S. Abdel-Rahman

Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy alone or with regional hyperthermia for localised high-risk soft-tissue sarcoma: a randomised phase 3 multicentre study

BACKGROUND The optimum treatment for high-risk soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) in adults is unclear. Regional hyperthermia concentrates the action of chemotherapy within the heated tumour region. Phase 2 studies have shown that chemotherapy with regional hyperthermia improves local control compared with chemotherapy alone. We designed a parallel-group randomised controlled trial to assess the safety and efficacy of regional hyperthermia with chemotherapy. METHODS Patients were recruited to the trial between July 21, 1997, and November 30, 2006, at nine centres in Europe and North America. Patients with localised high-risk STS (> or = 5 cm, Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer [FNCLCC] grade 2 or 3, deep to the fascia) were randomly assigned to receive either neo-adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of etoposide, ifosfamide, and doxorubicin (EIA) alone, or combined with regional hyperthermia (EIA plus regional hyperthermia) in addition to local therapy. Local progression-free survival (LPFS) was the primary endpoint. Efficacy analyses were done by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT 00003052. FINDINGS 341 patients were enrolled, with 169 randomly assigned to EIA plus regional hyperthermia and 172 to EIA alone. All patients were included in the analysis of the primary endpoint, and 332 patients who received at least one cycle of chemotherapy were included in the safety analysis. After a median follow-up of 34 months (IQR 20-67), 132 patients had local progression (56 EIA plus regional hyperthermia vs 76 EIA). Patients were more likely to experience local progression or death in the EIA-alone group compared with the EIA plus regional hyperthermia group (relative hazard [RH] 0.58, 95% CI 0.41-0.83; p=0.003), with an absolute difference in LPFS at 2 years of 15% (95% CI 6-26; 76% EIA plus regional hyperthermia vs 61% EIA). For disease-free survival the relative hazard was 0.70 (95% CI 0.54-0.92, p=0.011) for EIA plus regional hyperthermia compared with EIA alone. The treatment response rate in the group that received regional hyperthermia was 28.8%, compared with 12.7% in the group who received chemotherapy alone (p=0.002). In a pre-specified per-protocol analysis of patients who completed EIA plus regional hyperthermia induction therapy compared with those who completed EIA alone, overall survival was better in the combined therapy group (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.45-0.98, p=0.038). Leucopenia (grade 3 or 4) was more frequent in the EIA plus regional hyperthermia group compared with the EIA-alone group (128 of 165 vs 106 of 167, p=0.005). Hyperthermia-related adverse events were pain, bolus pressure, and skin burn, which were mild to moderate in 66 (40.5%), 43 (26.4%), and 29 patients (17.8%), and severe in seven (4.3%), eight (4.9%), and one patient (0.6%), respectively. Two deaths were attributable to treatment in the combined treatment group, and one death was attributable to treatment in the EIA-alone group. INTERPRETATION To our knowledge, this is the first randomised phase 3 trial to show that regional hyperthermia increases the benefit of chemotherapy. Adding regional hyperthermia to chemotherapy is a new effective treatment strategy for patients with high-risk STS, including STS with an abdominal or retroperitoneal location. FUNDING Deutsche Krebshilfe, Helmholtz Association (HGF), European Organisation of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology (ESHO), and US National Institute of Health (NIH).

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with regional hyperthermia (RHT) for locally advanced primary or recurrent high-risk adult soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) of adults: long-term results of a phase II study.

In this phase II study, activity and safety of neoadjuvant regional hyperthermia (RHT) combined with chemotherapy was investigated in 59 patients with primary advanced or recurrent high-risk soft-tissue sarcoma (STS). Patients received four EIA cycles consisting of etoposide, ifosfamide and doxorubicin combined with RHT followed by surgical resection and adjuvant treatment. The overall objective response (OR) rate was 17%, with one complete (2%) and eight partial (15%) responses. In addition, 13 minor responses (25%) were seen. At time of surgery, complete necrosis (pCR) occurred in 6 patients and >75% necrosis (favourable histological response (FHR)) in 12 patients. At the completion of protocol treatment, 36 patients were rendered disease-free which was significantly associated with the initial radiographic and/or pathological tumour response (P=0.004). Treatment-related toxicity was acceptable overall. At a medium follow-up of 82 months, local treatment failure occurred in 33 patients, median overall survival (OS) was 52 months, and the 5-year survival rate was 49% (95% confidence interval (CI): 36-61%). OS which did not differ for extremity versus non-extremity STS (P=0.21) was better for patients responding to EIA combined with RHT (P<0.01).

Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Combined With Regional Hyperthermia Predicts Long-Term Survival for Adult Patients With Retroperitoneal and Visceral High-Risk Soft Tissue Sarcomas

PURPOSE To determine the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with regional hyperthermia (RHT) for local tumor control and overall survival (OS) in adult patients with retroperitoneal or visceral (RP/V) high-risk soft tissue sarcomas (HR-STS). PATIENTS AND METHODS From 1991 to 1997, 58 patients with HR-STS at RP/V sites were prospectively treated with four cycles of etoposide, ifosfamide, and doxorubicin combined with RHT followed by surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy, and radiation. RESULTS Objective response rate assessable in 40 patients was 13% (five partial responses). Including minor responses (n = 8), the radiographic response rate was 33%. The pathologic response rate assessable in 26 patients after surgical resection was 42%. Median OS was 31 months. At a median observation time of 74 months, 5-year probability of local failure-free survival (LFFS), distant metastasis-free survival, event-free survival, and OS were 25%, 51%, 20%, and 32%, respectively. Averaged minimum temperatures (T(min)) and time-averaged temperatures achieved in 50% (T(50)) and 90% (T(90)) of all measured tumor sites differed significantly between responders and nonresponders (T(min), 39.3 degrees C v 38.0 degrees C; P =.002; T(50), 40.9 degrees C v 40.3 degrees C; P =.038; T(90), 40.1 degrees C v 39.3 degrees C; P =.017). At 5-year follow-up, probability of LFFS (59% v 0%; P <.001) and OS (60% v 10%; P <.001) was significantly in favor of patients responding to neoadjuvant thermochemotherapy. CONCLUSION Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with RHT is predictive for an improved local tumor control resulting in a long-term survival benefit for patients with HR-STS at unfavorable RP/V sites; however, the impact of RHT has to be defined in a randomized phase III trial.

Quality assurance for clinical studies in regional deep hyperthermia

BackgroundA guideline is provided for the implementation of regional deep hyperthermia treatments under strict rules of quality assurance. The objective is to guarantee a comparable and comprehensible method in the treatment and scientific analysis of hyperthermia. The guideline describes regional deep hyperthermia (RHT) and MR-controlled partial body hyperthermia (PBH) of children, young and adult patients. According to this guideline, hyperthermia treatment is always applied in combination with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy.MethodsThe guideline is based on practical experience from several hyperthermia centers. The procedure allows applying jointly coordinated standards and quality control in hyperthermia for studies.ResultsThe guideline contains recommendations for hyperthermia treatments, including indication, preparation, treatment, and standardized analysis.HintergrundZur Durchführung von qualitätsgesicherten Tiefenhyperthermiebehandlungen wurde eine Leitlinie erstellt. Ziel war, ein vergleichbares und nachvollziehbares Vorgehen bei der Behandlung und der wissenschaftlichen Auswertung von Hyperthermiebehandlungen zu gewährleisten. Die Leitlinie beschreibt die „Regionale Tiefenhyperthermie“ (RHT) und die „MR-kontrollierte Teilkörperhyperthermie“ (PBH) von Kindern, jugendlichen und erwachsenen Patienten. Hyperthermie im Sinne der Leitlinie wird als Kombinationsbehandlung mit einer Chemo- und/oder Strahlentherapie durchgeführt.MethodikDie Leitlinie basiert auf praktischen Erfahrungen mehrerer Hyperthermiezentren. Dieses Vorgehens erlaubt abgestimmte Standards in der Anwendung und der Qualitätskontrolle in der Hyperthermie für Studien.ErgebnisseDiese Leitlinie enthält Empfehlungen für Hyperthermiebehandlungen mit Indikationsstellung, Vorbereitung, Durchführung und standardisierter Auswertung.

Treatment of primary, recurrent or inadequately resected high-risk soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) of adults: results of a phase II pilot study (RHT-95) of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with regional hyperthermia☆

The efficacy of thermochemotherapy in adult patients with primary, recurrent or inadequately resected non-metastatic high-risk soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) was assessed. 54 patients were prospectively treated with four cycles of etoposide, ifosfamide and doxorubicin (EIA) combined with regional hyperthermia (RHT) followed by surgery, another four cycles of EIA without RHT and external beam radiation. The objective response rate was 16% and at a median follow-up time of 57 months, the 4-year estimated rates of local failure-free survival (LFFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 59% (95% confidence interval (CI) 45-73%), 59% (95% CI 44-73%), 26% (95% CI 14-38%) and 40% (95% CI 27-53%), respectively. OS was in favour of patients responding to neoadjuvant treatment (P=0.073). In comparison to a preceding phase II study including pre- and postsurgical thermochemotherapy (RHT-91), at a 4-year follow-up the RHT-95 study cohort showed an inferior LFFS rate (P=0.027), but this did not affect DMFS (P=0.558) or OS (P=0.126). Hence, postsurgical thermochemotherapy seems critical for local tumour control without affecting survival.

Effectiveness of regional hyperthermia with chemotherapy for high-risk retroperitoneal and abdominal soft-tissue sarcoma after complete surgical resection: a subgroup analysis of a randomized phase-III multicenter study.

Objective:To determine whether regional hyperthermia (RHT) in addition to chemotherapy improves local tumor control after macroscopically complete resection of abdominal or retroperitoneal high-risk sarcomas. Background:Within the prospectively randomized EORTC 62961 phase-III trial, RHT and systemic chemotherapy significantly improved local progression-free survival (LPFS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with abdominal and extremity sarcomas. That trial included macroscopically complete and R2 resections. Methods:A subgroup analysis of the EORTC trial was performed and long-term survival determined. From 341 patients, 149 (median age 52 years, 18–69) were identified with macroscopic complete resection (R0, R1) of abdominal and retroperitoneal soft-tissue sarcomas (median diameter 10 cm, G2 48.3%, G3 51.7%). Seventy-six patients were treated with EIA (etoposide, ifosfamide, doxorubicin) + RHT (≥5 cycles: 69.7%) versus 73 patients receiving EIA alone (≥5 cycles: 52.1%, P = 0.027). LPFS and DFS as well as overall survival were determined. Results:RHT and systemic chemotherapy significantly improved LPFS (56% vs 45% after 5 years, P = 0.044) and DFS (34% vs 27% after 5 years, P = 0.040). Overall survival was not significantly improved in the RHT group (57% vs 55% after 5 years, P = 0.82). Perioperative morbidity and mortality were not significantly different between groups. Conclusions:In patients with macroscopically complete tumor resection, RHT in addition to chemotherapy resulted in significantly improved local tumor control and DFS without increasing surgical complications. Within a multimodal therapeutic concept for abdominal and retroperitoneal high-risk sarcomas, RHT is a treatment option beside radical surgery and should be further evaluated in future trials.

Gemcitabine and cisplatin combined with regional hyperthermia as second-line treatment in patients with gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer

Purpose: There is no standard second-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (APC) after gemcitabine (G) failure. Cisplatin (Cis)-based chemotherapy has shown activity in APC. It is proven that cytotoxicity of G and Cis is enhanced by heat exposure at 40° to 42°C. Therefore G plus Cis with regional hyperthermia (RHT) might be beneficial for patients with G-refractory APC. Patients and methods: We retrospectively analysed 23 patients with advanced (n = 2) or metastatic (n = 21) pancreatic cancer with relapse after G mono first-line chemotherapy (n = 23). Patients had received G (day 1, 1000 mg/m2) and Cis (day 2 and 4, 25 mg/m2) in combination with RHT (day 2 and 4, 1 h) biweekly for 4 months. We analysed feasibility, toxicity, time to second progression (TTP2), overall survival (OS) and clinical response. Results: Between October 1999 and August 2008 23 patients were treated. Haematological toxicity was low with no grade 4 event. Hyperthermia-associated toxicity consisted of discomfort because of bolus pressure (3%), power-related pain (7%) or position-related pain (17%). Median TTP1 was 5.9 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.6–9.2), median TTP2 was 4.3 months (95%CI: 1.2–7.4) and OS 12.9 months (95%CI: 9.9–15.9). The disease control rate in 16 patients with available CT scans was 50%. Conclusion: We show first clinical data of G plus Cis with RHT being clinically active in G-pretreated APC with low toxicity. A prospective controlled phase II second-line clinical trial (EudraCT: 2005-003855-11) and a randomised phase III adjuvant clinical trial offering this treatment (HEAT; EudraCT: 2008-004802-14) are currently open for recruitment.

Guideline for the clinical application, documentation and analysis of clinical studies for regional deep hyperthermia

ObjectivesThese guidelines contain recommendations for the implementation of quality-assured hyperthermia treatments. The objective is to guarantee an internationally comparable and easily understandable method for hyperthermia treatment and for the subsequent scientific analysis of the treatment results. The guidelines describe “regional deep hyperthermia” (RHT) and MR-controlled “partial body hyperthermia” (PBH) of children, adolescents and adult patients. Hyperthermia in terms of these guidelines is defined as a treatment combining chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy.MethodsThese guidelines are based on practical experience from several hyperthermia centres in Europe. Our collaborative effort has ensured coordinated standards and quality control procedures in regional deep and partial body hyperthermia. The guidelines were developed by the Atzelsberg Research Group of the IAH (http://www.hyperthermie.org) of the German Cancer Society (“Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft”) to specifically ensure that the multi-institutional studies initiated by the Atzelsberg Research Group are executed following a single, uniform level of quality.ResultsThe guidelines contain recommendations for procedural methods for treatment using hyperthermia. They commence with diagnosis, which is followed by preparation and treatment and concludes with standardised analysis for the reporting of results.ZusammenfassungHintergrundDiese Leitlinie enthält Empfehlungen zur Durchführung von qualitätsgesicherten Hyperthermiebehandlungen. Ziel ist, ein vergleichbares und nachvollziehbares Vorgehen bei der Behandlung und der wissenschaftlichen Auswertung der Hyperthermie zu gewährleisten. Die Leitlinie beschreibt die „Regionale Tiefenhyperthermie“ (RHT) und die „MR-kontrollierte Teilkörperhyperthermie“ (PBH) von Kindern, Jugendlichen und erwachsenen Patienten. Die Hyperthermie im Sinne dieser Leitlinie wird als Kombinationsbehandlung mit einer Chemo- und/oder Strahlentherapie durchgeführt.MethodikDie vorgestellte Leitlinie basiert auf praktischen Erfahrungen von mehreren Hyperthermiezentren. Dieses Vorgehens erlaubt gemeinsam abgestimmte Standards in der Anwendung und der Qualitätskontrolle in der Hyperthermie für Studien, die im Rahmen des Atzelsberger Arbeitskreises in der Interdisziplinären Arbeitsgruppe Hyperthermie (http://www.hyperthermie.org) in der Deutschen Krebsgesellschaft und dem Technischen Komitee der „European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology“ (ESHO) entwickelt wurden, um sicher zu stellen, dass multizentrische Studien, die vom Atzelsberger Arbeitskreis entwickelt wurden, nach einem standardisierten, einheitlichen Qualitätsmaßstab durchgeführt werden.ErgebnisseDiese Leitlinie enthält Empfehlungen für das Vorgehen bei Hyperthermiebehandlungen von der Indikationsstellung, der Vorbereitung, der Durchführung bis zur standardisierten Auswertung.Die deutschsprachige Version des Beitrags ist auf SpringerLink unter „Supplemental“ zu finden.

Quality assurance guidelines for superficial hyperthermia clinical trials: I. Clinical requirements

Abstract Quality assurance guidelines are essential to provide uniform execution of clinical trials and treatment in the application of hyperthermia. This document provides definitions for a good hyperthermia treatment and identifies the clinical conditions where a certain hyperthermia system can or cannot adequately heat the tumour volume. It also provides brief description of the characteristics and performance of the current electromagnetic (radiative and capacitive), ultrasound and infra-red heating techniques. This information helps to select the appropriate heating technique for the specific tumour location and size, and appropriate settings of the water bolus and thermometry. Finally, requirements of staff training and documentation are provided. The guidelines in this document focus on the clinical application and are complemented with a second, more technical quality assurance document providing instructions and procedure to determine essential parameters that describe heating properties of the applicator for superficial hyperthermia. Both sets of guidelines were developed by the ESHO Technical Committee with participation of senior STM members and members of the Atzelsberg Circle.

Comparison of radiological and pathohistological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with regional hyperthermia (RHT) and study of response dependence on the applied thermal parameters in patients with soft tissue sarcomas (STS)

Purpose: To compare the radiological criteria RECIST, WHO, and tumor volume for evaluation of tumor response in patients with soft tissue sarcomas (STS) showing either good or poor pathohistological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with regional hyperthermia, and to examine the dependence of the findings on the applied thermal dose. Materials and methods:19 patients with pathohistological complete response (no vital tumor cells, group 1) and 27 with pathohistological no response (<25% necrosis, group 2) were selected from our previous clinical trials. The change in tumor size before and after therapy was determined. Intratumoral temperature (T90) and thermal dose (CEM 43°C T90) were calculated for 13 patients. Results: In the first group, 6 partial response (PR) and 13 stable disease (SD) according to RECIST, 7 PR and 12 SD according to WHO, 7 PR and 12 SD according to volumetric criteria were evaluated. In the second group, the results were 10 PR and 17 SD (RECIST), 9 PR and 18 SD (WHO), 8 PR and 19 SD (volume). The concordance of these criteria was 73.7% in group 1 and 74% in group 2. PR and SD were equally distributed in both groups (p > 0.421). Thermal parameters were not different between the groups (p > 0.327). Conclusions: SD or PR in radiological response assessment does not correlate with the pathohistological response after neoadjuvant thermochemotherapy. RECIST, WHO and volumetric criteria for response evaluation in STS are in substantial agreement. For irregularly shaped lesions, volumetric criteria seem to be more appropriate.