Romy Gadisseur

A new tool in the field of in-vitro diagnosis of allergy: preliminary results in the comparison of ImmunoCAP© 250 with the ImmunoCAP© ISAC.

Abstract Background: The ImmunoCAP© ISAC allows for the determination of specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) against 103 recombinant or purified allergen components in a single analytical step. The aim of our study was to perform a comparison of the specific IgE results measured with the microarray method to those obtained using the traditional method of ImmunoCAP©. Methods: We selected 86 clinically relevant patients on the basis of their specific IgE for recombinant allergens (ImmunoCAP© 250, Phadia). Also, we selected two patients with a high total IgE to evaluate the non-specific binding of IgE. All samples were screened with the ImmunoCAP© ISAC. Then, we compared the 555 specific IgE antibodies results provided by ImmunoCAP© ISAC with the specific IgE levels obtained with ImmunoCAP© 250. Results: We observed that 82 of the 384 results found to be positive with ImmunoCAP© were negative with ISAC© (concordance 78.65%). Of 171 negative results obtained with ImmunoCAP©, 11 were positive with ISAC© (concordance 93.57%). No non-specific binding was observed. Conclusions: Our results show that the ImmunoCAP© ISAC has good analytical performance when compared with the ImmunoCAP© 250 method. We did not observe any non-specific binding. However, better sensitivity for some clinically relevant allergen components, such as rPru p 3 is needed.

Evaluation of automated immunoassays for 25(OH)-vitamin D determination in different critical populations before and after standardization of the assays

INTRODUCTION Standardization of immunoassays for 25(OH)-vitamin D determination is a major problem in clinical practice. A worldwide standardization program has started to address this and will reduce the bias observed between immunoassays. We aimed to calibrate 5 immunoassays on a LC-MS/MS traceable to the SRM 2972 and the ID-LC-MS/MS 25(OH)D Reference Method Procedure to see if the re-standardization would be efficient in a population of 3rd trimester pregnant women (PW), hemodialysis (HD) and osteoporosis (OP) patient. MATERIAL AND METHODS 184 serum samples (25(OH)D: 8.4-87 ng/ml) were selected to calibrate the immunoassays (Abbott-Architect, Roche-Elecsys, DiaSorin-Liaison, Siemens-Centaur and IDS-iSYS). Chromsystems MassChrom method was used as the referenced. Serum obtained in 34 PW, 25 HD and 34 OP patients were used as comparatives. RESULTS After adjusting to LC-MS/MS, immunoassays had regression slopes nearly identical to 1.0 with intercepts <0.5 ng/ml. However, in special populations, a systematic bias was still observed, except for iSYS. CONCLUSIONS Re-standardization of 25(OH)D immunoassay will globally improve the differences. However, patients with a different serum matrix will still present significantly different results when they will be run with different methods. For those patients, the LC-MS/MS method seems to be the method of choice, even if some immunoassays are less influenced than others.

Critical care and vitamin D status assessment: What about immunoassays and calculated free 25OH-D?

BACKGROUND Interpretation of 25OH-D measurement during critical care (CC) may be problematic due to variations of binding protein concentrations (albumin, ALB, and vitamin D binding protein, VDBP). Determination of free 25OH-D concentration may thus be relevant in CC patients. The aim of this observational study was to evaluate effects of an acute hemodilution on vitamin D (VD) status. METHODS Blood samples were obtained before (T1) and after a crystalloid load (T2) administered at anesthesia induction for minor surgery. 25OH-D was measured with LC-MS/MS and with 3 immunoassays (IA): DiaSorin Liaison, IDS iSYS and bioMérieux Vidas. VDBP was measured with the R&D Elisa and ALB on Cobas. Free 25OH-D was calculated using published formula. Accuracy of each 25OH-D IA was calculated as the percentage of IA values within 20% of their respective LC-MS/MS values. Performances of the three AI were compared with LC-MC/MS using Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS Twenty adults were included. Compared to T1 values, VDBP, ALB and LC-MS/MS values decreased in parallel by a mean of 23% at T2. IA values decreased less significantly (12, 14 and 15% for Liaison, iSYS and Vidas, respectively). IA-based calculated free 25OH-D significantly increased after dilution, while LC-MS/MS-based free values remained stable. At T1 and T2, bias were demonstrable for all IA. After hemodilution, bias would lead to overestimation for the three IA. Accuracy of IA decreased after dilution. CONCLUSIONS Due to matrix effects, compared to LC-MS/MS, IA results were impacted by hemodilution. In CC patients, LC-MS/MS seems to be the best option to measure 25OH-D. Specific LC-MS/MS method should be developed to measure free 25OH-D.

The Third/Second Generation PTH Assay Ratio as a Marker for Parathyroid Carcinoma: Evaluation Using an Automated Platform

BACKGROUND Parathyroid carcinoma (PCa) is rare and often difficult to differentiate initially from benign disease. Because PCa oversecretes amino PTH that is detected by third-generation but not by second-generation PTH assays, the normal 3rd/2nd generation PTH ratio (<1) is inverted in PCa (ie, >1). OBJECTIVE The objective of the investigation was to study the utility and advantages of automated 3rd/2nd generation PTH ratio measurements using the Liaison XL platform over existing manual techniques. SETTING The study was conducted at a tertiary-referral academic center. DESIGN This was a retrospective laboratory study. SUBJECTS Eleven patients with advanced PCa (mean age 56.0 y). The controls were patients with primary-hyperparathyroidism (n = 144; mean age 53.8 y), renal transplantation (n = 41; mean age 50.6 y), hemodialysis (n = 80; mean age 65.2 y), and healthy elderly subjects (n = 40; mean age 72.6 y). RESULTS The median (interquartile range) 3rd/2nd generation PTH ratio was 1.16 (1.10-1.38) in the PCa group, which was significantly higher than the control groups: hemodialysis: 0.74 (0.71-0.75); renal transplant: 0.77 (0.73-0.79); primary hyperparathyroidism: 0.76 (0.74-0.78); healthy elderly: 0.80 (0.74-0.83). An inverted 3rd/2nd-generation PTH ratio (>1) was seen in 9 of 11 PCa patients (81.8%) and in 7 of 305 controls (2.3%): 3 of 80 hemodialysis (3.8%), and 4 of 144 primary-hyperparathyroidism patients (2.8%). Of four PCa patients who had a normal PTH ratio with the manual method, two had an inverted 3rd/2nd-generation PTH ratio with the automated method. CONCLUSIONS Study of the 3rd/2nd-generation PTH ratio in large patient populations should be feasible using a mainstream automated platform like the Liaison XL. The current study confirms the utility of the inverted 3rd/2nd-generation PTH ratio as a marker of PCa (sensitivity: 81.8%; specificity: 97.3%).

Inter-method variability in bone alkaline phosphatase measurement: clinical impact on the management of dialysis patients.

BACKGROUND Bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP) is now recommended to assess bone turnover in hemodialysis (HD) patients. However, little is known about potential variability between methods available to measure BAP. METHODS We measured BAP in 76 HD patients with six different assays (Beckman-Coulter Ostase IRMA, Beckman-Coulter Ostase Access, IDS iSYS Ostase, IDS Ostase enzyme immunoassay, DiaSorin Liaison Ostase and Quidel MicroVue BAP). RESULTS We observed a high correlation between all the assays ranging from 0.9948 (IDS iSYS vs. IDS EIA) to 0.9215 (DiaSorin Liaison vs. Quidel MicroVue). However, using the regression equations, the equivalent concentration of a Beckman-Coulter Access value of 10 μg/L can range from 7.7 to 14.4 μg/L and of 20 μg/L can range from 16.9 to 27.9 μg/L with other assays. According to Beckman-Coulter Access, 13%, 50% and 37% of the patients presented BAP values ≤10, between 10 and 20 and ≥20 μg/L, respectively. Discrepancies are observed when other assays are used (concordance from 10 to 100%). CONCLUSIONS Analytical problems leading to inter-method variation should be overcome to improve the usefulness of this marker in clinical practice. According to correlation results, recalibration of BAP assays is necessary but should not be a major issue.

Standardization of DiaSorin and Roche automated third generation PTH assays with an international standard: impact on clinical populations

Abstract Background: Standardization of parathyroid hormone (PTH) assays is a major issue, especially in hemodialyzed (HD) patients. Two automated third generation PTH assays (Roche Elecsys and DiaSorin Liaison) are now available. These assays are specific for the (1-84) PTH and do not cross-react with the (7-84) fragment, contrary to second generation (intact) assays. We aimed to calibrate the two methods against the WHO International PTH Standard (IS) 95/646 to see if the two assays could provide comparable results in a population of healthy subjects, HD patients and patients suffering from primary hyperparathyroidism (PHP). Methods: We selected 79 healthy subjects and two populations of patients presenting PTH disorders: 56 HD and 27 PHP patients. We reconstituted the IS in a pool of human serum containing undetectable levels of 1-84 PTH and prepared 13 serum standards ranging from 0 to 2000 pg/mL. The standards were run on the two instruments to calibrate the assays on the IS. The different populations were run before and after restandardization. Results: As these kits were differently calibrated, the results obtained after restandarization were significantly different. Restandardization process improved concordance between assays and, taking the analytical variability of the two kits into account, the results could be considered to be similar. Conclusions: Restandardization of automated third generation PTH assays with the WHO 1-84 PTH Standard significantly reduces inter-method variability. Reference ranges and raw values are totally transposable from one method to the other in healthy subjects, but also in diseased patients, e.g., with HD or those suffering from PHP.

Vitamin D status after a high dose of cholecalciferol in healthy and burn subjects

BACKGROUND Burn patients are at risk of vitamin D (VD) deficiency and may benefit from its pleiotropic effects as soon as acute phase. Aim of this observational study was to assess effects of a cholecalciferol (VD3) bolus on VD status in adult burn patients (Group B, GB) after admission, compared to healthy subjects (Group H, GH). METHODS Both groups received an oral dose of 100,000 IU VD3. Blood samples were collected before (D0) and 7 days (D7) after bolus to measure 250H-D, 1,25(OH)2-D, parathyroid hormone (PTH) and fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23). Albumin (ALB) and VD binding protein (DBP) were measured and used to calculate free 25OH-D level. Data were expressed as median (min-max) or proportions. RESULTS A total of 49 subjects were included: 29 in GH and 20 in GB. At D0, prevalence of VD deficiency was higher in GB: 25OH-D was 21.5 (10.1-46.3) ng/ml in GH vs 11 (1.8-31.4) ng/ml in GB. DBP and ALB were lower in GB. At D7, DBP was stable in both groups while ALB decreased in GB. 25OH-D increased by 66.6 (13.5-260.3)% in GH. In GB, changes in 25OH-D extended from -36.7% to 333.3% with a median increase of 33.1%. Similar changes were observed in each group for free 25OH-D. High FGF23 levels were observed in GB. CONCLUSIONS This study highlighted the differences in VD status and in response to a high dose VD3 in burn patients when compared to healthy patients. Pitfalls in VD status assessment are numerous during acute burn care: 25OH-D measurement needs cautious interpretation and interest of free 25OH-D is still questionable. They should not prevent burn patients to receive VD supplements during acute care. Higher doses than general recommendations should probably be considered.