Russell Z. Szmulewitz

Glucocorticoid Receptor Activity Contributes to Resistance to Androgen-Targeted Therapy in Prostate Cancer

Despite new treatments for castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), the prognosis of patients with CRPC remains bleak due to acquired resistance to androgen receptor (AR)-directed therapy. The glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and AR share several transcriptional targets, including the anti-apoptotic genes serum and glucocorticoid-regulated kinase 1 (SGK1) and Map kinase phosphatase 1 (MKP1)/dual specificity phosphatase 1 (DUSP1). Because GR expression increases in a subset of primary prostate cancer (PC) following androgen deprivation therapy, we sought to determine whether GR activation can contribute to resistance to AR-directed therapy. We studied CWR-22Rv1 and LAPC4 AR/GR-expressing PC cell lines following treatment with combinations of the androgen R1881, AR antagonist MDV3100, GR agonist dexamethasone, GR antagonists mifepristone and CORT 122928, or the SGK1 inhibitor GSK650394. Cell lines stably expressing GR (NR3C1)-targeted shRNA or ectopic SGK1-Flag were also studied in vivo. GR activation diminished the effects of the AR antagonist MDV3100 on tumor cell viability. In addition, GR activation increased prostate-specific antigen (PSA) secretion and induced SGKI and MKP1/DUSP gene expression. Glucocorticoid-mediated cell viability was diminished by a GR antagonist or by co-treatment with the SGK1 inhibitor GSK650394. In vivo, GR depletion delayed castrate-resistant tumor formation, while SGK1-Flag-overexpressing PC xenografts displayed accelerated castrate-resistant tumor initiation, supporting a role for SGK1 in GR-mediated CRPC progression. We studied several PC models before and following treatment with androgen blockade and found that increased GR expression and activity contributed to tumor-promoting PC cell viability. Increased GR-regulated SGK1 expression appears, at least in part, to mediate enhanced PC cell survival. Therefore, GR and/or SGK1 inhibition may be useful adjuncts to AR blockade for treating CRPC.

Sox2 Is an Androgen Receptor-Repressed Gene That Promotes Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Despite advances in detection and therapy, castration-resistant prostate cancer continues to be a major clinical problem. The aberrant activity of stem cell pathways, and their regulation by the Androgen Receptor (AR), has the potential to provide insight into novel mechanisms and pathways to prevent and treat advanced, castrate-resistant prostate cancers. To this end, we investigated the role of the embryonic stem cell regulator Sox2 [SRY (sex determining region Y)-box 2] in normal and malignant prostate epithelial cells. In the normal prostate, Sox2 is expressed in a portion of basal epithelial cells. Prostate tumors were either Sox2-positive or Sox2-negative, with the percentage of Sox2-positive tumors increasing with Gleason Score and metastases. In the castration-resistant prostate cancer cell line CWR-R1, endogenous expression of Sox2 was repressed by AR signaling, and AR chromatin-IP shows that AR binds the enhancer element within the Sox2 promoter. Likewise, in normal prostate epithelial cells and human embryonic stem cells, increased AR signaling also decreases Sox2 expression. Resistance to the anti-androgen MDV3100 results in a marked increase in Sox2 expression within three prostate cancer cell lines, and in the castration-sensitive LAPC-4 prostate cancer cell line ectopic expression of Sox2 was sufficient to promote castration-resistant tumor formation. Loss of Sox2 expression in the castration-resistant CWR-R1 prostate cancer cell line inhibited cell growth. Up-regulation of Sox2 was not associated with increased CD133 expression but was associated with increased FGF5 (Fibroblast Growth Factor 5) expression. These data propose a model of elevated Sox2 expression due to loss of AR-mediated repression during castration, and consequent castration-resistance via mechanisms not involving induction of canonical embryonic stem cell pathways.

A Randomized Phase 1 Study of Testosterone Replacement for Patients with Low-Risk Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

BACKGROUND Even in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), the androgen pathway remains biologically relevant. In preclinical models, androgen therapy for CRPC leads to growth arrest, apoptosis, and tumor shrinkage. OBJECTIVE This study sought to determine the toxicity and feasibility of a testosterone therapy in early CRPC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Prostate cancer patients with progressive disease following androgen ablation, antiandrogen therapy, and withdrawal and no to minimal metastatic disease who were followed at the University of Chicago were randomized to treatment with three doses of transdermal testosterone. INTERVENTION Patients were treated with transdermal testosterone at 2.5, 5.0, or 7.5 mg/day. MEASUREMENTS Toxicity, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), imaging, quality of life (QoL), and strength were monitored. Treatment was discontinued for significant toxicity, clinical progression, or a 3-fold increase in PSA. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Fifteen men with a median age of 73 yr (range: 62-92) and a median PSA of 11.1 ng/ml (range: 5.2-63.6) were treated. Testosterone increased from castrate to median concentrations of 305 ng/dl, 308 ng/dl, and 297 ng/dl for dosages of 2.5 mg/day (n=4), 5.0 mg/day (n=5), and 7.5 mg/day (n=5), respectively. One patient was taken off of the study at 53 wk due to grade 4 cardiac toxicity. There were no other grade 3 or 4 toxicities related to the study medication, and the grade 2 toxicities were minimal. Only one patient experienced symptomatic progression, and three (20%) patients demonstrated a decrease in PSA (largest was 43%). Median time to progression was 9 wk (range: 2-96), with no detectable difference in the three dose cohorts. There was no significant improvement in QoL, and there was a borderline statistically significant improvement in hand-grip strength with treatment. The study was limited by sample size, single arm, and variability of baseline patient characteristics. CONCLUSIONS Testosterone is a feasible and reasonably well-tolerated therapy for men with early CRPC. A larger, randomized trial is under way to further characterize efficacy and impact on QoL measures.

National trends in prostate cancer screening among older American men with limited 9-year life expectancies: evidence of an increased need for shared decision making.

Prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) screening for prostate cancer remains controversial. Most groups recommend informed decision making for men with 10 years of remaining life expectancy. The primary objective of this observational cohort study was to investigate the association between predicted 9‐year mortality and prostate cancer screening among American men aged ≥65 years in 2005 and 2010. The second objective was to analyze the proportions of men who discussed screening with their physicians.

Metastasis-suppressor genes in clinical practice: lost in translation?

Over the past 25 years, an expanding set of metastasis-suppressor genes (MSGs) has been identified that specifically regulate metastasis formation without affecting primary growth. MSGs are involved in diverse molecular processes in multiple tumor types. Given the wealth of metastasis biology that underlies their functions, treatment strategies based on MSGs have an unparalleled potential to improve patient care. Using NM23 as a prime example, we discuss how specific MSGs have been used as prognostic markers, tools for predicting response to treatment, and targets for the development of novel therapies. Barriers specific to the translation of MSG biology into clinical practice are reviewed and future research directions necessary for clinical advances are delineated. Although to date the impact of MSGs on patient care is limited, it is an expanding field with vast potential to help develop new treatments and identify patients who will most benefit from them.

Serum/glucocorticoid-regulated kinase 1 expression in primary human prostate cancers

Serum/glucocorticoid‐regulated kinase 1 (SGK1), a known target of the androgen receptor (AR) and glucocorticoid receptor (GR), is reported to enhance cell survival. This study sought to better define the role of SGK1 and GR in prostate cancer.

New paradigms for the function of JNKK1/MKK4 in controlling growth of disseminated cancer cells.

Much work has been done in the 20 years since the discovery of the first metastasis suppressor gene to investigate the diverse biochemical functions of the proteins these genes encode. The function of metastasis suppressors cannot be solely predicted from correlative clinical data or in vitro studies. Instead, careful design of in vivo experiments to test broader hypotheses is necessary to pinpoint the mechanism of action of these novel proteins. Our laboratory identified c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase activating kinase 1 (JNKK1)/Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) kinase 4 (JNKK1/MKK4) as a metastasis suppressor in prostate and ovarian cancer. JNKK1/MKK4 is a stress activated protein kinase (SAPK) involved in a variety of signaling events, ranging from the regulation of hepatoblast survival during mammalian development to metastasis suppression in adult ovarian and prostate cancers. JNKK1/MKK4 function has typically been associated with the c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase (JNK) signaling pathway, particularly in the immune system where JNK plays a role in inflammatory signaling and apoptosis. However, evidence continues to accumulate that JNKK1/MKK4 is also a physiologic activator of p38 under certain conditions, and that activation of p38 arrests cell cycle progression. This review will provide a historical perspective on the role of JNKK1/MKK4 in SAPK signaling, including some recent findings from our own laboratory that shed light on the complicated role for JNKK1/MKK4 in metastatic colonization.

Quantitative characterization of androgen receptor protein expression and cellular localization in circulating tumor cells from patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

BackgroundMany current therapies for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) are aimed at AR signaling; however, resistance to these therapies is inevitable. To personalize CRPC therapy in an individual with clinical progression despite maximal AR signaling blockade, it is important to characterize the status of AR activity within their cancer. Biopsies of bone metastases are invasive and frequently fail to yield sufficient tissue for further study. Evaluation of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) offers an alternative, minimally invasive mechanism to characterize and study late-stage disease. The goal of this study was to evaluate the utility of CTC interrogation with respect to the AR as a potential novel therapeutic biomarker in patients with mCRPC.MethodsFifteen mL of whole blood was collected from patients with progressive, metastatic mCRPC, the mononuclear cell portion was isolated, and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) was used to isolate and evaluate CTCs. A novel protocol was optimized to use ImageStreamX to quantitatively analyze AR expression and subcellular localization within CTCs. Co-expression of AR and the proliferation marker Ki67 was also determined using ImageStreamX.ResultsWe found inter-patient and intra-patient heterogeneity in expression and localization of AR. Increased AR expression and nuclear localization are associated with elevated co-expression of Ki-67, consistent with the continued role for AR in castration-resistant disease. Despite intra-patient heterogeneity, CTCs from patients with prior exposure to abiraterone had increased AR expression compared to CTCs from patients who were abiraterone-naïve.ConclusionsAs our toolbox for targeting AR function expands, our ability to evaluate AR expression and function within tumor samples from patients with late-stage disease will likely be a critical component of the personalized management of advanced prostate cancer. AR expression and nuclear localization varies within patients and between patients; however it remains associated with markers of proliferation. This supports a molecularly diverse AR-centric pathobiology imparting castration-resistance.

Individualized Decision-Making for Older Men With Prostate Cancer: Balancing Cancer Control With Treatment Consequences Across the Clinical Spectrum

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most prevalent non-skin cancer among men and is the second leading cause of cancer death in men. PCa has an increased incidence and prevalence in older men. Age-associated incidence is on the rise due to increased screening in the older population. This has led to a sharp rise in the detection of early stage PCa. Given the indolent nature of many prostatic malignancies, a large proportion of older men with PCa will ultimately die from other causes. As a result, physicians and patients are faced with the challenge of identifying optimal treatment strategies for localized PCa, biochemically recurrent PCa and later-stage PCa. Age-related changes can impact tolerance of hormonal therapy and chemotherapy in men with metastatic disease and shift the risk-benefit ratio of these treatments. Tools such as the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) can help estimate remaining life expectancy and can help predict treatment-related morbidity and mortality in older men. Application of CGA in older men with PCa is important to help individualize and optimize treatment strategies. Research that integrates multidisciplinary and multidimensional assessment of PCa and the patients overall health status is needed.

Targeting the glucocorticoid receptor in breast and prostate cancers.

The glucocorticoid receptor has a context-dependent role in breast and prostate cancers and may serve as a therapeutic target. Steroid receptors for androgens and estrogens have essential roles in prostate and breast cancers. Recently, glucocorticoid receptor (GR) activity has also been proposed as having an important role in these cancers. Underscoring the cooperative nature of nuclear receptor activity, data now suggest that GR function in prostate and breast cancers is dependent on the tumor’s concomitant androgen or estrogen receptor activity.