Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where S. K. Morley is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by S. K. Morley.


Science | 2013

Electron Acceleration in the Heart of the Van Allen Radiation Belts

G. D. Reeves; Harlan E. Spence; M. G. Henderson; S. K. Morley; Roland H. Friedel; H. O. Funsten; D. N. Baker; Shrikanth G. Kanekal; J. B. Blake; J. F. Fennell; S. G. Claudepierre; Richard M. Thorne; D. L. Turner; C. A. Kletzing; W. S. Kurth; Brian A. Larsen; J. T. Niehof

Local Acceleration How the electrons trapped in Earth-encircling Van Allen radiation belts get accelerated has been debated since their discovery in 1958. Reeves et al. (p. 991, published online 25 July) used data from the Van Allen Radiation Belt Storm Probes, launched by NASA on 30 August 2012, to discover that radiation belt electrons are accelerated locally by wave-particle interactions, rather than by radial transport from regions of weaker to stronger magnetic fields. Satellite observations provide evidence for local relativistic electron acceleration in Earth’s radiation belts. The Van Allen radiation belts contain ultrarelativistic electrons trapped in Earth’s magnetic field. Since their discovery in 1958, a fundamental unanswered question has been how electrons can be accelerated to such high energies. Two classes of processes have been proposed: transport and acceleration of electrons from a source population located outside the radiation belts (radial acceleration) or acceleration of lower-energy electrons to relativistic energies in situ in the heart of the radiation belts (local acceleration). We report measurements from NASA’s Van Allen Radiation Belt Storm Probes that clearly distinguish between the two types of acceleration. The observed radial profiles of phase space density are characteristic of local acceleration in the heart of the radiation belts and are inconsistent with a predominantly radial acceleration process.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2014

On the cause and extent of outer radiation belt losses during the 30 September 2012 dropout event

D. L. Turner; V. Angelopoulos; S. K. Morley; M. G. Henderson; G. D. Reeves; W. Li; D. N. Baker; C.-L. Huang; A. J. Boyd; Harlan E. Spence; S. G. Claudepierre; J. B. Blake; J. V. Rodriguez

On 30 September 2012, a flux “dropout” occurred throughout Earths outer electron radiation belt during the main phase of a strong geomagnetic storm. Using eight spacecraft from NASAs Time History of Events and Macroscale Interactions during Substorms (THEMIS) and Van Allen Probes missions and NOAAs Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites constellation, we examined the full extent and timescales of the dropout based on particle energy, equatorial pitch angle, radial distance, and species. We calculated phase space densities of relativistic electrons, in adiabatic invariant coordinates, which revealed that loss processes during the dropout were > 90% effective throughout the majority of the outer belt and the plasmapause played a key role in limiting the spatial extent of the dropout. THEMIS and the Van Allen Probes observed telltale signatures of loss due to magnetopause shadowing and subsequent outward radial transport, including similar loss of energetic ring current ions. However, Van Allen Probes observations suggest that another loss process played a role for multi-MeV electrons at lower L shells (L* < ~4).


Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences | 2010

Dropouts of the outer electron radiation belt in response to solar wind stream interfaces: global positioning system observations

S. K. Morley; Reiner H Friedel; Emma L. Spanswick; G. D. Reeves; John T. Steinberg; Josef Koller; Thomas E. Cayton; Evan Noveroske

We present a statistical study of relativistic electron counts in the electron radiation belt across a range of drift shells (L*>4) combining data from nine combined X-ray dosimeters (CXD) on the global positioning system (GPS) constellation. The response of the electron counts as functions of time, energy and drift shell are examined statistically for 67 solar wind stream interfaces (SIs); two-dimensional superposed epoch analysis is performed with the CXD data. For these epochs we study the radiation belt dropouts and concurrent variations in key geophysical parameters. At higher L* we observe a tendency for a gradual drop in the electron counts over the day preceding the SI, consistent with outward diffusion and magnetopause shadowing. At all L*, dropouts occur with a median time scale of ≃7 h and median counts fall by 0.4–1.8 orders of magnitude. The central tendencies of radiation belt dropout and recovery depend on both L* and energy. For ≃70 per cent of epochs Sym-H more than −30 nT, yet only three of 67 SIs did not have an associated dropout in the electron data. Statistical maps of electron precipitation suggest that chorus-driven relativistic electron microbursts might be major contributors to radiation belt losses under high-speed stream driving.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2014

Competing source and loss mechanisms due to wave-particle interactions in Earth’s outer radiation belt during the 30 September to 3 October 2012 geomagnetic storm

D. L. Turner; V. Angelopoulos; W. Li; J. Bortnik; B. Ni; Q. Ma; Richard M. Thorne; S. K. Morley; M. G. Henderson; G. D. Reeves; M. E. Usanova; Ian R. Mann; S. G. Claudepierre; J. B. Blake; D. N. Baker; C.-L. Huang; Harlan E. Spence; W. S. Kurth; C. A. Kletzing; J. V. Rodriguez

Drastic variations of Earths outer radiation belt electrons ultimately result from various competing source, loss, and transport processes, to which wave-particle interactions are critically important. Using 15 spacecraft including NASAs Van Allen Probes, THEMIS, and SAMPEX missions and NOAAs GOES and POES constellations, we investigated the evolution of the outer belt during the strong geomagnetic storm of 30 September to 3 October 2012. This storms main phase dropout exhibited enhanced losses to the atmosphere at L*  1 MeV electrons and energetic protons, SAMPEX >1 MeV electrons, and ground observations of band-limited Pc1-2 wave activity, we show that this sudden loss was consistent with pitch angle scattering by electromagnetic ion cyclotron waves in the dusk magnetic local time sector at 3  300 nT, and energetic electron injections and whistler-mode chorus waves were observed throughout the inner magnetosphere for >12 h. After this period, Bz turned northward, and injections, chorus activity, and enhancements in PSD ceased. Overall, the outer belt was depleted by this storm. From the unprecedented level of observations available, we show direct evidence of the competitive nature of different wave-particle interactions controlling relativistic electron fluxes in the outer radiation belt.


Space Weather-the International Journal of Research and Applications | 2012

Dynamic Radiation Environment Assimilation Model: DREAM

G. D. Reeves; Yue Chen; Gregory S. Cunningham; R. W. H. Friedel; M. G. Henderson; V. K. Jordanova; Josef Koller; S. K. Morley; M. F. Thomsen; S. Zaharia

The Dynamic Radiation Environment Assimilation Model (DREAM) is a 3-year effort sponsored by the US Department of Energy to provide global, retrospective, or real-time specification of the natural and potential nuclear radiation environments. The DREAM model uses Kalman filtering techniques that combine the strengths of new physical models of the radiation belts with electron observations from long-term satellite systems such as GPS and geosynchronous systems. DREAM includes a physics model for the production and long-term evolution of artificial radiation belts from high altitude nuclear explosions. DREAM has been validated against satellites in arbitrary orbits and consistently produces more accurate results than existing models. Tools for user-specific applications and graphical displays are in beta testing and a real-time version of DREAM has been in continuous operation since November 2009.


Geophysical Research Letters | 2009

No evidence for externally triggered substorms based on superposed epoch analysis of IMF Bz

M. P. Freeman; S. K. Morley

Superposed epoch analyses have shown that, on average, the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) turns northward close to substorm onset. This has been commonly accepted as evidence for the substorm onset being triggered by a rapid northward turning of the IMF. Here we show that the tendency arises in any superposed epoch analysis of the IMF in which event onset is biased to occur for southward IMF, irrespective of a coincident rapid northward turning of the IMF. The overall IMF variation found in the largest superposed epoch analysis of this kind is also well reproduced using a Minimal Substorm Model in which substorm onsets are determined without the requirement of a northward IMF turning trigger. We discuss the explanation underlying these results and conclude that there is no conclusive evidence in favour of the hypothesis that substorm onsets are triggered by a rapid northward turning of the IMF. Citation: Freeman, M. P., and S. K. Morley (2009), No evidence for externally triggered substorms based on superposed epoch analysis of IMF B-z, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L21101, doi: 10.1029/2009GL040621.


Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union | 2008

High‐Speed Solar Wind Streams: A Call for Key Research

Michael H. Denton; Joseph E. Borovsky; Richard B. Horne; Robert L. McPherson; S. K. Morley; Bruce T. Tsurutani

The arrival of high-speed solar wind streams (HSSs) at the Earths magnetopause drives particle and wave phenomena that are distinct from the phenomena caused by other solar wind structures. Although HSS events do not generally produce a particularly strong ring current (the current caused by ions and electrons drifting around the Earth), they do produce storm levels of other magnetospheric phenomena (enhanced convection, heating, precipitation, relativistic electron energization, and so forth) that can persist for an extended time period (e.g., many days). These events contrast with interplanetary coronal mass ejection (ICME) events, where more transient driving (e.g., 1 day) is the norm. As such, the energy input to the magnetosphere during HSS events is comparable to, or may exceed, the energy input to the magnetosphere during ICME events.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2015

EMIC waves and plasmaspheric and plume density: CRRES results

A. J. Halford; B. J. Fraser; S. K. Morley

Electromagnetic ion cyclotron (EMIC) waves frequently occur during geomagnetic storms, specifically during the main phase and 3–6 days following the minimum Sym − H value. EMIC waves contribute to the loss of ring current ions and radiation belt MeV electrons. Recent studies have suggested that cold plasma density structures found inside the plasmasphere and plasmaspheric plumes are important for the generation and propagation of EMIC waves. During the CRRES mission, 913 EMIC wave events and 124 geomagnetic storms were identified. In this study we compare the quiet time cold plasma density to the cold plasma density measured during EMIC wave events across different geomagnetic conditions. We found statistically that EMIC waves occurred in regions of enhanced densities. EMIC waves were, on average, not associated with large local negative density gradients.


Dynamics of the Earth's Radiation Belts and Inner Magnetosphere | 2013

Rapid Radiation Belt Losses Occurring During High-Speed Solar Wind Stream–Driven Storms: Importance of Energetic Electron Precipitation

Aaron T. Hendry; Craig J. Rodger; Mark A. Clilverd; Neil R. Thomson; S. K. Morley; Tero Raita

Dynamics of the E Geophysical Mon


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2016

Dependence of EMIC wave parameters during quiet, geomagnetic storm, and geomagnetic storm phase times

A. J. Halford; B. J. Fraser; S. K. Morley; Scot Richard Elkington; Anthony A. Chan

As electromagnetic ion cyclotron (EMIC) waves may play an important role in radiation belt dynamics, there has been a push to better include them into global simulations. How to best include EMIC wave effects is still an open question. Recently many studies have attempted to parameterize EMIC waves and their characteristics by geomagnetic indices. However, this does not fully take into account important physics related to the phase of a geomagnetic storm. In this paper we first consider how EMIC wave occurrence varies with the phase of a geomagnetic storm and the SYM-H, AE, and Kp indices. We show that the storm phase plays an important role in the occurrence probability of EMIC waves. The occurrence rates for a given value of a geomagnetic index change based on the geomagnetic condition. In this study we also describe the typical plasma and wave parameters observed in L and magnetic local time for quiet, storm, and storm phase. These results are given in a tabular format in the supporting information so that more accurate statistics of EMIC wave parameters can be incorporated into modeling efforts.

Collaboration


Dive into the S. K. Morley's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

M. G. Henderson

Los Alamos National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

B. J. Fraser

University of Newcastle

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

G. D. Reeves

Los Alamos National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

D. N. Baker

University of Colorado Boulder

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Harlan E. Spence

University of New Hampshire

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

D. L. Turner

The Aerospace Corporation

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J. B. Blake

The Aerospace Corporation

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge