Russell E. Scheffer

Lithium in the Acute Treatment of Bipolar I Disorder: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study.

BACKGROUND: Lithium is a benchmark treatment for bipolar disorder in adults. Definitive studies of lithium in pediatric bipolar I disorder (BP-I) are lacking. METHODS: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of pediatric participants (ages 7–17 years) with BP-I/manic or mixed episodes compared lithium (n = 53) versus placebo (n = 28) for up to 8 weeks. The a priori primary efficacy measure was change from baseline to the end of study (week 8/ET) in the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) score, based on last-observation-carried-forward analysis. RESULTS: The change in YMRS score was significantly larger in lithium-treated participants (5.51 [95% confidence interval: 0.51 to 10.50]) after adjustment for baseline YMRS score, age group, weight group, gender, and study site (P = .03). Overall Clinical Global Impression–Improvement scores favored lithium (n = 25; 47% very much/much improved) compared with placebo (n = 6; 21% very much/much improved) at week 8/ET (P = .03). A statistically significant increase in thyrotropin concentration was seen with lithium (3.0 ± 3.1 mIU/L) compared with placebo (–0.1 ± 0.9 mIU/L; P < .001). There was no statistically significant between-group difference with respect to weight gain. CONCLUSIONS: Lithium was superior to placebo in reducing manic symptoms in pediatric patients treated for BP-I in this clinical trial. Lithium was generally well tolerated in this patient population and was not associated with weight gain, distinguishing it from other agents commonly used to treat youth with bipolar disorder.

Guidelines for treatment-resistant mania in children with bipolar disorder.

Objective To implement a treatment algorithm to operationalize treatment-resistance and improve patient outcomes in youth with pediatric bipolar disorder (PBD). The term “treatment resistance” was operationally defined as significant persistent symptoms following the application of a treatment algorithm. Method Youth (6–17 years of age, n=120) with treatment-refractory bipolar I or II disorder, currently in a manic or mixed episode, were treated in accordance with the following 3step algorithm: (1) removal of destabilizing agents (antidepressants, gamma aminobutyric acid [GABA]-agonists, and stimulants), (2) optimization of antimanic agents, and (3) use of a limited number (E 2) of mood stabilizers. The primary efficacy measure was change in scores on the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) over the 6-month treatment course. Response was defined as repeated YMRS scores E 12. Results The sample was dichotomized into responders and non-responders. Both responders and non-responders improved significantly, with responders improving by a greater margin (d=3.2). At the end of 6 months, 75.8% of subjects demonstrated a significant and stable decrease in manic symptoms consistent with symptomatic remission (YMRS E 12). None of the subjects withdrew from the clinical process due to adverse events. Conclusion The application of this proposed treatment algorithm allows for more accurate identification of true treatment resistance and can significantly reduce manic symptoms in patients previously described as having treatment-refractory bipolar disorder.

Placebo-Controlled Trial of Valproic Acid Versus Risperidone in Children 3–7 Years of Age with Bipolar I Disorder

OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of valproic acid versus risperidone in children, 3-7 years of age, with bipolar I disorder (BPD), during a mixed or manic episode. METHODS Forty-six children with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed., Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) diagnosis of bipolar disorder, manic, hypomanic, or mixed episode, were recruited over a 6 year period from two academic outpatient programs for a double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial in which subjects were randomized in a 2:2:1 ratio to risperidone solution, valproic acid, or placebo. RESULTS After 6 weeks of treatment, the least-mean Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) total scores change, adjusted for baseline YMRS scores, from baseline by treatment group was: Valproic acid 10.0±2.46 (p=0.50); risperidone 18.82±1.55 (p=0.008); and placebo 4.29±3.56 (F=3.93, p=0.02). The mixed models for repeated measure (MMRM) analysis found a significant difference for risperidone-treated subjects versus placebo treated subjects (p=0.008) but not for valproic acid-treated subjects versus placebo-treated subjects (p=0.50). Treatment with risperidone over 6 weeks led to increased prolactin levels, liver functions, metabolic measures, and weight/body mass index (BMI). Treatment with valproic acid led to increases in weight/BMI and decreases in total red blood cells (RBC), hemoglobin, and hematocrit. CONCLUSIONS In this small sample of preschool children with BPD, risperidone demonstrated clear efficacy versus placebo, whereas valproic acid did not. The laboratory and weight findings suggest that younger children with BPD are more sensitive to the effects of both of these psychotropics, and that, therefore, frequent laboratory and weight monitoring are warranted.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Vortioxetine in Pediatric Patients

Abstract Objective: The primary objectives of this study were to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) and tolerability of single and multiple doses of vortioxetine in children and adolescents with a depressive or anxiety disorder and to provide supportive information for appropriate dosing regimens for pediatric clinical trials. Methods: This prospective, open-label, multinational, multisite, multiple-dose trial enrolled 48 patients (children and adolescents; 1:1 ratio) divided into 8 cohorts (4 adolescent and 4 child), with each cohort including 6 patients. The cohorts in each age group were assigned to receive one of four dosing regimens: vortioxetine 5, 10, 15, or 20 mg q.d. for 14 days. The total treatment period lasted 14–20 days with patients in the higher dose cohorts uptitrated over 2–6 days. Plasma samples for PK analysis were obtained on the first and last days of dosing. Results: Among children and adolescents, respectively, 62% and 92% had depression and 58% and 33% had anxiety disorder. Comorbid attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) was present in 50% of children and 38% of adolescents. After 14 days q.d. at the target dose, the PK of vortioxetine concentrations was generally proportional to the dose in both age groups. Exposure, as assessed by maximum plasma concentrations and area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time 0 to 24 hours, was 30%–40% lower in adolescents than in children. There was no significant relationship between sex, height, or ADHD diagnosis and PK parameters. Most adverse events were mild in severity and consistent with those seen in adults. Conclusion: The results suggest that the dosages of vortioxetine evaluated (5–20 mg q.d.; approved for treatment in adults) and the uptitration schedule used are appropriate for pediatric efficacy and safety trials.

A 6-Month Open-Label Extension Study of Vortioxetine in Pediatric Patients with Depressive or Anxiety Disorders

Abstract Objectives: In this 6-month open-label extension (OLE) of NCT01491035 (a 14-day, open-label, pharmacokinetic/safety lead-in study), the long-term safety and tolerability of vortioxetine (5–20 mg/day) were investigated in children and adolescents with a DSM-IV-TR™ diagnosis of depressive or anxiety disorder in the United States or Germany. The study also was designed to provide data to inform dose selection and titration in future pediatric studies with vortioxetine. Methods: Safety evaluations included spontaneously reported adverse events (AEs), the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS), and the Pediatric Adverse Events Rating Scale (PAERS; clinician administered). Clinical effectiveness was determined by Clinical Global Impressions. Comorbid attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder was permitted, including concomitant use of stimulant medication (US sites only). Results: Of the 47 patients who completed the lead-in period, 41 continued into the OLE. Most patients (n = 39 [95%]) continued their previous dose regimen. Twenty-one patients (51%) withdrew during the OLE; the most common primary reasons were administrative [n = 8], AEs [n = 4], and lack of efficacy [n = 3]. Thirty-five patients (85%) had ≥1 AE, 86% of which were mild or moderate in severity. Five patients (12%) reported a severe AE, none of which was considered related to study medication. The most common AEs (≥10%) were headache (27%), nausea (20%), dysmenorrhea (females; 19%), and vomiting (15%), with no relationship between AE intensity and age or dose. Five patients reported instances of suicidal ideation during the OLE, one of whom also reported this during the lead-in period. Two patients had nonsuicidal self-injurious behavior; one had a nonfatal suicide attempt. Throughout the study, there was a decrease over time in the incidence and intensity of AEs collected using the PAERS. Effectiveness assessment indicated a trend toward improvement based on numeric results. Conclusion: This OLE confirms the findings from the lead-in study, which concluded that a dosing strategy of 5–20 mg/day is safe, well tolerated, and suitable for future clinical studies of vortioxetine in pediatric patients.