Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Rona F. Levin is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Rona F. Levin.


Nursing Research | 1989

The effects of relaxation training on clinical symptoms: a meta-analysis.

Ruth Bernstein Hyman; Harriet R. Feldman; Ruth B. Harris; Rona F. Levin; Gail B. Malloy

Forty-eight experimental studies of nonmechanically assisted relaxation techniques used to control a variety of clinical symptoms were synthesized using meta-analysis. Effect sizes for three types of comparison, experimental-control, experimental-placebo, and pre-post, ranged from .43 to .66, demonstrating that treatment of any type included in the analysis moved the client form the 50th to the 67th percentile of an untreated group at minimum and from the 50th to the 75th percentile at maximum. All treatments included in the analysis except Bensons relaxation technique demonstrated evidence of effectiveness, particularly for nonsurgical samples with chronic problems such as hypertension, headache, and insomnia.


Journal of Nursing Care Quality | 2010

Evidence-based practice improvement: merging 2 paradigms.

Rona F. Levin; Jeffrey M. Keefer; Joan Marren; Mary Jo Vetter; Bonnie Lauder; Sally Sobolewski

This article presents a new model, Evidence-Based Practice Improvement, for improving patient care. The model merges 2 extant paradigms currently used for quality improvement initiatives—evidence-based practice and practice or performance improvement. The literature expounds on the virtues of each of these approaches, yet no authors have moved beyond parallel play between them. The merged model, Evidence-Based Practice Improvement, may provide a more effective and practical approach to reach our quality goals.


Journal of Nursing Education | 2008

Strategies for Learning Evidence-Based Practice:Critically Appraising Clinical Practice Guidelines

Joanne K. Singleton; Rona F. Levin

Nurse educators have a mandate to educate our students about using an evidence-based practice approach to clinical decision making. At the Lienhard School of Nursing, Pace University, faculty have successfully integrated evidence-based practice into the family nurse practitioner curriculum. This article describes one teaching-learning strategy to help students learn how to critically appraise clinical practice guidelines using the AGREE instrument. There are several steps to the learning exercise: completing preparatory reading, obtaining the guideline that forms the focus of the assignment, working as teams, using the AGREE tool to assess the guidelines validity, and reporting team findings to the entire class. Students have found this learning activity helpful in preparing them for clinical practice.


Research and Theory for Nursing Practice | 2007

Disciplinary perspectives on evidence-based practice: the more the merrier.

Joanne K. Singleton; Rona F. Levin; Jeffrey Keefer

A Google search on June 14, 2007, produced 59,700,000 hits for the term evidence based practice. While this is a popular term today in health care, it is most interesting that the use of this term crosses disciplinary boundaries. With the current trend toward interdisciplinary approaches to our work, the question arises: What does evidence-based practice mean and how is it defined and used by various disciplines?


Research and Theory for Nursing Practice | 2012

Can You Touch Your Toes? Using Tables of Evidence (TOES) to Organize Your Evidence Review

Gina Myers; Rona F. Levin

When working with students or practicing nurses who want to engage in evidence-based practice (EBP), the usual first directive is to construct a problem, intervention, comparison, and outcome (PICO) question and then search the literature to find evidence to answer that question. Usually, what happens next is that students and clinicians alike amass a stack of research articles which may or may not be related to their topic. Despite the admonition of faculty and mentors to use a systematic search process, students fall back to old habits.Typically, much of the literature they accumulate does not relate directly to the PICO question. At this junction, it is imperative for the faculty member or mentor to help students differentiate the apples from the oranges (Levin, 2006). A successful teaching strategy to do this is to ask students to first provide you with abstracts of the studies they have retrieved before requesting the full text. That way, you are able to make sure that there are only apples in the literature basket.The next step in the EBP process is for the students or clinicians to read, appraise, and synthesize the evidence that they have gathered to determine if the extant evidence provides answers to their clinical question. Many students and clinicians alike initially are overwhelmed by the accumulated evidence: The reading is manageable, the appraisal is challenging, but the synthesis seems nearly impossible. They find that although they have read the articles and can discuss individual studies, they are unsure of how to integrate them in a way that answers their question. This is because a linear review of the evidence can lead to inefficiency in creating a clear picture of the available science on a particular topic. To help students and clinicians to streamline the literature review and synthesis process, the use of a table of evidence (TOE; also called a literature review matrix), which organizes the details of the research gathered in relation to a PICO question, is a helpful and necessary tool.WHAT IS A TABLE OF EVIDENCE?A TOE is essentially a table with rows and columns populated with focused aspects of each article included in the evidence review. The rows hold the specifics of the individual studies. The important elements to be taken from each article are identified by the headings of the columns. The cells of the table are filled in with the information listed at the top of the column (Worral, Levin, & Arsenault, 2010). The individual or individuals conducting the evidence review decide upon what the column headings should be, and then information from each article is pulled out and included in the table for the purposes of the review. This process is called abstracting (Garrard, 2011). An example of a TOE can be seen in Table 1. The TOE can be constructed any way the reviewers desire. It is a dynamic tool; columns may be added or changed at any time depending on the shifting focus of the PICO question or what is trending in the literature (Garrard, 2011). Although the TOE is most useful for research studies, it can include nonresearch articles as well.BENEFITS OF USING A TOEAt first, some believe that creating a TOE is cumbersome and creates more work. This is untrue. A benefit of using a TOE is that it is easy to set up in any word processing program and allows the user to get started immediately. …


Nursing administration quarterly | 2011

Fostering evidence-based practice to improve nurse and cost outcomes in a community health setting: A pilot test of the advancing research and clinical practice through close collaboration model

Rona F. Levin; Ellen Fineout-Overholt; Bernadette Mazurek Melnyk; Michael J. Barnes; Mary Jo Vetter


International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications | 2004

Improving Diagnostic Accuracy Using an Evidence-Based Nursing Model

Rona F. Levin; Margaret Lunney; Barbara Krainovich-Miller


Journal of Professional Nursing | 2007

Building Bridges in Academic Nursing and Health Care Practice Settings

Rona F. Levin; Mary Jo Vetter; Joan Chaya; Harriet R. Feldman; Joan Marren


Archive | 2013

Teaching evidence-based practice in nursing

Rona F. Levin; Harriet R. Feldman


Archive | 2006

Teaching evidence-based practice in nursing : a guide for academic and clinical settings

Rona F. Levin; Harriet R. Feldman

Collaboration


Dive into the Rona F. Levin's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mary Jo Vetter

Visiting Nurse Service of New York

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Joan Marren

Visiting Nurse Service of New York

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Priscilla Sandford Worral

State University of New York Upstate Medical University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bonnie Lauder

Visiting Nurse Service of New York

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge