Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Robert Stegemann is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Robert Stegemann.


43RD ANNUAL REVIEW OF PROGRESS IN QUANTITATIVE NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION, VOLUME 36 | 2017

Evaluation of high spatial resolution imaging of magnetic stray fields for early damage detection

Robert Stegemann; Sandra Cabeza; Matthias Pelkner; Viktor Lyamkin; Nadja Sonntag; Giovanni Bruno; Birgit Skrotzki; Marc Kreutzbruck

The paper discusses the evaluation of elastic and plastic strain states in two low-carbon steels of the same steel group with high spatial resolution GMR (giant magneto resistance) sensors. The residual stress distributions of tungsten inert gas welded plates were determined by means of neutron diffraction as a reference. The normal component of local residual magnetic stray fields arise in the vicinity of the positions of maximum stress. The experiments performed on flat tensile specimen indicate that the boundaries of plastic deformations are a source of stray fields. The spatial variations of magnetic stray fields for both the weld and the tensile samples are in the order of the earths magnetic field.


Archive | 2018

Benefits of GMR sensors for high spatial resolution NDT applications

Matthias Pelkner; Robert Stegemann; Nadja Sonntag; Rainer Pohl; Marc Kreutzbruck

Magneto resistance sensors like GMR (giant magneto resistance) or TMR (tunnel magneto resistance) are widely used in industrial applications, examples are position measurement and read heads of hard disk drives. However, in case of non-destructive testing (NDT) applications these sensors, although their properties are outstanding like high spatial resolution, high field sensitivity, low cost and low energy consumption, never reached a technical transfer to an application beyond sci-entific scope. This paper deals with benefits of GMR/TMR sensors in terms of high spatial resolution testing for different NDT applica-tions. The first example demonstrates the preeminent advantages of MR-elements compared with conventional coils used in eddy current testing (ET). The probe comprises one-wire excitation with an array of MR elements. This led to a better spatial resolution in terms of neighboring defects. The second section concentrates on MFL-testing (magnetic flux leakage) with active field excitation during and before test-ing. The latter illustrated the capability of highly resolved crack detection of a crossed notch. This example is best suited to show the ability of tiny magnetic field sensors for magnetic material characterization of a sample surface. Another example is based on characterization of samples after tensile test. Here, no external field is applied. The magnetization is only changed due to external load and magnetostriction leading to a field signature which GMR sensors can resolve. This gives access to internal changes of the magnetization state of the sample under test.


Materials | 2018

The role of surface topography on deformation-induced magnetization under inhomogeneous elastic-plastic deformation

Nadja Sonntag; Birgit Skrotzki; Robert Stegemann; Peter Löwe; Marc Kreutzbruck

It is widely accepted that the magnetic state of a ferromagnetic material may be irreversibly altered by mechanical loading due to magnetoelastic effects. A novel standardized nondestructive testing (NDT) technique uses weak magnetic stray fields, which are assumed to arise from inhomogeneous deformation, for structural health monitoring (i.e., for detection and assessment of damage). However, the mechanical and microstructural complexity of damage has hitherto only been insufficiently considered. The aim of this study is to discuss the phenomenon of inhomogeneous “self-magnetization” of a polycrystalline ferromagnetic material under inhomogeneous deformation experimentally and with stronger material-mechanical focus. To this end, notched specimens were elastically and plastically deformed. Surface magnetic states were measured by a three-axis giant magnetoresistant (GMR) sensor and were compared with strain field (digital image correlation) and optical topography measurements. It is demonstrated that the stray fields do not solely form due to magnetoelastic effects. Instead, inhomogeneous plastic deformation causes topography, which is one of the main origins for the magnetic stray field formation. Additionally, if not considered, topography may falsify the magnetic signals due to variable lift-off values. The correlation of magnetic vector components with mechanical tensors, particularly for multiaxial stress/strain states and inhomogeneous elastic-plastic deformations remains an issue.


Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials | 2017

Residual stress characterization of steel TIG welds by neutron diffraction and by residual magnetic stray field mappings

Robert Stegemann; Sandra Cabeza; Viktor Lyamkin; Giovanni Bruno; Andreas Pittner; Robert C. Wimpory; Mirko Boin; Marc Kreutzbruck


Insight | 2016

Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the stress-induced geometry effect on self-magnetic leakage fields during tensile deformation

W Sharatchandra Singh; Robert Stegemann; Marc Kreutzbruck


Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation | 2018

Influence of the Microstructure on Magnetic Stray Fields of Low-Carbon Steel Welds

Robert Stegemann; Sandra Cabeza; Matthias Pelkner; Viktor Lyamkin; Andreas Pittner; Daniel Werner; Robert C. Wimpory; Mirko Boin; Marc Kreutzbruck; Giovanni Bruno


Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation | 2018

Mapping of Deformation-Induced Magnetic Fields in Carbon Steels Using a GMR Sensor Based Metal Magnetic Memory Technique

W. Sharatchandra Singh; Robert Stegemann; Marc Kreutzbruck; C. K. Mukhopadhyay; B. Purnachandra Rao


Archive | 2017

GMR Sensor Arrays for High-Spatial Resolution Measurements in NDT-Applications

Matthias Pelkner; Robert Stegemann


Archive | 2015

Eddy current testing with high-spatial resolution probes using MR arrays as receiver

Matthias Pelkner; Rainer Pohl; Thomas Erthner; Robert Stegemann; Marc Kreutzbruck; N. Sergeeva-Chollet


Archive | 2015

Vergleich konventioneller und neuer Oberflächenprüfverfahren für ferromagnetische Werkstoffe

Ralf Casperson; René Heideklang; Philipp Myrach; Yener Onel; Matthias Pelkner; Rainer Pohl; Robert Stegemann; Mathias Ziegler; Marc Kreutzbruck

Collaboration


Dive into the Robert Stegemann's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marc Kreutzbruck

Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Matthias Pelkner

Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nadja Sonntag

Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Birgit Skrotzki

Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sandra Cabeza

Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Viktor Lyamkin

Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andreas Pittner

Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Giovanni Bruno

Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mirko Boin

Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge