of prostate cancers, but how the fusion products regulate prostate cancer remains unclear. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation coupled with massively parallel sequencing, we found that ERG disrupts androgen receptor (AR) signaling by inhibiting AR expression, binding to and inhibiting AR activity at gene-specific loci, and inducing repressive epigenetic programs via direct activation of the H3K27 methyltransferase EZH2, a Polycomb group protein. These findings provide a working model in which TMPRSS2-ERG plays a critical role in cancer progression by disrupting lineage-specific differentiation of the prostate and potentiating the EZH2-mediated dedifferentiation program.
Science Translational Medicine | 2011
Sameek Roychowdhury; Matthew K. Iyer; Dan R. Robinson; Robert J. Lonigro; Yi Mi Wu; Xuhong Cao; Shanker Kalyana-Sundaram; Lee Sam; O. Alejandro Balbin; Michael J. Quist; Terrence R. Barrette; Jessica Everett; Javed Siddiqui; Lakshmi P. Kunju; Nora M. Navone; John C. Araujo; Patricia Troncoso; Christopher J. Logothetis; Jeffrey W. Innis; David C. Smith; Christopher D. Lao; Scott Y. H. Kim; J. Scott Roberts; Stephen B. Gruber; Kenneth J. Pienta; Moshe Talpaz; Arul M. Chinnaiyan
The mutations present in advanced cancers can be identified by integrative high-throughput sequencing to enable biomarker-driven clinical trials and, ultimately, treatment. First Steps to Personalized Cancer Treatment In an optimistic vision of personalized medicine, each cancer patient is treated with drugs tailored for their particular tumor. This sounds appealing, but is it even possible? Roychowdhury and his colleagues tested this approach by extensively characterizing cancers in several patients and then convening a Sequencing Tumor Board of experts to determine the appropriate treatment. With a combination of whole genome and exome sequencing plus sequencing of transcribed RNA, the authors were able to find informative mutations within 3 to 4 weeks, a short enough time to be useful clinically. To verify that their sequencing strategy would work before testing it on actual patients, they assessed two xenografts established from patients with metastatic prostate cancer. They found that one of these carried the common prostate cancer–specific gene fusion of TMPRSS2 and ERG and another, previously undescribed, gene fusion. Also, the androgen receptor gene was amplified and two tumor suppressors were inactivated. The Board concluded that this pattern of mutations could in theory be treated by combined block of the PI3K and androgen receptor signaling pathways. The authors then turned to an actual patient, a 46 year old with colorectal cancer, who had been unsuccessfully treated. Characterization of his metastatic tumor showed mutations in the oncogene NRAS, the tumor suppressor TP53, aurora kinase A, a myosin heavy chain and the FAS death receptor, plus amplification of CDK8. Of these, the Sequencing Tumor Board concluded that the NRAS and CDK8 aberrations could potentially be matched to clinical trials, although none were available at the time. Similar analysis of another patient with metastatic melanoma revealed a structural rearrangement in CDKN2C and HRas. Although the HRAS mutation has not been described before in melanoma, the Sequencing Tumor Board suggested that combined treatment with PI3K and MEK inhibitors would be suitable for this patient. The good news resulting from these studies was that the patients’ tumors were analyzed with in 24 days for ~
Nature Genetics | 2013
Dan R. Robinson; Yi Mi Wu; Pankaj Vats; Fengyun Su; Robert J. Lonigro; Xuhong Cao; Shanker Kalyana-Sundaram; Rui Wang; Yu Ning; Lynda Hodges; Amy Gursky; Javed Siddiqui; Scott A. Tomlins; Sameek Roychowdhury; Kenneth J. Pienta; Scott Y. H. Kim; J. Scott Roberts; James M. Rae; Catherine Van Poznak; Daniel F. Hayes; Rashmi Chugh; Lakshmi P. Kunju; Moshe Talpaz; Anne F. Schott; Arul M. Chinnaiyan
3600, well within the cost of routine clinical tests. But aspects need improvement: Additional testing for epigenetic and small RNA variants will allow more informative characterization. Sequencing at higher depth or enrichment methods will be needed for tumors of lower purity. And perhaps most important, we need a broader array of clinical trials, as highlighted by the fact that none was available for these two patients. Individual cancers harbor a set of genetic aberrations that can be informative for identifying rational therapies currently available or in clinical trials. We implemented a pilot study to explore the practical challenges of applying high-throughput sequencing in clinical oncology. We enrolled patients with advanced or refractory cancer who were eligible for clinical trials. For each patient, we performed whole-genome sequencing of the tumor, targeted whole-exome sequencing of tumor and normal DNA, and transcriptome sequencing (RNA-Seq) of the tumor to identify potentially informative mutations in a clinically relevant time frame of 3 to 4 weeks. With this approach, we detected several classes of cancer mutations including structural rearrangements, copy number alterations, point mutations, and gene expression alterations. A multidisciplinary Sequencing Tumor Board (STB) deliberated on the clinical interpretation of the sequencing results obtained. We tested our sequencing strategy on human prostate cancer xenografts. Next, we enrolled two patients into the clinical protocol and were able to review the results at our STB within 24 days of biopsy. The first patient had metastatic colorectal cancer in which we identified somatic point mutations in NRAS, TP53, AURKA, FAS, and MYH11, plus amplification and overexpression of cyclin-dependent kinase 8 (CDK8). The second patient had malignant melanoma, in which we identified a somatic point mutation in HRAS and a structural rearrangement affecting CDKN2C. The STB identified the CDK8 amplification and Ras mutation as providing a rationale for clinical trials with CDK inhibitors or MEK (mitogen-activated or extracellular signal–regulated protein kinase kinase) and PI3K (phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase) inhibitors, respectively. Integrative high-throughput sequencing of patients with advanced cancer generates a comprehensive, individual mutational landscape to facilitate biomarker-driven clinical trials in oncology.
Cancer Research | 2008
Bharathi Laxman; David S. Morris; Jianjun Yu; Javed Siddiqui; Jie Cao; Rohit Mehra; Robert J. Lonigro; Alex Tsodikov; John T. Wei; Scott A. Tomlins; Arul M. Chinnaiyan
Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer in women, and over two-thirds of cases express estrogen receptor-α (ER-α, encoded by ESR1). Through a prospective clinical sequencing program for advanced cancers, we enrolled 11 patients with ER-positive metastatic breast cancer. Whole-exome and transcriptome analysis showed that six cases harbored mutations of ESR1 affecting its ligand-binding domain (LBD), all of whom had been treated with anti-estrogens and estrogen deprivation therapies. A survey of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) identified four endometrial cancers with similar mutations of ESR1. The five new LBD-localized ESR1 mutations identified here (encoding p.Leu536Gln, p.Tyr537Ser, p.Tyr537Cys, p.Tyr537Asn and p.Asp538Gly) were shown to result in constitutive activity and continued responsiveness to anti-estrogen therapies in vitro. Taken together, these studies suggest that activating mutations in ESR1 are a key mechanism in acquired endocrine resistance in breast cancer therapy.
Cancer Discovery | 2013
Yi Mi Wu; Fengyun Su; Shanker Kalyana-Sundaram; Nickolay A. Khazanov; Bushra Ateeq; Xuhong Cao; Robert J. Lonigro; Pankaj Vats; Rui Wang; Su Fang Lin; Ann Joy Cheng; Lakshmi P. Kunju; Javed Siddiqui; Scott A. Tomlins; Peter Wyngaard; Seth Sadis; Sameek Roychowdhury; Maha Hussain; Felix Y. Feng; Mark M. Zalupski; Moshe Talpaz; Kenneth J. Pienta; Daniel R. Rhodes; Dan R. Robinson; Arul M. Chinnaiyan
Although prostate-specific antigen (PSA) serum level is currently the standard of care for prostate cancer screening in the United States, it lacks ideal specificity and additional biomarkers are needed to supplement or potentially replace serum PSA testing. Emerging evidence suggests that monitoring the noncoding RNA transcript PCA3 in urine may be useful in detecting prostate cancer in patients with elevated PSA levels. Here, we show that a multiplex panel of urine transcripts outperforms PCA3 transcript alone for the detection of prostate cancer. We measured the expression of seven putative prostate cancer biomarkers, including PCA3, in sedimented urine using quantitative PCR on a cohort of 234 patients presenting for biopsy or radical prostatectomy. By univariate analysis, we found that increased GOLPH2, SPINK1, and PCA3 transcript expression and TMPRSS2:ERG fusion status were significant predictors of prostate cancer. Multivariate regression analysis showed that a multiplexed model, including these biomarkers, outperformed serum PSA or PCA3 alone in detecting prostate cancer. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was 0.758 for the multiplexed model versus 0.662 for PCA3 alone (P = 0.003). The sensitivity and specificity for the multiplexed model were 65.9% and 76.0%, respectively, and the positive and negative predictive values were 79.8% and 60.8%, respectively. Taken together, these results provide the framework for the development of highly optimized, multiplex urine biomarker tests for more accurate detection of prostate cancer.
Cancer Cell | 2011
J. Chad Brenner; Bushra Ateeq; Yong Li; Anastasia K. Yocum; Qi Cao; Irfan A. Asangani; Sonam Patel; Xiaoju Wang; Hallie Liang; Jindan Yu; Nallasivam Palanisamy; Javed Siddiqui; Wei Yan; Xuhong Cao; Rohit Mehra; Aaron Sabolch; Venkatesha Basrur; Robert J. Lonigro; Jun Yang; Scott A. Tomlins; Christopher A. Maher; Kojo S.J. Elenitoba-Johnson; Maha Hussain; Nora M. Navone; Kenneth J. Pienta; Sooryanarayana Varambally; Felix Y. Feng; Arul M. Chinnaiyan
Through a prospective clinical sequencing program for advanced cancers, four index cases were identified which harbor gene rearrangements of FGFR2, including patients with cholangiocarcinoma, breast cancer, and prostate cancer. After extending our assessment of FGFR rearrangements across multiple tumor cohorts, we identified additional FGFR fusions with intact kinase domains in lung squamous cell cancer, bladder cancer, thyroid cancer, oral cancer, glioblastoma, and head and neck squamous cell cancer. All FGFR fusion partners tested exhibit oligomerization capability, suggesting a shared mode of kinase activation. Overexpression of FGFR fusion proteins induced cell proliferation. Two bladder cancer cell lines that harbor FGFR3 fusion proteins exhibited enhanced susceptibility to pharmacologic inhibition in vitro and in vivo. Because of the combinatorial possibilities of FGFR family fusion to a variety of oligomerization partners, clinical sequencing efforts, which incorporate transcriptome analysis for gene fusions, are poised to identify rare, targetable FGFR fusions across diverse cancer types.