S. Doizi

Current Standard Technique for Modern Flexible Ureteroscopy: Tips and Tricks

BACKGROUND Thanks to advancements in the endoscopic armamentarium, flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) has become a viable and attractive option for the treatment of renal stones because of its high stone-free rates (SFRs) and low morbidity. OBJECTIVE To describe our surgical technique for fURS, step-by-step, for the treatment of renal stones and to assess its effectiveness and safety. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A retrospective analysis of 316 consecutive patients who underwent fURS for renal stones at our institution between March 2014 and September 2015 was performed. SURGICAL PROCEDURE Ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy using a standardized technique with last-generation flexible ureteroscopes. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Clinical data were collected in a dedicated database. Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were assessed. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS The mean overall stone size was 16.5 ± 7.9mm. Ureteral access sheath placement was possible in 287 patients (90.8%). At 1-mo follow-up, the overall primary SFR was 79.1%; the secondary and tertiary SFRs were 89.5% and 91.5%, respectively. The mean operative time was 72.6 ± 27.5min. The mean number of procedures was 1.27. Complications were reported in 92 patients (29.1%) overall, with Clavien grade 1 in 55 patients (17.4%), grade 2 in 30 patients (9.5%), grade 3 in 6 patients (1.9%), grade 4 in 1 patient (0.3%), and grade 5 in none. The main limitation of the study was the retrospective nature. CONCLUSIONS The fURS procedure is safe and effective for the treatment of renal stones. A staged procedure is necessary to achieve stone-free status with large calculi. PATIENT SUMMARY Flexible ureteroscopy is an effective treatment with low complication rates for the majority of renal stones. Both the modern highly technological armamentarium and surgical know-how should be available.

Comparative Study of the Treatment of Renal Stones With Flexible Ureterorenoscopy in Normal Weight, Obese, and Morbidly Obese Patients

OBJECTIVE To compare the efficacy and the safety of flexible ureterorenoscopy (f-URS) in the treatment of kidney stones according to the body mass index (BMI), which seems to be less influenced by weight compared with shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. METHODS We conducted a retrospective monocentric study in patients with a known BMI who underwent an f-URS for kidney stones between 2006 and 2008. Success rates in the obese patients (OP) group (BMI ≥30 kg/m(2)) were compared with success rates in the normal weight patients (NWP) control group (BMI <25 kg/m(2)). Patients with a BMI ≥40 kg/m(2) were defined as morbidly obese patients (MOP), a subgroup of the OP group. The success was defined as a stone-free status (no or ≤2 mm residual stone) at the time of control, 3 months after the procedure assessed by kidneys-ureters-bladder radiography coupled with ultrasound (only in NWP with radiopaque stones), or computed tomography-scan. RESULTS A total of 327 procedures were performed, including 97 f-URS in 87 OP (including 14 procedures in 13 MOP) and 230 procedures for 188 NWP. The overall success rate was 67.4% and 68% in the NWP and OP, respectively; P = .91 (71.4% in the MOP subgroup). Success rates decreased with an increasing stone size without any differences between the groups. Regardless of location and stone size (<10, 10-20, >20 mm), there was no statistical difference in the success rate. Postoperative morbidity was similar in both groups and occurred in 2.44% of cases. CONCLUSION f-URS for kidney stones resulted in similar outcomes in NWP and OP, and even MOP, regardless of stone size and location and with equivalent morbidity.

Simultaneous Bilateral Endoscopic Manipulation for Bilateral Renal Stones

OBJECTIVE To report the first performance of simultaneous bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy carried out in tandem by 2 different surgeons in a patient with bilateral medium-sized renal calculi, describing step-by-step details of the surgical technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS A 46-year-old man, affected with hyperparathyroidism, was diagnosed with asymptomatic bilateral medium-sized renal stones. An abdominal noncontrast computed tomography scan revealed a left single kidney stone with a maximum diameter of 16 mm and 2 right renal stones located in the pelvis and in the lower calyx, of 21 and 19 mm in maximum diameter, respectively. A bilateral simultaneous percutaneous nephrolithotomy on the right side and flexible ureteroscopy on the left side were therefore carried out. RESULTS The total operative time was 80 minutes. No intra- or postoperative complications were experienced. On postoperative day 1, the creatinine serum level was stable (0.7 mg/dL); he was discharged home 48 hours later. Ureteral stents were removed 7 days after the procedure. At 2 weeks follow-up, an abdominal noncontrast computed tomography scan showed a stone-free status and no changes in renal function were detected. CONCLUSION A simultaneous bilateral endoscopic manipulation is feasible and safe and it can be offered in the presence of medium-sized bilateral renal stones in high-volume centers by experienced surgeons.

Which Patients with Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Can be Safely Treated with Flexible Ureteroscopy with Holmium:YAG Laser Photoablation? Long-Term Results from a High Volume Institution

Purpose We tested the effects of tumor size, distribution and grade on progression‐free survival in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma treated with flexible ureteroscopy with Ho:YAG laser photoablation. Materials and Methods Included in analysis were data on 92 consecutive patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma treated with Ho:YAG laser photoablation from 2003 to 2015 at a single tertiary care referral center. Stringent followup was offered according to EAU (European Association of Urology) guidelines. Progression during followup was defined by tumor upgrading, distant metastases and/or a relapsing tumor that could not be completely removed with a conservative approach. Kaplan‐Meier curves were used to assess the rate of disease progression according to tumor size (1 or less cm vs greater than 1 cm), tumor distribution (unifocal vs multifocal) and tumor grade (low vs high). Cox regression analysis was done to test the impact of clinical and pathological characteristics on the rate of progression‐free survival. Results At a median followup of 52 months (IQR 27.8–76.4) the progression‐free survival rate was 68% vs 72% in patients with a tumor size of 1 or less vs greater than 1 cm (p = 0.9), 72% vs 69% in patients with unifocal vs multifocal lesions (p = 0.6) and 75% vs 52% in patients with a low vs a high grade tumor (p = 0.03). On multivariable Cox regression analysis tumor grade at first treatment was the only independent predictor of disease progression (HR 5.16, 95% CI 1.19–22.26, p = 0.03). Conclusions High tumor grade independently decreased progression‐free survival in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma treated with Ho:YAG laser photoablation. Tumor size greater than 1 cm and multifocality did not increase the risk of disease progression in patients treated conservatively with Ho:YAG laser photoablation.

Which Patients with Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Can Be Safely Treated with Conservative Treatment by Flexible Ureteroscopy with Holmium:YAG Laser Photoablation? Long-Term Results from a High Volume Institution

Purpose We tested the effects of tumor size, distribution and grade on progression‐free survival in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma treated with flexible ureteroscopy with Ho:YAG laser photoablation. Materials and Methods Included in analysis were data on 92 consecutive patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma treated with Ho:YAG laser photoablation from 2003 to 2015 at a single tertiary care referral center. Stringent followup was offered according to EAU (European Association of Urology) guidelines. Progression during followup was defined by tumor upgrading, distant metastases and/or a relapsing tumor that could not be completely removed with a conservative approach. Kaplan‐Meier curves were used to assess the rate of disease progression according to tumor size (1 or less cm vs greater than 1 cm), tumor distribution (unifocal vs multifocal) and tumor grade (low vs high). Cox regression analysis was done to test the impact of clinical and pathological characteristics on the rate of progression‐free survival. Results At a median followup of 52 months (IQR 27.8–76.4) the progression‐free survival rate was 68% vs 72% in patients with a tumor size of 1 or less vs greater than 1 cm (p = 0.9), 72% vs 69% in patients with unifocal vs multifocal lesions (p = 0.6) and 75% vs 52% in patients with a low vs a high grade tumor (p = 0.03). On multivariable Cox regression analysis tumor grade at first treatment was the only independent predictor of disease progression (HR 5.16, 95% CI 1.19–22.26, p = 0.03). Conclusions High tumor grade independently decreased progression‐free survival in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma treated with Ho:YAG laser photoablation. Tumor size greater than 1 cm and multifocality did not increase the risk of disease progression in patients treated conservatively with Ho:YAG laser photoablation.