Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Robert J. Palmer is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Robert J. Palmer.


Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews | 2002

Communication among Oral Bacteria

Paul E. Kolenbrander; Roxanna N. Andersen; David S. Blehert; Paul G. Egland; Jamie S. Foster; Robert J. Palmer

SUMMARY Human oral bacteria interact with their environment by attaching to surfaces and establishing mixed-species communities. As each bacterial cell attaches, it forms a new surface to which other cells can adhere. Adherence and community development are spatiotemporal; such order requires communication. The discovery of soluble signals, such as autoinducer-2, that may be exchanged within multispecies communities to convey information between organisms has emerged as a new research direction. Direct-contact signals, such as adhesins and receptors, that elicit changes in gene expression after cell-cell contact and biofilm growth are also an active research area. Considering that the majority of oral bacteria are organized in dense three-dimensional biofilms on teeth, confocal microscopy and fluorescently labeled probes provide valuable approaches for investigating the architecture of these organized communities in situ. Oral biofilms are readily accessible to microbiologists and are excellent model systems for studies of microbial communication. One attractive model system is a saliva-coated flowcell with oral bacterial biofilms growing on saliva as the sole nutrient source; an intergeneric mutualism is discussed. Several oral bacterial species are amenable to genetic manipulation for molecular characterization of communication both among bacteria and between bacteria and the host. A successful search for genes critical for mixed-species community organization will be accomplished only when it is conducted with mixed-species communities.


Nature Reviews Microbiology | 2010

Oral multispecies biofilm development and the key role of cell–cell distance

Paul E. Kolenbrander; Robert J. Palmer; Saravanan Periasamy; Nicholas S. Jakubovics

Growth of oral bacteria in situ requires adhesion to a surface because the constant flow of host secretions thwarts the ability of planktonic cells to grow before they are swallowed. Therefore, oral bacteria evolved to form biofilms on hard tooth surfaces and on soft epithelial tissues, which often contain multiple bacterial species. Because these biofilms are easy to study, they have become the paradigm of multispecies biofilms. In this Review we describe the factors involved in the formation of these biofilms, including the initial adherence to the oral tissues and teeth, cooperation between bacterial species in the biofilm, signalling between the bacteria and its role in pathogenesis, and the transfer of DNA between bacteria. In all these aspects distance between cells of different species is integral for oral biofilm growth.


Molecular Microbiology | 2006

Autoinducer 2: a concentration‐dependent signal for mutualistic bacterial biofilm growth

Alexander H. Rickard; Robert J. Palmer; David S. Blehert; Shawn R. Campagna; M. F. Semmelhack; Paul G. Egland; Bonnie L. Bassler; Paul E. Kolenbrander

4,5‐dihydroxy‐2,3‐pentanedione (DPD), a product of the LuxS enzyme in the catabolism of S‐ribosylhomocysteine, spontaneously cyclizes to form autoinducer 2 (AI‐2). AI‐2 is proposed to be a universal signal molecule mediating interspecies communication among bacteria. We show that mutualistic and abundant biofilm growth in flowing saliva of two human oral commensal bacteria, Actinomyces naeslundii T14V and Streptococcus oralis 34, is dependent upon production of AI‐2 by S. oralis 34. A luxS mutant of S. oralis 34 was constructed which did not produce AI‐2. Unlike wild‐type dual‐species biofilms, A. naeslundii T14V and an S. oralis 34 luxS mutant did not exhibit mutualism and generated only sparse biofilms which contained a 10‐fold lower biomass of each species. Restoration of AI‐2 levels by genetic or chemical (synthetic AI‐2 in the form of DPD) complementation re‐established the mutualistic growth and high biomass characteristic for the wild‐type dual‐species biofilm. Furthermore, an optimal concentration of DPD was determined, above and below which biofilm formation was suppressed. The optimal concentration was 100‐fold lower than the detection limit of the currently accepted AI‐2 assay. Thus, AI‐2 acts as an interspecies signal and its concentration is critical for mutualism between two species of oral bacteria grown under conditions that are representative of the human oral cavity.


Applied and Environmental Microbiology | 2006

Molecular characterization of subject-specific oral microflora during initial colonization of enamel.

Patricia I. Diaz; Natalia I. Chalmers; Alexander H. Rickard; Colin Kong; Craig L. Milburn; Robert J. Palmer; Paul E. Kolenbrander

ABSTRACT The initial microbial colonization of tooth surfaces is a repeatable and selective process, with certain bacterial species predominating in the nascent biofilm. Characterization of the initial microflora is the first step in understanding interactions among community members that shape ensuing biofilm development. Using molecular methods and a retrievable enamel chip model, we characterized the microbial diversity of early dental biofilms in three subjects. A total of 531 16S rRNA gene sequences were analyzed, and 97 distinct phylotypes were identified. Microbial community composition was shown to be statistically different among subjects. In all subjects, however, 4-h and 8-h communities were dominated by Streptococcus spp. belonging to the Streptococcus oralis/Streptococcus mitis group. Other frequently observed genera (comprising at least 5% of clone sequences in at least one of the six clone libraries) were Actinomyces, Gemella, Granulicatella, Neisseria, Prevotella, Rothia, and Veillonella. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) confirmed that the proportion of Streptococcus sp. sequences in the clone libraries coincided with the proportion of streptococcus probe-positive organisms on the chip. FISH also revealed that, in the undisturbed plaque, not only Streptococcus spp. but also the rarer Prevotella spp. were usually seen in small multigeneric clusters of cells. This study shows that the initial dental plaque community of each subject is unique in terms of diversity and composition. Repetitive and distinctive community composition within subjects suggests that the spatiotemporal interactions and ecological shifts that accompany biofilm maturation also occur in a subject-dependent manner.


Methods in Enzymology | 1999

Molecular tools for study of biofilm physiology.

Bjarke Bak Christensen; Claus Sternberg; Jens Bo Andersen; Robert J. Palmer; Alex Toftgaard Nielsen; Michael Givskov; Søren Molin

Publisher Summary This chapter describes methods for the handling and analysis of microbial behavior of organisms in biofilm communities at both microscopic and macroscopic levels. Only methods and reporter systems that can be applied without disturbing the spatial organization of the organisms in the biofilm are presented. The in situ methods described in this chapter can be used for more than just identifying or tracing cells or genes in biofilms. By combining promoters that respond to specific environmental signals with appropriate marker genes, it may be possible to tag specific organisms and use these as monitor systems to estimate local chemical composition directly in the biofilms. Changes in environmental conditions will also have significant effects on the physiological state of the organisms. Such shifting conditions may result in several responses, such as altered growth rates, stress response, starvation, or even cell death. Most of these responses can be visualized directly using specific promoter–reporter fusions. The ribosome number is a reliable indicator of growth rate in bacteria growing in balanced growth and has been used as a standard for growth rates in biofilm-embedded bacteria as well.


Journal of Bacteriology | 2003

Coaggregation-Mediated Interactions of Streptococci and Actinomyces Detected in Initial Human Dental Plaque

Robert J. Palmer; Sharon M. Gordon; John O. Cisar; Paul E. Kolenbrander

Streptococci and actinomyces that initiate colonization of the tooth surface frequently coaggregate with each other as well as with other oral bacteria. These observations have led to the hypothesis that interbacterial adhesion influences spatiotemporal development of plaque. To assess the role of such interactions in oral biofilm formation in vivo, antibodies directed against bacterial surface components that mediate coaggregation interactions were used as direct immunofluorescent probes in conjunction with laser confocal microscopy to determine the distribution and spatial arrangement of bacteria within intact human plaque formed on retrievable enamel chips. In intrageneric coaggregation, streptococci such as Streptococcus gordonii DL1 recognize receptor polysaccharides (RPS) borne on other streptococci such as Streptococcus oralis 34. To define potentially interactive subsets of streptococci in the developing plaque, an antibody against RPS (anti-RPS) was used together with an antibody against S. gordonii DL1 (anti-DL1). These antibodies reacted primarily with single cells in 4-h-old plaque and with mixed-species microcolonies in 8-h-old plaque. Anti-RPS-reactive bacteria frequently formed microcolonies with anti-DL1-reactive bacteria and with other bacteria distinguished by general nucleic acid stains. In intergeneric coaggregation between streptococci and actinomyces, type 2 fimbriae of actinomyces recognize RPS on the streptococci. Cells reactive with antibody against type 2 fimbriae of Actinomyces naeslundii T14V (anti-type-2) were much less frequent than either subset of streptococci. However, bacteria reactive with anti-type-2 were seen in intimate association with anti-RPS-reactive cells. These results are the first direct demonstration of coaggregation-mediated interactions during initial plaque accumulation in vivo. Further, these results demonstrate the spatiotemporal development and prevalence of mixed-species communities in early dental plaque.


Infection and Immunity | 2001

Mutualism versus Independence: Strategies of Mixed-Species Oral Biofilms In Vitro Using Saliva as the Sole Nutrient Source

Robert J. Palmer; Karen M. Kazmerzak; Martin C. Hansen; Paul E. Kolenbrander

ABSTRACT During initial dental plaque formation, the ability of a species to grow when others cannot would be advantageous, and enhanced growth through interspecies and intergeneric cooperation could be critical. These characteristics were investigated in three coaggregating early colonizers of the tooth surface (Streptococcus gordoniiDL1, Streptococcus oralis 34, and Actinomyces naeslundii T14V). Area coverage and cell cluster size measurements showed that attachment of A. naeslundii and of S. gordonii to glass flowcells was enhanced by a salivary conditioning film, whereas attachment of S. oralis was hindered. Growth experiments using saliva as the sole carbon and nitrogen source showed that A. naeslundii was unable to grow either in planktonic culture or as a biofilm, whereas S. gordonii grew under both conditions. S. oralis grew planktonically, but to a much lower maximum cell density than did S. gordonii;S. oralis did not grow reproducibly as a biofilm. Thus, only S. gordonii possessed all traits advantageous for growth as a solitary and independent resident of the tooth. Two-species biofilm experiments analyzed by laser confocal microscopy showed that neither S. oralis nor A. naeslundii grew when coaggregated pairwise with S. gordonii. However, both S. oralis and A. naeslundii showed luxuriant, interdigitated growth when paired together in coaggregated microcolonies. Thus, the S. oralis-A. naeslundiipair formed a mutualistic relationship, potentially contact dependent, that allows each to grow where neither could survive alone. S. gordonii, in contrast, neither was hindered by nor benefited from the presence of either of the other strains. The formation of mutually beneficial interactions within the developing biofilm may be essential for certain initial colonizers to be retained during early plaque development, whereas other initial colonizers may be unaffected by neighboring cells on the substratum.


Microbiology | 2001

Assessment of GFP fluorescence in cells of Streptococcus gordonii under conditions of low pH and low oxygen concentration

Martin C. Hansen; Robert J. Palmer; Camilla Udsen; David C. White; Søren Molin

Use of green fluorescent protein (GFP) as a molecular reporter is restricted by several environmental factors, such as its requirement for oxygen in the development of the fluorophore, and its poor fluorescence at low pH. There are conflicting data on these limitations, however, and systematic studies to assess the importance of these factors for growing bacterial cultures are lacking. In the present study, homogeneous expression of the gfpmut3* gene directed by a synthetic constitutive lactococcal promoter was demonstrated in batch cultures and in biofilms of Streptococcus gordonii DL1. A lower limit of oxygen concentration for maturation of the GFP fluorophore was determined: fluorescence was emitted at 0.1 p.p.m. dissolved oxygen (in conventionally prepared anaerobic media lacking reducing agents), whereas no fluorescence was detected in the presence of 0.025 p.p.m. dissolved oxygen (obtained by addition of L-cysteine as reducing agent). When an anaerobically grown (non-fluorescent) >50 microm thick biofilm was shifted to aerobic conditions, fluorescence could be detected within 4 min, reaching a maximum over the next 16 min. It was not possible to detect any fluorescence gradients (lateral or vertical) within the >50 microm thick biofilm, and fluorescence development after the shift to aerobic conditions occurred throughout the biofilm (even at the substratum). This suggests that oxygen gradients, which might result in reduced GFP fluorescence, did not exist in the >50 microm thick biofilm of this organism. Production of lactic acid and the subsequent acidification in batch cultures of S. gordonii DL1 led to a decrease in fluorescence intensity. However, severe pH reduction was prevented when the bacterium was grown as a biofilm in a flowcell, and a homogeneous distribution of a strong fluorescence signal was observed. These findings show that GFP can be applied to studies of oxygen-tolerant anaerobic bacteria, that densely packed, flowcell-grown biofilms of S. gordonii do not develop oxygen gradients inhibitory to GFP fluorescence development, and that the often transient nature of GFP fluorescence in acid-producing bacteria can be overcome in flowcells, probably by the elimination of metabolic by-product accumulation.


Journal of Bacteriology | 2003

Autoinducer 2 Production by Streptococcus gordonii DL1 and the Biofilm Phenotype of a luxS Mutant Are Influenced by Nutritional Conditions

David S. Blehert; Robert J. Palmer; Joao B. Xavier; Jonas S. Almeida; Paul E. Kolenbrander

The luxS gene, present in many bacterial genera, encodes the autoinducer 2 (AI-2) synthase. AI-2 has been implicated in bacterial signaling, and this study investigated its role in biofilm formation by Streptococcus gordonii, an organism that colonizes human tooth enamel within the first few hours after professional cleaning. Northern blotting and primer extension analyses revealed that S. gordonii luxS is monocistronic. AI-2 production was dependent on nutritional conditions, and maximum AI-2 induction was detected when S. gordonii was grown in the presence of serum and carbonate. In planktonic cultures, AI-2 production rose sharply during the transition from exponential to stationary phase, and the AI-2 concentration peaked approximately 4 h into stationary phase. An S. gordonii luxS mutant that did not produce AI-2 was constructed by homologous recombination. Complementation of the mutant by insertion of an intact luxS gene into the chromosome in tandem with the disrupted gene restored AI-2 production to a level similar to that of the wild-type strain. In planktonic culture, no growth differences were observed between the mutant and wild-type strains when five different media were used. However, when grown for 4 h as biofilms in 25% human saliva under flow, the luxS mutant formed tall microcolonies that differed from those formed by the wild-type and complemented mutant strains. Biofilms of the luxS mutant exhibited finger-like projections of cells that extended into the flow cell lumen. Thus, the inability to produce AI-2 is associated with altered microcolony architecture within S. gordonii biofilms formed in saliva during a time frame consistent with initial colonization of freshly cleaned enamel surfaces.


Current Opinion in Biotechnology | 1999

MODERN MICROSCOPY IN BIOFILM RESEARCH : CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY AND OTHER APPROACHES

Robert J. Palmer; Claus Sternberg

Microscopy is the only technique whereby bacterial biofilms can be studied at the single-cell level in situ. Our understanding of biofilm structure, physiology and control hinges on the application of confocal scanning laser microscopy and other advanced microscopic techniques. Gene expression in four dimensions (x,y,z,t), interspecies interactions, and the role of exopolymer are being defined.

Collaboration


Dive into the Robert J. Palmer's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Paul E. Kolenbrander

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John O. Cisar

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Patricia I. Diaz

University of Connecticut Health Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Claus Sternberg

Technical University of Denmark

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Paul G. Egland

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David S. Blehert

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jinghua Yang

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge