Ross Hunter

The importance of alcohol-induced muscle disease.

Alcohol-induced muscle disease (AIMD) is a composite term to describe any muscle pathology (molecular, biochemical, structural or physiological) resulting from either acute or chronic alcohol ingestion or a combination thereof. The chronic form of AIMD is arguably the most prevalent skeletal muscle disorder in the Western Hemisphere affecting more than 2000 subjects per 100,000 population and is thus much more common than hereditary disorders such as Becker or Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Paradoxically, most texts on skeletal myopathies or scientific meetings covering muscle disease have generally ignored chronic alcoholic myopathy. The chronic form of AIMDs affects 40–60% of alcoholics and is more common than other alcohol-induced diseases, for example, cirrhosis (15–20% of chronic alcoholics), peripheral neuropathy (15–20%), intestinal disease (30–50%) or cardiomyopathy (15–35%). In this article, we summarise the pathological features of alcoholic muscle disease, particularly biochemical changes related to protein metabolism and some of the putative underlying mechanisms. However, the intervening steps between the exposure of muscle to ethanol and the initiation of the cascade of responses leading to muscle weakness and loss of muscle bulk remain essentially unknown. We argue that alcoholic myopathy represents: (a) a model system in which both the causal agent and the target organ is known; (b) a myopathy involving free-radical mediated pathology to the whole body which may also target skeletal muscle and (c) a reversible myopathy, unlike many hereditary muscle diseases. A clearer understanding of the mechanisms responsible for alcoholic myopathy is important since some of the underlying pathways may be common to other myopathies.

Alcohol: Absorption, Metabolism, and Physiological Effects

After caffeine, ethanol is the most commonly used recreational drug worldwide. After oral ingestion ethanol passes down the gastrointestinal tract until absorbed by passive diffusion. Alcohol diffuses from the luminal mucosal surface into the submucosal capillaries, which rapidly distribute it throughout the body in the blood before entering tissues by diffusion. Absorbed ethanol is oxidized to acetaldehyde, which is highly toxic but rapidly converted to acetate. The metabolism of acetate is unclear. Nonoxidative metabolism also occurs and may be more significant if oxidation is inhibited. Ethanol damages nearly all cellular structures and functions resulting in significant morbidity and mortality.

Cellular and molecular changes in rat models of alcoholic cardiomyopathy

RODGER BROUGH: Next we have a joint presentation Coralie Ober who currently works as a research fellow, Queensland Alcohol and Drug Research and Education Centre at the University of Queensland School of Population Health. She has a very broad experience in clinical nursing through to teaching, advocacy and advisory roles. Her work with Indigenous communities is widely recognised inside and outside this country and her role with the WHO is testimony to that.Alcoholism results in changes in the human brain which reinforce the cycle of craving and dependency, and these changes are manifest in the pattern of expression of mRNA and proteins in key cells and brain areas. Long-term alcohol abuse also results in damage to selected regions of the cortex. We have used cDNA microarrays to show that less than 1% of mRNA transcripts differ signifi cantly between cases and controls in the susceptible area and that the expression profi le of a subset of these transcripts is suffi cient to distinguish alcohol abusers from controls. In addition, we have utilized a 2D gel proteomics based approach to determine the identity of proteins in the superior frontal cortex (SFC) of the human brain that show differential expression in controls and long term alcohol abusers. Overall, 182 proteins differed by the criterion of > 2-fold between case and control samples. Of these, 139 showed signifi cantly lower expression in alcoholics, 35 showed signifi cantly higher expression, and 8 were new or had disappeared. To date 63 proteins have been identifi ed. The expression of one family of proteins, the synucleins, has been further characterized using Real Time PCR and Western Blotting. The expression of alpha-synuclein mRNA was signifi cantly lower in the SFC of alcoholics compared with the same area in controls (P = 0.01) whereas no such difference in expression was found in the motor cortex. The expression of beta- and gamma- synuclein were not signifi cantly different between alcoholics and controls. In contrast, the pattern of alphasynuclein protein expression differs from that of the corresponding RNA transcript. Because of the key role of synaptic proteins in the pathogenesis of alcoholism, we are developing 2-D DIGE based techniques to quantify expression changes in synaptosomes prepared from the SFC of controls and alcoholics.Chronic alcohol misuse leads to both widespread and localized damage in human cerebral cortex. The latter, as neuronal loss, is marked in superior frontal cortex (SFC) but milder in primary motor cortex (PMC) and elsewhere. Quantitative morphometry by Harper et al showed that neuronal loss is greater in alcoholics with comorbidity (Wernicke Korsakoff syndrome, liver cirrhosis). Previous work revealed a paradox: the marked differences in GABAA receptor density, pharmacology, and expression between alcoholics without cormorbidity and controls are muted or absent in cirrhotic alcoholics. This concurs with work by the Butterworth group on hepatic encephalopathy cases — most of whom had an alcoholic aetiology — who show only minor differences from controls. Glutamate receptor differences are muted in many autopsy studies, though we have evidence that NMDA site pharmacology may vary in cirrhotic alcoholics. Here we used Real-Time PCR normalized to GAPDH deltaCT to quantify NMDA NR1, NR2A and NR2B subunit expression in SFC and PMC samples obtained at autopsy from alcoholics with and without comorbid cirrhosis and matched controls. Overall subunit transcript expression was signifi cantly lower in alcoholic cirrhotics than in either of the other groups (F2,42 = 12.942, P < 0.001). The effect was most marked for the NR1 subunit; males differed from females, particularly in SFC. The data suggest that if excitotoxicity mediates neuronal loss in SFC, it may be implemented differently: passively in uncomplicated alcoholics, by altered GABAergic transmission; actively in cirrhotic alcoholics, by altered glutamatergic transmission. We also subdivided cases on a panel of genetic markers. Different genotypes interacted with NMDA and GABAA pharmacology and expression. Cirrhotic and uncomplicated alcoholics may differ pathogenically because of inherent characteristics in addition to possible neurotoxic sequelae to the liver damage.