S. Michalak

Genotype–phenotype correlation in hepatocellular adenoma: New classification and relationship with HCC

Hepatocellular adenomas are benign tumors that can be difficult to diagnose. To refine their classification, we performed a comprehensive analysis of their genetic, pathological, and clinical features. A multicentric series of 96 liver tumors with a firm or possible diagnosis of hepatocellular adenoma was reviewed by liver pathologists. In all cases, the genes coding for hepatocyte nuclear factor 1α (HNF1α) and β‐catenin were sequenced. No tumors were mutated in both HNF1α and β‐catenin enabling tumors to be classified into 3 groups, according to genotype. Tumors with HNF1α mutations formed the most important group of adenomas (44 cases). They were phenotypically characterized by marked steatosis (P < 10−4), lack of cytological abnormalities (P < 10−6), and no inflammatory infiltrates (P < 10−4). In contrast, the group of tumors defined by β‐catenin activation included 13 lesions with frequent cytological abnormalities and pseudo‐glandular formation (P < 10−5). The third group of tumors without mutation was divided into two subgroups based on the presence of inflammatory infiltrates. The subgroup of tumors consisting of 17 inflammatory lesions, resembled telangiectatic focal nodular hyperplasias, with frequent cytological abnormalities (P = 10−3), ductular reaction (P < 10−2), and dystrophic vessels (P = .02). In this classification, hepatocellular carcinoma associated with adenoma or borderline lesions between carcinoma and adenoma is found in 46% of the β‐catenin–mutated tumors whereas they are never observed in inflammatory lesions and are rarely found in HNF1α mutated tumors (P = .004). In conclusion, the molecular and pathological classification of hepatocellular adenomas permits the identification of strong genotype–phenotype correlations and suggests that adenomas with β‐catenin activation have a higher risk of malignant transformation. (HEPATOLOGY 2006;43:515–524.)

A novel panel of blood markers to assess the degree of liver fibrosis

The objective was to develop new blood tests to characterize different fibrosis parameters in viral and alcoholic chronic liver diseases. Measurements included 51 blood markers and Fibrotest, Fibrospect, ELFG, APRI, and Forns scores. The clinically significant fibrosis was evaluated via Metavir staging (F2‐F4), and image analysis was used to determine the area of fibrosis. In an exploratory step in 383 patients with viral hepatitis, the area under the receiving operator characteristic (AUROC) curve for stages F2‐F4 in a test termed the “Fibrometer” test combining platelets, prothrombin index, aspartate aminotransferase, α2‐macroglobulin (A2M), hyaluronate, urea, and age was 0.883 compared with 0.808 for the Fibrotest (P = .01), 0.820 for the Forns test (P = .005), and 0.794 for the APRI test (P < 10−4). The Fibrometer AUROC curve was 0.892 in the validating step in 120 patients. The AUROC curve for stages F2‐F4 in a test combining prothrombin index, A2M, hyaluronate, and age was 0.962 in 95 patients with alcoholic liver diseases. The area of fibrosis was estimated in viral hepatitis by testing for hyaluronate, γ‐glutamyltransferase, bilirubin, platelets, and apolipoprotein A1 (aR2 = 0.645), and in alcoholic liver diseases by testing for hyaluronate, prothrombin index, A2M, and platelets (aR2 = 0.836). In conclusion, the pathological staging and area of liver fibrosis can be estimated using different combinations of blood markers in viral and alcoholic liver diseases. Whereas the Fibrometer has a high diagnostic accuracy for clinically significant fibrosis, blood tests for the area of liver fibrosis provide a quantitative estimation of the amount of fibrosis, which is especially useful in cirrhosis. (HEPATOLOGY 2005.)

Sources of variability in histological scoring of chronic viral hepatitis

Inter‐observer agreement on activity and fibrosis scores used in chronic viral hepatitis has only been studied under selected conditions. The aim of this study was to identify the sources of variability due to specimen characteristics and observers. This study included 254 liver specimens and 15 pathologists and used the Metavir score. In 44 specimens scored by 4 academic pathologists, agreement of Metavir score was good overall, but better for fibrosis (κ = 0.59) than for activity (κ = 0.43) and poor for lobular necrosis (κ = 0.15). The mean agreement was better for senior (0.60 ± 0.24) than junior pathologists (0.52 ± 0.30, P < .05). Mean intrabserver agreement was better than inter‐observer agreement (0.77 ± 0.18 vs. 0.58 ± 0.26, P < .01). In 157 specimens scored by 2 expert pathologists (one senior, one junior), agreement of Metavir score was only good but greatly improved after consensus reading (fibrosis: κ = 0.48 and 0.77, activity: κ = 0.44 and 0.70, respectively, before and after consensus). Several causes of disagreement were identified: specimen length, fibrosis class number, observer bias, and putative causes related to Metavir score or specimen. In an intercenter evaluation involving 59 specimens, 1 expert and 10 nonacademic pathologists, agreement was very poor and did not improve over 5 years for activity (κ = 0.22‐0.25) or fibrosis (κ = 0.13‐0.18). In conclusion, the level of experience (specialization, duration, and location of practice) has more influence on agreement than the characteristics of the specimen (length, fibrosis class number, miscellaneous factors). Agreement can be improved by experienced pathologist or consensus reading. (HEPATOLOGY 2005,41:257–264.)

The combination of a blood test and Fibroscan improves the non‐invasive diagnosis of liver fibrosis

Background and aims: Blood tests and liver stiffness evaluation (LSE) by ultrasonographic elastometry are accurate tools for diagnosing liver fibrosis. We evaluated whether their synchronous combination in new scores could improve the diagnostic accuracy and reduce liver biopsy requirement in algorithm.

Liver stiffness in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A comparison of supersonic shear imaging, FibroScan, and ARFI with liver biopsy

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has become a major public health issue. The goal of this study was to assess the clinical use of liver stiffness measurement (LSM) evaluated by supersonic shear imaging (SSI), FibroScan, and acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) in a cohort of NAFLD patients who underwent liver biopsy. A total of 291 NAFLD patients were prospectively enrolled from November 2011 to February 2015 at 2 French university hospitals. LSM was assessed by SSI, FibroScan (M probe), and ARFI within two weeks prior to liver biopsy. Calculations of the area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) were performed and compared for the staging of liver fibrosis. AUROC for SSI, FibroScan, and ARFI were 0.86, 0.82, and 0.77 for diagnoses of ≥F2; 0.89, 0.86, and 0.84 for ≥F3; and 0.88, 0.87, and 0.84 for F4, respectively. SSI had a higher accuracy than ARFI for diagnoses of significant fibrosis (≥F2) (P = 0.004). Clinical factors related to obesity such as body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2, waist circumference ≥102 cm or increased parietal wall thickness were associated with LSM failures when using SSI or FibroScan and with unreliable results when using ARFI. In univariate analysis, FibroScan values were slightly correlated with NAFLD activity score and steatosis (R = 0.28 and 0.22, respectively), whereas SSI and ARFI were not; however, these components of NAFLD did not affect LSM results in multivariate analysis. The cutoff values for SSI and FibroScan for staging fibrosis with a sensitivity ≥90% were very close: 6.3/6.2 kPa for ≥F2, 8.3/8.2 kPa for ≥F3, and 10.5/9.5 kPa for F4. Conclusion: Although obesity is associated with an increase in LSM failure, the studied techniques and especially SSI provide high value for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis in NAFLD patients. (Hepatology 2016;63:1817‐1827)

Immunohistochemical markers on needle biopsies are helpful for the diagnosis of focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatocellular adenoma subtypes.

Phenotypic identification of focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) and hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) subtypes using immunohistochemical markers has been developed from their molecular characteristics. Our objective was to evaluate the sensitivity of these markers in the definitive diagnosis of these lesions by core needle biopsies. A total of 239 needle biopsies paired with their surgical resection specimen (group A) or without an associated resection specimen (group B) were reviewed. Using a step-by-step algorithm after standard staining, appropriate immunostaining analyses were performed to determine the certainty of diagnosis of FNH, HNF1&agr;-inactivated HCA, inflammatory HCA, &bgr;-catenin-activated HCA, or unclassified HCA. The diagnosis of FNH was certain or probable on routine stains in 53% of needle biopsies of group A, whereas after glutamine synthetase staining, the diagnosis was certain in 86.7% as compared with 100% on the corresponding surgical specimen (P=0.04). In needle biopsies of group A, the diagnosis of HCA was certain on routine stains in 58.6% as compared with 94.3% on surgical specimens. After specific immunostaining, diagnosis was established on biopsies with 74.3% certainty, including all HCA subtypes, with similar distribution in surgical specimens. For each “certain diagnosis” paired diagnostic test (biopsy and surgical specimen), a positive correlation was observed (P<0.001). No significant difference was observed between groups A and B for FNH (P=0.714) or for HCA subtypes (P=0.750). Compared with surgical specimens, immunohistochemical analysis performed on biopsies allowed the discrimination of FNH from HCA and the identification of HCA subtypes with good performance.

Diagnostic accuracy and prognostic significance of blood fibrosis tests and liver stiffness measurement by FibroScan in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS NAFLD is highly prevalent but only a small subset of patients develop advanced liver fibrosis with impaired liver-related prognosis. We aimed to compare blood fibrosis tests and liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by FibroScan for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis and the evaluation of prognosis in NAFLD. METHODS Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated in a cross-sectional study including 452 NAFLD patients with liver biopsy (NASH-CRN fibrosis stage), LSM, and eight blood fibrosis tests (BARD, NAFLD fibrosis score, FibroMeter(NAFLD), aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI), FIB4, FibroTest, Hepascore, FibroMeter(V2G)). Prognostic accuracy was evaluated in a longitudinal study including 360 NAFLD patients. RESULTS LSM and FibroMeter(V2G) were the two best-performing tests in the cross-sectional study: AUROCs for advanced fibrosis (F3/4) were, respectively, 0.831±0.019 and 0.817±0.020 (p⩽0.041 vs. other tests); rates of patients with ⩾90% negative/positive predictive values for F3/4 were 56.4% and 46.7% (p<0.001 vs. other tests); Obuchowski indexes were 0.834±0.014 and 0.798±0.016 (p⩽0.036 vs. other tests). Two fibrosis classifications were developed to precisely estimate the histological fibrosis stage from LSM or FibroMeter(V2G) results without liver biopsy (diagnostic accuracy, respectively: 80.8% vs. 77.4%, p=0.190). Kaplan-Meier curves in the longitudinal study showed that both classifications categorised NAFLD patients into subgroups with significantly different prognoses (p<0.001): the higher was the class of the fibrosis classification, the worse was the prognosis. CONCLUSIONS LSM and FibroMeter(V2G) were the most accurate of nine evaluated tests for the non-invasive diagnosis of liver fibrosis in NAFLD. LSM and FibroMeter(V2G) fibrosis classifications help physicians estimate both fibrosis stage and patient prognosis in clinical practice. LAY SUMMARY The amount of liver fibrosis is the main determinant of the liver-related prognosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We evaluated eight blood tests and FibroScan in a cross-sectional diagnostic study and found that FibroScan and the blood test FibroMeter(V2G) were the two most accurate tests for the non-invasive evaluation of liver fibrosis in NAFLD. A longitudinal prognostic study showed these two tests initially developed for the diagnosis are also prognostic markers as they allow for the stratification of NAFLD patients in several subgroups with significantly different prognosis.

Respective roles of porto-septal fibrosis and centrilobular fibrosis in alcoholic liver disease

In alcoholic liver disease, fibrosis classically begins around the centrilobular veins, while portal tract fibrosis is described as inconstant and septal fibrosis is a late event. The aim of this study was to compare the roles of centrilobular fibrosis (CLF) and portal tract/septal fibrosis (PTF) especially in alcoholic chronic liver disease. One hundred and sixty patients with alcoholic chronic liver disease and 83 controls with viral chronic hepatitis were included. The PTF score, derived from the Metavir score, CLF and the area of fibrosis, assessed by image analysis, were evaluated on liver biopsies in addition to blood markers of fibrosis. The correlation between the PTF score and the area of fibrosis was higher in alcoholic liver disease (r = 0.87, p < 10−4) than in viral chronic hepatitis (r = 0.66, p < 10−4). The PTF score correlated with the CLF score (r = 0.92, p < 10−4), serum hyaluronate (r = 0.76, p < 10−4), and the prothrombin index (r = −0.77, p < 10−4). Multiple regression analyses showed that the area of fibrosis was explained only by the PTF score and not by the CLF score. PTF appears more frequent than CLF in alcoholic chronic liver disease, suggesting that PTF may precede CLF. PTF is more responsible for the amount of fibrosis than CLF. The results of this study also validate the use of the Metavir fibrosis score in alcoholic chronic liver disease. Copyright

Spectrum of HNF1A Somatic Mutations in Hepatocellular Adenoma Differs From That in Patients With MODY3 and Suggests Genotoxic Damage

OBJECTIVE Maturity onset diabetes of the young type 3 (MODY3) is a consequence of heterozygous germline mutation in HNF1A. A subtype of hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) is also caused by biallelic somatic HNF1A mutations (H-HCA), and rare HCA may be related to MODY3. To better understand a relationship between the development of MODY3 and HCA, we compared both germline and somatic spectra of HNF1A mutations. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We compared 151 somatic HNF1A mutations in HCA with 364 germline mutations described in MODY3. We searched for genotoxic and oxidative stress features in HCA and surrounding liver tissue. RESULTS A spectrum of HNF1A somatic mutations significantly differed from the germline changes in MODY3. In HCA, we identified a specific hot spot at codon 206, nonsense and frameshift mutations mainly in the NH2-terminal part, and almost all amino acid substitutions were restricted to the POU-H domain. The high frequency of G-to-T tranversions, predominantly found on the nontranscribed DNA strand, suggested a genotoxic mechanism. However, no features of oxidative stress were observed in the nontumor liver tissue. Finally, in a few MODY3 patients with HNF1A germline mutation leading to amino acid substitutions outside the POU-H domain, we identified a different subtype of HCA either with a gp130 and/or CTNNB1 activating mutation. CONCLUSIONS Germline HNF1A mutations could be associated with different molecular subtypes of HCA. H-HCA showed mutations profoundly inactivating hepatocyte nuclear factor-1α function; they are associated with a genotoxic signature suggesting a specific toxicant exposure that could be associated with genetic predisposition.

FibroMeters: a family of blood tests for liver fibrosis

FibroMeters are blood tests for liver fibrosis with several specificities: two main diagnostic targets (fibrosis stage and area of fibrosis); adaptation to specific causes; and results confirmed by an expert system. Thus, FibroMeters comprise six different tests: one for staging and one for quantitation of liver fibrosis in each of the three main causes of chronic liver disease-chronic viral hepatitis, alcoholic liver disease (ALD) and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). FibroMeters display a high overall diagnostic accuracy and are the only tests to correctly classify 100% of HCV patients without fibrosis or with cirrhosis. They have 90% predictive values in a higher proportion of patients than with other usual blood tests. A 90% correct classification is available in 100% of HCV patients with the following reliable diagnostic intervals: F0/1, F1/2, F2+/-1, F3+/-1. In real-life conditions, the reproducibility of FibroMeters is higher than that of liver biopsy or ultrasonographic elastometry. FibroMeters are robust tests with the most stable diagnostic performance across different centers. Optional tests are also available, such as a specific one for cirrhosis, which has a diagnostic accuracy of 93.0% (AUROC: 0.92) and a 100% positive predictive value for diagnosis of HCV cirrhosis. Determination by FibroMeters of the area of fibrosis - the only direct, non-invasive, quantitative measurement of liver fibrosis - are especially useful for following-up cirrhosis as it correlates well with clinical events. FibroMeters are also very accurate in HVB or HIV-HCV co-infected patients. The tests specific for ALD and NAFLD also have a high diagnostic accuracy (AUROCs: 0.96 and 0.94, respectively, for significant fibrosis).