Romney C. Andersen

Heterotopic Ossification in High-energy Wartime Extremity Injuries: Prevalence and Risk Factors

BACKGROUND Heterotopic ossification in the extremities remains a common complication in the setting of high-energy wartime trauma, particularly in blast-injured amputees and in those in whom the definitive amputation was performed within the zone of injury. The purposes of this cohort study were to report the experience of one major military medical center with high-energy wartime extremity wounds, to define the prevalence of heterotopic ossification in these patients, and to explore the relationship between heterotopic ossification and other potential independent predictors. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the records and radiographs of all combat-wounded patients admitted to this institution between March 1, 2003, and December 31, 2006. Patients with a minimum of two months of radiographic follow-up who underwent at least one orthopaedic procedure on an extremity constituted our study group; those who underwent at least one orthopaedic procedure but had not had heterotopic ossification develop constituted the control group. Variables recorded for each study subject included age and sex, location and mechanism of injury, method(s) of fracture fixation, number of débridement procedures, duration of negative pressure therapy, location of heterotopic ossification, presence and severity of traumatic brain injury, and Injury Severity Scores. RESULTS During the study period, 1213 war-wounded patients were admitted. Of those patients, 243 (157 in the heterotopic ossification group and eighty-six controls) met the inclusion criteria. The observed rate of heterotopic ossification was 64.6%. A significant relationship was detected between heterotopic ossification and the presence (p = 0.006) and severity (p = 0.003) of a traumatic brain injury. Risk factors for the development of heterotopic ossification were found to be an age of less than thirty years (p = 0.007, odds ratio = 3.0), an amputation (p = 0.048, odds ratio = 2.9), multiple extremity injuries (p = 0.002, odds ratio = 3.9), and an Injury Severity Score of >or=16 (p = 0.02, odds ratio = 2.2). CONCLUSIONS The prevalence of heterotopic ossification in war-wounded patients is higher than that in civilian trauma. Although trends associated with local wound conditions were identified, the risk factors for the development of heterotopic ossification found in this study suggest that systemic causes predominate.

Prevention and management of infections associated with combat-related extremity injuries.

Orthopedic injuries suffered by casualties during combat constitute approximately 65% of the total percentage of injuries and are evenly distributed between upper and lower extremities. The high-energy explosive injuries, environmental contamination, varying evacuation procedures, and progressive levels of medical care make managing combat-related injuries challenging. The goals of orthopedic injury management are to prevent infection, promote fracture healing, and restore function. It appears that 2% to 15% of combat-related extremity injuries develop osteomyelitis, although lower extremity injuries are at higher risk of infections than upper extremity. Management strategies of combat-related injuries primarily focus on early surgical debridement and stabilization, antibiotic administration, and delayed primary closure. Herein, we provide evidence-based recommendations from military and civilian data to the management of combat-related injuries of the extremity. Areas of emphasis include the utility of bacterial cultures, antimicrobial therapy, irrigation fluids and techniques, timing of surgical care, fixation, antibiotic impregnated beads, wound closure, and wound coverage with negative pressure wound therapy. Most of the recommendations are not supported by randomized controlled trials or adequate cohorts studies in a military population and further efforts are needed to answer best treatment strategies.

Correlation of Short Form–36 and Disability Status With Outcomes of Arthroscopic Acetabular Labral Debridement

Background Arthroscopic debridement is the standard of care for the treatment of acetabular labral tears. The Short Form-36 has not been used to measure hip arthroscopy outcomes, and the impact of disability status on hip arthroscopy outcomes has not been reported. Hypothesis Short Form-36 subscale scores will demonstrate good correlation with the modified Harris hip score, but patients undergoing disability evaluation will have significantly worse outcome scores. Study Design Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods The records of active-duty soldiers who underwent hip arthroscopy at the authors’ institution were retrospectively reviewed. Forty consecutive patients who underwent hip arthroscopy for the primary indication of labral tear formed the basis of the study group. Patients completed the modified Harris hip score, the Short Form-36 general health survey, and a subjective overall satisfaction questionnaire. Results Thirty-three patients, with a mean age of 34.6 years, were available for follow-up at a mean of 25.7 months postoperatively. Fourteen (43%) patients were undergoing medical evaluation boards (military equivalent of workers’ compensation or disability claim). Pearson correlation coefficients for comparing the Short Form-36 Bodily Pain, Physical Function, and Physical Component subscale scores to the modified Harris hip score were 0.73, 0.71, and 0.85, respectively (P <. 001). The mean modified Harris hip score was significantly lower in patients on disability status than in those who were not (92.4 vs 61.1; P <. 0001). The Short Form-36 subscale scores were significantly lower in disability patients (P <. 02). Patient-reported satisfaction rates (70% overall) were 50% for those undergoing disability evaluations and 84% for those who were not (P <. 04). There was no significant difference in outcomes based on patient age, surgically proven chondromalacia, or gender for military evaluation board status. Conclusion The Short Form-36 demonstrated good correlation with the modified Harris hip score for measuring outcomes after arthroscopic partial limbectomy. Arthroscopic debridement yielded a high percentage of good results when patients undergoing disability evaluations were excluded. Disability status may be a negative predictor of success after hip arthroscopy.

Prevention of infections associated with combat-related extremity injuries

During combat operations, extremities continue to be the most common sites of injury with associated high rates of infectious complications. Overall, ∼ 15% of patients with extremity injuries develop osteomyelitis, and ∼ 17% of those infections relapse or recur. The bacteria infecting these wounds have included multidrug-resistant bacteria such as Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Klebsiella species and Escherichia coli, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. The goals of extremity injury care are to prevent infection, promote fracture healing, and restore function. In this review, we use a systematic assessment of military and civilian extremity trauma data to provide evidence-based recommendations for the varying management strategies to care for combat-related extremity injuries to decrease infection rates. We emphasize postinjury antimicrobial therapy, debridement and irrigation, and surgical wound management including addressing ongoing areas of controversy and needed research. In addition, we address adjuvants that are increasingly being examined, including local antimicrobial therapy, flap closure, oxygen therapy, negative pressure wound therapy, and wound effluent characterization. This evidence-based medicine review was produced to support the Guidelines for the Prevention of Infections Associated With Combat-Related Injuries: 2011 Update contained in this supplement of Journal of Trauma.

Infectious complications of damage control orthopedics in war trauma.

BACKGROUND War-trauma, especially due to blast injury, can be associated with long bone fracture. Immediate external fixation of fractures, followed by internal fixation when the patient is medically stabilized (damage control orthopedics [DCO]), is the U.S. Army policy for war-related fractures. Data on infectious outcomes when DCO is used for war-trauma fractures are scant. METHODS A retrospective review of U.S. war-trauma patients from 2003 to 2007 with femoral or tibial fractures treated by DCO was conducted. Fishers Exact and Mann-Whitney tests were used for comparisons. RESULTS Fifty-eight soldiers were identified. Fifty-five were males with a median age of 26 years (19-54 years) and a median time to internal fixation by intramedually nailing of 9 days (4-414 days). Eighty-eight percent of fractures were open, and 57% were femoral fractures. The median duration of follow-up was 447 days (20-1,340 days). Fracture site infection occurred in 40% (23 of 58), with suspected osteomyelitis in 17% (10 of 58). Of infected nails, fracture union occurred in 70% and nail retention in 57%. Median time to infection after nail placement was 15 days (0-717 days) with 75% of infections occurring by day 113. Multiple bacterial pathogens including Acinetobacter baumannii and Staphylococcus spp. were causative organisms. Blast injuries occurred in 91% of infected versus 47% of uninfected (p = 0.005). There was no difference between infections occurring in femoral (61%) versus tibial (39%) (p = 0.620) location. CONCLUSIONS Infection was associated with 40% of DCO-associated intramedullary nails. Blast injury was a predictor of infection. Despite infection, fracture union and nail retention rates were high, suggesting a good outcome.

Guidelines for the prevention of infections associated with combat-related injuries: 2011 update endorsed by the infectious diseases society of America and the surgical infection society

Despite advances in resuscitation and surgical management of combat wounds, infection remains a concerning and potentially preventable complication of combat-related injuries. Interventions currently used to prevent these infections have not been either clearly defined or subjected to rigorous clinical trials. Current infection prevention measures and wound management practices are derived from retrospective review of wartime experiences, from civilian trauma data, and from in vitro and animal data. This update to the guidelines published in 2008 incorporates evidence that has become available since 2007. These guidelines focus on care provided within hours to days of injury, chiefly within the combat zone, to those combat-injured patients with open wounds or burns. New in this update are a consolidation of antimicrobial agent recommendations to a backbone of high-dose cefazolin with or without metronidazole for most postinjury indications, and recommendations for redosing of antimicrobial agents, for use of negative pressure wound therapy, and for oxygen supplementation in flight.

Advantage of pedicle screw fixation directed into the apex of the sacral promontory over bicortical fixation: a biomechanical analysis.

Study Design. A biomechanical study of human cadaveric sacra using insertional torque and bone mineral density was conducted to determine the optimal sagittal trajectory of S1 pedicle screws. Objective. To measure the maximal insertional torque of sacral promontory versus bicortical pedicle screw fixation. Summary of Background Data. Fixation of instrumentation to the sacrum is commonly accomplished using S1 pedicle screws, with previous studies reporting biomechanical advantages of bicortical over unicortical S1 screws. The biomechanical effect of bicortical screws (paralleling the endplate) versus screws directed into the apex of the sacral promontory is unknown. Methods. For this study, 10 fresh frozen cadaver sacra were harvested and evaluated with dual-energy radiograph absorptiometry to assess bone mineral density. Matched 7.5-mm monoaxial stainless steel pedicle screws then were randomly assigned by side (left versus right) and placed bicortically or into the apex of the sacral promontory under direct visualization. Maximum insertional torque was recorded for each screw revolution with a digital torque wrench (TQJE1500, Snap-On Tools, Kenosha, WI). Results. Maximum bicortical S1 screw insertional torque averaged 5.22 ± 0.83 inch-pounds, as compared with the maximum sacral promontory S1 screw insertional torque of 10.34 ± 1.94 inch-pounds. This resulted in a 99% increase in maximum insertional torque (P = 0.005) using the “tricortical” technique, with the screw directed into the sacral promontory. Mean bone mineral density was 940 ± 0.25 mg/cm2 (range, 507–1428 mg/cm2). The bone mineral density correlated with maximal insertional torque for the sacral promontory technique (r = 0.806;P = 0.005), but not for the bicortical technique (r = 0.48;P = 0.16). Conclusions. The screws directed into the apex of the sacral promontory of the S1 pedicle resulted in an average 99% increase in peak insertional torque (P = 0.005), as compared with bicortical S1 pedicle screw fixation. Tricortical pedicle screw fixation correlates directly with bone mineral density.

Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Nonunion of the Tibia

Objectives: Delayed and nonunion of the tibia are not uncommon in orthopaedic practice. Multiple methods of treatment have been developed with variable results. The objective of this study was to define disease-specific and treatment-related factors of prognostic significance in patients undergoing shock wave therapy for tibia nonunion. Design: Retrospective analysis. Patients: One hundred ninety-two patients treated with extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) at a single referral trauma center, AUVA-Trauma Center Meidling, a large single-referral trauma center located in Vienna, Austria, in an attempt to determine the feasibility and factors associated with the use of ESWT in the treatment for tibia nonunion. Intervention: ESWT coupled with posttreatment immobilization, external fixation, or ESWT alone. Main Outcome Measures: Fracture healing, overall healing percent, and factors associated with ESWT success or failure. Results: At the time of last follow up, 138 of 172 (80.2%) patients have demonstrated complete fracture healing. Mean time from first shock wave therapy to complete healing of the tibia nonunion was 4.8 ± 4.0 months. Number of orthopaedic operations (P = 0.003), shock wave treatments (P = 0.002), and pulses delivered (P = 0.04) were significantly associated with complete bone healing. Patients requiring multiple (more than one) shock wave treatments versus a single treatment had a significantly lower likelihood of fracture healing (P = 0.003). This may be attributable to the finding that a significantly greater proportion of patients with multiple rather than single ESWT treatments had three or more prior orthopaedic procedures (more than one ESWT, 63.9% versus one ESWT, 23.5%; P < 0.001). Conclusions: ESWT is a feasible treatment modality for tibia nonunion.

Inflammatory Cytokine and Chemokine Expression is Associated With Heterotopic Ossification in High-energy Penetrating War Injuries

Objective: Heterotopic ossification (HO) develops frequently after modern high-energy penetrating war injuries. The purpose of this prospective study was to identify and characterize the unique cytokine and chemokine profile associated with the development of HO as it pertained to the systemic inflammatory response after penetrating combat-related trauma. Methods: Patients with high-energy penetrating extremity wounds were prospectively enrolled. Surgical debridement along with the use of a pulse lavage and vacuum-assisted-closure device was performed every 48–72 hours until definitive wound closure. Wound bed tissue biopsy, wound effluent, and serum were collected before each debridement. Effluent and serum were analyzed for 22 relevant cytokines and chemokines. Tissue was analyzed quantitatively for bacterial colonization. Correlations between specific wound and patient characteristics were also analyzed. The primary clinical outcome measure was the formation of HO as confirmed by radiographs at a minimum of 2 months of follow-up. Results: Thirty-six penetrating extremity war wounds in 24 patients were investigated. The observed rate of HO in the study population was 38%. Of the 36 wounds, 13 (36%) demonstrated HO at a minimum follow-up of 2 months. An elevated injury severity score was associated with the development of HO (P = 0.006). Wound characteristics that correlated with the development of HO included impaired healing (P = 0.005) and bacterial colonization (P < 0.001). Both serum (interleukin-6, interleukin-10, and MCP-1) and wound effluent (IP-10 and MIP-1&agr;) cytokine and chemokine bioprofiles were individually associated and suggestive of the development of HO (P < 0.05). Conclusions: A severe systemic and wound-specific inflammatory state as evident by elevated levels of inflammatory cytokines, elevated injury severity score, and bacterial wound colonization is associated with the development of HO. These findings suggest that the development of HO in traumatic combat-related wounds is associated with a hyper-inflammatory systemic response to injury. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Microbiology and injury characteristics in severe open tibia fractures from combat.

BACKGROUND: Type III open tibia fractures are common combat injuries. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effect of injury characteristics and surveillance cultures on outcomes in combat-related severe open tibia fractures. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of all combat-related open Gustilo and Anderson (G/A) type III diaphyseal tibia fractures treated at our centers between March 2003 and September 2007. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-two Operation Iraqi Freedom/Operation Enduring Freedom military personnel with 213 type III open tibial shaft fractures were identified. Fifty-seven extremities (27%) developed a deep infection and 47 extremities (22%) ultimately underwent amputation at an average follow-up of 24 months. Orthopedic Trauma Association type C fractures took significantly longer to achieve osseous union (p = 0.02). G/A type III B and III C fractures were more likely to undergo an amputation and took longer to achieve fracture union. Deep infection and osteomyelitis were significantly associated with amputation, revision operation, and prolonged time to union. Surveillance cultures were positive in 64% of extremities and 93% of these cultures isolated gram-negative species. In contrast, infecting organisms were predominantly gram-positive. CONCLUSIONS: Type III open tibia fractures from combat unite in 80.3% of cases at an average of 9.2 months. We recorded a 27% deep infection rate and a 22% amputation rate. The G/A type is associated with development of deep infection, need for amputation, and time to union. Positive surveillance cultures are associated with development of deep infection, osteomyelitis, and ultimate need for amputation. Surveillance cultures were not predictive of the infecting organism if a deep infection subsequently develops. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.