Roberta M. Moretti

miR-205 Exerts Tumor-Suppressive Functions in Human Prostate through Down-regulation of Protein Kinase Cε

Limited information is available concerning the expression and role of microRNAs in prostate cancer. In this study, we investigated the involvement of miR-205 in prostate carcinogenesis. Significantly lower miR-205 expression levels were found in cancer than in normal prostate cell lines as well as in tumor compared with matched normal prostate tissues, with a particularly pronounced reduction in carcinomas from patients with local-regionally disseminated disease. Restoring the expression of miR-205 in prostate cancer cells resulted in cell rearrangements consistent with a mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition, such as up-regulation of E-cadherin and reduction of cell locomotion and invasion, and in the down-regulation of several oncogenes known to be involved in disease progression (i.e., interleukin 6, caveolin-1, EZH2). Our evidence suggests that these events are driven by the concurrent repression of specific predicted miR-205 targets, namely N-chimaerin, ErbB3, E2F1, E2F5, ZEB2, and protein kinase Cepsilon. Strikingly, the latter seemed to play a direct role in regulating epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. In fact, its down-regulation led to a cell phenotype largely reminiscent of that of cells ectopically expressing miR-205. Overall, we showed for the first time that miR-205 exerts a tumor-suppressive effect in human prostate by counteracting epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and reducing cell migration/invasion, at least in part through the down-regulation of protein kinase Cepsilon.

The luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone receptor in human prostate cancer cells: messenger ribonucleic acid expression, molecular size, and signal transduction pathway.

Evidence has accumulated indicating that LHRH might behave as an autocrine/paracrine growth inhibitory factor in some peripheral tumors. However, LHRH receptors in tumor cells have not been fully characterized, so far. The present experiments were performed to analyze: 1) the messenger RNA expression; 2) the molecular size; and 3) the signal transduction pathway of LHRH receptors in prostate cancer. For these studies, the human androgen-dependent LNCaP and androgen-independent DU 145 prostate cancer cell lines were used. 1) By RT-PCR, a complementary DNA product, which hybridized with a 32 P-labeled oligonucleotide probe specific for the pituitary LHRH receptor complementary DNA, was found both in LNCaP and in DU 145 cells. 2) Western blot analysis, using a monoclonal antibody raised against the human pituitary LHRH receptor, revealed the presence of a protein band of approximately 64 kDa (corresponding to the molecular mass of the pituitary receptor) in both cell lines. 3) In LNCaP and DU 145 cells, pertussis toxin completely abrogated the antiproliferative action of a LHRH agonist (LHRH-A). Moreover, LHRH-A substantially antagonized the pertussis toxin-catalyzed ADP-ribosylation of a Gai protein. Finally, LHRH-A significantly counteracted the forskolin-induced increase of intracellular cAMP levels in both cell lines. These data demonstrate that the LHRH receptor, which is present in prostate cancer cells, independently of whether they are androgen-dependent or not, corresponds to the pituitary receptor, in terms of messenger RNA expression and protein molecular size. However, at variance with the receptor of the gonadotrophs, prostate cancer LHRH receptor seems to be coupled to the Gai protein-cAMP signal transduction pathway, rather than to the Gaq/11-phospholipase C signaling system. This might be responsible for the different actions of LHRH in anterior pituitary and in prostate cancer. (Endocrinology 140: 5250 ‐5256, 1999)

LHRH analogues as anticancer agents: pituitary and extrapituitary sites of action

Two classes of luteinising hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analogues have been developed so far to be used for oncological therapies: LHRH agonists and antagonists. LHRH agonists are widely and successfully used for the management of steroid-dependent malignancies. Chronic administrations of these compounds result in downregulation and desensitisation of pituitary LHRH receptors and, therefore, in a complete suppression of gonadal function. LHRH agonist administration is effective, safe and reversible, suffering only from the ‘flare-up’ phenomenon at the beginning of treatment. LHRH antagonists suppress the pituitary-gonadal function by competing with native LHRH for binding to its pituitary receptor but without giving rise to the intracellular cascade of events evoked by the natural hormone or LHRH agonists. Synthetic peptides belonging to the last generations of LHRH antagonists have already been successful in clinical trials. They are completely devoid of the ‘flare-up’ phenomenon and seem to be free of side effects, such as histamine release. Recently, the expression of LHRH and LHRH receptors has been reported in a number of hormone-responsive tumours. In constrast with the pituitary LHRH receptor which is coupled to the Gq/11-PLC intracellular system of events, stimulation of the tumour LHRH receptor by LHRH is followed by the activation of a Gi protein and a decrease in cAMP levels. This intracellular pathway mediates the inhibitory action of the autocrine/paracrine LHRH system on tumour cell proliferation. The activation of LHRH receptors at tumour level may then represent an additional and more direct mechanism of action for the antitumoural activity of LHRH agonists. Surprisingly, LHRH antagonists also exert a marked antimitogenic activity on a number of hormone-responsive cancer cell lines, indicating that these compounds might behave as antagonists at pituitary level and as agonists at the level of the tumour. The observation that the inhibitory LHRH autocrine system is also present in some steroid-unresponsive cancer cell lines might suggest a possible clinical utility of LHRH analogues also for those tumours that have escaped the initial phase of hormone dependency.

Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists interfere with the mitogenic activity of the insulin-like growth factor system in androgen-independent prostate cancer cells

We have previously shown that LHRH agonists exert a direct and specific inhibitory action on the proliferation of the androgen-independent DU 145 prostate cancer cell line; however, the cellular mechanisms mediating this antiproliferative action are not well defined. It is well known that the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) system plays a crucial role in the local regulation of the growth of androgen-independent prostate cancer. The present experiments were performed to evaluate whether LHRH agonists might exert their antimitogenic effect by interfering with the activity of the locally expressed IGF system. To this purpose, the effects of the LHRH agonist Zoladex (LHRH-A) on 1) the mitogenic action of IGF-I, 2) the tyrosine phosphorylation of type 1 IGF-I receptor (IGF-IR), 3) the concentration of IGF-IR, and 4) the secretion of IGF-binding protein-3 were studied. The results obtained show that in DU 145 cells, LHRH-A 1) counteracts the mitogenic action of IGF-I in a dose-dependent manner, 2) prevents th...

Growth-Inhibitory Activity of Melatonin on Human Androgen-Independent DU 145 Prostate Cancer Cells

The pineal hormone melatonin has been shown to exert a direct oncostatic activity on neoplastic cells, particularly from breast cancer. In the present study, we evaluated the effects of melatonin on the proliferation and on the cell cycle distribution of human androgen‐independent DU 145 prostate cancer cells. Experiments were also performed to gain insights into the possible mechanism of action of the hormone.

GnRH Receptors in Cancer: From Cell Biology to Novel Targeted Therapeutic Strategies

The crucial role of pituitary GnRH receptors (GnRH-R) in the control of reproductive functions is well established. These receptors are the target of GnRH agonists (through receptor desensitization) and antagonists (through receptor blockade) for the treatment of steroid-dependent pathologies, including hormone-dependent tumors. It has also become increasingly clear that GnRH-R are expressed in cancer tissues, either related (i.e. prostate, breast, endometrial, and ovarian cancers) or unrelated (i.e. melanoma, glioblastoma, lung, and pancreatic cancers) to the reproductive system. In hormone-related tumors, GnRH-R appear to be expressed even when the tumor has escaped steroid dependence (such as castration-resistant prostate cancer). These receptors are coupled to a G(αi)-mediated intracellular signaling pathway. Activation of tumor GnRH-R by means of GnRH agonists elicits a strong antiproliferative, antimetastatic, and antiangiogenic (more recently demonstrated) activity. Interestingly, GnRH antagonists have also been shown to elicit a direct antitumor effect; thus, these compounds behave as antagonists of GnRH-R at the pituitary level and as agonists of the same receptors expressed in tumors. According to the ligand-induced selective-signaling theory, GnRH-R might assume various conformations, endowed with different activities for GnRH analogs and with different intracellular signaling pathways, according to the cell context. Based on these consistent experimental observations, tumor GnRH-R are now considered a very interesting candidate for novel molecular, GnRH analog-based, targeted strategies for the treatment of tumors expressing these receptors. These agents include GnRH agonists and antagonists, GnRH analog-based cytotoxic (i.e. doxorubicin) or nutraceutic (i.e. curcumin) hybrids, and GnRH-R-targeted nanoparticles delivering anticancer compounds.

Growth‐inhibitory effects of luteinizing hormone‐releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists on xenografts of the DU 145 human androgen‐independent prostate cancer cell line in nude mice

Experiments have been performed to clarify whether LHRH agonists might decrease growth of hormone‐unresponsive prostate cancer in vivo. Male nude mice were injected s.c. with the human androgen‐independent prostate tumor DU 145 cells; osmotic minipumps releasing the LHRH agonist Zoladex (LHRH‐A) for 14 days were simultaneously implanted under the skin. Treatment with LHRH‐A induced a significant decrease in tumor growth up to the end of the treatment. In subsequent experiment, minipumps releasing LHRH‐A were implanted in nude mice either 7 or 14 days after cell inoculation. When the treatment was started 7 days after inoculation of the cells, tumor growth was significantly decreased up to 28 days; thereafter, tumor volume remained lower than in controls, although not significantly. When LHRH‐A was administered beginning 14 days after cell inoculation, tumor growth was not significantly affected at any time interval considered. LHRH‐A did not appear to induce apoptosis in DU 145 cells, at least on the basis of the apoptotic index and immunohistochemical staining of the p53 protein. On the other hand, treatment with LHRH‐A was accompanied by a significant decrease of the concentration of epidermal growth factor receptors in DU 145 prostate cancer specimens. Our results show that the LHRH agonist used significantly inhibits the growth of DU 145 androgen‐independent prostate tumor xenografts in nude mice. Int. J. Cancer 76:506–511, 1998.© 1998 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Activation of the orphan nuclear receptor RORα counteracts the proliferative effect of fatty acids on prostate cancer cells: Crucial role of 5‐lipoxygenase

The incidence of prostate carcinoma is very low in Eastern countries, such as Japan, suggesting that life style conditions may play a crucial role in the development of this pathology. Dietary ω‐6 polyunsaturated fatty acids, such as linoleic (LA) and arachidonic (AA) acids, have been shown to stimulate the proliferation of prostate cancer cells after being converted into 5‐HETE by means of the 5‐lipoxygenase (5‐LOX) pathway. Blockade of 5‐LOX activity has been proposed as an attractive target for the prevention of the mitogenic action of dietary fats on prostate cancer. The 5‐LOX gene has been shown to carry a response element for the orphan nuclear receptor RORα (for its RORα1 isoform in particular) in its promoter region. We attempt to clarify whether activation of RORα might modulate the expression of 5‐LOX, thus interfering with the mitogenic activity of fatty acids in prostate cancer cells. We show that in androgen‐independent DU 145 prostate cancer cells, LA, AA and their metabolite 5‐HETE exert a strong stimulatory action on cell proliferation. This effect is completely counteracted by the simultaneous treatment of the cells with a non redox inhibitor of 5‐LOX activity. We then demonstrate that: i) RORα, and specifically its RORα1 isoform, is expressed in DU 145 cells; ii) activation of RORα, by means of the thiazolidinedione derivative CGP 52608 (the synthetic RORα activator), significantly reduces 5‐LOX expression, both at mRNA (as evaluated by comparative RT‐PCR) and at protein (as investigated by Western blot analysis) level (this was confirmed by the reduced activity of 5‐LOX in CGP 52608 treated cells); and iii) the treatment of DU 145 cells with CGP 52608 completely abrogated the proliferative action of both LA and AA. These results have been confirmed in another androgen‐independent prostate cancer cell line (PC3). Our data indicate that, by decreasing the expression of 5‐LOX, activation of RORα might interfere with the mitogenic activity of fatty acids on prostate cancer. We have shown previously that CGP 52608 reduces the proliferation and the metastatic behavior of DU 145 cells. These observations indicate that the orphan nuclear receptor RORα might be considered as a molecular target for the development of new chemopreventive or chemotherapeutic strategies for prostate carcinoma.

GnRH and GnRH receptors in the pathophysiology of the human female reproductive system

BACKGROUND Human reproduction depends on an intact hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis. Hypothalamic gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) has been recognized, since its identification in 1971, as the central regulator of the production and release of the pituitary gonadotrophins that, in turn, regulate the gonadal functions and the production of sex steroids. The characteristic peculiar development, distribution and episodic activity of GnRH-producing neurons have solicited an interdisciplinary interest on the etiopathogenesis of several reproductive diseases. The more recent identification of a GnRH/GnRH receptor (GnRHR) system in both the human endometrium and ovary has widened the spectrum of action of the peptide and of its analogues beyond its hypothalamic function. METHODS An analysis of research and review articles published in international journals until June 2015 has been carried out to comprehensively summarize both the well established and the most recent knowledge on the physiopathology of the GnRH system in the central and peripheral control of female reproductive functions and diseases. RESULTS This review focuses on the role of GnRH neurons in the control of the reproductive axis. New knowledge is accumulating on the genetic programme that drives GnRH neuron development to ameliorate the diagnosis and treatment of GnRH deficiency and consequent delayed or absent puberty. Moreover, a better understanding of the mechanisms controlling the episodic release of GnRH during the onset of puberty and the ovulatory cycle has enabled the pharmacological use of GnRH itself or its synthetic analogues (agonists and antagonists) to either stimulate or to block the gonadotrophin secretion and modulate the functions of the reproductive axis in several reproductive diseases and in assisted reproduction technology. Several inputs from other neuronal populations, as well as metabolic, somatic and age-related signals, may greatly affect the functions of the GnRH pulse generator during the female lifespan; their modulation may offer new possible strategies for diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. A GnRH/GnRHR system is also expressed in female reproductive tissues (e.g. endometrium and ovary), both in normal and pathological conditions. The expression of this system in the human endometrium and ovary supports its physiological regulatory role in the processes of trophoblast invasion of the maternal endometrium and embryo implantation as well as of follicular development and corpus luteum functions. The GnRH/GnRHR system that is expressed in diseased tissues of the female reproductive tract (both benign and malignant) is at present considered an effective molecular target for the development of novel therapeutic approaches for these pathologies. GnRH agonists are also considered as a promising therapeutic approach to counteract ovarian failure in young female patients undergoing chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS Increasing knowledge about the regulation of GnRH pulsatile release, as well as the therapeutic use of its analogues, offers interesting new perspectives in the diagnosis, treatment and outcome of female reproductive disorders, including tumoral and iatrogenic diseases.

Growth of the androgen-dependent tumor of the prostate : role of androgens and of locally expressed growth modulatory factors

The crucial role played by androgens in the growth of prostatic carcinoma is now well established. However, the mechanisms of this proliferative action are still poorly understood. Experiments have been performed to clarify: (1) the metabolism of androgens in prostatic tumor cells; and (2) the role played by locally produced growth factors in the autocrine regulation of prostatic tumor cell proliferation and the possible regulation exerted by testosterone (T) on the activity of these factors. These studies have been performed by utilizing the human androgen-responsive prostatic cancer LNCaP cell line. (1) By incubating LNCaP cells with different 14C-labeled androgenic precursors, it has been shown that all the major key enzymes involved in the metabolism of androgens (5 alpha-reductase, 17 beta-hydroxysteroid-oxidoreductase, 3 alpha- and 3 beta-hydroxysteroid-oxidoreductases) are present and active in these cells. In particular, the 5 alpha-reductase, which converts T and delta 4 to DHT and 5 alpha-A respectively, seems to be more active when delta 4 is the substrate, suggesting a preference for this precursor. (2) The hypothesis that LNCaP cells might produce LHRH (or a LHRH-like peptide) has been verified by RT-PCR, performed in the presence of a pair of specific oligonucleotide primers. A cDNA band of the expected size (228 bp), which specifically hybridized with a 32P-labeled LHRH oligonucleotide probe, has been obtained in LNCaP cells. To clarify the possible role played by this factor in the regulation of tumor growth, LNCaP cells, cultured in steroid-free conditions, have been treated with a LHRH antagonist; the treatment resulted in a significant increase of cell proliferation. Taken together, these data indicate that a LHRH (or LHRH-like) growth modulatory system is expressed in LNCaP cells and plays an inhibitory role in the regulation of tumor cell proliferation. This system seems to be regulated in a negative way by steroids. Growth factors endowed with stimulatory activity, such as EGF and TGF alpha, have also been shown to be produced by LNCaP cells. The present studies show that the immunoprecipitation of the EGF receptor with a specific monoclonal antibody (Ab225) reveals a protein band of the expected size (170 kDa) which is phosphorylated even in basal conditions. Moreover, the treatment of LNCaP cells, cultured in serum-free conditions, either with a monoclonal antibody against the EGF receptor, or with immunoneutralizing antibodies against EGF and TGF alpha, results in a significant decrease of cell proliferation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)