Robyn Schofield
University of Melbourne
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Robyn Schofield.
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society | 2007
Johannes Verlinde; Jerry Y. Harrington; Greg M. McFarquhar; V. T. Yannuzzi; Alexander Avramov; S. Greenberg; Nathaniel C. Johnson; Gong Zhang; Michael R. Poellot; James H. Mather; David D. Turner; Edwin W. Eloranta; B. D. Zak; Anthony J. Prenni; John S. Daniel; Gregory L. Kok; D. C. Tobin; Robert E. Holz; Kenneth Sassen; Douglas A. Spangenberg; Patrick Minnis; Tim Tooman; M. D. Ivey; Scott J. Richardson; C. P. Bahrmann; Matthew D. Shupe; Paul J. DeMott; Andrew J. Heymsfield; Robyn Schofield
The Mixed-Phase Arctic Cloud Experiment (M-PACE) was conducted from 27 September through 22 October 2004 over the Department of Energys Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Climate Research Facility (ACRF) on the North Slope of Alaska. The primary objectives were to collect a dataset suitable to study interactions between microphysics, dynamics, and radiative transfer in mixed-phase Arctic clouds, and to develop/evaluate cloud property retrievals from surface-and satellite-based remote sensing instruments. Observations taken during the 1977/98 Surface Heat and Energy Budget of the Arctic (SHEBA) experiment revealed that Arctic clouds frequently consist of one (or more) liquid layers precipitating ice. M-PACE sought to investigate the physical processes of these clouds by utilizing two aircraft (an in situ aircraft to characterize the microphysical properties of the clouds and a remote sensing aircraft to constraint the upwelling radiation) over the ACRF site on the North Slope of Alaska. The measureme...
Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy & Radiative Transfer | 2004
Robyn Schofield; Brian J. Connor; K. Kreher; P. V. Johnston; C. D. Rodgers
Abstract An algorithm has been developed to retrieve altitude information at different diurnal stages for trace gas species by combining direct-sun and zenith-sky UV-visible differential slant column density (DSCD) measurements. DSCDs are derived here using differential optical absorption spectroscopy. Combining the complementary zenith-sky measurements (sensitive to the stratosphere) with direct-sun measurements (sensitive to the troposphere) allows this vertical distinction. Trace gas species such as BrO and NO 2 have vertical profiles with strong diurnal dependence. Information about the diurnal variation is simultaneously retrieved with the altitude distribution of the trace gas. The retrieval is a formal optimal estimation profile retrieval, allowing a complete assessment of information content and errors.
Nature microbiology | 2016
Caitlin M. Gionfriddo; Michael T. Tate; Ryan R. Wick; Mark B. Schultz; Adam Zemla; Michael P. Thelen; Robyn Schofield; David P. Krabbenhoft; Kathryn E. Holt; John W. Moreau
Atmospheric deposition of mercury onto sea ice and circumpolar sea water provides mercury for microbial methylation, and contributes to the bioaccumulation of the potent neurotoxin methylmercury in the marine food web. Little is known about the abiotic and biotic controls on microbial mercury methylation in polar marine systems. However, mercury methylation is known to occur alongside photochemical and microbial mercury reduction and subsequent volatilization. Here, we combine mercury speciation measurements of total and methylated mercury with metagenomic analysis of whole-community microbial DNA from Antarctic snow, brine, sea ice and sea water to elucidate potential microbially mediated mercury methylation and volatilization pathways in polar marine environments. Our results identify the marine microaerophilic bacterium Nitrospina as a potential mercury methylator within sea ice. Anaerobic bacteria known to methylate mercury were notably absent from sea-ice metagenomes. We propose that Antarctic sea ice can harbour a microbial source of methylmercury in the Southern Ocean.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2016
X. Zhao; Kimberly Strong; C. Adams; Robyn Schofield; X. Yang; Andreas Richter; U. Friess; A.-M. Blechschmidt; J.‐H. Koo
Ozone depletion events in the polar troposphere have been linked to extremely high concentrations of bromine, known as bromine explosion events (BEE). However, the optimum meteorological conditions for the occurrence of these events remain uncertain. On 4–5 April 2011, a combination of both blowing snow and a stable shallow boundary layer was observed during a BEE at Eureka, Canada (86.4°W, 80.1°N). Measurements made by a Multi-Axis Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy spectrometer were used to retrieve BrO profiles and partial columns. During this event, the near-surface BrO volume mixing ratio increased to ~20 parts per trillion by volume, while ozone was depleted to ~1 ppbv from the surface to 700 m. Back trajectories and Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment-2 satellite tropospheric BrO columns confirmed that this event originated from a bromine explosion over the Beaufort Sea. From 30 to 31 March, meteorological data showed high wind speeds (24 m/s) and elevated boundary layer heights (~800 m) over the Beaufort Sea. Long-distance transportation (~1800 km over 5 days) to Eureka indicated strong recycling of BrO within the bromine plume. This event was generally captured by a global chemistry-climate model when a sea-salt bromine source from blowing snow was included. A model sensitivity study indicated that the surface BrO at Eureka was controlled by both local photochemistry and boundary layer dynamics. Comparison of the model results with both ground-based and satellite measurements confirmed that the BEE observed at Eureka was triggered by transport of enhanced BrO from the Beaufort Sea followed by local production/recycling under stable atmospheric shallow boundary layer conditions.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2007
Robyn Schofield; John S. Daniel; Robert W. Portmann; H. LeRoy Miller; Susan Solomon; C. S. Eubank; Megan L. Melamed; A. O. Langford; Matthew D. Shupe; David D. Turner
best for moderately thick clouds (LWP � 100 g m � 2 ), but the accuracy is limited by uncertainties in the MWR LWP on which it relies. The second method performed well over a wider range of values with 1s retrieval errors of <4 g m � 2 (� 4%) and � 3 mm (� 7%) for 15 � LWP � 170 g m � 2 . The LWPs retrieved using the radiance-PLWP method were highly correlated (r 2 = 0.96) with LWPs from the MWR (with a bias subtracted) derived using the ARM statistical method. A limited comparison (LWP < 100 g m � 2 ) to millimeter wave cloud radar showed that values of re retrieved using the radiance-PLWP method were consistently higher (by � 3 mm) than the LWC-weighted mean re from the radar. Additional field studies are needed to resolve this discrepancy, although this first comparison is promising.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2018
Pamela A. Wales; R. J. Salawitch; Julie M. Nicely; Daniel C. Anderson; T. Canty; Sunil Baidar; B. Dix; Theodore K. Koenig; R. Volkamer; Dexian Chen; L. Gregory Huey; David J. Tanner; Carlos A. Cuevas; Rafael P. Fernandez; Douglas E. Kinnison; Jean-Francois Lamarque; Alfonso Saiz-Lopez; Elliot Atlas; Samuel R. Hall; Maria A. Navarro; Laura L. Pan; S. Schauffler; Meghan Stell; Simone Tilmes; Kirk Ullmann; Andrew J. Weinheimer; Hideharu Akiyoshi; M. P. Chipperfield; Makoto Deushi; S. Dhomse
We quantify the stratospheric injection of brominated very short‐lived substances (VSLS) based on aircraft observations acquired in winter 2014 above the Tropical Western Pacific during the CONvective TRansport of Active Species in the Tropics (CONTRAST) and the Airborne Tropical TRopopause EXperiment (ATTREX) campaigns. The overall contribution of VSLS to stratospheric bromine was determined to be 5.0 ± 2.1 ppt, in agreement with the 5 ± 3 ppt estimate provided in the 2014 World Meteorological Organization (WMO) Ozone Assessment report (WMO 2014), but with lower uncertainty. Measurements of organic bromine compounds, including VSLS, were analyzed using CFC‐11 as a reference stratospheric tracer. From this analysis, 2.9 ± 0.6 ppt of bromine enters the stratosphere via organic source gas injection of VSLS. This value is two times the mean bromine content of VSLS measured at the tropical tropopause, for regions outside of the Tropical Western Pacific, summarized in WMO 2014. A photochemical box model, constrained to CONTRAST observations, was used to estimate inorganic bromine from measurements of BrO collected by two instruments. The analysis indicates that 2.1 ± 2.1 ppt of bromine enters the stratosphere via inorganic product gas injection. We also examine the representation of brominated VSLS within 14 global models that participated in the Chemistry‐Climate Model Initiative. The representation of stratospheric bromine in these models generally lies within the range of our empirical estimate. Models that include explicit representations of VSLS compare better with bromine observations in the lower stratosphere than models that utilize longer‐lived chemicals as a surrogate for VSLS.
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2018
Huang Yang; Darryn W. Waugh; Clara Orbe; Guang Zeng; Olaf Morgenstern; Douglas E. Kinnison; Jean-Francois Lamarque; Simone Tilmes; David A. Plummer; Patrick Jöckel; Susan E. Strahan; Kane A. Stone; Robyn Schofield
and the Hadley Cell Huang Yang1, Darryn W. Waugh1,2, Clara Orbe3, Guang Zeng4, Olaf Morgenstern4, Douglas E. Kinnison5, Jean-Francois Lamarque5, Simone Tilmes5, David A. Plummer6, Patrick Jöckel7, Susan E. Strahan8,9, Kane A. Stone10,11,a, and Robyn Schofield10,11 1Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA 2School of Mathematics, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia 3NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, New York, USA 4National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Wellington, New Zealand 5National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), Atmospheric Chemistry Observations and Modeling (ACOM) Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado, USA 6Climate Research Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Montreal, QC, Canada 7Deutsches Zentrum für Luftund Raumfahrt (DLR), Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany 8Atmospheric Chemistry and Dynamics Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA 9Universities Space Research Association, Columbia, Maryland, USA 10School of Earth Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia 11ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate System Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales 2052, Australia anow at: Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139-4307, USA Correspondence: Huang Yang ([email protected])
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2018
Laura E. Revell; Andrea Stenke; Fiona Tummon; Aryeh Feinberg; E. Rozanov; Thomas Peter; N. Luke Abraham; Hideharu Akiyoshi; A. T. Archibald; Neal Butchart; Makoto Deushi; Patrick Jöckel; Douglas E. Kinnison; M. Michou; Olaf Morgenstern; Fiona M. O apos; Connor; Luke D. Oman; Giovanni Pitari; David A. Plummer; Robyn Schofield; Kane A. Stone; Simone Tilmes; Daniele Visioni; Yousuke Yamashita; Guang Zeng
Previous multi-model intercomparisons have shown that chemistry-climate models exhibit significant biases in tropospheric ozone compared with observations. We investigate annual-mean tropospheric column ozone in 15 models participating in the SPARC/IGAC (Stratosphere-troposphere Processes and their Role in Climate/International Global Atmospheric Chemistry) Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative (CCMI). These models exhibit a positive bias, on average, of up to 40–50% in the Northern Hemisphere compared with observations derived from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument and Microwave Limb 5 Sounder (OMI/MLS), and a negative bias of up to ∼30% in the Southern Hemisphere. SOCOLv3.0 (version 3 of the SolarClimate Ozone Links CCM), which participated in CCMI, simulates global-mean tropospheric ozone columns of 40.2 DU – approximately 33% larger than the CCMI multi-model mean. Here we introduce an updated version of SOCOLv3.0, “SO1 Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2018-615 Manuscript under review for journal Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discussion started: 26 June 2018 c
Geoscientific Model Development | 2017
Olaf Morgenstern; M. I. Hegglin; E. Rozanov; F. M. O'Connor; N. Luke Abraham; Hideharu Akiyoshi; A. T. Archibald; Slimane Bekki; Neal Butchart; M. P. Chipperfield; Makoto Deushi; S. Dhomse; Rolando R. Garcia; Steven C. Hardiman; Larry W. Horowitz; Patrick Jöckel; B. Josse; Douglas E. Kinnison; Meiyun Lin; E. Mancini; Michael Manyin; Marion Marchand; Virginie Marécal; M. Michou; Luke D. Oman; Giovanni Pitari; David A. Plummer; Laura E. Revell; David Saint-Martin; Robyn Schofield
Geophysical Research Letters | 2007
Piers M. Forster; Greg Bodeker; Robyn Schofield; Susan Solomon; David W. J. Thompson