Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Ryan Pavlick is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Ryan Pavlick.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2014

Carbon residence time dominates uncertainty in terrestrial vegetation responses to future climate and atmospheric CO2

Andrew D. Friend; Wolfgang Lucht; Tim Tito Rademacher; Rozenn Keribin; Richard A. Betts; P. Cadule; Philippe Ciais; Douglas B. Clark; Rutger Dankers; Pete Falloon; Akihiko Ito; R. Kahana; Axel Kleidon; Mark R. Lomas; Kazuya Nishina; Sebastian Ostberg; Ryan Pavlick; Philippe Peylin; Sibyll Schaphoff; Nicolas Vuichard; Lila Warszawski; Andy Wiltshire; F. Ian Woodward

Future climate change and increasing atmospheric CO2 are expected to cause major changes in vegetation structure and function over large fractions of the global land surface. Seven global vegetation models are used to analyze possible responses to future climate simulated by a range of general circulation models run under all four representative concentration pathway scenarios of changing concentrations of greenhouse gases. All 110 simulations predict an increase in global vegetation carbon to 2100, but with substantial variation between vegetation models. For example, at 4 °C of global land surface warming (510–758 ppm of CO2), vegetation carbon increases by 52–477 Pg C (224 Pg C mean), mainly due to CO2 fertilization of photosynthesis. Simulations agree on large regional increases across much of the boreal forest, western Amazonia, central Africa, western China, and southeast Asia, with reductions across southwestern North America, central South America, southern Mediterranean areas, southwestern Africa, and southwestern Australia. Four vegetation models display discontinuities across 4 °C of warming, indicating global thresholds in the balance of positive and negative influences on productivity and biomass. In contrast to previous global vegetation model studies, we emphasize the importance of uncertainties in projected changes in carbon residence times. We find, when all seven models are considered for one representative concentration pathway × general circulation model combination, such uncertainties explain 30% more variation in modeled vegetation carbon change than responses of net primary productivity alone, increasing to 151% for non-HYBRID4 models. A change in research priorities away from production and toward structural dynamics and demographic processes is recommended.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2014

Multisectoral climate impact hotspots in a warming world

Franziska Piontek; Christoph Müller; Thomas A. M. Pugh; Douglas B. Clark; Delphine Deryng; Joshua Elliott; Felipe de Jesus Colón González; Martina Flörke; Christian Folberth; Wietse Franssen; Katja Frieler; Andrew D. Friend; Simon N. Gosling; Deborah Hemming; Nikolay Khabarov; Hyungjun Kim; Mark R. Lomas; Yoshimitsu Masaki; Matthias Mengel; Andrew P. Morse; Kathleen Neumann; Kazuya Nishina; Sebastian Ostberg; Ryan Pavlick; Alex C. Ruane; Jacob Schewe; Erwin Schmid; Tobias Stacke; Qiuhong Tang; Zachary Tessler

The impacts of global climate change on different aspects of humanity’s diverse life-support systems are complex and often difficult to predict. To facilitate policy decisions on mitigation and adaptation strategies, it is necessary to understand, quantify, and synthesize these climate-change impacts, taking into account their uncertainties. Crucial to these decisions is an understanding of how impacts in different sectors overlap, as overlapping impacts increase exposure, lead to interactions of impacts, and are likely to raise adaptation pressure. As a first step we develop herein a framework to study coinciding impacts and identify regional exposure hotspots. This framework can then be used as a starting point for regional case studies on vulnerability and multifaceted adaptation strategies. We consider impacts related to water, agriculture, ecosystems, and malaria at different levels of global warming. Multisectoral overlap starts to be seen robustly at a mean global warming of 3 °C above the 1980–2010 mean, with 11% of the world population subject to severe impacts in at least two of the four impact sectors at 4 °C. Despite these general conclusions, we find that uncertainty arising from the impact models is considerable, and larger than that from the climate models. In a low probability-high impact worst-case assessment, almost the whole inhabited world is at risk for multisectoral pressures. Hence, there is a pressing need for an increased research effort to develop a more comprehensive understanding of impacts, as well as for the development of policy measures under existing uncertainty.


Environmental Research Letters | 2013

A multi-model analysis of risk of ecosystem shifts under climate change

Lila Warszawski; Andrew D. Friend; Sebastian Ostberg; Katja Frieler; Wolfgang Lucht; Sibyll Schaphoff; David J. Beerling; P. Cadule; Philippe Ciais; Douglas B. Clark; R. Kahana; Akihiko Ito; Rozenn Keribin; Axel Kleidon; Mark R. Lomas; Kazuya Nishina; Ryan Pavlick; Tim Tito Rademacher; Matthias Buechner; Franziska Piontek; Jacob Schewe; Olivia Serdeczny; Hans Joachim Schellnhuber

Climate change may pose a high risk of change to Earth’s ecosystems: shifting climatic boundaries may induce changes in the biogeochemical functioning and structures of ecosystems that render it difficult for endemic plant and animal species to survive in their current habitats. Here we aggregate changes in the biogeochemical ecosystem state as a proxy for the risk of these shifts at different levels of global warming. Estimates are based on simulations from seven global vegetation models (GVMs) driven by future climate scenarios, allowing for a quantification of the related uncertainties. 5‐19% of the naturally vegetated land surface is projected to be at risk of severe ecosystem change at 2 C of global warming (1GMT) above 1980‐2010 levels. However, there is limited agreement across the models about which geographical regions face the highest risk of change. The extent of regions at risk of severe ecosystem change is projected to rise with1GMT, approximately doubling between1GMTD 2 and 3 C, and reaching a median value of 35% of the naturally vegetated land surface for1GMTD 4 C. The regions projected to face the highest risk of severe ecosystem changes above1GMTD 4 C or earlier include the tundra and shrublands of the Tibetan Plateau, grasslands of eastern India, the boreal forests of northern Canada and Russia, the savanna region in the Horn of Africa, and the Amazon rainforest.


PLOS ONE | 2014

The strengths of r- and K-selection shape diversity-disturbance relationships.

Kristin Bohn; Ryan Pavlick; Björn Reu; Axel Kleidon

Disturbance is a key factor shaping species abundance and diversity in plant communities. Here, we use a mechanistic model of vegetation diversity to show that different strengths of r- and K-selection result in different disturbance-diversity relationships. R- and K-selection constrain the range of viable species through the colonization-competition tradeoff, with strong r-selection favoring colonizers and strong K-selection favoring competitors, but the level of disturbance also affects the success of species. This interplay among r- and K-selection and disturbance results in different shapes of disturbance-diversity relationships, with little variation of diversity with no r- and no K-selection, a decrease in diversity with r-selection with disturbance rate, an increase in diversity with K-selection, and a peak at intermediate values with strong r- and K-selection. We conclude that different disturbance-diversity relationships found in observations may reflect different intensities of r- and K-selection within communities, which should be inferable from broader observations of community composition and their ecophysiological trait ranges.


Biogeosciences | 2012

The Jena Diversity-Dynamic Global Vegetation Model (JeDi-DGVM): a diverse approach to representing terrestrial biogeography and biogeochemistry based on plant functional trade-offs

Ryan Pavlick; Darren T. Drewry; Kristin Bohn; Björn Reu; Axel Kleidon


Earth System Dynamics Discussions | 2013

Comparing projections of future changes in runoff from hydrological and biome models in ISI-MIP

J. C. S. Davie; P. D. Falloon; R. Kahana; Rutger Dankers; Richard A. Betts; Felix T. Portmann; Dominik Wisser; Douglas B. Clark; Akihiko Ito; Yoshimitsu Masaki; Kazuya Nishina; B M Fekete; Zachary Tessler; Yoshihide Wada; Xingcai Liu; Qiuhong Tang; Stefan Hagemann; Tobias Stacke; Ryan Pavlick; Sibyll Schaphoff; Simon N. Gosling; Wietse Franssen; Nigel W. Arnell


Global Ecology and Biogeography | 2011

The role of climate and plant functional trade-offs in shaping global biome and biodiversity patterns

Björn Reu; Raphaël Proulx; Kristin Bohn; James G. Dyke; Axel Kleidon; Ryan Pavlick; Sebastian Schmidtlein


Earth System Dynamics Discussions | 2014

Quantifying uncertainties in soil carbon responses to changes in global mean temperature and precipitation

Kazuya Nishina; Akihiko Ito; David J. Beerling; P. Cadule; Philippe Ciais; Douglas B. Clark; P. D. Falloon; Andrew D. Friend; R. Kahana; Etsushi Kato; Rozenn Keribin; Wolfgang Lucht; Mark R. Lomas; Tim Tito Rademacher; Ryan Pavlick; Sibyll Schaphoff; Nicolas Vuichard; L. Warszawaski; Tokuta Yokohata


Biogeosciences | 2010

The role of plant functional trade-offs for biodiversity changes and biome shifts under scenarios of global climatic change

Bjoern Reu; Sönke Zaehle; Raphaël Proulx; Kristin Bohn; Axel Kleidon; Ryan Pavlick; Sebastian Schmidtlein


Environmental Research Letters | 2009

Simulated geographic variations of plant species richness, evenness and abundance using climatic constraints on plant functional diversity.

Axel Kleidon; Jonathan M. Adams; Ryan Pavlick; Bjoern Reu

Collaboration


Dive into the Ryan Pavlick's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kazuya Nishina

National Institute for Environmental Studies

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sibyll Schaphoff

Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge