Ryo Ishida

Prognostic value of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate in radical prostatectomy specimens.

Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC‐P) is an adverse prognostic factor for radical prostatectomy (RP). The endpoint in most IDC‐P studies is increased prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) levels. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether IDC‐P in RP specimens is an adverse prognostic factor for progression‐free survival (PFS) and cancer‐specific survival (CSS).

The presence of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate in needle biopsy is a significant prognostic factor for prostate cancer patients with distant metastasis at initial presentation

Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate is an adverse prognostic factor in localized prostate cancer patients. However, whether it influences outcome of those patients with distant metastases discovered at initial diagnosis is unclear. Here, we evaluated whether the presence of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate in prostate needle biopsies is an adverse prognostic factor for cancer-specific survival and overall survival in such prostate cancer patients. We retrospectively enrolled 150 eligible patients. All patients received androgen-deprivation therapy and/or chemotherapy. Their age, performance status, pain, metastatic sites, clinical T stage, serum prostate-specific antigen, alkaline phosphatase, hemoglobin, Gleason score, and the presence of Gleason pattern 5 were analyzed. Primary end point was cancer-specific survival; secondary end points included prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival and overall survival. Fine and Gray’s model and the Cox proportional hazards model were used as statistical tests. Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate was detected in 100 (67%) patients. At a median follow-up of 38 months, 79 patients (53%) had died of the disease and nine (6%) had died of other causes. The average time interval to cancer-related death was 28 months. On multivariate analysis, only intraductal carcinoma of the prostate was significantly associated with cancer-specific survival (P=0.018) and overall survival (P=0.001), and only the presence of Gleason pattern 5 was significantly associated with prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival (P=0.026). The presence of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate was the only significant prognostic parameter for cancer-specific survival and overall survival in prostate cancer patients with distant metastasis at presentation. These results may prove useful in planning future treatments.

Alpha methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) in prostate adenocarcinomas from Japanese patients: is AMACR a "race"-dependent marker?

Alpha methylacyl‐CoA racemase (AMACR) is a useful diagnostic marker for prostate adenocarcinoma. However, its usefulness has not been fully validated in Japanese patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic utility of AMACR in prostate needle biopsy examination in Japanese patients.

Prognostic parameter for high risk prostate cancer patients at initial presentation

High‐risk prostate cancer can be defined by a patients Gleason score (GS), prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) level, and clinical T (cT) stage, but a novel marker is needed due to heterogeneity of the disease. In this study, we evaluated whether intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC‐P) confirmed by needle biopsy is an adverse prognostic parameter for progression‐free survival (PFS) and cancer‐specific survival (CSS) in patients with high‐risk prostate cancer.

Integrating tertiary Gleason pattern 5 into the ISUP grading system improves prediction of biochemical recurrence in radical prostatectomy patients

Although the presence of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 is reportedly related to unfavorable prostate cancer characteristics, few data are available regarding the effects of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 on the new ISUP (International Society of Urological Pathology) grading system in radical prostatectomy patients. In this study, we evaluated the effect of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 on biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer. We retrospectively evaluated 1000 patients with prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy. The ISUP Grades were as follows: Grade 1, 16.3%; Grade 2, 48.1% (with tertiary Gleason pattern 5, 8.0% and without tertiary Gleason pattern 5, 40.1%); Grade 3, 21.9% (with tertiary Gleason pattern 5, 9.1% and without tertiary Gleason pattern 5, 12.8%); Grade 4, 3.9%; and Grade 5, 9.8%. Biochemical recurrence-free survival differed significantly among the five groups (Grade 1–5) (P < 0.0001). Grade 2 with tertiary Gleason pattern 5 had a significantly worse prognosis than Grade 2 without tertiary Gleason pattern 5. Similarly, Grade 3 with tertiary Gleason pattern 5 demonstrated a significantly worse prognosis than Grade 3 without tertiary Gleason pattern 5. When Grade 2 and Grade 3 were divided with or without tertiary Gleason pattern 5, the survival curves differed significantly among Grade 1, Grade 2 without tertiary Gleason pattern 5, Grade 2 with tertiary Gleason pattern 5, Grade 3 without tertiary Gleason pattern 5, Grade 3 with tertiary Gleason pattern 5, and Grade 4 (P < 0.0001) (hazard ratios: 1, 1.14, 1.86, 2.23, 3.53, and 6.30). In a multivariate analysis, integrating tertiary Gleason pattern 5 into the ISUP Grade, PSA, and surgical margin status significantly predicted biochemical recurrence (P < 0.0001). Integrating tertiary Gleason pattern 5 into the ISUP grading system will improve the accuracy of patient outcome prediction following radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer.