S. Böhler

Cardiovascular risk factors in primary care: methods and baseline prevalence rates - the DETECT program

ABSTRACT Objectives: DETECT is an epidemiological study in primary care to examine (a) the prevalence rates and comorbidity of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and coronary heart disease (CHD), and associated conditions; (b) the frequency of behavioural and clinical risk factors for onset and progression; (c) the 12-month course and outcome; and (d) the met and unmet needs for these patients. Methods: Three-stage, cross-sectional clinical-epidemiological study with a prospective-longitudinal component in a nationally representative sample of N = 3795 primary care settings [response rate (RR): 60.2%] and N = 55 518 patients (RR: 95.5%). Patients completed a standardized assessment, including questionnaires for patients and the physician and diagnostic screening measures (i.e. blood pressure, heart rate, body mass index and waist circumference assessments). A subsample of patients (N = 7519) also completed a standardized laboratory screening program and was followed-up after 12 months. Data were weighted to adjust for non-response, regional distribution and attrition. Results: (1) Doctors and patients sample can be regarded as representative for primary care settings in Germany. (2) The clinician-rated point prevalence of hypertension is highest (35.5%), followed by hyperlipidaemia (29.1%), diabetes (14.1%) and CHD (12.1%); prevalence rates of each disorder as well as their co-incidence rates increase markedly with age. (3) The vast majority (78%) of all patients revealed multiple (3+) behavioural and clinical risk factors. Conclusion: The findings of DETECT underline the considerable burden for primary care doctors in managing a highly morbid patient population, with predominantly complex risk factor constellations, in routine care. Our data provide, in unprecedented detail, a basis for calculating age-, gender- and risk-group-adjusted risk-factor profiles in routine care.

Diabetes Mellitus in German Primary Care: Quality of Glycaemic Control and Subpopulations not well Controlled - Results of the DETECT Study

INTRODUCTION The quality of glycaemic control of patients with T1D and T2D can be assessed with HbA (1c) levels. We aimed to assess the quality of glycaemic control and the prevalence of inadequately controlled diabetes in German primary care, and to determine simple patient and treatment related factors associated with poor control. MATERIAL AND METHODS Using a nationwide probability sample of 3 188 general practices (response rate 50.6%), a total of 55,518 patients were assessed in DETECT, a cross-sectional and prospective multistage epidemiological study. Diabetes diagnoses were based on physician assessment. HbA (1c) values were taken from the patient charts. RESULTS The quality of metabolic control was unsatisfactory on the whole in the 277 people with T1D (e.g. mean HbA (1c)=7.4%+/-1.4%). The 8 188 people with T2D had a mean HbA (1c) of 6.89%+/-1.2%. 38.8% of individuals had an HbA (1c)>/=7.0%. The situation was less favourable in subjects with a longer history of diabetes - in many cases in those with diabetes for 5-9 years, but generally in those with a plus-10-year history of diabetes - and also in younger men with a shorter disease history. Patients with a short T2D history, especially older subjects had more favourable values. With regard to age, a higher percentage of patients had an HbA (1c)>/=7.0% (42.0% and 40.6%) in the 45-54 and 55-64 year olds. With respect to the correlation between HbA (1c) and treatment modality, we identified the best metabolic control in T2D patients without drug therapy for diabetes, and the worst in patients on combination regimens (OAD/insulin). The average duration of diabetes in the various treatment groups differs substantially. The average duration was highest (12.1 y) in the insulin group. Oral treatment was the predominant treatment modality in all HbA (1c) categories. CONCLUSION T1D treatment needs to be improved overall. The situation as regards T2D is less clear-cut. When people with T2D start requiring more intensive and complex treatment in response to disease progression, the treatment efforts of patients and physicians evidently fail to keep up with the actual pace of metabolic deterioration. Early and strict alignment with approximately normal HbA (1c) targets is essential. Close attention should be paid to T2 diabetics with a 5-9-year diabetes history, with the aim of preventing any loss of metabolic control. Likewise, patients aged 45-64 y and younger men require more attention.

Prevalence of low male testosterone levels in primary care in Germany: cross-sectional results from the DETECT study

Objective  Low testosterone levels in men occur with increasing age and are associated with increased morbidity, particularly metabolic syndrome, and mortality. As the prevalence of hypogonadal testosterone levels has not been assessed in the primary care setting in Europe, we aimed to investigate the prevalence of low testosterone levels in this setting, and the patient characteristics and comorbidities associated with this finding.

Associations of age-dependent IGF-I SDS with cardiovascular diseases and risk conditions: cross-sectional study in 6773 primary care patients

OBJECTIVE We aimed at investigating the association of age-dependent IGF-I SDS with diabetes, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and heart diseases, in a large patient sample. BACKGROUND IGF-I has been suggested to be associated with several diseases and a prognostic marker for the development of cardiovascular diseases and risk factors. The findings, though, have been inconsistent possibly due to the methodological factors. METHODS We studied 6773 consecutive primary care patients, aged 18+ years, in a cross-sectional, epidemiological study in primary care, Diabetes Cardiovascular Risk-Evaluation: Targets and Essential Data for Commitment of Treatment study. All patients underwent a standardized clinical diagnostic and laboratory assessment. IGF-I levels were measured with an automated chemiluminescence assay system. We calculated the odds ratios (OR) for diseases in quintiles of IGF-I, and additionally analyzed the association of age-dependent IGF-I SDS with these conditions. RESULTS After multiple adjustments for confounders, we found increased ORs for coronary artery disease in patients with high IGF-I. Women, but not men, with low IGF-I also showed increased ORs for coronary artery disease. Dyslipidemia was positively associated with IGF-I. Type 2 diabetes showed a curvilinear association with IGF-I SDS. CONCLUSIONS The findings suggest the existence of multiple and complex interactions between IGF-I and several health conditions. The complex nature of disease- and subgroup-specific associations along with the methodological factors can be held responsible for divergent findings in previous studies.

[Prevalence, drug treatment and metabolic control of diabetes mellitus in primary care].

ZusammenfassungHintergrund und Ziel:Hintergrund und Ziel: Der hausärztliche Bereich ist von zentraler Bedeutung für die Betreuung von Patienten mit Diabetes mellitus. Die Autoren untersuchten a) die Prävalenz von Diabetes mellitus Typ 1 und Typ 2, b) die Art und Häufigkeit von nichtmedikamentösen und medikamentösen Behandlungen und deren Zusammenhang mit dem Vorliegen von diabetestypischen Komplikationen sowie c) die Qualität der Stoffwechseleinstellung anhand des HbA1c.Methodik:Auf der Grundlage einer bundesweiten Zufallsstichprobe von 3 188 Arztpraxen („response rate“ [RR] 50,6%) wurden 55 518 Patienten (RR 93,5%) im September 2003 in einer prospektiven Querschnittsstudie standardisiert mit Fragebögen, Arztgespräch und Labormessungen untersucht. Neben Diabetes mellitus wurden 28 weitere Erkrankungen explizit erfasst, darunter auch die typischen makrovaskulären (koronare Herzkrankheit, zerebrovaskuläre Erkrankungen, periphere arterielle Verschlusskrankheit) und mikrovaskulären Komplikationen (Neuropathie, Nephropathie, Retinopathie, diabetischer Fuß).Ergebnisse:Es wurde eine Prävalenz des Diabetes mellitus von 0,5% (Typ 1) bzw. 14,7% (Typ 2) dokumentiert. 49,5% (Typ 1) bzw. 50,2% (Typ 2) der Patienten hatten bereits mikro- oder makrovaskuläre Folge- bzw. Begleiterkrankungen. 6,8% der Patienten erhielten keine Therapie, 13,5% wurden nur mit Diät/Bewegung behandelt, und 75,3% erhielten orale Antidiabetika und/oder Insulin, davon 26,6% eine Kombinationstherapie mit verschiedenen Antidiabetika. Die Behandlungsintensität war im Vergleich zu Diabetikern ohne Komplikationen bei Patienten mit mikrovaskulären Kom- plikationen deutlich höher (Odds-Ratio [OR] 3,02) als bei denen mit makrovaskulären Komplikationen (OR 0,98). Ein HbA1c-Wert ≥ 7,0% fand sich bei 39,6% der Patienten.Schlussfolgerung:Im Vergleich zu früheren Untersuchungen im hausärztlichen Bereich hat die Rate der medikamentös behandelten Diabetiker zugenommen. Eine Kombinationstherapie wird häufiger eingesetzt. Die Qualität der Einstellung scheint sich ebenfalls verbessert zu haben.AbstractBackground and Purpose:Background and Purpose: The primary care sector is of key importance for the management of patients with diabetes mellitus. The authors investigated (a) the prevalence of diabetes mellitus type 1 and type 2, (b) the type and frequency of non-drug and drug treatment and its association with the presence of diabetic complications, and (c) the quality of metabolic control by HbA1c.Method:Using a nationwide probability sample of 3,188 general practices (response rate [RR] 50.6%), a total of 55,518 (RR 93.5%) patients were assessed in a prospective cross-sectional study by their physicians in September 2003 in a standardized manner using questionnaires, physician interview, and laboratory assessments. In addition to diabetes mellitus, 28 diseases were explicitly screened for, among them typical macrovascular (coronary heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, peripheral arterial disease) and microvascular disease (neuropathy, nephropathy, retinopathy, diabetic foot) complications.Results:The prevalence of diabetes mellitus was 0.5% (type 1) and 14.7% (type 2), respectively. 49.5% (type 1) and 50.2% (type 2) of patients had micro- or macrovascular complications. 6.8% did not receive any treatment, 13.5% received non-drug treatment, and 75.3% received oral antidiabetic drugs and/or insulin (26.6% a combination of two or more). Compared to diabetics without any complications, treatment intensity was significantly higher in patients with microvascular complications (odds ratio [OR] 3.02), but not in those with macrovascular complications only (OR 0.98). An HbA1c value ≥ 7.0% was recorded in 39.6% of patients.Conclusion:Compared to previous studies in this setting, the proportion of diabetics with drug treatment has increased. More patients receive antidiabetic drug combinations. Quality of blood sugar control appears to have improved as well.

Prävalenz, medikamentöse Behandlung und Einstellung des Diabetes mellitus in der Hausarztpraxis*

ZusammenfassungHintergrund und Ziel:Hintergrund und Ziel: Der hausärztliche Bereich ist von zentraler Bedeutung für die Betreuung von Patienten mit Diabetes mellitus. Die Autoren untersuchten a) die Prävalenz von Diabetes mellitus Typ 1 und Typ 2, b) die Art und Häufigkeit von nichtmedikamentösen und medikamentösen Behandlungen und deren Zusammenhang mit dem Vorliegen von diabetestypischen Komplikationen sowie c) die Qualität der Stoffwechseleinstellung anhand des HbA1c.Methodik:Auf der Grundlage einer bundesweiten Zufallsstichprobe von 3 188 Arztpraxen („response rate“ [RR] 50,6%) wurden 55 518 Patienten (RR 93,5%) im September 2003 in einer prospektiven Querschnittsstudie standardisiert mit Fragebögen, Arztgespräch und Labormessungen untersucht. Neben Diabetes mellitus wurden 28 weitere Erkrankungen explizit erfasst, darunter auch die typischen makrovaskulären (koronare Herzkrankheit, zerebrovaskuläre Erkrankungen, periphere arterielle Verschlusskrankheit) und mikrovaskulären Komplikationen (Neuropathie, Nephropathie, Retinopathie, diabetischer Fuß).Ergebnisse:Es wurde eine Prävalenz des Diabetes mellitus von 0,5% (Typ 1) bzw. 14,7% (Typ 2) dokumentiert. 49,5% (Typ 1) bzw. 50,2% (Typ 2) der Patienten hatten bereits mikro- oder makrovaskuläre Folge- bzw. Begleiterkrankungen. 6,8% der Patienten erhielten keine Therapie, 13,5% wurden nur mit Diät/Bewegung behandelt, und 75,3% erhielten orale Antidiabetika und/oder Insulin, davon 26,6% eine Kombinationstherapie mit verschiedenen Antidiabetika. Die Behandlungsintensität war im Vergleich zu Diabetikern ohne Komplikationen bei Patienten mit mikrovaskulären Kom- plikationen deutlich höher (Odds-Ratio [OR] 3,02) als bei denen mit makrovaskulären Komplikationen (OR 0,98). Ein HbA1c-Wert ≥ 7,0% fand sich bei 39,6% der Patienten.Schlussfolgerung:Im Vergleich zu früheren Untersuchungen im hausärztlichen Bereich hat die Rate der medikamentös behandelten Diabetiker zugenommen. Eine Kombinationstherapie wird häufiger eingesetzt. Die Qualität der Einstellung scheint sich ebenfalls verbessert zu haben.AbstractBackground and Purpose:Background and Purpose: The primary care sector is of key importance for the management of patients with diabetes mellitus. The authors investigated (a) the prevalence of diabetes mellitus type 1 and type 2, (b) the type and frequency of non-drug and drug treatment and its association with the presence of diabetic complications, and (c) the quality of metabolic control by HbA1c.Method:Using a nationwide probability sample of 3,188 general practices (response rate [RR] 50.6%), a total of 55,518 (RR 93.5%) patients were assessed in a prospective cross-sectional study by their physicians in September 2003 in a standardized manner using questionnaires, physician interview, and laboratory assessments. In addition to diabetes mellitus, 28 diseases were explicitly screened for, among them typical macrovascular (coronary heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, peripheral arterial disease) and microvascular disease (neuropathy, nephropathy, retinopathy, diabetic foot) complications.Results:The prevalence of diabetes mellitus was 0.5% (type 1) and 14.7% (type 2), respectively. 49.5% (type 1) and 50.2% (type 2) of patients had micro- or macrovascular complications. 6.8% did not receive any treatment, 13.5% received non-drug treatment, and 75.3% received oral antidiabetic drugs and/or insulin (26.6% a combination of two or more). Compared to diabetics without any complications, treatment intensity was significantly higher in patients with microvascular complications (odds ratio [OR] 3.02), but not in those with macrovascular complications only (OR 0.98). An HbA1c value ≥ 7.0% was recorded in 39.6% of patients.Conclusion:Compared to previous studies in this setting, the proportion of diabetics with drug treatment has increased. More patients receive antidiabetic drug combinations. Quality of blood sugar control appears to have improved as well.

All-cause mortality and serum insulin-like growth factor I in primary care patients

OBJECTIVE Previous population-based studies provided conflicting results regarding the association of total serum insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and mortality. The aim of the present study was to assess the relation of IGF-I levels with all-cause mortality in a prospective study. DESIGN DETECT (Diabetes Cardiovascular Risk-Evaluation: Targets and Essential Data for Commitment of Treatment) is a large, multistage, and nationally representative study of primary care patients in Germany. The study population included 2463 men and 3603 women. Death rates were recorded by the respective primary care physician. Serum total IGF-I levels were determined by chemiluminescence immunoassays and categorized into three groups (low, moderate, and high) according to the sex- and age-specific 10th and 90th percentiles. RESULTS Adjusted analyses revealed that men with low [hazard ratio (HR) 1.70 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-2.73), p=0.03] and high [HR 1.76 (95% CI 1.09-2.85), p=0.02] IGF-I levels had higher risk of all-cause mortality compared to men with moderate IGF-I levels. The specificity of low IGF-I and high IGF-I levels increased with lower and higher cut-offs, respectively. No such association became apparent in women. CONCLUSIONS The present study revealed a U-shaped relation between IGF-I and all-cause mortality in male primary care patients.

Drug interactions with angiotensin receptor blockers

Many patients with high blood pressure receive multiple medications for hypertension and other conditions, placing them at risk for adverse drug interactions. Additionally, as the prevalence of hypertension increases with age, factors like greater frailty, comorbidity of the elderly requiring polypharmacy, and reduced hepatic and renal clearance rates for the elimination of drugs increase the likelihood of drug interactions. Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are the most recent class of agents for the treatment of hypertension. Due to a favourable side effect profile, this class of drugs deserves increased attention. This article reviews drug interactions of ARBs and suggests measures for reducing the risk of adverse events when drugs are co-administered. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library, and CINAHL were searched. Reported and likely clinical relevant interactions of ARBs with concomitantly given drugs are summarised in Table 2 and 3. Compared to other classes of antihypertensive agents, the ARBs appear to have a low potential for drug interactions; however, interactions with this class occur and variations within the class have been detected, mainly due to different affinities for cytochrome P450 isoenzymes.

Prävalenz, medikamentöse Behandlung und Einstellung des Diabetes mellitus in der Hausarztpraxis*@@@Prevalence, Drug Treatment and Metabolic Control of Diabetes Mellitus in Primary Care

ZusammenfassungHintergrund und Ziel:Hintergrund und Ziel: Der hausärztliche Bereich ist von zentraler Bedeutung für die Betreuung von Patienten mit Diabetes mellitus. Die Autoren untersuchten a) die Prävalenz von Diabetes mellitus Typ 1 und Typ 2, b) die Art und Häufigkeit von nichtmedikamentösen und medikamentösen Behandlungen und deren Zusammenhang mit dem Vorliegen von diabetestypischen Komplikationen sowie c) die Qualität der Stoffwechseleinstellung anhand des HbA1c.Methodik:Auf der Grundlage einer bundesweiten Zufallsstichprobe von 3 188 Arztpraxen („response rate“ [RR] 50,6%) wurden 55 518 Patienten (RR 93,5%) im September 2003 in einer prospektiven Querschnittsstudie standardisiert mit Fragebögen, Arztgespräch und Labormessungen untersucht. Neben Diabetes mellitus wurden 28 weitere Erkrankungen explizit erfasst, darunter auch die typischen makrovaskulären (koronare Herzkrankheit, zerebrovaskuläre Erkrankungen, periphere arterielle Verschlusskrankheit) und mikrovaskulären Komplikationen (Neuropathie, Nephropathie, Retinopathie, diabetischer Fuß).Ergebnisse:Es wurde eine Prävalenz des Diabetes mellitus von 0,5% (Typ 1) bzw. 14,7% (Typ 2) dokumentiert. 49,5% (Typ 1) bzw. 50,2% (Typ 2) der Patienten hatten bereits mikro- oder makrovaskuläre Folge- bzw. Begleiterkrankungen. 6,8% der Patienten erhielten keine Therapie, 13,5% wurden nur mit Diät/Bewegung behandelt, und 75,3% erhielten orale Antidiabetika und/oder Insulin, davon 26,6% eine Kombinationstherapie mit verschiedenen Antidiabetika. Die Behandlungsintensität war im Vergleich zu Diabetikern ohne Komplikationen bei Patienten mit mikrovaskulären Kom- plikationen deutlich höher (Odds-Ratio [OR] 3,02) als bei denen mit makrovaskulären Komplikationen (OR 0,98). Ein HbA1c-Wert ≥ 7,0% fand sich bei 39,6% der Patienten.Schlussfolgerung:Im Vergleich zu früheren Untersuchungen im hausärztlichen Bereich hat die Rate der medikamentös behandelten Diabetiker zugenommen. Eine Kombinationstherapie wird häufiger eingesetzt. Die Qualität der Einstellung scheint sich ebenfalls verbessert zu haben.AbstractBackground and Purpose:Background and Purpose: The primary care sector is of key importance for the management of patients with diabetes mellitus. The authors investigated (a) the prevalence of diabetes mellitus type 1 and type 2, (b) the type and frequency of non-drug and drug treatment and its association with the presence of diabetic complications, and (c) the quality of metabolic control by HbA1c.Method:Using a nationwide probability sample of 3,188 general practices (response rate [RR] 50.6%), a total of 55,518 (RR 93.5%) patients were assessed in a prospective cross-sectional study by their physicians in September 2003 in a standardized manner using questionnaires, physician interview, and laboratory assessments. In addition to diabetes mellitus, 28 diseases were explicitly screened for, among them typical macrovascular (coronary heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, peripheral arterial disease) and microvascular disease (neuropathy, nephropathy, retinopathy, diabetic foot) complications.Results:The prevalence of diabetes mellitus was 0.5% (type 1) and 14.7% (type 2), respectively. 49.5% (type 1) and 50.2% (type 2) of patients had micro- or macrovascular complications. 6.8% did not receive any treatment, 13.5% received non-drug treatment, and 75.3% received oral antidiabetic drugs and/or insulin (26.6% a combination of two or more). Compared to diabetics without any complications, treatment intensity was significantly higher in patients with microvascular complications (odds ratio [OR] 3.02), but not in those with macrovascular complications only (OR 0.98). An HbA1c value ≥ 7.0% was recorded in 39.6% of patients.Conclusion:Compared to previous studies in this setting, the proportion of diabetics with drug treatment has increased. More patients receive antidiabetic drug combinations. Quality of blood sugar control appears to have improved as well.

Prävalenz, medikamentöse Behandlung und Einstellung desDiabetes mellitus in der Hausarztpraxis*

ZusammenfassungHintergrund und Ziel:Hintergrund und Ziel: Der hausärztliche Bereich ist von zentraler Bedeutung für die Betreuung von Patienten mit Diabetes mellitus. Die Autoren untersuchten a) die Prävalenz von Diabetes mellitus Typ 1 und Typ 2, b) die Art und Häufigkeit von nichtmedikamentösen und medikamentösen Behandlungen und deren Zusammenhang mit dem Vorliegen von diabetestypischen Komplikationen sowie c) die Qualität der Stoffwechseleinstellung anhand des HbA1c.Methodik:Auf der Grundlage einer bundesweiten Zufallsstichprobe von 3 188 Arztpraxen („response rate“ [RR] 50,6%) wurden 55 518 Patienten (RR 93,5%) im September 2003 in einer prospektiven Querschnittsstudie standardisiert mit Fragebögen, Arztgespräch und Labormessungen untersucht. Neben Diabetes mellitus wurden 28 weitere Erkrankungen explizit erfasst, darunter auch die typischen makrovaskulären (koronare Herzkrankheit, zerebrovaskuläre Erkrankungen, periphere arterielle Verschlusskrankheit) und mikrovaskulären Komplikationen (Neuropathie, Nephropathie, Retinopathie, diabetischer Fuß).Ergebnisse:Es wurde eine Prävalenz des Diabetes mellitus von 0,5% (Typ 1) bzw. 14,7% (Typ 2) dokumentiert. 49,5% (Typ 1) bzw. 50,2% (Typ 2) der Patienten hatten bereits mikro- oder makrovaskuläre Folge- bzw. Begleiterkrankungen. 6,8% der Patienten erhielten keine Therapie, 13,5% wurden nur mit Diät/Bewegung behandelt, und 75,3% erhielten orale Antidiabetika und/oder Insulin, davon 26,6% eine Kombinationstherapie mit verschiedenen Antidiabetika. Die Behandlungsintensität war im Vergleich zu Diabetikern ohne Komplikationen bei Patienten mit mikrovaskulären Kom- plikationen deutlich höher (Odds-Ratio [OR] 3,02) als bei denen mit makrovaskulären Komplikationen (OR 0,98). Ein HbA1c-Wert ≥ 7,0% fand sich bei 39,6% der Patienten.Schlussfolgerung:Im Vergleich zu früheren Untersuchungen im hausärztlichen Bereich hat die Rate der medikamentös behandelten Diabetiker zugenommen. Eine Kombinationstherapie wird häufiger eingesetzt. Die Qualität der Einstellung scheint sich ebenfalls verbessert zu haben.AbstractBackground and Purpose:Background and Purpose: The primary care sector is of key importance for the management of patients with diabetes mellitus. The authors investigated (a) the prevalence of diabetes mellitus type 1 and type 2, (b) the type and frequency of non-drug and drug treatment and its association with the presence of diabetic complications, and (c) the quality of metabolic control by HbA1c.Method:Using a nationwide probability sample of 3,188 general practices (response rate [RR] 50.6%), a total of 55,518 (RR 93.5%) patients were assessed in a prospective cross-sectional study by their physicians in September 2003 in a standardized manner using questionnaires, physician interview, and laboratory assessments. In addition to diabetes mellitus, 28 diseases were explicitly screened for, among them typical macrovascular (coronary heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, peripheral arterial disease) and microvascular disease (neuropathy, nephropathy, retinopathy, diabetic foot) complications.Results:The prevalence of diabetes mellitus was 0.5% (type 1) and 14.7% (type 2), respectively. 49.5% (type 1) and 50.2% (type 2) of patients had micro- or macrovascular complications. 6.8% did not receive any treatment, 13.5% received non-drug treatment, and 75.3% received oral antidiabetic drugs and/or insulin (26.6% a combination of two or more). Compared to diabetics without any complications, treatment intensity was significantly higher in patients with microvascular complications (odds ratio [OR] 3.02), but not in those with macrovascular complications only (OR 0.98). An HbA1c value ≥ 7.0% was recorded in 39.6% of patients.Conclusion:Compared to previous studies in this setting, the proportion of diabetics with drug treatment has increased. More patients receive antidiabetic drug combinations. Quality of blood sugar control appears to have improved as well.